Can you recommend a good manual spinning service?

8 replies
Hi fellow warriors,

I am looking for a someone or a company that will manually spin my articles for me. I don't mean someone just pressing the auto spin button on a bit of software (which is what it seems I get on outsourcing sites)

I want someone to be able to have a fantastic grasp of English to spin my content for words that make sense when replaced.

Any pointers would be gratefully received.

Thanks
#good #manual #recommend #service #spinning
  • Profile picture of the author Corey Geer
    Originally Posted by realreview View Post

    Hi fellow warriors,

    I am looking for a someone or a company that will manually spin my articles for me. I don't mean someone just pressing the auto spin button on a bit of software (which is what it seems I get on outsourcing sites)

    I want someone to be able to have a fantastic grasp of English to spin my content for words that make sense when replaced.

    Any pointers would be gratefully received.

    Thanks
    People are still spinning articles? I've tried the whole 3 deep level spinning on a manual level (and that takes FOREVER). It still comes out to jumbled garbage and I've tried hiring people to do it in the past.

    I don't care what anyone says, there are no good spinners out there that can continually produce unique content that makes sense.
    Signature

    Skype: Coreygeer319

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7489342].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author writeaway
    If you are looking for flawless material, you will need the spun articles EDITED HEAVILY and monitored closely. This might produce a service that is priced in between manually written materials (1 cent per word and lower) and fully spun articles (15 x 500 words @ $5 - I am using the price mentioned in a Fiverr gig: the actual average price for this service might be higher or lower).
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7489520].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Alexa Smith
    Banned
    Originally Posted by realreview View Post

    I am looking for a someone or a company that will manually spin my articles for me.
    Why?

    What is it that you hope to gain by having multiple spun versions of the same article, rather than just having one and using it for multiple purposes/in multiple locations?

    Spinning is based on a fundamental misunderstanding. It's a "solution to a problem that doesn't actually exist" - a solution of benefit only to people selling spinning services, as explained in this post, and in other posts in the same thread.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7489549].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author dvduval
    If you are going to spin something, spin your brain! I would recommend thesaurus.com I actually just wrote on diversifying your writing a few days ago. What I find about my own writing is I use the same words and phrases repetitiously throughout my writing, which essentially reduces the number of keyword combinations possible. If you use a thesaurus while you right and target common word phrases you use, you can have fun writing with a greater fullness over time.
    Signature
    It is okay to contact me! I have been developing software since 1999, creating many popular products like phpLD.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7489786].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author realreview
    Thanks for the comments. I did think that a spinning question would raise the "what's the point of spinning debate"

    However someone told me once never to believe what you read in the forums and only go from your own evidence in the field.

    I have a friend who runs an seo company and part of their service involves spinning articles (I can't use them as they are too expensive) but throughout all these Google updates less than 5% of their websites were hit.

    Most sites increased their positions.

    Whether Googl can or cannot tell the difference between a spun article and a unique one is not the question. The fact that my friends SEO clients are enjoying steady and increasing rankings is all the proof I need.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7490963].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Alexa Smith
      Banned
      Originally Posted by realreview View Post

      The fact that my friends SEO clients are enjoying steady and increasing rankings is all the proof I need.
      So you're not at all interested in the possibility that (as so many of us have found) they might enjoy much steadier and further increasing rankings without the spinning component of the service? Ok, if you're not, you're not ...

      This "reasoning" typifies so much of the reaction to spinning. People habitually misattribute the causation, and mistakenly assume that it was the spinning that produced some of the benefit.

      Originally Posted by realreview View Post

      someone told me once never to believe what you read in the forums and only go from your own evidence in the field.
      That we do agree about. In my experience, those of us explaining why spinning doesn't and can't help are the ones who have tested for ourselves, and are the people who have disproved and disbelieve the "forum consensus view" to which you so evidently subscribe, yourself.

      I don't mean it rudely, but you're hardly well placed, here, to be advising people to "go from your own evidence", because if you did any real testing for yourself you'd see quickly and easily (as so many of us have) that you actually do much better without spinning than with it - and it isn't even difficult to understand why, either.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7494268].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author realreview
        Originally Posted by Alexa Smith View Post

        So you're not at all interested in the possibility that (as so many of us have found) they might enjoy much steadier and further increasing rankings without the spinning component of the service? Ok, if you're not, you're not ...

        This "reasoning" typifies so much of the reaction to spinning. People habitually misattribute the causation, and mistakenly assume that it was the spinning that produced some of the benefit.



        That we do agree about. In my experience, those of us explaining why spinning doesn't and can't help are the ones who have tested for ourselves, and are the people who have disproved and disbelieve the "forum consensus view" to which you so evidently subscribe, yourself.
        Of course I would love to know how to get further steadier and increasing rankings without spinning. But as the majority of my friends service involves spinning (except for a few manual links thrown in) then I'm not sure just doing the manual links would have the same effect.

        I'm open to your views from the non spinning angle.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7499545].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Vikram73
    Can you really identify properly spun content? I was skeptical but have seen some stuff that is very readable. Properly spun content published to these "web 2.0" properties looks readable. In the spinning process relevant images and videos are also inserted where there wasn't any before.

    SEO when done right is hard to identify. Same with rented/purchased links that Google frowns upon. It's hard to really say that I paid someone $100 to get onto their blogroll.

    I'm not advocating web-spam or link purchases. Just pointing out the facts.

    I've seen lots of case studies with keywords disclosed that are getting rankings with tiered link building (and spinning is a part of it).

    I've not seen any case studies with keywords and the traffic is based on "article syndication".

    Again, I'm not advocating one over the other. I prefer PPC, affiliate traffic, email and other more predictable traffic sources myself. SEO plays a smaller role but it's pretty cheap and effective.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7494437].message }}

Trending Topics