What next for an excuse?

35 replies
  • OFF TOPIC
  • |
Yesterday in Hong Kong the couple who left their preemie baby home alone to die of malnutrition while they played video games at a cafe claimed they were "addicted" to video games.

What was shocking was the information that if they are found guilty they face only 5 years as a sentence! Even worse, the woman is pregnant again and her mate says "we won't make the same mistake".

I can't imagine a culture where letting a child starve is a 5 years sentence and you get to try again with another child. Will they let them keep this latest baby? Was the first child just "practice"?

There are few things that shock me - but this did. Their attorney was able to say with a straight face these people deserve compassion because they have an addiction.

The only addiction I see is being so self-involved they have no regard for anything other than their own pleasure.

kay
  • Profile picture of the author KimW
    Kay, In todays society people are allowed to shrug off almost any bad behavior by saying its an addiction instead of the truth,which is a lack of self responsibility.
    Signature

    Read A Post.
    Subscribe to a Newsletter
    KimWinfrey.Com

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1945198].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author sainteve21
      Originally Posted by KimW View Post

      Kay, In todays society people are allowed to shrug off almost any bad behavior by saying its an addiction instead of the truth,which is a lack of self responsibility.
      Absolutely too many people are getting away with stuff by saying 'I'm addicted to xxx' rather than 'I'm an irresponsible, selfish, self-centred xxxx!'
      Signature
      MOBILE MARKETING TOOLS SquiddleBooks.com

      PREMIUM DOMAIN NAME FOR SALE Outsource Samurai .COM
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1945230].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Steven Wagenheim
        If it were up to me, I'd have them both executed.

        But that's why I don't run for office of any kind.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1945238].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author KenThompson
          Originally Posted by Steven Wagenheim View Post

          If it were up to me, I'd have them both executed.

          But that's why I don't run for office of any kind.
          My first thought was 'bullet to the head.'

          Steve, I think we'd make a great ticket.

          Man... too many thoughts going through my head on this one. Not
          like my first one, just so many issues it involves.
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1946099].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Andie
          Originally Posted by Steven Wagenheim View Post

          If it were up to me, I'd have them both executed.

          But that's why I don't run for office of any kind.

          why?? Fear of winning? <g> I'd vote for ya!!:p
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1946208].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Kay King
        Thinking about this story it strikes me that there's something missing today. Guilt is a "learned" emotion. Bad behavior should have consequences that include self examination and self doubt. The narcissistic "my bad, I'll try again" just isn't good enough.

        I was raised to feel guilty if I did something wrong and I raised my sons that way, too. I can't imagine how anyone can just leave a child to starve while they play games or leave an animal by the side of the road because it has become inconvenient to care for it. How can you live with yourself after you do that?

        I see friends now who are focused on raising their child's self esteem and self confidence but I don't know a single person who makes their child feel guilty for bad behavior. The parents are more likely to make excuses for why bad behavior occurred.

        Guilt isn't a comfortable feeling - but I think it's a necessary lesson in life that's being ignored today.

        kay
        Signature
        Saving one dog will not change the world - but the world changes forever for that one dog
        ***
        It actually doesn't take much to be considered a 'difficult woman' -
        that's why there are so many of us.
        ...jane goodall
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1945279].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author lcombs
          Originally Posted by Kay King View Post

          Thinking about this story it strikes me that there's something missing today. Guilt is a "learned" emotion. Bad behavior should have consequences that include self examination and self doubt. The narcissistic "my bad, I'll try again" just isn't good enough.

          I was raised to feel guilty if I did something wrong and I raised my sons that way, too. I can't imagine how anyone can just leave a child to starve while they play games or leave an animal by the side of the road because it has become inconvenient to care for it. How can you live with yourself after you do that?

          I see friends now who are focused on raising their child's self esteem and self confidence but I don't know a single person who makes their child feel guilty for bad behavior. The parents are more likely to make excuses for why bad behavior occurred.

          Guilt isn't a comfortable feeling - but I think it's a necessary lesson in life that's being ignored today.

          kay
          I disagree.

          Guilt is an instinctive emotion.

          To not feel guilt is learned behavior.

          Society has devolved to the point where people are conditioned to believe that their behavior is not their fault.

          it is "societies fault", or "name the excuse".

          I've said it before and I'll say it again, political correctness is going to get us all killed.
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1947238].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Patrician
    Kay - I agree there is no excuse for this at all and it is just sickening the way it is being treated as a 'whoops'.

    Addiction is NO excuse. I would of course prosecute them to the fullest and the thing that is really really getting to me is 'keep in mind she is pregnant' - I would take the baby from her the minute it is born.

    However, the story I read took place in South Korea - not Hong Kong.
    Signature
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1945739].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author whateverpedia
      Originally Posted by Patrician View Post

      Kay - I agree there is no excuse for this at all and it is just sickening the way it is being treated as a 'whoops'.

      Addiction is NO excuse. I would of course prosecute them to the fullest and the thing that is really really getting to me is 'keep in mind she is pregnant' - I would take the baby from her the minute it is born.

      However, the story I read took place in South Korea - not Hong Kong.
      That's right. Weren't the couple involved in that playing a "raise a baby game"?
      Signature
      Why do garden gnomes smell so bad?
      So that blind people can hate them as well.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1945767].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author JustOnePepsi
    Oi. Horrible story.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1945742].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Underground SEO
    thats disgraceful, some people are absolutely unbelieveable.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1945848].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author seasoned
    KAY,

    I HATE this "misplaced compassion". If a man comes home, and finds a guy having sex with his wife, and kills him, he could get a DEATH SENTENCE!!!!!!! THINK ABOUT IT! That guy:

    1. Risked the others life and wellbeing.
    2. Destroyed his family, in whole or part.
    3. Caused his wife to be unfaithful.
    4. May have endangered others indirectly.
    5. Trespassed on his place.
    6. Used his property.

    Yet HE gets the death sentence? WHY!?!?!?

    NOW, if a guy goes into 50 places and kills/maimes people for NO reason, he can get off for being too young, too dumb, or just crazy! WHY!!?!?!?!?

    I mean in case #1, he was wronged and really DID have legitimate concerns. It was a one time deal. Frankly, the trespasser should be treated as the criminal and potential murderer he was! WHO KNOWS if the person has aids or herpes? It has been shown that it could take over SIX MONTHS to have ANY idea if he was clean.

    In case #2, they WEREN'T wronged, had NO legitimate concerns. It will likely happen AGAIN! They should be treated as the murderers they are!

    In such a world, it is EASY to imagine some idiots having a kid and not caring for it at all.

    Steve
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1946053].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Andie
      Originally Posted by seasoned View Post

      KAY,

      I HATE this "misplaced compassion". If a man comes home, and finds a guy having sex with his wife, and kills him, he could get a DEATH SENTENCE!!!!!!! THINK ABOUT IT! That guy:

      1. Risked the others life and wellbeing.
      2. Destroyed his family, in whole or part.
      3. Caused his wife to be unfaithful.
      4. May have endangered others indirectly.
      5. Trespassed on his place.
      6. Used his property.

      Yet HE gets the death sentence? WHY!?!?!?

      NOW, if a guy goes into 50 places and kills/maimes people for NO reason, he can get off for being too young, too dumb, or just crazy! WHY!!?!?!?!?

      I mean in case #1, he was wronged and really DID have legitimate concerns. It was a one time deal. Frankly, the trespasser should be treated as the criminal and potential murderer he was! WHO KNOWS if the person has aids or herpes? It has been shown that it could take over SIX MONTHS to have ANY idea if he was clean.

      In case #2, they WEREN'T wronged, had NO legitimate concerns. It will likely happen AGAIN! They should be treated as the murderers they are!

      In such a world, it is EASY to imagine some idiots having a kid and not caring for it at all.

      Steve

      Steve (love your posts btw)
      I'm sorry -- I simply cannot get beyond #3
      he MADE his wife be unfaithful?? huh??:confused:

      Andie

      [edit] okay, made it to #6 which really made me LOL!!!
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1946215].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Dital
    Addiction? That's a lot of crap.

    It could be excusable, when someone ignores something or forgets something for a while because of addiction.

    But deliberately leaving a child for a whole night, knowing very well just where and why they were leaving just doesn't fit into the "addiction" scenario to me.

    I think they just didn't have a care in the world about their child or their responsibilities.
    Signature
    I never think of the future, it comes soon enough.
    (Albert Einstein)
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1946298].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author seasoned
    I have an addiction to this forum! You know, I would consider my FAMILY FIRST! Apparently, they were raising a VIRTUAL kid!

    BTW I ALREADY figured what I would do if I had a kid. I don't even think I would be on this forum if I had a kid. I would spend all my time with work, my wife, and my child(ren).

    And I am NOT here 100% of the time.

    Addiction is NO excuse AND, if it were, they should have simply made him/her a ward of the state and paid child support. If they were on welfare, they should have given up the portion that would generally be used to provide FULL support for the child. If that exceeded the amount they got, they should sell ALL assets to pay any difference. They would, of course, THEN have to go to work and have wages garnished.

    I hope THIS pregnancy is HARSH on her, and practically BANKRUPTS him, and they end up STERILE! HOPEFULLY, the child will be remanded to the state.

    Andie,

    By property, I meant bed, house, etc... My point is that use of his wife, EVEN if she "consented", is WORSE than using his car, money, credit, etc.... TECHNICALLY, she COULDN'T really provide consent, since she IS married. And the property IS partly his.

    But WHY should credit fraud or theft be considered more illegal than technical rape and DEFINITELY trespass and suborning infidelity?

    STILL, WHATEVER you think, I find it INCREDIBLE that someone would JAIL a person for a SPECIFIC "crime of passion", and NOT someone for MULTIPLE capricious MURDERS!

    Steve
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1946672].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author KimW
    Hey Dad, I mean Steve..........
    Signature

    Read A Post.
    Subscribe to a Newsletter
    KimWinfrey.Com

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1946785].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author valerieSONORA
    So sad they would let their real life baby starve to death which is a slow, painful death rather than let their virtual baby go "hungry". Sad virtual "lives" are put over real lives.

    I think you should run for office Steve, I'd vote for you too.

    I heard this story a while back and thought it was S. Korea instead of HK though.
    Signature

    siggy taking a break...

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1947709].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author seasoned
      Originally Posted by valerieSONORA View Post

      I think you should run for office Steve, I'd vote for you too.
      I thought about it. But some people misinterpreted my posts, etc... so they may have a field day with that, or maybe say I slept too much in nursery schooll(I didn't, but WHO KNOWS?). I mused about this only yesterday with a friend. They couldn't use any criminal record(I don't have one), or any upper level education things, etc... Oh well, as all here are probably aware, I'm not really social. I can be a great friend, loyal, nice, generous, but not social. 8-(

      ALSO, fraud is actually ALLOWED and ENCOURAGED in politics!

      Just yesterday, believe it or not, I mused about what amendments **I** would add to the US constitution if I were king, to solve almost every problem in the past 4+ decades. I would add 11 amendments! 3 are repeals of earlier amendments. 1 is a clarification of an earlier amendment. I always CLAIMED it meant the obvious thing. Surprisingly, the constitution ALREADY has amendment 9 that says I was right all along. 2 would be refinements to what is there. 1 would be making government susceptible to their OWN laws(so they would actually think about the impact). And ONE, IN PART, would make fraud and misrepresentation an impeached offense!(People would be deemed impeached, with no recompense or government remedy)

      Somehow, I don't think they would pass. IN FACT, recently(Just DAYS AGO, in the reconciliation bill!), they TRIED to pass a law stating that government would be susceptible to their OWN laws! It was "TABLED"(AKA rejected!)! Pity, I have wanted such a law for about 3 DECADES!

      BTW I won't state what my amendments are simply because it may start an argument. I just thought it was interesting.

      WOW, I just thought of a few more.

      Steve
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1948546].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Kay King
      Guilt is an instinctive emotion.
      There is disagreement among experts as to whether guilt is "learned behavior" or "learned emotion". But is it considered "learned" rather than "instinctive".

      Which is odd considering a sign of mental illness in children is lack of empathy and the inability to feel guilt about their actions. Guess psychologists get to have it both ways....


      Pat -You are absolutely right about the location. I'd swear the reporter on Fox said "Hong Kong" becuase I remember thinking it didn't sound right but assumed I was wrong. Thanks for the correction.
      Signature
      Saving one dog will not change the world - but the world changes forever for that one dog
      ***
      It actually doesn't take much to be considered a 'difficult woman' -
      that's why there are so many of us.
      ...jane goodall
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1948562].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author seasoned
        Originally Posted by Kay King View Post

        There is disagreement among experts as to whether guilt is "learned behavior" or "learned emotion". But is it considered "learned" rather than "instinctive".

        Which is odd considering a sign of mental illness in children is lack of empathy and the inability to feel guilt about their actions. Guess psychologists get to have it both ways....
        .
        Yeah, I don't know. Even LOWER ANIMALS seem to feel guilt. Granted, it could be learned, but I am pretty sure I have felt guilt for minor things EVEN when the most affected person seemed 100% fine with it.

        That said, I ALSO have a conscience that is innate, and not learned. SOME claim you have to be RELIGIOUS to ever have such feelings. Either they are dumb, lying, or DON'T have such innate feelings. then again, some CLAIM to be religious, and have NO conscience AT ALL!

        Steve
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1948580].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author HeySal
    Animals feel guilt - humans have become too good to be part of the animal kingdom anymore I guess. We think we are of angels, but are showing more of being of demons.

    I concur that the couple should have just been shot. We have 7 bil people on earth we don't need people this severely warped sucking up resources.

    At the very least these people should have been sterilized. Not everyone should be allowed to have children, sorry if that sounds fascist, but that's the way it is. These people need to be sterilized - if too many are against abortion at least make sure that the present baby never touches that woman's hands. Let her drop it and take it immediately, then sterilize the animal.

    I think it's just a matter that there are now so many of us that people are losing their sense of what being human is and are reverting back to ferral beings. It is said that the over crowding, poisons, etc, are literally turning humans into two separate species and people like these to show us very clearly what the lower species is going to be like. Dangerous, resource sucking, lacking all human ability to act with integrity or even to understand the dynamics of personal integrity.
    Signature

    Sal
    When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
    Beyond the Path

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1948868].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author seasoned
      Heysal,

      V came out in the 80s! at one point, they said there were 3 billion people! and you are RIGHT! There is no longer ANY thing I really see in people that distinguishes us, as a group from ANY other animal.

      THINKING? NOPE! Animals THINK! It is FACT! Dispute it if you want, but they DO!
      COMMUNICATION? NOPE! Animals communicate! AGAIN, FACT!
      VISUAL MEMORY and SPATIAL intelligence? HEY, look at monkeys swinging in trees, squirrels, birds, etc...
      NAVIGATION? NOPE!
      MAKING TOOLS!?!?!? NOPE! SEVERAL animals do! Even BIRDS have been known to!
      MAKING TOOLS FROM TOOLS!?!? NOPE! CHIMPS have been observed doing that!
      TEACHING/LEARNING? NOPE, CHIMPS have actually taught their kids!
      COMPASSION/PROTECTION? NOPE!
      SOCIETIES? NOPE!
      LOVE? NOPE!

      OK, can ANYONE here name even ONE way in which we are all as a group materially different? GRANTED, I don't think any creature WRITES, but WHO KNOWS?

      I just named 10 things earlier given, that are proven FALSE!

      HEY, I GOT IT! We are the ONLY creature that will go THOUSANDS of miles out of its way to hurt one another!

      But YEP, we do NOT need another kid in this world. If parents don't even care about the kid, they should ABORT and be STERILIZED! In fact, with such little care, the women should have a hysterectomy, and the man should be CASTRATED, because otherwise they may encourage it and possibly have a kid!

      Steve
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1948970].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Andie
    More often than not, even lower animals have a ferocious instinct to protect their young

    and they will come together above all else to protect individual survival as a group against threats outside their 'species'

    --some humans are missing those instincts

    sorry, i'd rather be a cat
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1949019].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author seasoned
      Originally Posted by Andie View Post

      More often than not, even lower animals have a ferocious instinct to protect their young

      and they will come together above all else to protect individual survival as a group against threats outside their 'species'

      --some humans are missing those instincts

      sorry, i'd rather be a cat
      Some animals in a LARGE group have been known to RISK THEIR LIVES in almost CERTAIN DANGER for another's offspring! HECK, DOLPHINS have been known to do it for OTHER SPECIES!

      Steve
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1949062].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author JohnMcCabe
        To put it in language even those two brain-dead idiots in South Korea could understand - reformat their hard drives, reboot them and recycle the parts.

        Some members of the species should never be allowed to play in the gene pool.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1949175].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Michael Motley
    For all those that say you can't be addicted to video games, you should think again.

    Many countries including the u.s., canada and china (and i think the netherlands) have treatment facilities for gaming addiction. China has a federal law that cuts gaming to 3 hours a day. The FCC stated that gaming is one of the top 5 reasons for college drop outs. I've seen craigslist ads for women in THIS country willing to trade sex for in-game money so that they can buy special objects in the game

    It is not unusual, especially in korea to hear about people that die from prolonged gaming all the time. Its no different than a gambling addiction.

    I've been into gaming since the early 90's, got so deep into it that I owned a LAN center. I see people all the time that say 'i dont know how you can spend all that time on the pc'. Those are people that have just not found their game yet. You can say 'not me' all you like, I can't count how many people i know that said 'not me' and then they found the game they were into and you dont see them for 6 mos to a year, and when you do they are so white from the lack of sun they are practically clear, mt. dew cans stacked up around them, piles of dog doo by the door because they dont walk the dog...if its still alive

    I dont play that much any more, but there was a time that I was setting my alarm to get up a little extra early because of in-game events. I used to be in a 'clan', which is pretty much a team. We had 2 sometimes 3 practices a week, had specific 'plays' we ran, and were using things like voice communications before it came on every x-box and its only lately that I didnt have one pc in the house that did absolutely nothing but be a dedicated gaming server.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1955627].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author HeySal
    It's the constant connection that is getting us, I believe. Did you know some cell phone energy waves are addictive? Also - people are now driving off for wilderness drives in winter in their sunday clothes thinking nothing of it because they have a cell phone connection -- then when they get stranded in areas that you can get no connection to society, they are completely without any emergency supplies or even adequate clothing for the situation. They die because they couldn't think past being connected. They kill people in their cars because they can't fathom being disconnected for a few minutes.

    People - no animal, social or otherwise - was built to be connected 24/7 - you need time to unwind from continual sensory input. The connection is replacing all survival instinct somehow. What do you think would happen if every cell phone tower were shut down all at once? It would cause a mass frenzy........perhaps a week later people would start to wake up to how bad cells really are, but the first reaction would be so volatile it would probably cause deaths.



    Steve - we were at about 4 bil in the 80's. Last May we hit 6.67 bil and we are adding between 150,000 to half a mil to that per DAY. The population rate of increase is going exponential at a time we have crossed carrying capacity by almost (and possibly there now) 75 billion people. In another bil you will see how mom nature takes care of fleas. It's already starting, but politicians are still busy trying to rake in some extra bucks while the scientists work quietly in the background to try to stall and reverse the chain reaction. It's getting cold.....this ain't gonna be pretty - but it will be a lesson. A costly one.

    And - the difference between humans and animals are 1. oppossable (sp?) thumbs and 2. for the most part anyway - the construction of our vocal chords. Dogs could talk if they had vocal chords constructed like ours - parrots can to an extent but I don't think they can imitate all of our sounds. That's all good - we can't imitate completely all of theirs either. Dogs would actually make a lot of sense, too, as they can learn around 500 words and understand them in phrases. Simians, dolphins, dogs, birds, etc - have all been found to have abstract thinking abilities.

    Communication - is instinctual to all species and that includes humans. If you have two humans raised together without contact from others, they will develop their own language -- it's hardwired right in, just as the growl of an angry dog is hardwired in their brains. When I was in grade school they taught us that humans don't have instincts. We were too Godly to have instincts. They used their strongest instinct, communication, to teach us that crap. LOL.
    Signature

    Sal
    When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
    Beyond the Path

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1961823].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author seasoned
      Originally Posted by HeySal View Post

      Steve - we were at about 4 bil in the 80's. Last May we hit 6.67 bil and we are adding between 150,000 to half a mil to that per DAY. The population rate of increase is going exponential at a time we have crossed carrying capacity by almost (and possibly there now) 75 billion people. In another bil you will see how mom nature takes care of fleas. It's already starting, but politicians are still busy trying to rake in some extra bucks while the scientists work quietly in the background to try to stall and reverse the chain reaction. It's getting cold.....this ain't gonna be pretty - but it will be a lesson. A costly one.
      I don't think this planet could EVER support 75 billion people. Each person living needs a place to live, food, air, water, work, and a little piece they can share to move around. FURTHER, more people means more disease, insects, mold, and WASTE! So that grows at an exponential rate to growth. Maybe all politicians, and citizens should learn the LIFE algorithm. It is an old computer simulation simulating bacterial growth and, as they spread, they spread and spread and eventually parts die because of overpopulation.

      Originally Posted by HeySal View Post

      And - the difference between humans and animals are 1. oppossable (sp?) thumbs
      There ARE other creatures that have them!

      Originally Posted by HeySal View Post

      2. for the most part anyway - the construction of our vocal chords. Dogs could talk if they had vocal chords constructed like ours - parrots can to an extent but I don't think they can imitate all of our sounds. That's all good - we can't imitate completely all of theirs either. Dogs would actually make a lot of sense, too, as they can learn around 500 words and understand them in phrases.
      Who knows, but that really means NOTHING to them. Some birds have a special larynx(I forget the name) that allows them to do a DUET with themselves!

      Originally Posted by HeySal View Post

      Communication - is instinctual to all species and that includes humans. If you have two humans raised together without contact from others, they will develop their own language -- it's hardwired right in, just as the growl of an angry dog is hardwired in their brains. When I was in grade school they taught us that humans don't have instincts. We were too Godly to have instincts. They used their strongest instinct, communication, to teach us that crap. LOL.
      Yeah, a lot of "scientists" are IDIOTS! HUMANS have NO instincts, and "animals"(meaning all animals besides humans) have NO thought. BOTH are demonstrably WRONG! Even curiousity could be considered a kind of instinct. Frankly, the brain is like a computer. LIKE a computer, it needs a basic program. That program contains basic reactions and THOSE, by definition, are INSTINCTS. Even a baby crying when it is hit or in pain, or needs something.

      Granted, humans seem kind of weird(eyes, lack of offensive abilities, LONG time till we can go out for ourselves and/or have kids, no apparent instinctive language), but OTHERS have some similar odd things.

      Steve
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1962007].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author JohnMcCabe
        Sal, I really hope I'm pushing up daisies before the Malthusian Solution kicks in. It's not going to be pretty.

        Just remember, Soylent Green is people!
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1962160].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author sweetaj
    That is a sick story. Makes me angry that people like that can have kids at all, and I've been trying for 7 years with no luck.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1961968].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author MarthaDu
    Lol I remember hearing about this same story a long time ago if it is not just a similar story.

    we could have a real addiction problem on our hands in China
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1961975].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author HeySal
    LOL - seems I left out the decimal, Steve - that's .75 bil, hahaha - 3/4, that is.

    Planet won't support 9 bil either but that's what they keep talking about publicly. Privately I'm sure they know scientists are coming to a consensus we're already there and a tad past.

    What other animal has opposible thumbs? I've never heard of one?
    Signature

    Sal
    When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
    Beyond the Path

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1962690].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Andie
      Originally Posted by HeySal View Post

      LOL - seems I left out the decimal, Steve - that's .75 bil, hahaha - 3/4, that is.

      Planet won't support 9 bil either but that's what they keep talking about publicly. Privately I'm sure they know scientists are coming to a consensus we're already there and a tad past.

      What other animal has opposable thumbs? I've never heard of one?
      LOL-what a difference a little dot can make.

      Here ya go Sal -
      Other Animals with Opposable Thumbs
      As mentioned, other primates besides humans have opposable thumbs. Chimpanzees, gorillas, and orangutans have opposable thumbs. Many of these primates also have toes on their feet that can function like an opposable thumb. These "opposable toes" are particularly useful in climbing trees.
      Opossums have toes on their hind feet that help them grip branches and climb. Giant pandas have a bony portion of their wrist bone that they use like an opposable thumb to grasp bamboo when they eat.


      such an educational place this is!
      Andie
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1962719].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author seasoned
      Originally Posted by HeySal View Post

      LOL - seems I left out the decimal, Steve - that's .75 bil, hahaha - 3/4, that is.

      Planet won't support 9 bil either but that's what they keep talking about publicly. Privately I'm sure they know scientists are coming to a consensus we're already there and a tad past.

      What other animal has opposible thumbs? I've never heard of one?
      I think ALL primates do! Some can even grasp with their FEET! Some smaller mammals do. Some birds can GRASP, not as well, but they CAN. SHOOT, ANDIE beat me to it! 8-(

      Steve
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1963508].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Kay King
        • Primates fall into one of four groups:[19]
        • Giant Pandas - five clawed fingers plus an extra-long sesamoid bone that, though not really a finger (as the human thumb is), works like an opposable thumb.
        • Most phalangerid marsupials (a family of possums) - an opposable toe on each foot, plus two opposable digits on each hand
        • Koalas - similar to phalangerids, though they are in a different order.
        • Opossums - opposable "thumbs" on the rear feet.
        • Many polydactyl cats - when a cat has six toes, both the innermost and outermost ("pinky") toes may become opposable, allowing the cat to perform more complex tasks.
        • Troodon, a birdlike dinosaur - partially opposable thumbs.
        • Bambiraptor, a small, predatory dinosaur - it could touch the outer two of its three digits together in an opposable grip.
        • Phyllomedusa, a genus of frogs native to South America.
        • Lophiomys, a genus of african cricetid (rodent), with only one extant species (Lophiomys imhausi), but several extinct species.
        Most birds have at least one opposable digit on the foot, in various configurations, but these are seldom called "thumbs".
        I bolded polydactyl cats - because I have one. That cat can pick up things in a way that brings to mind a hand with furry gloves on.
        Signature
        Saving one dog will not change the world - but the world changes forever for that one dog
        ***
        It actually doesn't take much to be considered a 'difficult woman' -
        that's why there are so many of us.
        ...jane goodall
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1963519].message }}

Trending Topics