Some Truths About Ranking And Backlinks

by 54 replies
65
While there is a wealth of great information on Warrior, there's also a *lot* of myths, misinformation, conjecture, and some really bad information.

For those of you struggling to get your head around rankings and backlinks, perhaps this will help.


"RANKINGS" DEFINED

The term "ranking" by itself doesn't mean much, sort of like the term "color". Ranking is always in relation to a keyword or phrase. Statements like "ranking in the #1 spot" or "How do I get my site on the first page?" by themselves are meaningless.

A search engine database is relative - there's no set order of 1st, 2nd, 3rd, etc. It's not a table like a spreadsheet. Where a particular page sits in the database, or SERPS (Search Engine Results Pages), is only in relation to a particular search, meaning a keyword or phrase. Further, Websites aren't listed in the SERPS, pages of a website are.

Where we rank in the SERPS is one specific ordering or listing of the database for a specific keyword or phrase. That's why a page might rank #3 for "red bikini bottom" and #141 for "bikini bottom". Same database, different ordering of it for different queries.


WHY RANKINGS CHANGE

(This applies to primarily to Google; each search engine uses somewhat different criteria and values). The goal of a search engine is to display the most relevant pages, in order of 'importance', for a given search query. When a search is entered, the database produces a list of relevant results and orders them. The order is determined by a number of factors including onpage values, Pagerank, backlinks, trustrank, and authority.

When a page is first indexed, Google does an initial 'approximation'. Because many of the more 'costly' calculations aren't figured in yet, a well-optimized site can often place well for it's 'targeted' keyword/phrase when it's first indexed.

Within some period, usually a few days to a few weeks, a more thorough valuation is done. At this point, that well-optimized page, that doesn't yet have much else going for it, drops significantly. This is often referred to as part of the "Google dance".

Over the next period, backlinks start to be found, perhaps more are being added, and the page will often begin to creep back upwards.

Of course this is an oversimplification; Google's algorithms are very sophisticated and complex. It's believed there are somewhere around 100 factors that are calculated - some that add to a page's 'importance', some that subtract.


BOOSTING RANKINGS

In order to improve a page's overall values, we want to optimize the page itself, and we want to build it's total "backlink value".

Generally speaking, it's 'easiest' to target one keyword/phrase per page. Assuming that is our goal, the first thing we want to do is optimize the page itself.

The main factors are (roughly in order of importance):
  • Domain name
  • Page title (title tag)
  • H1 tag
  • Keyword density
  • Meta description
  • Meta keyword

Beyond that, we can add some additional boost by linking internally to our 'target' page. Wherever you have the opportunity on other pages, create a keyword link to your 'target' page.

Once our page is optimized, the rest comes down to building 'importance' which is essentially 'backlink value'. Backlink value is the number of backlinks times the 'strength' of each backlink (whatever PR it's passing, it's trustrank, and authority). In otherwords, total backlink value is the addition of each backlink's value combined together.

In order to boost our rankings once our page is optimized, we have to increase it's overall backlink value higher than those pages ahead of us.

If we're trying to boost our rankings for keywords we're not as well optimized for, we'll need that much more backlink value.


BACKLINKS

A backlink is simply a link pointing to our page from another page that is recognized by the search engine (not all backlinks are 'found' - those that aren't, add no backlink value).

The value of a backlink is determined by where it is, and the link itself. For the link itself, using our 'target' keyword/phrase as the anchor text (the clickable part) gives it the highest value. The amount of backlink value it gives us for ranking purposes is based on where it appears on the page (higher is better), the Pagerank, trustrank and authority of the page it's on, and the context, or relevancy of that page to our keyword/phrase.

Ranking for a keyword/phrase comes down to optimizing our page for that keyword/phrase, then gaining more total backlink value than the tops sites we're trying to beat.


PAGERANK

While you hear many people say "Pagerank doesn't matter", it does matter when we're trying to boost our total backlink value. Why? Because part of the value of a given backlink comes from how much Pagerank it conveys. And that is a function of the Pagerank of the page where the backlink resides.

For example, all other things being equal, a backlink residing on a PR-5 page adds considerably more backlink value than a backlink from a PR-2 page.

Keep in mind, Pagerank is not a static value, it changes, ebbs and flows. The PR you see on your browser, or at a Pagerank checker, is the value that it had at the last "update". Google 'exports' the PR values once every few months. A site that shows a PR-3 may not actually be a PR-3. The only thing that shows is that when Google did the last "update", it was a PR-3. Like rankings, Pagerank is fluid.

That being said, there is no way to know the actual PR of a page other than on the day Google exports that info. But it's "all we have" and can be at least a relative indicator.

Pagerank, as the name implies, is assigned per page, not per site. Pages from a given site can, and often do have different PR values. Usually, the homepage, which is usually the oldest, most optimized, and has the most backlinks, is the highest, but this isn't always the case. As such, a backlink from a "PR-4 site" often doesn't convey the backlink value of a PR-4 page. If the actual page the link is on isn't a PR-4, than that's not the value passed. Still, a backlink on an inner page of a site who's homepage is a PR-4 is usually stronger than the backlink on an inner page of a site who's homepage is a PR-2.

FOLLOW / NOFOLLOW

The "NoFollow" tag was created by Google (other search engines don't consider it) for webmasters to tell their crawler not to 'follow' a link on a page. It also discounted the passing of the page's PR through that link. Currently, a link that is tagged "NoFollow" does not pass PR value to the link. That does not mean that backlink has no value - it does - it means however that it's value is relatively low.

While Matt Cutts at Google says they're moving towards ignoring "NoFollow" tags, they haven't yet, at least where passing Pagerank is concerned.

What this means for ranking is that "NoFollow" links are low-value backlinks, regardless of where they are.

Hope this helps~

Mark
#search engine optimization #backlinks #ranking #truths
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
  • Good stuff, thanks. And while it is true that only backlinks recognised by the search engine have value, there is no way of knowing which links are recognised. Experiments that have improved rankings using backlinks that do not show up anywhere in any index have proven this. My advice is to not second-guess the SEs but go for a very broad mix of backlinks, including ones with nofollow tags as a total absence of nofollow links would not occur naturally.
  • Good points, Peter. I think a broad range of backlinks is always the best strategy.

    Mark
    • [1] reply

    • This topic has become of significant interest as of late ...

      What evidence do we have or can link to that supports the above paragraph? Urban Internet Legend?

      Where and when did Matt Cutts make this revelation?

      Id love to expand upon this further.
      • [2] replies
  • Great information you have here and good job you havegiven a general meaning of each, perfect for any noob.

    However the whole no follow thing ive personally proved to be wrong a few times in the google search engine hence why i get links from both dofollow and nofollow without caring too much!

    Tom Brite
    • [1] reply
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
  • IMHO the nofollow atribute is/was/will be just a way to track webmasters.

    John Doe, owner of a powerful website does not know what's a nofollow tag, so this serves very well the purposes of Google to track avid webmasters, nothing more.

    Just my 2 cents.

    Don't care about those tags, don't use them, and frankly, never saw a proven technique of what they can do to hurt-improve your rankings.

    Fernando
  • Great summarized info, Let me take prinout of it,.

    Thxs man
  • Would say the relative truth of the initial post is higher than most on this subject. And that's about the best you can say on this topic where much is nebulous as that is how the Big G wants it!!

    One point I would make is that the importance of the domain's relevance is more about the CTR and therefore the traffic we get from our rankings (which is what we are working for anyway, right?!) unless there is a dead tie with another site and then I think a good keyword rich domain might give an edge over a more general or random domain in the rankings.
  • The No-Follow debate will rage for some time to come I think.

    Keep in mind that many sites that are "known" to be No-Follow have areas that are Do-Follow. Squidoo is one. People are constantly stating that it is completely No-Follow, and it just ain't so.

    Don't believe me? Do a few searches for threads by TheFluffaNutta on the topic and get it straight from the Squid's beak...
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
  • All a keyword in a domain does is say - this site is about this subject. It's part of the jigsaw but not 100% necessary.
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
  • Great information, thanks!
  • Good post. I think the most important strategy is to maintain a diverse backlink profile with links form numerous sources, domains and IPs
  • It's funny, because sitting on the Top 10 of a 4 word keyphrase I'm interested in (with 4,400 exact searches a month) is the front page of a Wordpress blog with NO CONTENT on it!

    From what I can tell, there are no backlinks to the site (I've checked Yahoo! Site Explorer and Smart PageRank).

    The only thing they appear to have done with the site is changed the blog title to the 4 word keyphrase, and the domain name is the 4 word keyphrase, .net. (The blog still has the default Wordpress theme!)

    And yet it's in the Top 10 for this four word keyphrase, in a reasonably competitive and definitely profitable niche.

    This tells me that, at least for longer tails (this one contains four words), Google gives pretty strong weight to the domain name + name of the blog, when both match exactly with the keywords.

    Personally, I'd love to buy this blog, but the whois information is protected. If they can get into the Top 10 with NOTHING but the right title and domain name, just think what they could do if they actually bothered to do something with it!

    And no, I'm not telling. Not a chance.
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
    • [2] replies
    • Hi Daniel,

      I happy to see that we agree on some things.

      I agree powerful and relevant backlinks can certainly boost your ranking, but you seem to imply that this is the single most important factor. While I agree it is an important factor, there are many factors and collectively they add up to a total relevancy score. I believe that extremely competitive keywords demand additional factors beyond the power of high PR backlinks.

      For an example lets use a keyword very similar to the one you cited in your post. "Business Solutions" a keyword that is at least as competitive in every way. I could argue that Google has identified this as a keyword that has great commercial value and has created a page that specifically targets this keyword and promoted in many ways including a link to it from their most powerful PR10 page (the home page for Google.com). Surely no one would be able to outrank them, right?

      Could it be possible that Google themselves can be outranked, seemingly by using a keyword domain name. It seems that the keyword domain is a really important factor since neither their backlinks nor their on-page optimization appear to be superior to Google's efforts.
      • [1] reply
    • Grab an old domain using a WP blog with relative authority .

      Keyword phrase in h1 tag, title tag, meta keywords tag, meta description tag. First phrase of content and every 100 words.

      Do about 50 Angela type backlinks with anchor text for the respective keyword and you'll outrank them.

      It's only weighed in that heavily because no one else is going for it.
      • [ 1 ] Thanks
      • [1] reply
  • Useful post!

    What is your opinion about two alternatives:

    1. A backlink with anchor text and
    2. Just a domain as a link, for instance on the blog comment

    When the anchor text directs the effect for that keyword, how does
    a domain without an anchor text work? How does a search engine
    handle these links?
    • [1] reply
    • First, you must realize that rankings are for *pages* not domains. So when you say "how does a domain without an anchor text work?" what you are referring to is the home page or index page that the domain points to. I think you mean "how does a link without anchor text work?" In that case, the link itself is also the anchor text, and basically squanders much of the ranking value that the link is able to convey. And don't confuse the actual link, which is where you go when you click it, with the anchor text, which is what you see as the link.

      If you're trying to rank for particular keywords/phrases - and you must be, otherwise you cannot optimize your efforts - then you *always* want to use your keywords/phrases and variations as your anchor text. It tells Google where to focus the backlink value.

      If you have just a link with no anchor text, then there is nothing to tell Google where to 'assign' it's value and you are diluting it across the page.

      In short, backlink value is 'focused' by the anchor text.

      Mark
  • Great job in the analysis and key notes for us to be aware of, internetmarketer99!
  • A well written and informative article. I'd add regarding backlinks that I've seen a lot of sites with 0 page rank showing up in Google's first page for fairly competitive keywords.

    They did it by having a ton of backlinks, many of them from very low page rank sites. So, I have concluded that Google places quite a lot of value on backlinks. Probably because many won't do the work needed to get them.
    • [2] replies
    • Yes, many PR-0 backlinks will do it, without conveying Pagerank. In addition, backlinks from higher-value, higher-PR pages that are "NoFollowed" will do that as well.

      Mark
    • Very well observed. I'm looking forward to adopt the same tactic as an experiment. Diversifying excites me!

      By the way, brilliant post Mark, great reference to keep to heart. Perhaps that will change my outlook on NoFollow from now on.
      • [2] replies
  • WOW! Thanks for all the great info guys!!
  • [DELETED]
  • page one of this thread is pure hotness.

    good bump

Next Topics on Trending Feed