[Saidar]

Originally Posted by Doug D

I emailed him back and told him, if you email me again...I'm coming to your house, I'm gonna knock your wife's teeth out, eat your dog, and make you my bitch!

What? should I not have done that? Seemed like a reasonable reply to me?

muuhaha........just kidding guys, woulda been funny though.

Haha, funny, I almost sent him something like that!

[Saidar]

Question...

I have been linking the crap out of my new site, at first the rankings improved, but from a week ago my rankings started to decrease bit by bit every day. 14th, next day 15th, next day 16th etc etc

I don't think this is the google dance, and I have never stopped my linking campaign. What is happening here? Maybe Google is devaluing my links?

Age of the domain and website must play a factor, why I'm saying this is because the number one two and three spot, 90% of their backlinks comes from directories and link pages (reciprocal links), but their domains is at least two years old.

[lharding]

Hello,

This is a very busy thread, but thought I would just let you know that I followed Angela's advise and this morning my article is on the first page of google at #6. So, thanks Angela, it works great!!!! I set this all up yesterday!

Lee.

[Terry Kyle]

Using Angela and PJ's backlinks, I've gotten several GoArticles to #1 for a range of specific phrases.

THE PROBLEM?

The problem is that these articles don't seem to convert into sales.

I've played around with different article styles: reviews, FAQ, problem/solution etc but conversions are elusive across a range of Clickbank products in very different niches.

Have any Warriors here hit on a good layout/style/approach on GoArticles that seems to work sales-wise?

Plus, Warriors using GA should use all available formatting and linking options in their articles: centering, bolding, bullet points, in-article links, vertical spacing for readability etc as GA is very flexible in this regard (unlike EZA).

Thanks for sharing your experience.

[AndyBlackSEO]

Originally Posted by Doug D

I emailed him back and told him, if you email me again...I'm coming to your house, I'm gonna knock your wife's teeth out, eat your dog, and make you my bitch!

What? should I not have done that? Seemed like a reasonable reply to me?

muuhaha........just kidding guys, woulda been funny though.

Ah... that old chestnut. Hahaha. You could save it as an email template in case you get any more site owners threatening legal action for placing a link within your profile.

Shop keepers will be taking legal action against us next if we pick up the fresh bread towards the back of their shelf instead of the older bread placed at the front. What is this world coming too? lol.

[AndyBlackSEO]

Originally Posted by Saidar

Question...

I have been linking the crap out of my new site, at first the rankings improved, but from a week ago my rankings started to decrease bit by bit every day. 14th, next day 15th, next day 16th etc etc

I don't think this is the google dance, and I have never stopped my linking campaign. What is happening here? Maybe Google is devaluing my links?

Age of the domain and website must play a factor, why I'm saying this is because the number one two and three spot, 90% of their backlinks comes from directories and link pages (reciprocal links), but their domains is at least two years old.

If it's a brand new site I would really only submit a few of these links per day as well as an odd article and maybe blog comment. Other people may disagree, but with a brand new site I think it's best to take the gradual approach. At least for say 3 months or something.

Why not try slowing your backlinking down but don't stop. See how that pans out for you.

[Saidar]

Originally Posted by AndyBlackSEO

If it's a brand new site I would really only submit a few of these links per day as well as an odd article and maybe blog comment. Other people may disagree, but with a brand new site I think it's best to take the gradual approach. At least for say 3 months or something.

Why not try slowing your backlinking down but don't stop. See how that pans out for you.

I agree, I didn't take that approach to test for myself because most warriors says you can go crazy with link building from the start. But looks like progress is difficult. Of course Google will not penalise you but maybe they give little value to the links for a brand new site.

I'll slow it down a bit and see what happens

[nobluff]

I am at no 7 this morning and +8 on my article requests (still not 100% sure what this is).

Originally Posted by nobluff

Ive got something to add:

Added a goarticle on the 28th of June.

Keyword without quotes - Results 1 - 10 of about 1,200,000 (numbers rounded)
Keyword in quotes - Results 1 - 10 of about 150,000 (numbers rounded)

I am currently at no 10 (1st page), the article is sitting at 60 requests right now, I think this is the amount of times someone reads article? Anyway, I will update this number to see if there is any movement.

I have done about 40 links in total, plus some other links (few blog comments and social links).

[Saidar]

Okay people,

All of my articles completely disappeared from Google. All of them were in the top 5 pages and now they are nowhere to be seen.

Lets hope this is the Google dance otherwise I'm going to cry until my eyes burst

[lharding]

Originally Posted by Saidar

Lets hope this is the Google dance otherwise I'm going to cry until my eyes burst

OUCH! I have my fingers crossed for you. Realistically, how long do the articles stay on the first page? I guess that depends on other activity around the keywords you've chosen. Just wondered how long I've got!!!

Cheers, Lee.

[daveshu]

LOL Saidar, I had the same worry a few days ago when my customers website vanished from page 4 - I was convincing myself I'd killed it off.

Fortunately it's now back - it arrived half way up page 3 & is now currently at the top of page 2 - COME ON BABY, COME ON!!!!

[jw007]

This kind of backlink building (Angela Edwards etc) works only with older trusted sites that have "some" traffic not with new websites which have a little traffic.

You can try it yourself: register a domain, obtain 200 backlinks by using specific keyword from high PR sites and wait a few days. You can get a good position in Google for a while but then Google drops your page out of first 500 SE results with that keyword. Google do not deindex that page but you can't find that page later with your keyword via Google. And this is not some "Google Dance". You can wait a year but your page will not appear again in top 100 results in Google with your keyword.

[lharding]

Originally Posted by jw007

This kind of backlink building (Angela Edwards etc) works only with older trusted sites that have "some" traffic not with new websites which have a little traffic.

You can try it yourself: register a domain...

I thought the experiment was with an Article, which ultimately pointed to your domain. So, it's the article that ranked in Google, not your domain. I guess it would work either way but the article site would have more "history" than your own newly registered site.

Cheers, Lee.

[Angela V. Edwards]

Originally Posted by jw007

This kind of backlink building (Angela Edwards etc) works only with older trusted sites that have "some" traffic not with new websites which have a little traffic.

You can try it yourself: register a domain, obtain 200 backlinks by using specific keyword from high PR sites and wait a few days. You can get a good position in Google for a while but then Google drops your page out of first 500 SE results with that keyword. Google do not deindex that page but you can't find that page later with your keyword via Google. And this is not some "Google Dance". You can wait a year but your page will not appear again in top 100 results in Google with your keyword.

I wouldn't recommend saying that sort of thing unless you KNOW it's true because some people will actually believe you. My friend just started a website in February called Take Him With You. By April, it was a Page Rank 3. In mid May, (not long after the new Star Trek Movie came out) I asked him to create a brand new page on his site based on the keyword phrase Star Trek Computer Sound, since he is a huge "Trekkie" and that particular search term gets over 1,000 searches a day.

He created the page and I went to work on it. Within a week, his site was number ONE for that keyword, where it remains today. (And just in case you ask, that keyword is converting BEAUTIFULLY for him; he couldn't be happier with the results.)

His website is now a Page Rank 4. All this with a "brand new" website.

[Angela V. Edwards]

Originally Posted by AndyBlackSEO

Shop keepers will be taking legal action against us next if we pick up the fresh bread towards the back of their shelf instead of the older bread placed at the front. What is this world coming too? lol.

Of course they will, as you've violated the United States Food Code and will be turned in to the FDA. :p

[Saidar]

Originally Posted by jw007

This kind of backlink building (Angela Edwards etc) works only with older trusted sites that have "some" traffic not with new websites which have a little traffic.

You can try it yourself: register a domain, obtain 200 backlinks by using specific keyword from high PR sites and wait a few days. You can get a good position in Google for a while but then Google drops your page out of first 500 SE results with that keyword. Google do not deindex that page but you can't find that page later with your keyword via Google. And this is not some "Google Dance". You can wait a year but your page will not appear again in top 100 results in Google with your keyword.

Is this the results that you got? Have you tried it before? I'm just curious because many senior warrior members says exactly the opposite.

If your results shows otherwise please share with us as this may be critical to our understanding of how Google works

[Saidar]

Originally Posted by daveshu

LOL Saidar, I had the same worry a few days ago when my customers website vanished from page 4 - I was convincing myself I'd killed it off.

Fortunately it's now back - it arrived half way up page 3 & is now currently at the top of page 2 - COME ON BABY, COME ON!!!!

That is good news, hope mine will come back as well.

But like I said, the age factor of a website must play a huge role in obtaining backlinks.

By the way, the day before it happened I installed Google analytics on my site. Maybe Google uses that data to determine the rank of your website because a website with 200 links and no traffic in analytics is off course a website who obtained the links himself. Maybe we should not use analytics until the site receives some good traffic

[4morereferrals]

So does this toolbag screen every poster and opinion that permeates his site? Does he endorse - screen every google adsense POS that pops up on their users screens from all his sites?

What a croc ...

Originally Posted by traceye

Hi Steve,

I got the same email, but I just laughed.

Report me for what? Leaving a link on my own profile page on their site? If that's the worst thing I did then Google will laugh in their face.

I wouldn't worry too much, I doubt they even really reported anyone - it's just a threat.

And as for the FTC law they quoted, that has to do with bloggers writing fake reviews and receiving payment in return. Hardly the same as leaving a link or two on a profile page.

Ignore the threat and move on. You'll be fine.

Tracey

[Gabby12]

I don't think so and if you read all of this and others threads many of us have had new sites rank and stay up on the first page with these links. I have finally reached #5 for a site I have been linking to for the past 2 mo. Thanks Angela!

Originally Posted by jw007

This kind of backlink building (Angela Edwards etc) works only with older trusted sites that have "some" traffic not with new websites which have a little traffic.

You can try it yourself: register a domain, obtain 200 backlinks by using specific keyword from high PR sites and wait a few days. You can get a good position in Google for a while but then Google drops your page out of first 500 SE results with that keyword. Google do not deindex that page but you can't find that page later with your keyword via Google. And this is not some "Google Dance". You can wait a year but your page will not appear again in top 100 results in Google with your keyword.

[Angela V. Edwards]

That's excellent, Gabby. Thank you for letting me know.

[Angela V. Edwards]

Originally Posted by 4morereferrals

So does this toolbag screen every poster and opinion that permeates his site? Does he endorse - screen every google adsense POS that pops up on their users screens from all his sites?

What a croc ...

Of course he does and if they happen to say or post the wrong thing, he contacts the FBI. Why does this remind me of the playground in gradeschool, where all the kids are going to "tell the teacher" on the other kids?

[4morereferrals]

Perhaps it had more to do with Porn ... other links from bad neighborhoods, or adsense spam/violations or something else - it certainly had NOTHING to do with a google penalty for too many HIGH PR backlinks to quickly.

.... 200 ... too many backlinks too quickly? ... totally absurd.

More likely you got spidered by the bots quickly cuz you used a high traffic high PR domain to obtain a backlink ... site got indexed quickly - ALL Good things ... you got a temporary QDF bump to the front of the line for fresh new content ... then your site settled into its rightful spot in the SERPS.

If you went and placed 200 backlinks on 200 different sites in a 48 hr period - very UNLIKELY theyd get hit by Yahoo slerp or Googlebot for weeks... So in effect your new domain would trickle in those 200 links over a 4 week period or longer. Certainly nothing to set off any red flags.

If all you did was put down 200 links and stop ... a good 25% of those likely never were found and another % were removed by mods or not approved and deleted - so when the bots went back on their rotation to that site - they were not found again, and deleted from gooogle and yahoo's systems. So your total link count likely dropped off big time.

Originally Posted by jw007

This kind of backlink building (Angela Edwards etc) works only with older trusted sites that have "some" traffic not with new websites which have a little traffic.

You can try it yourself: register a domain, obtain 200 backlinks by using specific keyword from high PR sites and wait a few days. You can get a good position in Google for a while but then Google drops your page out of first 500 SE results with that keyword. Google do not deindex that page but you can't find that page later with your keyword via Google. And this is not some "Google Dance". You can wait a year but your page will not appear again in top 100 results in Google with your keyword.

[jw007]

Originally Posted by Saidar

Is this the results that you got? Have you tried it before? I'm just curious because many senior warrior members says exactly the opposite.

If your results shows otherwise please share with us as this may be critical to our understanding of how Google works

Yes, it's based on my own experience but maybe I'm wrong, sorry Angela. Maybe I have used too competitive keyword terms. But (in my opinion) it's much easier to get better results with trusted high traffic website than with a new one. And some pages got (not very) good positions (maybe 3 months ago) but lost them, I don't know why.

"Star Trek Computer Sound" has not competition at all: only 200-300 results (when search term in title tag) in Google. So it's easy to get a page with this term on page 1 on SERPs...

[Angela V. Edwards]

Originally Posted by jw007

Yes, it's based on my own experience but maybe I'm wrong, sorry Angela. Maybe I have used too competitive keyword terms. But (in my opinion) it's much easier to get better results with trusted high traffic website than with a new one. And some pages got (not very) good positions (maybe 3 months ago) but lost them, I don't know why.

"Star Trek Computer Sound" has not competition at all: only 200-300 results (when search term in title tag) in Google. So it's easy to get a page with this term on page 1 on SERPs...

Of course it's easier to get better results with trusted high traffic websites. No one is disputing that; as a matter of fact, that's what the whole "Goarticles" experiment thing was all about. But you said the links DID NOT WORK for newer sites; that's completely different. And again, the sites that fall into the index for Star Trek Computer Sound are NOT only the sites that have that keyword in their title tag; we've discussed this at length on this thread. The MAJORITY of the sites in the TOP TEN (Front Page) for this keyword do NOT have that keyword in the title tag; if the "title tag" was the biggest thing pushing sites to the top, then why aren't 10 of those "200-300 results" not ALL on Page One? As a matter of fact, I had to bug my friend Rick to put a title tag on that very page; it was number one for a week before he even added the title tag to it.

But that whole issue doesn't matter. The only reason I brought it up is because it proves that the backlinks do, indeed, work for brand new websites, which you said they didn't. If you are trying to compete in a HUGELY competitive market, of COURSE it will take longer and more links. The links are powerful, but they are not going to get you to Page One out of millions and millions of results in a week or two.

Even *I* wouldn't recommend that a brand new site try to compete with millions of other sites right away if they actually want to see a good ranking in the near future. That's a "given", I would have thought. But it still doesn't mean the backlinks don't work for brand new sites.

[mwoeppel1]

Originally Posted by Saidar

Ok people,

I used Paul's backlinks yesterday, and today I received an email from to owner of urbis.com,

Here is the email:

Dear Spammer,

You have just spammed my site, Urbis.com, by creating a profile with the purposes of creating backlinks to your site.

I am taking the following actions:
1. I am reporting you to the Federal Trade Commission. What you are doing is illegal. Read the law here: FTC GUIDES CONCERNING USE OF ENDORSEMENTS AND TESTIMONIALS IN ADVERTISING
2. I am reporting you to Google, which means you will be much lower in the search rankings. Google punishes link spammers.
3. If your profile spam continues, I will file a civil lawsuit against you.

-Steve

I sent him an email and he told me he had 300 people sign up within two days. Kinda sent a red flag. So those of us that are using the packets may not want to post them on the same day!

[Angela V. Edwards]

Originally Posted by mwoeppel1

I sent him an email and he told me he had 300 people sign up within two days. Kinda sent a red flag. So those of us that are using the packets may not want to post them on the same day!

While that might be a red flag, his method of handling it (instead of simply cutting off new sign ups or making the links No Follow or disabling HTML) was a little "over the top", IMO. He even told Paul that he was going to report him to the FBI for "breaking the law". Here is the answer I put together for people who are worried about it (and quite a few people WERE frightened by this):

First of all, that FTC rule about "endorsements" goes for HIM, not for you. If he doesn't want "advertisements" on his site, then he is free to remove them. You are not breaking the law by simply putting a link on a website. Not to mention that trying to tie a simple backlink as a violation of the FTC "endorsement" statute is REALLY pushing it. I don't think ANY court in the country would see a simple backlink as a violation of the FTC's "endorsement statute". The website itself would be the one in violation of this statute if it allowed illegal "endorsements", not a person leaving a backlink. And in order to violate the FTC's statute, you'd actually have to appear to be endorsing something that is not valid, not simply leaving a link to your website in your profile. You can read the FTC's definitions of such "endorsements" here.

This is just a scare tactic. How is putting a link on a site illegal? What law does it break? It doesn't; not even the FTC's "endorsement statute". They are just trying to scare you and are pointing to a law that has NOTHING to do with backlinks to "prove their point". Backlinks are the lifeblood of the Search Engines, and putting links on websites is not illegal, nor is it unethical. It's not like you are trying to disguise the links on the site or anything. What would they "report" you for, and what would the FBI do to you? Have you broken any laws? Of course not!

There are some sites who don't like links and have even created a "list" of people who have tried to leave a link on their system. A few other sites might pay attention to such a 'list'. However, it means absolutely nothing to Google or any other search engine. If it did, wouldn't you think that competitors would be getting the competition "blacklisted" all over the Internet? Of COURSE they would. If that sort of thing really mattered, all you'd have is mayhem instead of a search engine. Google knows that and they are NOT going to let something like this ruin their BILLION dollar business.

How do you think the "Big Name" companies get their sites to the top of Google? Anyone who thinks it's just because of their "Great Content" is seriously naive. They are all getting backlinks, too. They have SEO people who work FULL TIME, making sure their sites get and stay at the top and their job does not ONLY consist of fixing up the company's website for SEO purposes. Backlinks are the "name of the game" and just because a site doesn't like it doesn't mean that you have done ANYTHING illegal.

I advocate being a "good neighbor" and if a site doesn't like links, don't put links there. But I also don't believe in "sabre rattling" either, and that is exactly what this webmaster is doing.

[Karen Keyes]

Originally Posted by Angela V. Edwards

I think we're actually talking about similar things. The "visitors who spam" the sites much of the time were the folks who got the packets for free in the first place. I'm all for the webmasters taking away those links.

I always put my name, my photo, my location and often other stuff in my profiles and I've recommended that others do the same. People who are wise and use the sites like the gold they are most likely won't have any problems, even two years down the road.

Hi Angela,
Love your backlink packets, am a devoted member! I also belong to Brute Force, where we just got access today to the Linking Loophole software that incorporates a certain number of high PR backlinks. I'm curious, because you (and others have) stress that it's wise to fill out profiles etc, but then isn't that quite contrary to the purpose of BF - where automation is key? Are you suggesting that although we have this great Linking Loophole software to automate the backlinking, we *also* should visit these sites and fill out profiles etc? I'm concerned, because obviously that just undermines the whole purpose of having the software automate anything to do with backlinking.

My personal opinion - the backlinks through the automation of the software, without *any* other enhancements to the sites' profile pages etc, will still prove to be strong in the serps. I'm interested to hear what you have to say about it though.

Thanks!
Karen

[Angela V. Edwards]

Hi Karen,

Thank you very much for your kind words.

As far as the SERPS go, getting your backlinks that way will probably be no problem. For now. However, people are concerned about webmasters removing the links later on (although this really only happens in a TINY percentage of the sites) because all that is there is a link and no other information at all. I can see the point and if webmasters, sometime in the future, decide to really crack down on this sort of thing then backlinks that are automated in the way you are talking about will probably be the ones most at risk of removal.

At this point it's really up to you, but I do advocate being a "good neighbor" and good neighbors tend to give (ie, a little bit of information about you) as well as "take".

[djbory]

Ok guys, this is what you may call a little bit off topic (I don’t think it is) but I have to ask cause is very-very important….

Ok, I’ve been using Angela’s backlinks and I’m doing ok so far, so I built 2 more sites and I’m in the process of KEYWORD RESEARCH for the new articles… Keyword research, I believe is the base of Online Business…

Here is my dilemma: I did some research using WORDTRACKER and SEOBOOK (seobook is powered by wordtraker so it contains about the same data)…

Then I went to compare the results with GOOGLE KEYWORD EXTERNAL TOOL and I was astonished!… not only the results are totally different; far worse they are opposite…

Some keywords in GKET have hundreds, even thousands of daily searches (I divided the GLOOGLE numbers into 30 days to get a roughly daily estimate), and wordtraker shows only 2 or 3 daily searches…

Other times is the opposite; Wordtracker shows 800 or 900 daily searches, and Google shows very few and in some instances “NO ENOUGH DATA”

But it gets worse; if I do the research in MARKET SAMURAI, again I get extremely different results, and I’m getting frustrated over this…. I optimized a website before and after I got to GOOGLE ‘page 1’ I didn’t get the searches I was expecting…. So I like to get it right from now on…

Where do you guys do your Keyword research? Any advice will be really appreciated…

DJBory

How To Stop Foreclosure

[djbory]

Who should we trust for the results; the other guys or GOOGLE? After all, GOOGLE is showing its own numbers....Shouldn't they be accurate?

DJBory

[AnneE]

Here's my update -- I submitted my Goarticles article and over the course of a week submitted 30 backlinks (most of the PR 7). A little less than a week after the last link was posted the article was at number 5. A few days later it dropped to number 6. Then yesterday (about 1 week later), it dropped to number 16. I think I will add at least one new link to it and see if I can get it to come back up.

I know my Squidoo lens that I backlinked like crazy and had risen up to #16 has dropped to 40-something, even though I occasionally add additional links to it.

So I guess I'm a bit discouraged about what seems at least in some cases to be a temporary gain in ranking.

One thought about avoiding SPAM detection. I didn't really do this intentionally, but I created one profile and added a comment on their forum, then got called away.... haven't gotten back to it for 3 or 4 days and it occurred to me, maybe that is best. If new profiles are being reviewed, mine will be empty when checked. Tonight I'll go back and place my links on that profile page.

[djbory]

Originally Posted by AnneE

One thought about avoiding SPAM detection. I didn't really do this intentionally, but I created one profile and added a comment on their forum, then got called away.... haven't gotten back to it for 3 or 4 days and it occurred to me, maybe that is best. If new profiles are being reviewed, mine will be empty when checked. Tonight I'll go back and place my links on that profile page.

That sounds like a nice strategy... It would, however, be very time consuming, but it may be worth it at the end...

DJBory

[gmr324]

Angela and Paul,

I have a question about the need for "spinning" the profile content across the
different sites. In the interest of being a good neighbor and extending the
lifetime of the profiles, I believe in making the profiles as realistic as possible.
So, I created a 2-3 paragraph fictitious profile which includes my anchor text for
2-3 links which logically fit into the content. This way, the description of the person
makes sense and the anchor text fits seemlessly into it rather than just being
isolated obvious spam.

So, my question has to do with using this method but avoiding the Google
duplicate content filter by just cutting and pasting the same profile text
on every site. Do you believe its necessary to have the profiles be at least
50% different on each backlink site to avoid tripping this filter?

It would seem to be a good practice so Google doesn't see the same text
and just discounts it as something it has seen 100 times before thereby
possibly devaluing the backlinks.

Appreciate your thoughts

George

[Angela V. Edwards]

Originally Posted by AnneE

Here's my update -- I submitted my Goarticles article and over the course of a week submitted 30 backlinks (most of the PR 7). A little less than a week after the last link was posted the article was at number 5. A few days later it dropped to number 6. Then yesterday (about 1 week later), it dropped to number 16. I think I will add at least one new link to it and see if I can get it to come back up.

I know my Squidoo lens that I backlinked like crazy and had risen up to #16 has dropped to 40-something, even though I occasionally add additional links to it.

So I guess I'm a bit discouraged about what seems at least in some cases to be a temporary gain in ranking.

One thought about avoiding SPAM detection. I didn't really do this intentionally, but I created one profile and added a comment on their forum, then got called away.... haven't gotten back to it for 3 or 4 days and it occurred to me, maybe that is best. If new profiles are being reviewed, mine will be empty when checked. Tonight I'll go back and place my links on that profile page.

Anne, I honestly don't think it's been long enough. The first few days of adding links, the "Google Dance" is VERY evident, but it can also affect your rankings over the course of the next few weeks. I know the thread is very long, but if you were to read through it, you'd see that several folks faced this same thing. They were quite discouraged and didn't think the links were working for them. A few weeks later, just out of the blue, they thought about checking their rankings again. Most of them found their sites or articles or whatever in VERY high positions in Google.

Remember, the Google bot doesn't crawl all the sites at the same time, and it almost always "dances" when it sees brand new links; regardless of how they got there. Give it a bit more time and then let me know how it's doing.

[Angela V. Edwards]

Originally Posted by gmr324

Angela and Paul,

I have a question about the need for "spinning" the profile content across the
different sites. In the interest of being a good neighbor and extending the
lifetime of the profiles, I believe in making the profiles as realistic as possible.
So, I created a 2-3 paragraph fictitious profile which includes my anchor text for
2-3 links which logically fit into the content. This way, the description of the person
makes sense and the anchor text fits seemlessly into it rather than just being
isolated obvious spam.

So, my question has to do with using this method but avoiding the Google
duplicate content filter by just cutting and pasting the same profile text
on every site. Do you believe its necessary to have the profiles be at least
50% different on each backlink site to avoid tripping this filter?

It would seem to be a good practice so Google doesn't see the same text
and just discounts it as something it has seen 100 times before thereby
possibly devaluing the backlinks.

Appreciate your thoughts

George

Google doesn't count this sort of stuff as "duplicate content" and Google themselves even said so.

Duplicate content. There's just something about it. We keep writing about it, and people keep asking about it. In particular, I still hear a lot of webmasters worrying about whether they may have a "duplicate content penalty."


Let's put this to bed once and for all, folks: There's no such thing as a "duplicate content penalty." At least, not in the way most people mean when they say that.

So Duplicate Content is NOT an issue, but let me ask you: how would you go about making each profile "different" when so many of them ask you the same things? They ask your name, where you live, your age, etc. What would you do...create a slightly different "persona" for each profile? Of course not! You wouldn't be expected to by the websites, nor would Google want that. You are you and if you are filling out a profile, it would be best to put information about yourself, unless you are using a "pen name" and in that case, you would still create a "persona" of sorts for the pen name.

[Angela V. Edwards]

Originally Posted by djbory

Who should we trust for the results; the other guys or GOOGLE? After all, GOOGLE is showing its own numbers....Shouldn't they be accurate?

DJBory

I generally tend to take the more conservative number. Google's keyword tool says that people search for the keyword Angela four MILLION times every month. The other keyword tools show 39,000 searches a month for Angela. I am certainly NOT going to count on there being 133,333 searches per day when it's probably closer to the 1300 that the other tools show.

Google's tools seems WAY "out there" as far as numbers go and I am not sure I would count on those numbers, personally. I don't have any real reason for saying that, except that Google's numbers seem a bit on the extreme side of high. :p

[djbory]

Originally Posted by Angela V. Edwards

Google's tools seems WAY "out there" as far as numbers go and I am not sure I would count on those numbers, personally. I don't have any real reason for saying that, except that Google's numbers seem a bit on the extreme side of high. :p

Thanks, Angela.

Does anybody else agree with Angela? What do you guys think are the best keyword research tools? WORDTRAKER is giving me very weird results...

djbory

[Steven Carl Kelly]

Originally Posted by djbory

Thanks, Angela.

Does anybody else agree with Angela? What do you guys think are the best keyword research tools? WORDTRAKER is giving me very weird results...

djbory

I just use my GTEF and it has served me well for a long time. I don't use any paid keyword services.

[traceye]

What do you make of this article on the official google webmaster blog about the rise of profile spam:

Official Google Webmaster Central Blog: Spam2.0: Fake user accounts and spam profiles

Just thought it was interesting.

t

[4morereferrals]

Ohhhh no ...

Round 1 - Spammers for the win

Round 2 - webamaster go for the block

Round 3 - spammers do an end around

Round "infiniti" <----- it will still be being battled out.

For every measure a counter-measure.

Originally Posted by traceye

What do you make of this article on the official google webmaster blog about the rise of profile spam:

Official Google Webmaster Central Blog: Spam2.0: Fake user accounts and spam profiles

Just thought it was interesting.

t

[AlbertF]

@djbory, if you are ranked 1, you aren't technique ranked one in every of Google's databases. If you see that in the external Google keyword that it is getting lets say 6,000 searches, this is all the searches with all the databases combined. So, although if someone searched the keyword up near your location, somewhere else, it may be different.

The more you dominate for the keyword, the more databases you will rank first for that particular keyword world wide.

[nobluff]

Originally Posted by Angela V. Edwards

I generally tend to take the more conservative number. Google's keyword tool says that people search for the keyword Angela four MILLION times every month. The other keyword tools show 39,000 searches a month for Angela. I am certainly NOT going to count on there being 133,333 searches per day when it's probably closer to the 1300 that the other tools show.

Google's tools seems WAY "out there" as far as numbers go and I am not sure I would count on those numbers, personally. I don't have any real reason for saying that, except that Google's numbers seem a bit on the extreme side of high. :p

Well Angela, how many searches a month do you get for your name?

[Angela V. Edwards]

Originally Posted by nobluff

Well Angela, how many searches a month do you get for your name?

Well, that's what I am trying to determine. Based on the visitors coming from Google, it's nowhere near the 4 MILLION a month that Google says it is; although I am in the number 2 spot, I'd still get a pretty healthy 15,000 clicks a day, according to these click through rates. But I don't get anywhere near that amount of clicks; although being in the number 2 spot is getting me some pretty healthy traffic.

[Angela V. Edwards]

Originally Posted by traceye

What do you make of this article on the official google webmaster blog about the rise of profile spam:

Official Google Webmaster Central Blog: Spam2.0: Fake user accounts and spam profiles

Just thought it was interesting.

t

It IS interesting and it underscores the fact that we should be "good neighbors" instead of spamming a bunch of links on the sites. Steve's response below yours makes a ton of sense as well.

[Angela V. Edwards]

There's absolutely NO WAY all my sites are hosted on the same IP address. No way. I find these sites all over the Internet, using various methods. They come from EVERYWHERE and from many, many different niches.

Dozens and dozens of people have reported being on Page One (many of them in the number ONE spot); some for as long 6 months to a year. The keywords and search terms they are ranking for vary from very low competition to SUPER high competition. There are dozens of testimonials right on my thread.

You would have to show me hard, tangible evidence that "90% of my links come from the same IP address" for me to believe that can even possibly be true. I've already given out 330 links; you're saying that 297 of them are from the same IP address? Uh oh. No way. I just found three more great sites in the last HOUR for upcoming packets that have NOTHING whatsoever to do with one another. Absolutely nothing. They are not on same domain, not in the same niche, they don't share the same host, none of that stuff. How can they possibly be "all from the same IP address"?

This is just plain wrong.

And what about Paul's links? He uses the same methods I do for finding links and he gives out 120 of them every month. Are you going to say that the majority of HIS sites are all from the same IP address, too?

[Saidar]

Originally Posted by Angela V. Edwards

It IS interesting and it underscores the fact that we should be "good neighbors" instead of spamming a bunch of links on the sites. Steve's response below yours makes a ton of sense as well.

It is a bit difficult to look like a "good neighbour" if your intention is to leave links and never come back.

This profile spamming is going to be a big issue in the future, the days of free quality links are numbered!

[Angela V. Edwards]

Originally Posted by Saidar

It is a bit difficult to look like a "good neighbour" if your intention is to leave links and never come back.

This profile spamming is going to be a big issue in the future, the days of free quality links are numbered!

I simply show people the sites every month. I never said that I leave a link and never come back; some of those sites are really cool. Other people have found the same thing with many of the sites; a lot of people are using the sites in the packets quite often.

Because people signing up on sites and not visiting the sites again is pretty common for MANY reasons: a high school kid might be out of school for the summer, a family lost their internet access, a computer crashed, the person forgot about the site, the person went on an African Safari and there is no Internet Access where they are, etc, it is going to be VERY hard for any Search Engine, including Google, to judge whether a link on a profile was simply "profile spam" or if it was put there for another reason. If anyone is going to be cracking down on this, it's going to be the website owners themselves.

Google wouldn't have published that blog entry if they had a simple way to judge this and take care of it; they published that blog entry for PEOPLE to read because they need PEOPLE to stop the "profile spamming" (just like they need people to report Paid Links). You don't read blog entries about stuff that Google can simply write into their algorithm. Don't forget that.

Also, remember this whole "profile thing" came about because of the spammers in the first place. If I could add blogs and forums and news stories and people would handle them correctly, we wouldn't be having this conversation about the future of "profile links". But just like Social Bookmarking, which is still strong two full YEARS after people said it was going to die, I think that decent profiles with links left in them in a respectful manner are going to be strong for a good long time to come.

[pj413]

Originally Posted by George Dube

The sad truth about Angela's Backlinks packages.

This has been a long time coming, and here's my misgivings about Angela's strategy for backlinks.

According to Google, if you post multiple backlinlks to sites hosted on one server (IP), then all those links amount to nought, and only one link will be credited towards your site.

After using Angela's packets for some time now, I am noticing a trend, thanks to a Firefox plugin that shows you the IP of the site you're visiting on the spot.

SEO Elite also has the ability of showing you the IP addresses where your backlinks are coming from.

Now, back to the story, about 90% of all sites Angela is providing are hosted on the same IP address... making the whole backlinks process redundant and a real waste of time. (Sorry Angela).

As for the graphic on this post showing the term "weight loss plr" being 2nd on Google.. this is a Bum Marketing method.. that search term has no real searches per month.. over a period of about 6 months, only 520 people searched for that term and, if you use the quotation marks as I have done above to search for the term in Google, you get only 2000 competing websites for the term.

Of course you're bound to land on page 1 of Google.. there is no real competition for the term, it's a natural progression and well documented in the Bum Marketing method.

So, take this with a pinch of salt... I love backlinks, but spending my time posting all my links to the same IP address to me, is tantamount to suicide.

Thank you...

Wow, you really need to do your homework before posting a reply like this, as it is clear that you don’t know what you’re talking about. I’ve been using Angela’s links from day one, and I assure you that they are not from the same IP address, and that they work extremely well.

And regarding search terms, just read through all 39 pages of Angela’s WSO, and you’ll find out that there are literally dozens of people ranking on the first page for their very competitive keywords.

[Doug D]

2 Things: 1st.- George, your either full of shit or you need to put your glasses on.
I know the importance of domain diversity for ones incoming links. I also, out of habit...look at a lot of stuff when I'm getting links or just surfing. I've got the whole gamut in my browser. domain age, PR, incoming links, monthly uniques, and yes, I.P.'s too. It's just a habit I picked up. I can say with 100% certainty that at least 95% of Ang's sites are on different I.P.'s. Let me rephrase- at least 95% are on different I.P. blocks. I don't know what your smoking chief? Maybe your looking at your own I.P. every time you visit one of the sites?
Everyone else, disregard the notion that these sites are on the same I.P.'s., they just aren't...period!
I will say this though-- I did email Paul last month...because he had quite a few sites that had very little traffic. I'm talking several thousand uniques a month. The only reason I brought it to his attention is because its probably not the greatest idea...to have an extra few hundred people visiting a site over a couple days....when that site is used to maybe 100 or so visitors a day. And I did see a couple here or there that were on the same I.P. block, but I could care less about a few redundancies over 120 sites. What the hell was the 2nd thing..........now I forgot? Oh yes!.................
I wanted to say this last batch from Paul, I found several sites that I thought were very cool....and I will be going back to them. I liked the video email one, don't know if anyone else thought that was cool, but I liked it.
Doug

[Sam101]

Originally Posted by AlbertF

@djbory, if you are ranked 1, you aren't technique ranked one in every of Google's databases. If you see that in the external Google keyword that it is getting lets say 6,000 searches, this is all the searches with all the databases combined. So, although if someone searched the keyword up near your location, somewhere else, it may be different.

The more you dominate for the keyword, the more databases you will rank first for that particular keyword world wide.

To know your ranking in many of Google's global sites, just install a Firefox Plugin called Google Global. Then you can see your rankings for each KW in Google US, Google UK, Australia, etc to see the different ranks that your site gets in each country.