Sorry, but this is NOT free speech

3 replies
  • OFF TOPIC
  • |
Judge: Animal snuff films protected by 1st Amendment

Talking about committing these crimes may well be free speech. Actually committing the crimes is not. Action ≠ Speech (and vice versa).

It boils my blood to think there are such sick, twisted fvckwits wandering the Earth, and makes it boil even further knowing that there is an even sicker twisted fvckwit on the bench defending them.

All of them should be made to experience what the animals endured.

(The sentence in blue is speech, not action).
  • Profile picture of the author KimW
    Tomorrows headline should read Federal Judge removed from Bench.
    Killing anything is not protected by the 1st amendment.
    Signature

    Read A Post.
    Subscribe to a Newsletter
    KimWinfrey.Com

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7996208].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author HeySal
    Which judge was that - we need to let EVERYONE on the planet know who they are and let them sweat that nobody is planning on exercising their "freedom of speech" on his vicious, twisted ass.
    Signature

    Sal
    When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
    Beyond the Path

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7996325].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author bizgrower
    This is the Judge:
    Sim Lake - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    Presided over some of the Enron case as well.

    I don't get why they were not fully prosecuted
    for all possible animal cruelty charges, separate from
    the filming, and now watched like Dahmer types should be.

    Dan
    Signature

    "If you think you're the smartest person in the room, then you're probably in the wrong room."

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7996463].message }}

Trending Topics