What's your highest converting traffic source except Adwords, Bing and Facebook?

This are some alternatives to Google, FB and Bing you can try:

Bing.com
7Search.com
Bidvertiser.com
Taboola.com
SiteScout.com
Amazon Sponsored Products
Clicksor.com
Web.BlogAds.com
Udimi.com
BuySellAds.com
Craiglist.com
Backpage.com
OLX.com

Google would be the most expensive traffic source, you might need to use Bing and Facebook to replace it instead.

Other than that, not really know of any traffic source that is cheap...

You might a need to know how much you willing to spend on each visitor coming to your website, maybe,

Start with an ads budget of $5 and keep testing with different techniques to achieve the lowest cost with the most click + quality possible?

btw... If you have great success using those past traffic souces... Definitely go ahead and keep using them, and test with something new until you have enough resources such as finding your best marketing strategy on each advertising platform.

- Louis

Thank you for your replies. I think the list you provided is very good. However, I have also made some tests on most of these networks in the past with not so good results. Probably I need to deep into them and make a better research on how to use these ad networks you mentioned. Any tips for them would be highly appreciated.

Hi,

Had experience with BuySellAds. They have been very good and can be targeted. You can spend a tenner for a month or a few hundred.

I personally live PPV networks such as PropelMedia(Trafficvance) or 50onRed...

Plenty of Fish (this works for non-dating niches too)
BlogAds
Direct media buys from websites (sponsored posts, etc...)
Buy Sell Ads

What type of offers are you promoting?

I heavily promote PPL (pay per lead) offers.

I drive traffic by acquiring data (email).The reason why I choose this route is because I'm building ssets that I then ownand canmarket to them over and over at low cost. Compared to what most marketers do, which is to pay for traffic that often just ends up generating a bunch of clicks and poor conversions. Unless they are optimizing and using a proven funnel.

Whereby having data, you then essentially own the traffic and can basically generate it on demand. However, as I mentioned, I mainly promote PPL offers and that's because it works best when monetizing data. Which completly comes down to the fact that with PPL offers, there is credit card/ purchase required. All user has to do is fill out a form, so conversion rates are typically much higher than offers that require you to make a sale.

I purchase fresh / targeted data, in that I know what the users are interested in and that there is a PPL offer that matches their interest.

I generate real-time co-reg that targets specific PPL offers.

I buy aged / domain targeted data, however this is a bit more complex and requires additional tools / resources to do profitably.

Last but not least, I develop rev-share deals with individual companies and data companies. Which is fesh / targeted data that you get for $0 upfront cost and then split the revenue generated from it, with the list owners.

Basically, I monetize data using PPL offers, because they offer the path of least resistance to generating conversions and converting the data to cash producing assets.

So if you are trying to promote a single business or product, the above will likely not be as effective. But with PPL offers, it can be extremely profitable!

Anyway, depending on what offer you run, it may be something you want to think about.

When it come to traffic, I think you pay more for quality. Google, Bing and Facebook cost more than other sources because they have more traffic and can target it efficiently and effectively. Other sources may have lots of traffic, but it may not be as high quality or as focused.

What I would suggest OP, is that even if the traffic in your niches is expensive on the big three providers, they are probably providing the best converting traffic. I would run camapigns on them and on another source and compare you ROI and your CPA. You may be suprised. Sometimes it is better to pay more for a lot less traffic than a small amoun t for lots of worse traffic.