14 {{ upvoteCount | shortNum }}
14 {{ upvoteCount | shortNum }}

PPV - 2 strategies. Which one is good?

by Pava
11 replies
I'm confused.

1. Only high traffic sources (urls, keys) that give you 100-5000 views/day. And try to build high CTR landing pages based on these sources + rotate many offers.
2. 1000-10000 of tiny traffic urls (keys), that give about 5-10 views/day, and general landing, some rotation, a couple of offers.

Which method is the best?

p.s. I'm a seo guy. And I know that good money come from a lot of low competition long tailed keywords, so I was trying to put this method on PPV, but this involves endless testing.
#good #ppv #strategies
  • Profile picture of the author Pava
    More votes please))
    Signature
    Search in HTML source code - a great tool for affiliate marketers
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6765096].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Jacob Lot
    I have used 1 to make a lot of money.

    In the long run 1 is more work (IMHO) but it is well worth the ROI you see by popping on pages that are very similar to your lander.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6765335].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author dimager2003
      Off course the first method, do you know how much money will take to find out which convert and which not.

      let's take for example a small medium payout offer - 4.15$ for example.
      4.15$ X 1000 urls = 4150$.

      And when it comes to CPA, you can't even be sure this offer won't expire soon so you must breakthrough and scale up as fast as possible!
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6772272].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author ChrisBa
    If you can find the high views for cheap enough obviously that's the easier route, however when scaling you can often find targets that get less traffic but are dirt cheap, and they will add up
    Signature
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6773895].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author w3bTools
    Depends on your marketing strategy, if your lander is offer optimized then go with long tailed targets. If your lander is target optimized then you can go with high traffic targets.
    Signature
    BlaCkPoPs.com [WSO] -Members Only PPV Spy Center LANDERS, LANDERS, & More LANDERS!
    ~~ Tips, Scripts, Guides, Tools 1-on-1 Support & MORE ~~


    OfferWarrior.com     -Advanced campaign management w/SMART Offer Rotation ~TRY IT FREE~
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6785011].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Greedy
    #1 first #2 after...

    #1 when start out. Since you have less URLs it is cheaper to test each URL to see what converts. See what dimager2003 said.

    #2 once you have a converting campaign, and you have optimized it so almost anything you throw at it converts. Because once its making good money you can take the time and spend money testing it.
    Signature
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6787931].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author wladimir
      @Greedy - +1 for your nick. This is the word which explains absolutely everything
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6789260].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author bsbear
    Always high-quality over more quantity, in my opinion.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6789337].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author bighunter
    the first method
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6790262].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author MikeMorgan
    I would prefer to go with option number 1 .

    But , the only problem is that you are going to need , huge budget for testing , if the URLs that you are focusing are targeted to wide audience .
    Signature
    CPA Game Changer - Coming Very Soon !

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6800815].message }}

Trending Topics