Fact-checking: Get your facts right

by WarriorForum.com Administrator
20 replies


In the last decade or so, the concept of "fake news" has become a major thorn in the side of consumers and content writers alike. Digital marketing experts who write SEO content at the enterprise level might not consider themselves journalists or news reporters - but there's a greater overlap between the roles than many people realize.

Like journos, enterprise SEO content writers need to earn the trust of their audience by demonstrating authority, relevance, and experience. And while you might think that, as a content marketing specialist, the only person you're serving is your client or employer, the truth is that good SEO content provides just as much service to consumers.

You're not just advertising to people; you're helping them find answers, information, and solutions to their problems. That's why, for SEO content writers, getting the facts right is crucial. "Fake news" has eroded a lot of people's trust in media. Online content, in particular, is always fighting an uphill battle due to the oversaturation of the digital space - and the sheer amount of misinformation that finds its way into blogs and social media sites with little quality control.

Today, fact-checking is arguably more important than ever before. One little mistake is all it takes to lose a consumer's trust forever. But what does it mean to get your facts right? Is it just ensuring every name is spelled correctly, and every claim has an attributed source?

Both of these things are an important part of SEO fact-checking, but they're only a small piece of a large puzzle. Fun fact: Even when consumers don't know you're lying, Google does.

Web pages with deceptive, inaccurate, or poorly vetted content are penalized and less likely to appear in search results. Want to avoid the wrath of the almighty algorithm? Here's what you need to do:

Get the basics right

A few paragraphs back, I mentioned that fact-checking isn't limited to correctly writing people's names, ages, positions, and pronouns. Nevertheless, getting the basics right is still important. If you can't do at least that much, then you won't be prepared to do more in-depth fact-checking. It's especially important to get this information right when you're quoting multiple people.

Not only do you need to attribute quotes and ideas to the proper sources, but you also have to make sure the information they shared with you is accurately reproduced.

Double check everything

If you get a quote from someone that says the sky is blue, go outside and look up, just to be sure. Okay, that might be an exaggerated example - but you get the point. Double and triple-check everything.

If you find a useful quote or statistic online, track down the original source. See if you can find other reliable web pages with the same information. Don't be afraid to do a little research yourself. Crunch the numbers and try to find corroborating evidence. Never take anything at face value.

Go to the source

Speaking of tracking down the sources of stats and quotes: That's a cornerstone of fact-checking so important, it merits expanding on now. Have you ever had a teacher or professor tell you, in no uncertain terms, never to use Wikipedia as a source?

Well, that's just as true when writing enterprise-level SEO content. Wikipedia might be useful in pointing you toward helpful sources, but it shouldn't be your primary text. Nor should any second-hand source. If another web page states something as a fact, confirm where it got that fact If it's a disreputable source and you parrot it, then you become a disreputable source, too.

Understand the information

Content writing - especially at the enterprise level and especially in an agency (rather than in-house PR team) context - often requires authors to cover many different areas of expertise in many different industries. It can be tempting to regurgitate and plagiarize information that already exists, but if you do that, you won't be able to offer any meaningful insights.

You have to understand the information you're relaying. That will help you spot contradictions and factual errors and demonstrate genuine authority.

What are your own fact-checking methods?

It's so important, but how do you ensure what you produce is accurate? Google frowns so hard on incorrect information these days that not keeping your content in check can be extremely costly!

I'd love to hear about your own approaches to this. But remember - keep it factual!
#factchecking #facts
  • Profile picture of the author WD Mino
    In a day of perpetual conspiracy theories and nonsensical information....

    You can use some sites like snopes.com to verify some things.

    I could tell you there's a guaranteed formula that will make you over 1 million dollars in one year. Truth. not attainable but if you have someone give you a penny a day double every day for a year voila. That's a fact.
    Facts by themselves don't give the picture but it is best to know what the heck you are talking about.
    Signature

    "As a man thinks in his heart so is he-Proverbs 23:7"

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[11729736].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Kay King
    It's not only fake facts that will lead you down the path of misinformation....so many articles online are based only the facts that SUIT the story....leaving out the facts that don't fit.


    These are the sites that say 'everything we publish is the truth' ...when in reality they don't publish everything that IS the truth. I find that more common online than outright lies.
    Signature
    Saving one dog will not change the world - but the world changes forever for that one dog
    ***
    2024 Patriot's Award for Service to Veterans
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[11729738].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author socialentry
      Originally Posted by Kay King View Post

      It's not only fake facts that will lead you down the path of misinformation....so many articles online are based only the facts that SUIT the story....leaving out the facts that don't fit.


      These are the sites that say 'everything we publish is the truth' ...when in reality they don't publish everything that IS the truth. I find that more common online than outright lies.

      u jelly ?
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[11730052].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author WF- Enzo
        Administrator
        ?????????????????

        Originally Posted by socialentry View Post

        u jelly ?
        Signature
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[11730080].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author RMRC
      I agree about this 100%
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[11731698].message }}
  • Worstest evah stuff is ... real trooth you cain't face.

    As an IRL Princess, natchrlly my hayer sposed to GLOW WITH HEAVENLY RADIANCE.

    Prahblem is, fkr looks an' feels like rats runnin' rampant ovah it 24/7.

    So our first porta call is sum kinda trooth, else'n we nuthin'.

    Mom says I could dredge rivahs for the dead with muh hayer.

    *sob*

    *snort*

    *honk*

    An' it is troo!

    Tellya, nowan else knows the soul-destroyin' sorrow of bein' a 99.9% adorable person like I do!

    Hey, but what violence it is always to shit yusself.

    Gotta want out of all crap you can.

    Bcs what else is it anyways?

    You wanna become mastah (whore mistress) of nowan else's crap?

    The frick the pointa THAT, zackly?

    Is it true you're a natural Sagittarius, O Princess --

    so full of wisdom

    you could light beacons on your titties

    and resist all accusation of Pornoing out?

    K. 'Tis Moi.
    Signature

    Lightin' fuses is for blowin' stuff togethah.

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[11729775].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Artkantos
    I will add: Don't trust "fact-checkers", more often than not they have conflicts of interest and therefore are biased to support a narrative and not necessarily the truth or the facts.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[11729786].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Troy Arrandale
      Originally Posted by Artkantos View Post

      I will add: Don't trust "fact-checkers", more often than not they have conflicts of interest and therefore are biased to support a narrative and not necessarily the truth or the facts.
      Interesting.

      You just taught me something.

      Thankyou!
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[11733696].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Marioluis
    thanks bro..... ☻
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[11730000].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author skgeorge
    Hiring industry experts to write content is the only way to avoid fake content. Some SEOs fall into the trap of hiring content writers who do not know the niche.

    Example: medical blogs. Those who do not have a recognized medical qualification must not write content for a medical blog.

    The same rule applies to other industries too.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[11730010].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author timberland
    Banned
    [DELETED]
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[11730016].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Artkantos
    Expert is such a buzzword...how do you distinguish a real expert from someone who is just a facade if you don't know anything or enough about a certain topic?
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[11730047].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Claude Whitacre
      Originally Posted by Artkantos View Post

      Expert is such a buzzword...how do you distinguish a real expert from someone who is just a facade if you don't know anything or enough about a certain topic?
      It's possible for a fake expert to fool individuals for a time. The problem is, there are other experts.

      For example, here on this forum, fake experts are exposed pretty darn quick. But these are people that know they are fakes.

      And then there are experts on irrational subjects. I won't list them, but these are subjects that you can know quite a lot about, and yet nothing you know is true. Completely sincere intelligent people who have written volumes on something that's just not true.

      A safe (meaning I won't offend anyone) example is the belief that there are civilizations on Mars. This was a firm belief until the beginning of this past century. The telescopes saw the lines on Mars' surface, and they were interpreted as canals. So it was assumed that there was lush vegetation, water, life and technology.

      And there were experts that could talk about this intelligently for hours. Respected people of science who were knowledgeable about something that wasn't true at all.

      I was alive when it was firmly believed that our galaxy was the entire universe. Expert astronomers just couldn't see that most of the stars they were looking at were actually other galaxies. Experts on something that isn't true.

      Like being an expert on Sherlock Holmes. Having a vast amount of knowledge on something that doesn't exist.
      Signature
      One Call Closing book https://www.amazon.com/One-Call-Clos...=1527788418&sr

      “Do not seek to follow in the footsteps of the wise; seek what they sought.” - Matsuo Basho
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[11730172].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author WayCoolJr
        Originally Posted by Claude Whitacre View Post

        A safe (meaning I won't offend anyone) example is the belief that there are civilizations on Mars. This was a firm belief until the beginning of this past century. The telescopes saw the lines on Mars' surface, and they were interpreted as canals. So it was assumed that there was lush vegetation, water, life and technology.

        And there were experts that could talk about this intelligently for hours. Respected people of science who were knowledgeable about something that wasn't true at all.
        Very interesting...I learned something new today...thank you!
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[11737124].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author RMRC
      I think often times people forget that you can have 2 experts in the same field that disagree. The question then becomes who is supporting the current narrative? Because that's the one they will give a platform through which to voice their opinion, while they ignore and bury the other expert. This is why open debate is so necessary in this day and age. I myself like to seek out and hear both sides, but sadly most times I find it's the expert they are trying to silence that has the most reasonable and well researched take.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[11731699].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Artkantos
        Originally Posted by RMRC View Post

        I think often times people forget that you can have 2 experts in the same field that disagree. The question then becomes who is supporting the current narrative? Because that's the one they will give a platform through which to voice their opinion, while they ignore and bury the other expert. This is why open debate is so necessary in this day and age. I myself like to seek out and hear both sides, but sadly most times I find it's the expert they are trying to silence that has the most reasonable and well researched take.
        Yeah, unfortunately for the vast majority of the population "perception" is the reality (And sadly based 90% or more on sensationalism) ...I'll say more, you can have 100 experts saying A and 1 saying B, and B can be closer to the truth than the other 100, the consensus is not the truth. This is a tricky topic I must say
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[11731777].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author socialentry
    can i haz 1 trillion terabyte to store all the truth int he universe
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[11730076].message }}
  • Make Zact.

    Reads like an appendix to muh las' post, but I see now this shoulda been the headline.

    Sadly, you gotta scroll BACK now steada forwards to see whethah this troo or naht.

    Your effort, naht mine.


    Bcs libraries fulla more wisdahm than soothsayers genrlly.

    Or, mebbe you disagree ...?


    Consult evry catalog till'n you packs
    non-visible pantyline
    beneath yuh slacks


    Want more Aphorisms From Beyond The Inevitable?
    Ain't happnin' anytime soon, Sweetiepoppet.
    So RELAX.
    Signature

    Lightin' fuses is for blowin' stuff togethah.

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[11730140].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Balanceaccs
    thanks bro.....
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[11731182].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author socialentry
    Originally Posted by WarriorForum.com View Post



    In the last decade or so, the concept of "fake news" has become a major thorn in the side of consumers and content writers alike. Digital marketing experts who write SEO content at the enterprise level might not consider themselves journalists or news reporters - but there's a greater overlap between the roles than many people realize.

    Like journos, enterprise SEO content writers need to earn the trust of their audience by demonstrating authority, relevance, and experience. And while you might think that, as a content marketing specialist, the only person you're serving is your client or employer, the truth is that good SEO content provides just as much service to consumers.

    You're not just advertising to people; you're helping them find answers, information, and solutions to their problems. That's why, for SEO content writers, getting the facts right is crucial. "Fake news" has eroded a lot of people's trust in media. Online content, in particular, is always fighting an uphill battle due to the oversaturation of the digital space - and the sheer amount of misinformation that finds its way into blogs and social media sites with little quality control.

    Today, fact-checking is arguably more important than ever before. One little mistake is all it takes to lose a consumer's trust forever. But what does it mean to get your facts right? Is it just ensuring every name is spelled correctly, and every claim has an attributed source?

    Both of these things are an important part of SEO fact-checking, but they're only a small piece of a large puzzle. Fun fact: Even when consumers don't know you're lying, Google does.

    Web pages with deceptive, inaccurate, or poorly vetted content are penalized and less likely to appear in search results. Want to avoid the wrath of the almighty algorithm? Here's what you need to do:

    Get the basics right

    A few paragraphs back, I mentioned that fact-checking isn't limited to correctly writing people's names, ages, positions, and pronouns. Nevertheless, getting the basics right is still important. If you can't do at least that much, then you won't be prepared to do more in-depth fact-checking. It's especially important to get this information right when you're quoting multiple people.

    Not only do you need to attribute quotes and ideas to the proper sources, but you also have to make sure the information they shared with you is accurately reproduced.

    Double check everything

    If you get a quote from someone that says the sky is blue, go outside and look up, just to be sure. Okay, that might be an exaggerated example - but you get the point. Double and triple-check everything.

    If you find a useful quote or statistic online, track down the original source. See if you can find other reliable web pages with the same information. Don't be afraid to do a little research yourself. Crunch the numbers and try to find corroborating evidence. Never take anything at face value.

    Go to the source

    Speaking of tracking down the sources of stats and quotes: That's a cornerstone of fact-checking so important, it merits expanding on now. Have you ever had a teacher or professor tell you, in no uncertain terms, never to use Wikipedia as a source?

    Well, that's just as true when writing enterprise-level SEO content. Wikipedia might be useful in pointing you toward helpful sources, but it shouldn't be your primary text. Nor should any second-hand source. If another web page states something as a fact, confirm where it got that fact If it's a disreputable source and you parrot it, then you become a disreputable source, too.

    Understand the information

    Content writing - especially at the enterprise level and especially in an agency (rather than in-house PR team) context - often requires authors to cover many different areas of expertise in many different industries. It can be tempting to regurgitate and plagiarize information that already exists, but if you do that, you won't be able to offer any meaningful insights.

    You have to understand the information you're relaying. That will help you spot contradictions and factual errors and demonstrate genuine authority.

    What are your own fact-checking methods?

    It's so important, but how do you ensure what you produce is accurate? Google frowns so hard on incorrect information these days that not keeping your content in check can be extremely costly!

    I'd love to hear about your own approaches to this. But remember - keep it factual!

    pffft. ur one to talk.



    hav u seen the # of conspiracy theorists and ersatz religions on the wf.

    police ur own backyard first.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[11732983].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Artkantos
      Originally Posted by socialentry View Post

      pffft. ur one to talk.



      hav u seen the # of conspiracy theorists and ersatz religions on the wf.

      police ur own backyard first.
      "Conspiracy theory" is another buzzword amigo, I agree many conspiracy theories are plain bs, but some mainstream explanations and "news" are bs too, no one owns the absolute truth, free speech is desirable and one's discernment and critical thinking skills must do the rest.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[11733056].message }}

Trending Topics