Being The "Guru"
It's good to sell info and be an authority on something you know you're the best at, but if you're not good at something, no point pretending just because you want to be like your guru/mentor. No point. I know we look at people like Frank Kern, John Reese etc and want to be rich like them. That's ok but bare in mind their success as being "gurus" wasn't straight forward, it wasn't like they slapped together a few ebooks and made millions. No. They actually spent many years trying and testing, failing and succeeding before actually writing info products on their success. They were actually very successfull and making money before they wrote their successful info products. They have huge experience in internet marketing.
Being the guru won't make you long term money and here's why. Even if you come up with the next big product and have a fantastic launch, sooner or later sales will start to decline. Even if you have 100s of affiliates for it, they'll move onto the next big thing before you know it. In order to keep money coming in you'll need to keep coming up with more products. Do you really think you can keep coming up with killer products everytime, and do we really need sub-standard ones? And I'm going to say something controversial here... Do you really think you can rely on your list forever?
Warrior Forum has tons of info on ways to make money online without you having to be a guru. If you follow a few of them, scale them up, outsource the tedious tasks, you can expect a good income which will keep growing with time. Sometimes very quickly and steeply too. Less work, more money, all without being noticed.
Thanks,
Adam
Fair warning: It's possible I'm arguing with you because I have nothing better to do.
Join my free copywriting group on Facebook: http://CultOfCopy.com