Method to compose "unique" article to Google - Do this work?

14 replies
Please correct me if I'm wrong, as I'm just a newbie.

As far as I know, after we have submitted an article to one article directory (like EZA), submitting the same article to other article directories may help traffice but will NOT help on building backlink, as Google just treat it as a duplicated article. If we want another quality backlink from the same article, we need to rewrite it before submitting to other article directories. If we submit it to 10 article directories, there will not be 10 quality backlink, unless we rewrite it to 10 versions.

Since rewriting can be a pain, I heard from somewhere about this approach. Could anyone tell me if it works or not?

1. Say the article has 5 paragraph. Let's represent it as "AAAAA", each "A" represent a paragraph of this article

2. Rewrite the article. Now we have the second version, represent it as "BBBBB"

3. A third version can be made by "BAAAB", just replace the first and last paragraph, and ensure the fluency so it is readable and does provide value. It is said that Google will treat it as new article if it is 30% unique, so the backlink count. (does this work?)

4. A fourth version can be made by "ABBBA". More versions can be generated similarly...

Could someone kindly give comment on whether it works or not? Thanks so much.
#article #compose #google #method #unique #work
  • Profile picture of the author jbode
    No, there is no duplicate content penalty unless you are submitting the same content to the same exact site.

    Each site is composed a little bit differently (source code) making the web page a different page which will still give you a backlink. Most likely one backlink will be better than the other, but that isn't due to the article you submit, it's usually due to the site you submit the article to.

    There is no duplicate content penalty!

    I've had numerous different sites with the exact same article rank on the first page of Google.

    Trust me I'm not the only one who has seen this happen to them.

    If you are still concerned change the first few sentences.
    Also unique content is good from a visitor perspective.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[343506].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author The Oilman
      The rule of thumb that I have heard is this:

      Google cannot penalize anyone for anything that a competitor could do to them.

      So lets say I wanted to bring down a guy in my niche. If there really WAS a dupe content penalty, I could point a bunch of dupe articles at his site.


      I do believe, however, that dupe articles do not equal strong backlinks.

      Google can certainly see they're from dupe content, and not give you nearly the reward you'd get for unique content.

      Anyone agree disagree with this?
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[343518].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author TheRichJerksNet
    Originally Posted by archonhawk View Post

    Please correct me if I'm wrong, as I'm just a newbie.

    As far as I know, after we have submitted an article to one article directory (like EZA), submitting the same article to other article directories may help traffice but will NOT help on building backlink, as Google just treat it as a duplicated article. If we want another quality backlink from the same article, we need to rewrite it before submitting to other article directories. If we submit it to 10 article directories, there will not be 10 quality backlink, unless we rewrite it to 10 versions.

    Since rewriting can be a pain, I heard from somewhere about this approach. Could anyone tell me if it works or not?

    1. Say the article has 5 paragraph. Let's represent it as "AAAAA", each "A" represent a paragraph of this article

    2. Rewrite the article. Now we have the second version, represent it as "BBBBB"

    3. A third version can be made by "BAAAB", just replace the first and last paragraph, and ensure the fluency so it is readable and does provide value. It is said that Google will treat it as new article if it is 30% unique, so the backlink count. (does this work?)

    4. A fourth version can be made by "ABBBA". More versions can be generated similarly...

    Could someone kindly give comment on whether it works or not? Thanks so much.
    This is the exact reason I made the product I have in WSO right now. Check it out because I will be pulling the offer in less than 36 hours..

    It is "Smart" marketing to submit different versions even if the Dup Content thing does not exist.

    What many fail to realize that preach about dup content penalty does not exist is this..

    * By submitting different versions of the article you can infact increase your keyword awareness and thus infact effect your listings.

    * Having different versions will make publishers more opt to pickup your article and re-publish it in their blogs and etc. Nobody wants the same content as joe blow has and this includes publishers.

    * Having different versions allows you to get different opinions accross without writing a very long article. Doing so can make you be seen as more of an expert on the subject.

    There are other reasons why different versions are of benefit to you but obviously I can't give away all the secrets This is one reason why I have built Article Productions.

    Bottom line though is -- It is very smart marketing to think out-side the box and not follow the crowd because using different versions of an article does infact have huge benefits.

    James
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[343547].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author archonhawk
      Thanks for all your replies. So I suppose for the method I mentioned to create the 3rd, 4th, and more versions of the articles can work without problem right?
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[343577].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author TheRichJerksNet
        Originally Posted by archonhawk View Post

        Thanks for all your replies. So I suppose for the method I mentioned to create the 3rd, 4th, and more versions of the articles can work without problem right?
        Yes that is correct .. My WSO has 50 versions with proof of uniqueness as high as 44% ...

        If you want a website that can do alot of this work for you then look into Article Productions in my signature..

        James
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[343586].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Daniel Deegan
    It's hard to say what the real truth about duplicate content is. I personally prefer to make all content at least somewhat unique. I shoot for around 50-60% which may or may not be over kill. If your looking for programs to spin content, check out Power Article Writer, Website Content Wizard or Content Composer. But as with all spinners, if you put garbage in you'll get garbage out.
    Signature

    ****************************************
    Spy & Track Winning Facebook Ads

    Spy & Track
    Winning Google Content Network Ads
    Spy & Track Winning Bing & Google PPC Search Ads
    â„¢ACP - Click Here For Details
    ****************************************

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[343580].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author GeorgR.
    uhm...google is MORE intelligent than what some people think.

    As a programmer myself i made some experiments, and i did some dupe tests with "scrambled" articles, the articles will still NOT become unique just by re-ordering paragraphs. This would be WAY to "cheap" to fool google.

    Even more advanced techniques like re-arranging text fragments into HTML elements like TABs/DIVs doesnt result in an unique article.

    I think G sees the words and gets an impression about the article, regardless of the order. The only way would be to use synonyms and really to rewrite most of the article.

    Scrambling like ABBA BABAA etc. would (IMHO) only result in marginally "better" article,maybe 10%-15% more "unique"...better than nothing but still FAR from unique and completely rewritten.
    Signature
    *** Affiliate Site Quick --> The Fastest & Easiest Way to Make Affiliate Sites!<--
    -> VISIT www.1UP-SEO.com *** <- Internet Marketing, SEO Tips, Reviews & More!! ***
    *** HIGH QUALITY CONTENT CREATION +++ Manual Article Spinning (Thread Here) ***
    Content Creation, Blogging, Articles, Converting Sales Copy, Reviews, Ebooks, Rewrites
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[343643].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Daniel Deegan
    To add to the quality spinner list I have to add Glenns "Artifact". Which might be a better choice then the other tools I mentioned, since I bet you'll get better support from Glenn and his software will cost your quite abit less...
    Signature

    ****************************************
    Spy & Track Winning Facebook Ads

    Spy & Track
    Winning Google Content Network Ads
    Spy & Track Winning Bing & Google PPC Search Ads
    â„¢ACP - Click Here For Details
    ****************************************

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[343685].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author GeorgR.
    if there is a tool which creates 60% - 90% "uniqueness", the work you have to put in would about equal the work to write a new article from scratch.

    If i rewrite 90% of paragraphs using synonyms, and i mean resulting in a "useful" and humanly readable article..i dont see that much use in using a spinner or software, honestly.

    Makes sense if i shoot for 60%, if i rephrase a parts of it, making it "kind of" unique....but as said, otherwise i could just write a 400 wds article myself from scratch, in the same time i spend using the tool replacing phrases?

    Correct me if i am wrong.
    Signature
    *** Affiliate Site Quick --> The Fastest & Easiest Way to Make Affiliate Sites!<--
    -> VISIT www.1UP-SEO.com *** <- Internet Marketing, SEO Tips, Reviews & More!! ***
    *** HIGH QUALITY CONTENT CREATION +++ Manual Article Spinning (Thread Here) ***
    Content Creation, Blogging, Articles, Converting Sales Copy, Reviews, Ebooks, Rewrites
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[343686].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author TheRichJerksNet
      Originally Posted by GeorgR. View Post

      if there is a tool which creates 60% - 90% "uniqueness", the work you have to put in would about equal the work to write a new article from scratch.

      If i rewrite 90% of paragraphs using synonyms, and i mean resulting in a "useful" and humanly readable article..i dont see that much use in using a spinner or software, honestly.

      Makes sense if i shoot for 60%, if i rephrase a parts of it, making it "kind of" unique....but as said, otherwise i could just write a 400 wds article myself from scratch, in the same time i spend using the tool replacing phrases?

      Correct me if i am wrong.
      No not at all GeorgR.. I can infact spend 4 hours and create 50 unique articles that will infact be 50% - 60% in uniqueness and this is with 700 - 800 word articles.. Yes I can actually post the proof of such but it would reveal a new product I am working on releasing..

      My system does NOT use synonyms or pre-determined database of words of any kind. My system is fully human controlled and it very simple and easy to use...

      There are many huge differences between my system and others though, not only is it 100% human controlled but there are additional powerful tools that you can use along with it and it is all in one spot.

      See my WSO ?? That entire package was created using nothing more than ArticleProductions.com including the PDF Articles. I used no other resources, no editors, no pdf creator, no html editor, Everything was done with ArticleProductions.com members area ...

      As you can see 1200+ word article with a 44% uniqueness, this can be tweaked to get even a higher % too with just 30 minutes of work.

      So you see unlike what many people preach.. done properly article spinners can save a HUGE amount of time and yes the articles can come out fully readable and proper.. Especially when you use proper tools that are full human controlled.

      Who does not want to spend 4 hours to create something that is worth $500+


      James
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[343747].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author GeorgR.
    i still like the thought of using a translator to create unique content from other languages, however...the usual "problems" apply.

    It is the bizarre data scandal of the year: A newspaper Frankfurter should have a Christstollen cleverly get - but two couriers had hunger and exchanged quickly from the packet. So surprised the journalists got thousands of customer records Landesbank Berlin skillfully.

    Even the editor of the "Frankfurter Rundschau", Uwe Vorkötter had once laughed heartily when he was the press release of the Frankfurt public prosecutor's office got. "Data scandal turns out to be a Stollenklau," wrote the investigators on Friday to the media: "A true Christmas story."

    Days, the editors of the "FR" gegrübelt. On 10 December was them by courier a parcel with highly controversial content has been delivered - including 907 microfiches with the credit card billing clients thousands of Landesbank Berlin (LBB). A first-class data scandal, the LBB brought into sharp Erklärungsnot - whose background but remained highly dubious. How did that on the mailing label of the parcel a totally unsuspicious Stuttgart companies appeared as the sender? Of course we had at the company nachgehakt - so we also knew that once originally a Christmas stollen on the way to Frankfurt was sent. But where was the Christstollen abgeblieben? And how were the sensitive banking data in the package arrived?
    Signature
    *** Affiliate Site Quick --> The Fastest & Easiest Way to Make Affiliate Sites!<--
    -> VISIT www.1UP-SEO.com *** <- Internet Marketing, SEO Tips, Reviews & More!! ***
    *** HIGH QUALITY CONTENT CREATION +++ Manual Article Spinning (Thread Here) ***
    Content Creation, Blogging, Articles, Converting Sales Copy, Reviews, Ebooks, Rewrites
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[343699].message }}

Trending Topics