Testing Facebook Groups, solos for .25 cents a click.

10 replies
Hey guys, I've been buildlng some massive facebook groups and testing out things.

One thing that will help you is this. If your a solo buyer then go to a solo group.
Doesn't matter which one just go to one.

Now join it and when you get in post this.

Looking for some fast clicks, I will pay .25 cents a click for 100 clicks.
Message me please, waiting......................

Now wait, in minutes you will get many offers from legit solo ad sellers.
You will get more offers for doing it on weekends when the net is slower, especially Friday and Saturday nights.

I have only went as low as .25 cents, give .20 cents a try and see what happens. You can check them out first before you buy.
#cents #click #facebook #groups #solos
  • Profile picture of the author Dain
    Pretty brilliant. I was thinking about doing this same thing. But to be honest I didn't have the balls to test it since the low end right now is .35.

    Great idea, however saying you want 'fast clicks.' and then throwing out .25.

    Love it.

    Thanks man!
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8460531].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author brutecky
    How is paying $0.25 per click for a solo ad sellers well circulated emails better than paying $0.02 per click for a targeted Facebook ad that links to a squeeze page on your fan page?
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8460541].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author hustlinsmoke
      Maybe you should read the thread, I never said anything was better than anything did I. And there are no .02 cent clicks on facebook automatically you have to earn it and there is no gaurantee and tired of everyone saying one cent two cent clicks on facebook. Cause when you add up the cost of clicks it took you to get down to .02 cents or .01 cents, its not that cheap no more.

      You know it's funny how rages are but if you already knew the rage you know that most of it is not true. Plus there is no guarantee you will even get to .02 cents. I have gotten less than a penny but took me more than that to get to it. You don't automatically get a .02 cent click.
      Originally Posted by brutecky View Post

      How is paying $0.25 per click for a solo ad sellers well circulated emails better than paying $0.02 per click for a targeted Facebook ad that links to a squeeze page on your fan page?
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8460707].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author brutecky
    Wow asked for some info and got a rant instead.

    Sure there is no guarantee that your going to get down to 2 cents a click, but my 10 year old kid can make a Facebook ad that gets clicks for less than $0.25, it seems that paying 25 cents a click for a solo ad that is 1 often trained to expect free stuff, and 2 gets you emails that are on tons of sellers lists and marketed to every day when you can get targeted traffic for less than that price (even if it isnt 2 cents) makes no sense at all. If you are paying more than 25 cents for targeted FB traffic then you are doing something very wrong.

    I had asked for some honest reasons why you seem to think that solo ads are more viable but instead of giving an answer why you think one should pay more per click for solo ads you responded with a rant.

    I have no choice but to assume that its because you have no intelligent answer as to why people should pay more for solo ads when they can get targeted traffic for a lower cost (even if not as low as 2 cents, still lower) thanks for taking the time to answer, your lack of reasons is actually an answer it itself.

    By the way when someone asks someone 'why is A better than B' they are not saying you said something, there asking a question if you are not able to give an answer just say so, no need to get so defensive.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8461695].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author hustlinsmoke
    No valid points on above. What do you have a product teaching people to get two cent clicks on FB or something.

    I can show them how to get a half cent click. If you target Malaysia anything is possible.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8461740].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Vector Graphics
    Well if FB ads were so easy then everyone would be doing them. Solo ads are done by many big marketers for a reason. Lots of solo ad sellers also have a buyers list and getting buyers on your mailing list is much more powerful than getting regular subscribers.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8461846].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author brutecky
    No, "hustlinsmoke" I was asking you to explain to me why you feel solo ads are better. Its obvouse that you have no intention of answering my question but instead want to get defensive and be condescending. Be assured Ill I wont bother you by asking you to explain anything again since you seem to have no desire to assist someone but instead want to be defensive and degrading.
    By the way whats with the 'target Malaysia' silly comment. Really man things you say reek of negativity. Perhaps you should re read my post. Honestly if you cant get targeted FB ads for under a quarter a click then your doing something really wrong. What I was trying to find out was how can solo ads be better than this traffic. But as I said its obvouse that you have no intention on engaging in anything even close to an intelligent conversation on the pros and cons of both of these methods, as such I will refrain from directing messages to you.
    Thanks anyway.

    To PirGraphics, so you are saying that in your experience the extra cost of a solo ad is justified by your perception that it is a 'buyers list'? It was my understanding that many people who do solo ads will only mail to a free offer. How can this be a buyers list if they are getting free offers all the time? I would think that all this does is 'condition' them to expect things for free? Also if you dont mind me asking what kind of conversions have you gotten with lists built from solo ads? Did you not find that these people getting offers daily combined with the solo ads themselves lead to lower than normal conversions? As hustle in his ever cynical mindset failed to comprehend Im not for one method or another Im merely trying to get some info on the pros and cons of both. If you have used both methods I would love to hear your experiences.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8461956].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author hustlinsmoke
    And as I stated in my earlier post. I want you to show me where I said Solo's were better. Like every other wanna be you put words in peoples mouths and talk about stuff that isn't true. Live it, walk it, learn it.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8462345].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Allen Payne
    Why did you have to let this 'secret' out??? J/K

    I do this too every now and then and there are times when the traffic is cr*p but usually I get decent results.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8462719].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author hustlinsmoke
      I don't think most will take advantage of it. Most don't take advantage of tips here. I had to try though.
      Originally Posted by Allen Payne View Post

      Why did you have to let this 'secret' out??? J/K

      I do this too every now and then and there are times when the traffic is cr*p but usually I get decent results.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8462816].message }}

Trending Topics