Is the Warrior Forum (WSO) gonna stay an open marketplace?

157 replies
Hey,

So this is a controversial thread (probably), and while I don't want to get in trouble with the mods here, I have a simple question.

Is the Warrior Forum a free marketplace? I mean a marketplace where you can sell the products that you create, through whatever payment platform that you want? As it always was?

You see, I had humble beginnings like many others here on the Warrior Forum. Big players like Don Wilson, Ben Adkins, EBR, and others started here on this very forum, by launching a product that springboarded a business for them. While, my level of success may not be at their level, I've cleared $xxx,xxx just from what I've learned/sold on this forum.

One of the biggest things that helped me along the way was this idea of an "open marketplace", a place where you could sell your products, get the opinion of your customers, all open and public, so everyone could see what quality products were.

When I first began here, there was very little competition for how to sell your WSO, there was Warrior+ (by the awesome Mike Lantz) and pretty much PayPal buttons. I guess some people used 1SC and other smaller platforms but nothing major.

As time grew on, there grew a need for more technology, and JVZoo (lead by awesome guys Chad, Brian and Bryan!) lead the way with adaptive payments that revolutionized selling through the forum. Other platforms have come and gone along the way.

These payment platforms & the competition they generated created an open marketplace, a marketplace with fair competition, where Warrior+ and JVZOO (as well as others) fought with a better USP (Unique Service Propostion) and awesome deals.

Now... Let's say things had gone the way that Allen once said (a quote from WarriorPlus.com), that he was thinking about making the WarriorForum just work with WSO Pro.... Then this idea of free spirited competition would never come through. People would have been stuck just launching with Mike's software, and really he never would have to make any changes because he was the one guy in town.

I guess the point I'm trying to make here, without rambling on, is that free marketplace, which is what the WSO forum used to be, where you could use any payment platform that you choose, encouraged platforms to compete, to be better, and allowed us the freedom to choose the platform that helped us the best.

The reason I'm posting this, is I had to struggle to find a "Post New WSO" button where I didn't have to go through a "WarriorPayments" setup (In fact I had to get it from WarriorPlus.com creation page).... Which I think is utterly ridiculous. I understand that from a financial perspective, Freelancer.com wants all the commission. However, doesn't that take away the opportunity for people to use the WSO forum like they want to?

I get at the end of the day, this might be about lining your pockets... But, the idea remains. Wouldn't it be a better idea to encourage competition, so that MORE people would actually use the Warrior Forum to sell their products, WOULD actually PAY for your sticky posts etc....

Because it seems to me that you chop the head off the horse when you say "you can only use us... (Especially when your payment platform doesn't have proper integration with membership scripts... and other features the top games in town have).

Anyway, I was just curious as to what's gonna happen next.

Caleb

PS While I've used most of the other payment platforms, I'm not tied in with, or work for, or work with any of the providers. This is just my personal opinions
#forum #gonna #marketplace #open #stay #warrior #wso
  • Profile picture of the author Bleupage
    Very good point Caleb..personally I think not keeping the Warrior Forum an open marketplace would be a death sentence. Simply because someone else will come along and be competition..that's how it always works

    I mean if WF only started using their own payment platform for WSO's then people are going to leave this forum and look for one that does allow all payment platforms. You simply can't force someone's hand like that, regardless of how big you are or how much money you have.

    So if the WF wants to thrive now and in the future it cannot become a proprietary marketplace..it must stay open to have continued success and any other thinking besides that is just pure arrogance..IMO

    P.S. I do think having Warrior Payments can be a great thing for healthy competition, especially considering they have a deal of the day. I think it's sparking the interest of a lot of marketers and making them curious, so just let people be naturally drawn to it instead of stuffing it down their throats..i think it has a BIG potential to be GREAT
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9404945].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author WillR
    Let's face it. Most people who launch WSO's make little (to very little) money from them. It would be only the top 5% or so that go on to make a lot of sales.

    My point in saying this is that the WF stands to lose a lot more money by not allowing other platforms to launch in this forum. Yes, new forum users will all use Warrior Payments (because they know no better) however as noted above, they are the people who will bring in very few sales (if any) and thus make the Warrior Forum very little money in payment fees. Because they make very little from their offers they are also the people who cannot afford to bump their WSO's very regularly.

    So the question is this. Do you want to attract the newbies who are happy to just go along with things and use Warrior Payments. The people who will (in majority of cases) sell very few products and very rarely pay to bump their offers. Or would you rather attract the power sellers who may not want to use Warrior Payments BUT they will drive a ton of traffic over to the Warrior Forum every time they do a big launch... and they are the type of people who can afford to bump their offers over and over again.

    To give you an idea, I have spent over $40,000 bumping my WSO's just the last few years. That is just one user. How many sales would it take from every day Joe's to get that same amount of money in fees through Warrior Payments?

    Well actually, I have the answer. If Warrior Payments take a 2% fee then to earn that same $40,000, they would need to process over $2,000,000 worth of sales.

    Wow!

    So which sellers do you really want to attract?
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9405032].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Tom B
      Banned
      Originally Posted by WillR View Post

      To give you an idea, I have spent over $40,000 bumping my WSO's just the last few years. That is just one user. How many sales would it take from every day Joe's to get that same amount of money in fees through Warrior Payments?

      Well actually, I have the answer. If Warrior Payments take a 2% fee then to earn that same $40,000, they would need to process over $2,000,000 worth of sales.

      Wow!

      So which sellers do you really want to attract?
      I suspect that you didn't spend 40k in fees just out of the goodness of your heart.

      You must have got something out of those transactions in order to continue bumping.

      Most business people will use multiple channels to reach their customers. The WSO would be one of those channels.

      Once a channel doesn't prove fruitful, you leave it.

      I simply don't get the constant whining (Caleb could have searched the forum and added this to the ongoing wso discussions already in play).

      Will, just because you seem to be very vocal, in these WSO threads, leads me to believe the section is very good to you. It wouldn't be smart to cut off your nose to spite your face. It's much better to sit back and wait to see how things fall before making your grand departure.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9405757].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author RichBeck
        Originally Posted by Thomas Belknap View Post

        I suspect that you didn't spend 40k in fees just out of the goodness of your heart.

        You must have got something out of those transactions in order to continue bumping.

        Most business people will use multiple channels to reach their customers. The WSO would be one of those channels.

        Once a channel doesn't prove fruitful, you leave it.

        I simply don't get the constant whining.
        Thomas,

        I agree...

        The Internet is.... a pretty big place.... :-)

        There are other forums and countless web sites people could use to sell their products...

        People incorrectly view WF as a "Democratic community."

        Warrior Forum is... what it always has been... in the complete control of the owners. You may like it or not. It is Freelancer's business.

        If you don't like it, you can simply chose to vote with you feet.... and find other venues.

        All The Best,

        Rich Beck BCIP, MCSD, MCIS
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9405787].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author WillR
        Originally Posted by Thomas Belknap View Post

        I suspect that you didn't spend 40k in fees just out of the goodness of your heart.
        Obviously I wouldn't keep spending money unless it was worth it. That's how advertising works. I don't think I ever said I got nothing in return for the money I had pent. I simply stated the amount I have spent and the forum has made from me with WSO bumps the last few years.

        Originally Posted by Thomas Belknap View Post

        Most business people will use multiple channels to reach their customers. The WSO would be one of those channels.
        Correct. I know that. I never said the WSO forum had no value.

        Originally Posted by Thomas Belknap View Post

        I simply don't get the constant whining (Caleb could have searched the forum and added this to the ongoing wso discussions already in play).
        If someone doesn't agree with something, it doesn't make it whining. It makes it someone not agreeing with something. People who are against the new payment system have just as much right to put their point of view across as those who are for it. I guess Caleb could say he doesn't get all the people constantly supporting the new payment system.

        Originally Posted by Thomas Belknap View Post

        Will, just because you seem to be very vocal, in these WSO threads, leads me to believe the section is very good to you. It wouldn't be smart to cut off your nose to spite your face. It's much better to sit back and wait to see how things fall before making your grand departure.
        I am simply stating a point of view which I am fairly certain the forum owners have not thought about. To me it seems clear the new owners main aim (at this point -- it may change over time) is squeezing as many dollars out of the forum as possible. Sometimes if you don't think things through thoroughly enough you can end up doing more harm than good.

        I think we all know the plan is eventually to allow Warrior Payments only and that will be a sad day if that happens. So rather than wait for that day I feel it important we all put our point of views across. As a regular user of the WSO forum the last few years I figured I might put my opinion forward.

        If it's maximizing profit they want (which it always is for publicly traded companies) then forcing people to use one payment processor may have the complete opposite effect.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9405798].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Tom B
          Banned
          Originally Posted by WillR View Post

          If someone doesn't agree with something, it doesn't make it whining. It makes it someone not agreeing with something. People who are against the new payment system have just as much right to put their point of view across as those who are for it. I guess Caleb could say he doesn't get all the people constantly supporting the new payment system.
          I think disagreements are wonderful. Popping up in thread after thread saying the same things tends to make it more whiny, imo.

          Supporting or not supporting the new payment system is irrelevant.

          It comes down to whether you plan on using the wso section or not. The payment system is here to stay. People can either help make it something that they can use or they can find a different ad channel.

          I agree that it looks like they will push other payment platforms out of the wso section.

          Hopefully, at that time, they will have their platform comparable to what is already offered out there. It it is comparable,there is no reason not to use them unless it's an emotional response.

          For me, I wouldn't use any of these platforms fully. I may utilize it in my funnel, but I wouldn't rely on one at all. Especially when you have platforms emailing customers their own offers. That is a total no, no for me and I will only use that platform to bring people onto my own.
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9405821].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author Lance K
            Originally Posted by Thomas Belknap View Post

            Especially when you have platforms emailing customers their own offers. That is a total no, no for me and I will only use that platform to bring people onto my own.
            This issue has been pointed out many times.

            To me, addressing it is the biggest opportunity for any of the existing payment platforms to differentiate themselves from the others. Or for a new one to disrupt the market and gain some market share.
            Signature
            "You can have everything in life you want if you will just help enough other people get what they want."
            ~ Zig Ziglar
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9406014].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Caleb Spilchen
        Originally Posted by Thomas Belknap View Post

        I suspect that you didn't spend 40k in fees just out of the goodness of your heart.

        You must have got something out of those transactions in order to continue bumping.

        Most business people will use multiple channels to reach their customers. The WSO would be one of those channels.

        Once a channel doesn't prove fruitful, you leave it.

        I simply don't get the constant whining (Caleb could have searched the forum and added this to the ongoing wso discussions already in play).

        Will, just because you seem to be very vocal, in these WSO threads, leads me to believe the section is very good to you. It wouldn't be smart to cut off your nose to spite your face. It's much better to sit back and wait to see how things fall before making your grand departure.
        First of all, Thomas, I'm not whining , I'm simply pointing out my personal opinion on the issue, (Which by the way is shared by many that won't post publicly.

        Even though Alaister might have stated that Hey we're gonna keep WSO forum open to all platforms, he hasn't really done that... Because there is no "Create WSO" button that allows you (Unless you grab the link off your desktop) to now...

        Just saying...

        I'm not a "new member" here, I know how to search the forums, I thought (and I still think) that I had a valid point to make so I made a thread... If the mods disagree, they could always delete it, but they haven't.
        Signature

        Canadian Expat Living in Medellin, Colombia

        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9407335].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Alexa Smith
    Banned
    Originally Posted by Caleb Spilchen View Post

    Is the Warrior Forum a free marketplace? I mean a marketplace where you can sell the products that you create, through whatever payment platform that you want? As it always was?
    Yes.

    Originally Posted by Caleb Spilchen View Post

    Anyway, I was just curious as to what's gonna happen next.
    Alaister, the Forum Administrator, has already specified (in another thread, while answering the same question) that there are no plans to change that, or to exclude other methods/processes/systems of people listing WSO's here.

    Good to see you posting again, Caleb.

    .
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9405785].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author sbucciarel
      Banned
      Originally Posted by Alexa Smith View Post

      Yes.

      Alaister, the Forum Administrator, has already specified (in another thread, while answering the same question) that there are no plans to change that, or to exclude other methods/processes/systems of people listing WSO's here.

      Good to see you posting again, Caleb.

      .
      In every instance where I've seen the question asked about whether freelancer was going to allow other platforms, the answer was for now or similar. And the disappearance of any link to make a choice (except a secret link when Alaister was pressed about it) speaks volumes to me.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9406394].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author kindsvater
    This ...

    People would have been stuck just launching with Mike's software, and really he never would have to make any changes because he was the one guy in town.
    In my view W+ is a much better service because of upgrades created after competition from JVZoo began.

    JVZoo just added one of the best coupon systems I have seen, if not the best. The "arms race" from competition keeps making the services better and better.

    In the long run the forum may rue the day if it disallowed WSOs using other services, instead of encouraging other services to funnel traffic to the forum.

    .
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9405826].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author salegurus
    Originally Posted by Caleb Spilchen View Post

    Hey,

    So this is a controversial thread (probably), and while I don't want to get in trouble with the mods here, I have a simple question.
    Not really as there have been a few on the topic, especially the changes, but then you would know that if you did a quick search....

    PS. These whiny threads don't help anybody. The new owners have been quite transparent and willing to take the recommendations of members into consideration...
    Signature
    Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.

    ― George Carlin
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9406021].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Caleb Spilchen
      Originally Posted by salegurus View Post

      Not really as there have been a few on the topic, especially the changes, but then you would know that if you did a quick search....

      PS. These whiny threads don't help anybody. The new owners have been quite transparent and willing to take the recommendations of members into consideration...
      I do know how to use the search feature, however I thought I had a couple good comments about an open marketplace. And while you might disagree (As you have every right to believe whatever you want)... My thoughts still remain as my thoughts.

      Oh and by the way... I am just expressing an opinion, while I have spent in the thousands on WSO Bumps & posts, I haven't actively done one in over a year... So it's not like I'm a "whiny pissed consumer"... I'm just expressing an opinion.

      If you don't dig my thread, you don't have to read it

      Caleb
      Signature

      Canadian Expat Living in Medellin, Colombia

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9407340].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Kay King
        You may not have launched a WSO in over a year - but you did post in your 2 yr old this week to say

        And I am here relaunching one of the greatest products I've ever created.
        Smart marketing - your comments will get more attention in a thread you start than in a conversation you join.

        Good news is - you don't have to use the new system 'for now'.
        Signature
        Saving one dog will not change the world - but the world changes forever for that one dog
        ***
        One secret to happiness is to let every situation be
        what it is instead of what you think it should be.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9407365].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Caleb Spilchen
          Originally Posted by Kay King View Post

          You may not have launched a WSO in over a year - but you did post in your 2 yr old this week to say



          Smart marketing - your comments will get more attention in a thread you start than in a conversation you join.

          Good news is - you don't have to use the new system 'for now'.
          Uhhh... I don't have any alterior motives here other then to express an opinion. But since you've thrown that suggestion out there, I've deleted the link to the bumped WSO from my signature.

          And... BTW, that was the first time I logged into the forum in 9 months... (Just FYI), so yeah, I noticed, and made a comment.
          Signature

          Canadian Expat Living in Medellin, Colombia

          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9407411].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author JensSteyaert
    I wouldn't worry about that, that's not going to happen.

    They would lose a lot of money if they started bannig other payment processors from being used, and since they want to profit as much as possible as any company does, they won't do that..
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9406201].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Caleb Spilchen
      Originally Posted by JensSteyaert View Post

      I wouldn't worry about that, that's not going to happen.

      They would lose a lot of money if they started bannig other payment processors from being used, and since they want to profit as much as possible as any company does, they won't do that..
      ....And yet, the "Create a New WSO" button links to WarriorPayments right now, and you need a "secret link" to post a WSO with another platform.

      ...Interesting. All I'm sayin

      Caleb
      Signature

      Canadian Expat Living in Medellin, Colombia

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9407437].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Kay King
        I was just bustin' you, silly. No biggie.

        I think a good move by management would be to restore a link that allows sellers to choose without knowing the "password".

        Eventually I fully expect this payment system to be an excellent one with all the bells and whistles we need - but until it is would be wise to keep options open for sellers.

        I've said before - if the system evolves into something really good...and is cheaper...you'll have fight off sellers with a stick. On the other hand, if they try to force it, people will dig in their heels and I don't blame them.

        kay
        Signature
        Saving one dog will not change the world - but the world changes forever for that one dog
        ***
        One secret to happiness is to let every situation be
        what it is instead of what you think it should be.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9407477].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author GlenH
          Originally Posted by Kay King View Post

          I've said before - if the system evolves into something really good...and is cheaper...you'll have fight off sellers with a stick. On the other hand, if they try to force it, people will dig in their heels and I don't blame them.

          kay
          Exactly....

          I'm they're heeding all the inputs from members, I'd be expecting the end results to be something members will willingly support and make good use of.

          But to subtly try to force it's use on members will only turn them against using the system altogether.
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9407539].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Caleb Spilchen
          Originally Posted by Kay King View Post

          I was just bustin' you, silly. No biggie.

          I think a good move by management would be to restore a link that allows sellers to choose without knowing the "password".

          Eventually I fully expect this payment system to be an excellent one with all the bells and whistles we need - but until it is would be wise to keep options open for sellers.

          I've said before - if the system evolves into something really good...and is cheaper...you'll have fight off sellers with a stick. On the other hand, if they try to force it, people will dig in their heels and I don't blame them.

          kay
          That is my BIG issue with the current situation. While, someone else in this thread pointed out that Alaister (or other Freelancer staff) may have mentioned that they have no plans to shut down the use of W+/jvzoo...

          They've made it harder for you to use, and for the average new Warrior, they have no idea how to launch a free WSO anymore, or a WSO with WarriorPayments because you have to create a button just to create a WSO.

          Just sayin

          Caleb
          Signature

          Canadian Expat Living in Medellin, Colombia

          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9407615].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author sbucciarel
    Banned
    Well, I can tell you that it is always a bad idea to put all your eggs in one basket. The affiliate platforms ... all of them ... bring traffic by the thousands to the WSO forum. So far, Warrior Payments is so undeveloped that it's not very useful at this point. Will it ever get up to speed. Time will tell.

    But you aren't forced to use it if you don't want to. I mean, right now there's a secret link to launch the old way and use any platform you want, but that will disappear and the only choice "on the Warrior Forum" will be Warrior Payments.

    Which makes JVZoo and a self hosted sales page look much more appealing to me. It has all the features I want and runs smoothly and, most importantly of all to me, it has delayed payments. No delayed payments is a deal breaker, but it's only one of many.

    You do have choices and don't ever let anyone tell you that you don't.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9406269].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Mark Hess
    Originally Posted by Thomas Belknap View Post

    Especially when you have platforms emailing customers their own offers. That is a total no, no for me and I will only use that platform to bring people onto my own.
    Originally Posted by Lance K View Post

    This issue has been pointed out many times.

    To me, addressing it is the biggest opportunity for any of the existing payment platforms to differentiate themselves from the others. Or for a new one to disrupt the market and gain some market share.
    Just throwing this out there: https://www.zaxaa.com/features

    Not only do they not email your customers, they have all the bells and whistles (and then some), vendors can pay a flat monthly or yearly payment and there's no additional fees per transaction other than PayPal (or they have a free option which involves taking a %).

    I've started to see some vendors moving in their direction. I was with them in beta running some offers.
    ---------------------------

    Warrior Payments right now is bringing a knife to a gunfight. The platform is no where close to being even remotely comparable to W+ or JVZoo but with the resources they have at their disposal, they should be able to get there rather quickly.

    Personally, I rather have a platform that tells my customers about other products versus a platform that emails my buyers 3 days later and harrases them to leave a "detailed review" of my product and give me a rating...

    Talk about leaving the door wide open and inviting problems for the vendor (and affiliates as well).
    Signature
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9407035].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author WillR
      Originally Posted by Mark Hess View Post

      I rather have a platform that tells my customers about other products versus a platform that emails my buyers 3 days later and harrases them to leave a "detailed review" of my product and give me a rating.
      Yes, the 'review system' they have implemented once again really only serves to benefit the forum by sending our buyer traffic back over to the forum.

      This is definitely a platform that has been developed with the profit of the forum first and foremost in mind. When I saw they had set the default (recommended) affiliate commission to 80% for themselves, that said it all.

      I hear the JVZoo, Deal Guardian and Warrior Plus guys are currently underground working on a project together. So don't be surprised if some BIG things are just around the corner.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9407134].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Mark Hess
        Originally Posted by WillR View Post

        Yes, the 'review system' they have implemented once again really only serves to benefit the forum by sending our buyer traffic back over to the forum.

        This is definitely a platform that has been developed with the profit of the forum first and foremost in mind. When I saw they had set the default (recommended) affiliate commission to 80% for themselves, that said it all.

        I hear the JVZoo, Deal Guardian and Warrior Plus guys are currently underground working on a project together. So don't be surprised if some BIG things are just around the corner.
        Sounds like those guys are taking their ball and going to play somewhere else...

        I actually posted about the issue with having a review system before.

        It's in full swing: 2014-08-01_2120 - MarkHess's library (and this seller was one of the more positively rated sellers who has sold 100+ copies of their product using the new payments platform).
        Signature
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9407181].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author GlenH
          Hiding the link to create a wso WITHOUT using warriorpayments is a less than subtle way of squeezing out the competition while still being able to claim "Everyone is welcome here."
          Exactly..

          Alaister had better not have plans to remove the option for members to use any payment platform when launching a WSO (ie launching a WSO the ‘old’ way)

          Forcing members to use Warrior Payments would get a lot of members right offside.
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9407207].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author XponentSYS
    Not sure how the rumor got started that WSO sellers were going to be REQUIRED to use Warrior Payments. That is simply not factual.

    If it's not fact, it's not worth worrying about.

    I don't hate the new Warrior Payments, JVZ or W+.

    It comes down to the fact that they're market places from which to draw affiliates. I'd use all 3 at the same time on every product if I could.
    Signature
    "Hybrid Method" Gets 120,846 TARGETED VISITORS
    To Any Site in ANY NICHE!

    NOW FREE IN THE WAR ROOM! CLICK HERE!
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9407252].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author GlenH
      Originally Posted by XponentSYS View Post

      Not sure how the rumor got started that WSO sellers were going to be REQUIRED to use Warrior Payments. That is simply not factual.

      If it's not fact, it's not worth worrying about.

      .
      Well, if I go to the 'Warrior Forum Special Offer' pages and click the big Red button that says....'Create A New WSO', I'm redirected straight the 'Warrior Payments page'

      There are NO other 'obvious' options to create a WSO, except via the 'Create a New WSO' button

      So right now, it seems pretty obvious that if you want to create a WSO you're forced to use "Warrior Payments'
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9407275].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author sbucciarel
      Banned
      Originally Posted by XponentSYS View Post

      Not sure how the rumor got started that WSO sellers were going to be REQUIRED to use Warrior Payments. That is simply not factual.

      If it's not fact, it's not worth worrying about.

      I don't hate the new Warrior Payments, JVZ or W+.

      It comes down to the fact that they're market places from which to draw affiliates. I'd use all 3 at the same time on every product if I could.
      Rumor? Can you not SEE that they have already eliminated your choices UNLESS you happen to have been reading these threads and know the secret link to bypass the Warrior Payments only option? It's not a rumor. It's fact, and it's a fact that has made me just go ahead and start moving my products to self hosted JVZoo pages.

      I won't tolerate not having Delayed Payments or a review system that immature, reactionary, clueless buyers (and we do have a fair number of those) can harm your ratings and listings ... and sales.

      That's just the beginning of what is unacceptable to me. The fact that it has so few features that I want, no OTOs yet, no listing where buyers can access all of their previous purchases ... the list is too long of things it doesn't have.

      It'll be very interesting to see what the three mentioned platforms are underground working on.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9407953].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author nicheblogger75
    I applaud the WF for creating Warrior Payments. Yes, there are still a lot of features that are lacking, and features that we all want to see, but Rome wasn't built in a day. I'm pretty sure as they work out the bugs and add/tweak features then it's going to become a competitive sales platform just like WSO Pro & JVZoo.

    That being said, the one thing that disturbs me is that when you go to create a WSO and you click the big red "Create WSO" button, you are not give any other option but Warrior Payments. They have said that you can use any payment processor you wish, yet in order to do so you have to go and hunt down a link that is buried in a thread somewhere. That's not exactly transparent, is it?

    The message that sends to me is yes they allow other payment processors, but they aren't going to make it easy for you to use them. And as others have stated, if you are new to this you won't know any better and you will basically be forced into using Warrior Payments. I can understand that thinking to a degree. They hope you create a WSO with WP and like it so much you will continue to use it, which of course will happen because you don't know you have other options.

    I don't know about anyone else, but I would be far more at ease if after you clicked the "Create WSO" button, you were given a drop down menu of accepted payment processors that you could choose. Hey, I've got no problem at all with Warrior Payments being the first one on the list, but please list the others as well!

    WF management has said we have a choice. Well then OPENLY give us that choice please! Don't make the link hard to find!

    The message I'm getting from the current setup is that while they continue to develop and add features to Warrior Payments we have a choice of payment processor (if you can find that link), but as soon as WP is fully developed there will be no other choice.

    We all know that it's their business and they can do what they like with it, and if we don't like it we don't have to list WSOs, but I also think that they should place a lot of weight on what their members want.

    Personally, I'm just going to lay back in my easy chair and watch this one play out!
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9408210].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author GlenH
      Originally Posted by nicheblogger75 View Post

      I

      ........but as soon as WP is fully developed there will be no other choice.
      There is no way that would be acceptable either!!!

      They have to allow members to always have a choice of payment platforms.

      If Freelancer forces the use of Warrior Payments on members in order to do a WSO, they'll be the losers.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9408389].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author kindsvater
        I would be far more at ease if after you clicked the "Create WSO" button, you were given a drop down menu of accepted payment processors that you could choose. Hey, I've got no problem at all with Warrior Payments being the first one on the list, but please list the others as well!
        I once ran a WSO where I took payment in the form of foreign coins so I could build up my world coin collection.

        There are not just a couple ways to get paid. There are dozens if not hundreds of payment processors. Anyone starting a WSO can use what they want.

        Technically, Warrior Payments, W+, JVZoo, etc., are not payment processors. They are service providers handling affiliates, product delivery, providing stats, and front and back end services for the actual payment processor: PayPal.

        If the forum only wants to allow Warrior Payments that's up to the forum.

        As a product seller I of course prefer options.

        In my view Mike Lantz deserves a ton of credit for Warrior Plus and making the WSO section what it is today. The money Freelancer is now making from the WSO section - some of it is due to Mike. So it does rub me a little wrong to say thanks for building it up, thanks for the creativity, thanks for spending your money and sweat thinking up features, creating them, and proving how profitable this can be - now get out of here while we take over with our new system and copy as many of your features as possible.

        .
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9408568].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author sbucciarel
          Banned
          Originally Posted by kindsvater View Post

          Technically, Warrior Payments, W+, JVZoo, etc., are not payment processors. They are service providers handling affiliates, product delivery, providing stats, and front and back end services for the actual payment processor: PayPal.

          If the forum only wants to allow Warrior Payments that's up to the forum.
          But technically, each platform is limited to the payment processors they work with, so by using them, that's what you are limited to. That's fine with me, but when someone tells me I have to use their product ... well my answer is, NO, I don't have to. As a customer, I choose where I spend my money.
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9408631].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author BIG Mike
          Banned
          [DELETED]
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9415406].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author Paul Myers
            Steve,
            When you become a publicly traded company, no one is ever satisfied with making great money, they always want to make more, and more and more, and are forced to do whatever it takes to make more to please those who are invested.
            That depends on whether you're looking at next week, next quarter, or next year.

            There are a lot of factors that can influence that decision, but that's what it boils down to.


            Paul
            Signature
            .
            Stop by Paul's Pub - my little hangout on Facebook.

            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9415531].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author TGOA
    I almost stayed away from this thread altogether because I'm a capitalist and I believe in individual rights and a free market which means I generally don't care what people do with their business if it's theirs, but I see a few of my friends here so I joined the convo.

    Before I chime in I already know that my stand may be an unpopular one, but I think marketplace disruption in any form always provides an opportunity for those who can weather the storm and figure out a new way.

    While I understand the views of both sides... the side that states that the Warrior forum has been built on the backs and hard work of many successful and even not to successful warriors, and that this change in payment structure will affect some or many adversely. (which I cannot argue with)

    And the side who thinks that it's this site belongs to Freelancer now, it's their show, and they can do what they want with it (A fact I also agree with.)

    I have to say from my position I don't think that the warrior forum is going anywhere soon, by that I mean...I don't see this becoming a baron wasteland where no one wants to learn marketing... at least not in the next year or so...so why not weather the storm too?

    If we ( more experienced marketers) are actually here to be fiduciaries to the newer marketers who are still signing up to the warrior forum on a daily basis; than a mass exodus of marketers who are angry with the payment system seems like an opportunity for the people who stick around.

    I my opinion (<--only my opinion) less people competing for mind-share in a competitive market like IM in the very place that attracts the most people looking for IM advice seems like a good event to me.

    I understand that the network of affiliates you could tap into to get behind your offers might be shrinking, but the truth is I agree with WillR most WSO's probably aren't bringing in a ton of cash.

    Besides, if you haven't established working relationships with a network of your peers and colleagues in the time Warrior Forum was the land of milk and honey-- then shame on you more not thinking like a business owner.

    Historically, businesses always change...

    Google removing authorship images from the organic listings for people not connected to you? Whattheapp testing advertising models after being adamant about not allowing ads? Facebook putting the crackdown on scraping after allowing it for so long even if it was against the terms of service all along?

    Marketing is a art form of mixing short term and long-term strategies in iteration and pivoting.

    Get in early, do your thing, ride the wave and MTFO when it stops working for you...It is what it is.

    I also know that this sucks for our friends at JVzoo and Warriorplus I the E. Brain Rose is one of the most awesome dudes around, but it also gives them opportunity to do something awesome as well.

    I promise you they've built their network of friends and colleagues, It will be a bump in the road...but these they don't seem to be pushing the panic button just pivoting.

    IMHO business isn't a game of fair. Do subscribers tell you how to run your list, do your clients tell you what to charge?

    Or do you analyze the data, test methodically with a large segment then keep the types of customers you want from the crowd and drop the rest.

    If people unsubscribe, do you shut down shop, or do you just get more subscribers?

    Either way...Warrior Forum has always done what what in the best interest of warrior forum (as it should) regardless of ownership and there have always been complaints...yet it's still here...and thing have always seemed to workout.

    My advice...leave this alone...just a bunch of wasted energy that won't change anything...help them work out their system or don't.

    Better advice go help a N00B they need you more then ever right now...and it even if the admins don't appreciate your opinion a N00B will .
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9408708].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author kindsvater
      IMHO business isn't a game of fair. Do subscribers tell you how to run your list, do your clients tell you what to charge?
      Good post. Clients may not be in charge, but they can provide useful suggestions and those suggestions may be worth listening to unless you want them to be former clients.

      As far as business not being fair. True. You may also recall Allen writing on the first page of Private Posts about cut throat tactics: a fortune is there to be made by copying / improving the software ideas others have created. On the other hand, he does not believe in doing this to friends and "members" and those who target the wrong people he had unkind words.

      After the forum sold there was some discussion about prior loyalties versus new corporation ownership with a legal obligation to maximize shareholder profits.

      Change often creates dissension, even if ultimately the change is for the better in the long-term.

      There are many dynamics involved. Many who are "big" sellers or affiliates don't bother to post in the forum. The WSO section is just a money-making tool, and whatever makes the most money is what they use. Yet, the forum is also a community which has helped make the WSO section more valuable than just another classified ads site, even if many posters are not selling WSOs.

      No question Matt and Alastair have a lot of issues to juggle and consider. There isn't even a "right" answer. Just new approaches and new leadership has been responsive in answering questions and implementing suggestions.

      I think everyone knew "Warrior Payments" was coming because it only made sense for monetizing a significant investment in the forum. It also means change, and it doesn't make sense to invest in creating a new system that doesn't make any money because everyone continues to use other systems they are familiar with.

      .
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9408812].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Tom B
        Banned
        Originally Posted by kindsvater View Post


        There are many dynamics involved. Many who are "big" sellers or affiliates don't bother to post in the forum. The WSO section is just a money-making tool, and whatever makes the most money is what they use. Yet, the forum is also a community which has helped make the WSO section more valuable than just another classified ads site, even if many posters are not selling WSOs.


        .
        The dynamics of this forum changed a long time before Freelancer purchased it. I would say when WarriorPlus came out the forum became more about making money than about community.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9408838].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author RichBeck
          Originally Posted by Thomas Belknap View Post

          The dynamics of this forum changed a long time before Freelancer purchased it. I would say when WarriorPlus came out the forum became more about making money than about community.
          Thomas,

          Very true...

          99% of what is done here is for "commercial" benefit... either immediate "commercial" benefit or "long term commercial" benefit...

          Simply put, people are doing things because they want you to purchase their product or service...

          Mike's creation of WarriorPlus was certainly based on profit not community... unless he is giving away all the money he makes from WarriorPlus.

          I had to laugh at this "event"....

          A while back "someone" was ticked off because I merely suggested a product... He PMed me... "The Warrior Forum is for community... not selling stuff."

          I PMed him back... "Welcome to Warrior Forum. You must be new here. The vast majority of people are trying to sell you something. If you don't like it, I suggest you go back to your Linux forum." I never heard back from him! :-)

          All The Best,

          Rich Beck BCIP, MCSD, MCIS
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9417862].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author Tom B
            Banned
            Originally Posted by RichBeck View Post

            Thomas,

            Very true...

            99% of what is done here is for "commercial" benefit... either immediate "commercial" benefit or "long term commercial" benefit...

            Simply put, people are doing things because they want you to purchase their product or service...
            Yeah it changed but I do believe Allen was more interested in seeing people succeed than making money off of the forum.

            I know I owe the guy a ton.

            I learned a lot from the forum, both from meeting people and learning how to sell. That is one of the reasons I enjoy coming back and helping others when I can.

            I hope Allen realizes he has a pretty big legacy that changed a lot of lives. The "cult following" came from him wanting to see others succeed. Hopefully that won't be lost with the new owners. I truly think you can make a lot of money and still hold true to those values.

            I sincerely hope Freelancer can pull it off.
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9417877].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author RichBeck
              Originally Posted by RichBeck View Post

              Thomas,

              Very true...

              99% of what is done here is for "commercial" benefit... either immediate "commercial" benefit or "long term commercial" benefit...

              Simply put, people are doing things because they want you to purchase their product or service...
              Originally Posted by Thomas Belknap View Post

              Yeah it changed but I do believe Allen was more interested in seeing people succeed than making money off of the forum.
              Thomas,

              I don't see the change with Freelancer...

              I'm writing specifically about the Warrior Forum members... not Freelancer.

              Most members are here posting.... for some commercial motive....

              Yes, there is the tiny 1% that are here to "help others" and "build community."

              But, 99% are not.....

              That was my point.

              All The Best,

              Rich Beck BCIP, MCSD, MCIS
              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9417888].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author sbucciarel
        Banned
        Originally Posted by kindsvater View Post

        I think everyone knew "Warrior Payments" was coming because it only made sense for monetizing a significant investment in the forum. It also means change, and it doesn't make sense to invest in creating a new system that doesn't make any money because everyone continues to use other systems they are familiar with.

        .
        Yes, I knew or had a fair idea that it was coming and I was holding off on decisions until it did. On the one hand, you're saying WP wouldn't make any money because it can't compete with other platforms, so they might as well attempt to take everyone hostage and make them use it.

        The problems I see with that type of thinking is that when you press or anger people enough, they leave. Instead of feeling like they have no choice, they choose something else. The WF isn't the only place on the Internet to sell and people who had just been lazy like me and used the WF for years, will now look for the other options. If you look at the WP marketplace, the only Listings that are selling anything are the Deal of the Day listings. I've been doing a little minor tracking to see who is selling anything.

        7/24
        77 Listings
        561 Total Sales
        2 Deal of the Days = 416 of those Sales
        145 Total Sales from the other 75 listings
        51 Listings with Zero sales

        7/27
        83 Listings
        975 Total Sales
        779 of the Sales from Deal of the Day (3)
        196 from all the other listings combined

        7/28
        94 Listings
        1514 Sales
        1260 from 4 Deal of the Day Listings
        254 from all other listings combined

        7/29
        101 Listings
        1684 Sales
        31 Listings with zero sales
        Additional 12 Listings with 10 or less sales
        1405 sales from 4 (No 5 seems to be missing/error in url) Deal of the Day
        Listings
        286 sales from all other listings combined

        8/2
        135 Listings
        87 Listings with 0 Sales
        Another 29 Listings with less than 10 Sales
        Only listings with significant sales are Deal of the Day
        But honestly, I don't detest change. I do detest lack of choice, and I feel that this change is fine with me. It's time I got out and about and explored the other options more fully, and that's exactly what I am doing.

        I think their roll out would have been significantly better received had they just reined themselves in and rolled out a product that is serious competition to what's already out there.

        I also feel that by eliminating W+ and JVZoo, they are saying bye bye to a lot of traffic that those two platforms bring here. I think this will all hurt both this forum and the Marketplace in the long run. I'm not going to be scratching my head and wondering what happened to my income when that happens.

        One thing to consider ... Freelancer is obviously thinking about income ... their income. They're not really thinking about our incomes, but our success in a marketplace will ultimately determine the financial success of that marketplace because no one is going to keep listing in a place where the traffic is declining and they aren't making sales.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9409148].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author kindsvater
          Fascinating numbers Suzanne, and I love actual numbers.

          Looks like Warrior Payments is rapidly increasing its listings, number of sales, including sales from daily promotions and from other offers.

          However, affiliates who drive a lot of sales are apparently not using Warrior Payments.

          Interestingly, I may have unique stats due to having the same product, same price, and virtually the same sales page being listed as a WSO using WarriorPlus and also Warrior Payments, and both listings were promoted as "deals of the day".

          WarriorPlus and affiliates using W+ have higher conversion rates. Although the Warrior Forum should have a significantly larger list, WarriorPlus generated more sales (head to head against the forum W+ beat the forum and W+ affiliates have clobbered WarriorPayments affiliates).

          One difference is the WarriorPlus promotion was first, so some who may have bought through Warrior Payments had already purchased.

          Another difference is the WarriorPlus list is of WSO buyers. The forum's "list", although advertised as 780,000 members, is obviously not, and a percentage of forum memberships will be junk and people passing through now doing something else.

          I'll guess the forum is happy to see its numbers increasing, but had hoped to attract more affiliates who drive large numbers of sales.

          .
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9409272].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author sbucciarel
            Banned
            Originally Posted by kindsvater View Post

            However, affiliates who drive a lot of sales are apparently not using Warrior Payments.

            Interestingly, I may have unique stats due to having the same product, same price, and virtually the same sales page being listed as a WSO using WarriorPlus and also Warrior Payments, and both listings were promoted as "deals of the day".

            WarriorPlus and affiliates using W+ have higher conversion rates. Although the Warrior Forum should have a significantly larger list, WarriorPlus generated more sales (head to head against the forum W+ beat the forum and W+ affiliates have clobbered WarriorPayments affiliates).

            One difference is the WarriorPlus promotion was first, so some who may have bought through Warrior Payments had already purchased.

            Another difference is the WarriorPlus list is of WSO buyers. The forum's "list", although advertised as 780,000 members, is obviously not, and a percentage of forum memberships will be junk and people passing through now doing something else.

            I'll guess the forum is happy to see its numbers increasing, but had hoped to attract more affiliates who drive large numbers of sales.

            .

            I've always thought that W+ had the highest quality affiiates. I've used both JVZoo and W+. After I got ripped by the credit card fraud affiliates on JVZoo (which could just as easily have happened on W+), I stopped using both platforms and just put my DLGuard buttons on.

            Now I'm testing out self hosted listings on JVZoo. I would love to do the same with W+, but there's no self hosting option that I know of so far and there's no Delayed Payments.

            But with the rumors of an underground "meeting of the minds" between 3 popular platforms, including JVZ, W+ and "who" else did someone say .... I think we're going see some very interesting and big changes coming down the pike. Who knows ... they could even be planning their own forum, and by their own, I assume it would be for all of the platforms combined. That's just a little whimsical speculation and not even a rumor, so don't pass it on, but I am very interested in seeing how they evolve and meet this challenge and trust me, they will evolve and meet this challenge.
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9410197].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author James Campbell
    Originally Posted by Caleb Spilchen View Post

    Is the Warrior Forum a free marketplace?
    I'm going to call this right now.

    The short answer is right now yes, but in the future, from the actions both subtly and overtly taken thus far by the new owners...sadly no it will not remain that way if they are able to have their way.

    I truly hope I'm wrong, but the writing is on the wall and it tells a different story than what is being preached but not practiced.

    Sad to say, but there is a good amount of false transparency going on. Hell, I just got a pm from the powers that be regarding just that, transparency. It makes me a bit sad to be completely honest.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9415113].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author blindapeseo
    For the short run, I'd think it will stay open.

    While they introduced their own system, you don't close off channels of income.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9415220].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author BaukeV
    It would pretty much ruin their business model not to stay open, I don't think it would be a sound decision.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9415242].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author sbucciarel
      Banned
      Originally Posted by orion87 View Post

      It would pretty much ruin their business model not to stay open, I don't think it would be a sound decision.
      Running a freelance marketplace is their business model and acquiring as many of it's competitors and other sites to absorb into that membership has always been their ultimate goal.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9415268].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Steve Wells
    The LOVE of money is the ROOT of all evil....

    Thats the truth, it's the love of money, greed, that will take this forum down if it goes down.

    When you become a publicly traded company, no one is ever satisfied with making great money, they always want to make more, and more and more, and are forced to do whatever it takes to make more to please those who are invested.

    It is a ruthless vicious cycle that ultimately causes companies to bring on their own demise by making very unpopular decisions, and by making unethical financial moves all in the name of making more money this quarter than last quarter, or more money this year than last year.

    I personally have hardly logged in to this site at all since the new takeover, I saw the quality of posts and other things go down very quickly, the whole forum seems much more deluted and watered down than before.

    I also believe that the forum, being owned by a corporation, is kinda ironic, considering the fact that most internet marketers are trying or have broken free from that kind of slavery and dictatorship so they could be their own boss. Now they are once again, being limited, influenced and controlled to a degree by a corporation if they choose to stay and do business on this platform.

    Just my observations........... a little straight to the point but nevertheless, true.

    If I owned this forum, and was a corporation, and wanted to make lots of money, I sure as hell would not let those people in high places pressure me to make decisions that they have no clue about. Which is normally what happens in these types of scenarios. It's the bean counters that just look at the numbers, and do not really understand the mechanics or the dynamics of what really makes a forum like this profitable.

    Oops, I went there.....
    Signature
    Need Custom Graphics Work? - Message Me For A Design Quote!
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9415288].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author James Campbell
      Originally Posted by Steve Wells View Post

      I saw the quality of posts and other things go down very quickly, the whole forum seems much more deluted and watered down than before.
      You and me both brother. It saddens me.

      Hell, even some of the powers that be here are a bit rude at least according to a PM I got today (not you Alaister or MB).

      Keep this BS up and the forum will end up being VERY displeasing in regards to financial performance as the exodus WILL happen if all the nonsense keeps happening. False transparency while tinting the windows to obscure the view isn't tricking anyone.

      For the sake of the future of this forum I hope "they" smarten up and abide by the spirit of this forum.

      I'm sure Allen wouldn't feel great about some of the stuff that is being done since he left the place that he worked so hard to create.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9415340].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author WillR
      Originally Posted by Steve Wells View Post

      I also believe that the forum, being owned by a corporation, is kinda ironic, considering the fact that most internet marketers are trying or have broken free from that kind of slavery and dictatorship so they could be their own boss. Now they are once again, being limited, influenced and controlled to a degree by a corporation if they choose to stay and do business on this platform..
      That's actually a VERY good point I had not thought of.

      I do think people could definitely associate with Allen and his cause a lot better because he was just an entrepreneur trying to make a living online... like most of us here. He represented the average person on this forum.

      A big corporation... not so much.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9415784].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Tom B
      Banned
      Originally Posted by Steve Wells View Post

      I also believe that the forum, being owned by a corporation, is kinda ironic, considering the fact that most internet marketers are trying or have broken free from that kind of slavery and dictatorship so they could be their own boss. Now they are once again, being limited, influenced and controlled to a degree by a corporation if they choose to stay and do business on this platform.

      I really don't get the comparison. If I were to advertise on Google, I have to follow their rules. Same with Facebook, Bing, Yahoo, other websites, even the FCC has it's own rules on what you an do and can't do.

      The WarriorForum has always had rules on what you can sell and can't sell.

      There has always been constraints put in place. You and others just didn't care because it didn't affect the way you wanted to use the forum.

      Now that some changes are being put in place, that do affect you, all of the sudden it is the evil corporate dictatorship coming down on the entrepreneur and all he stands for?

      Nah, not buying that.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9416127].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author WillR
        Originally Posted by Thomas Belknap View Post

        I really don't get the comparison. If I were to advertise on Google, I have to follow their rules. Same with Facebook, Bing, Yahoo, other websites, even the FCC has it's own rules on what you an do and can't do.

        The WarriorForum has always had rules on what you can sell and can't sell.

        There has always been constraints put in place. You and others just didn't care because it didn't affect the way you wanted to use the forum.

        Now that some changes are being put in place, that do affect you, all of the sudden it is the evil corporate dictatorship coming down on the entrepreneur and all he stands for?

        Nah, not buying that.
        That's really not what Steve was saying at all.

        Comparing a community forum to Google is like apples and oranges.

        Steve was correctly saying that the previous forum owner was one of us. He was an entrepreneur working for himself to make a living. For that reason he had a better understanding of what we wanted and how the community should evolve.

        We now have a publicly listed corporation in charge whose main aim is to milk dollars. I think we've all noticed the difference in feel around here lately. That's a big part of it.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9416150].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Tom B
          Banned
          Originally Posted by WillR View Post

          That's really not what Steve was saying at all.

          Comparing a community forum to Google is like apples and oranges.

          Steve was correctly saying that the previous forum owner was one of us. He was an entrepreneur working for himself to make a living. For that reason he had a better understanding of what we wanted and how the community should evolve.

          We now have a publicly listed corporation in charge who main aim is to mil dollars. I think we've all noticed the difference in feel around here lately. That's a big part of it.
          Ha! Cmon Will, you took out a specific site (Google) out of everything I posted in order to say it isn't right because Google isn't a community. Never mind everything else I wrote.

          Facebook is a community yet there are rules. Would that be better for you?

          Steve's premise was the evil empire trying to keep the free spirited entrepreneur down with constraints. You really think that is a fair comparison?

          This is a community but has been an advertising platform ever since W+ came out. That changed the dynamics of the forum.

          I even remember people complaining about that (I also remember Allen saying he thought about getting rid of all affiliate platforms on more than one occasion).

          Allen made changes that people didn't like. He started charging $20 for a wso listing when it was free and people complained he was just in it for the money.

          The truth was he wanted to clean up the section and hoped charging a free would do that. Allen wasn't into this community for the money but that isn't the reality of many people who said otherwise. All the people saw was people paying Allen lot's of money for listings so obviously he was a sell out.

          Freelancer could have made a better transition on what they wanted to do. That doesn't mean it will fail or everyone will leave.

          I do think people on this forum have a great case study unfolding right before their eyes.
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9416180].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Kay King
          broken free from that kind of slavery and dictatorship
          That ignores the idea of a job as freedom to be able to pay bills, buy things you want and need, etc.

          He was an entrepreneur working for himself to make a living. For that reason he had a better understanding of what we wanted and how the community should evolve.
          Yes, Allen is an entrepreneur and look what he dd.

          He started a forum available only through a purchase of one of his products.

          He opened that site later to the public.

          He built up the site offering free forum membership and free ads, etc for years.

          Then he moved the WF to a new platform in 2008 and began to monetize it. Do you have any concept of how much this forum produced monthly with $40 WSOs and various other ad fees - and banner fees - and War Room fees?

          Then Allen sold this site and can move on to do something new - or not work at all if he chooses. Isn't that what people here want to do...build up an online business, profit from it and sell it for a profit down the line? Of course it is.

          The WF has been big business for years now. But it's always been "someone else's" business. When the ownership changed hands - there were changes to the philosophy and direction of the forum. That should not have surprised anyone.

          you are still running the helpdesk
          Yeah - Thomas - you want to 'splain that?
          Signature
          Saving one dog will not change the world - but the world changes forever for that one dog
          ***
          One secret to happiness is to let every situation be
          what it is instead of what you think it should be.
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9416292].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Steve Wells
        Originally Posted by Thomas Belknap View Post

        I really don't get the comparison. If I were to advertise on Google, I have to follow their rules. Same with Facebook, Bing, Yahoo, other websites, even the FCC has it's own rules on what you an do and can't do.

        The WarriorForum has always had rules on what you can sell and can't sell.

        There has always been constraints put in place. You and others just didn't care because it didn't affect the way you wanted to use the forum.

        Now that some changes are being put in place, that do affect you, all of the sudden it is the evil corporate dictatorship coming down on the entrepreneur and all he stands for?

        Nah, not buying that.
        Facts are the facts, even if you do not buy it. This site is owned and operated by a corportation who has a bottom line that they must meet or else. It's simple. My statements above were not a comparison, they were spot on to what is going to happen on this forum. It's already happening, you have to be blind not to see it.

        I am just saying things that others may not want to say, which are the cold hard facts. Corporations are all self serving. I know that anyone who works or owns a business is looking out for their best interest and want to make money, but usually morals and best buisness practices are employed. Also they usually are wanting to please their customers, not do things opposite of what they want or ask for. Corporations will do just the opposite, they will do what they want, when they want, how they want, regardless of who it effects, as long as they meet their bottom line.

        Honesty is a very BASIC business principle. When honesty is sacrificed anything is possible, it's just shades of gray from that point on. So, when someone says one thing, and does another, or does something like HIDE or make it very hard to find ways to use alternative payment methods, such as JV ZOO and Warrior Plus, you know they are lying to you. And they are doing it while looking right into your eyes.

        I really love this forum, it has done lots for me, financially and educationally, and I have made quite of few personal friends and business aquaintences conducting business here.

        My whole point to all that I have said is that this place is not the same as it was before, it does not have the same core values. It may have one of the same agendas as it had before, which was to make money, but it lacks the integrity it once had. And it seems as though it is also doing things that could be considered standing in the way or blocking ways that help people easily conduct a profitable business funnel. Like hiding payment methods other than Warrior Forum payment button.

        Seriously? Who does something like that? What does that say about their integrity? It speaks loudly to those who are actually listening.

        Needless to say, until something better comes along, this forum will still exist, but when and if and new forum or marketing site comes along that has the same core values as the previous owner had, that new place will be the place to be........ What's crazy is that it shouldn't and doesn't have to be that way, but I honestly believe that it's going to happen, it's just a matter of time.
        Signature
        Need Custom Graphics Work? - Message Me For A Design Quote!
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9416919].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Tom B
          Banned
          Originally Posted by Steve Wells View Post

          Facts are the facts, even if you do not buy it. This site is owned and operated by a corportation who has a bottom line that they must meet or else. It's simple. My statements above were not a comparison, they were spot on to what is going to happen on this forum. It's already happening, you have to be blind not to see it.
          Are you trying to tell us Allen did business under his own name and not under a corporation or other legal entity?

          Are you also trying to tell us Allen didn't have a bottom line that needed to be met in order to continue running this site?

          Are you trying to say you don't have a bottom line that needs to be met in order to continue doing business?

          Are you saying that Freelancer should just continue putting in infrastructure enhancements and not try to recoup their investments?

          Your facts are facts for anyone doing business.


          I am just saying things that others may not want to say, which are the cold hard facts. Corporations are all self serving. I know that anyone who works or owns a business is looking out for their best interest and want to make money, but usually morals and best buisness practices are employed. Also they usually are wanting to please their customers, not do things opposite of what they want or ask for. Corporations will do just the opposite, they will do what they want, when they want, how they want, regardless of who it effects, as long as they meet their bottom line.
          No, you are stating generalized opinions and trying to push them off as facts. The whole corps are evil is not a fact but something made up in your own head.

          Those types of statements are the same as people saying everyone selling on this forum are scammers. While there are scammers among us, I like to think most selling here are not.


          Honesty is a very BASIC business principle. When honesty is sacrificed anything is possible, it's just shades of gray from that point on. So, when someone says one thing, and does another, or does something like HIDE or make it very hard to find ways to use alternative payment methods, such as JV ZOO and Warrior Plus, you know they are lying to you. And they are doing it while looking right into your eyes.
          What exactly did they lie about? Please refresh my memory.


          My whole point to all that I have said is that this place is not the same as it was before, it does not have the same core values. It may have one of the same agendas as it had before, which was to make money, but it lacks the integrity it once had. And it seems as though it is also doing things that could be considered standing in the way or blocking ways that help people easily conduct a profitable business funnel. Like hiding payment methods other than Warrior Forum payment button.
          This forum became more about making money when W+ came out. Before that, the wso section was about giving really good deals on products that you were already selling. It became more about wso's and less about community way before the Freelancer purchase.

          Needless to say, until something better comes along, this forum will still exist, but when and if and new forum or marketing site comes along that has the same core values as the previous owner had, that new place will be the place to be........ What's crazy is that it shouldn't and doesn't have to be that way, but I honestly believe that it's going to happen, it's just a matter of time.
          Time will tell. There has always been a vocal minority saying things like that when changes are made.
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9417054].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author Steve Wells
            First off, I want to clarify something. I am not trying nor wanting to debate with you. I am simply voicing my opinions which I believe are very valid and are true. If you do not agree, you have that right. I just simply do not want to debate with you.

            How do you define evil?

            1. Dishonesty/Deceit is wrong!
            2. Saying one thing and doing another is wrong!
            3. Hiding payment buttons which do not profit the forum and/or making them harder to find is wrong!

            DISCLAIMER: THIS IS A RHETORICAL QUESTION

            Which of the above numbered actions do you believe is ok? 1,2, or 3?
            Signature
            Need Custom Graphics Work? - Message Me For A Design Quote!
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9417187].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author James Campbell
              Originally Posted by Steve Wells View Post

              I just simply do not want to debate with you.
              But...but... he clearly wants to keep going.

              You've made your opinion pretty clear and from the stance of many of us who don't have skin in the game, you're almost spot on.
              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9417205].message }}
              • Profile picture of the author Tom B
                Banned
                Originally Posted by James Campbell View Post

                But...but... he clearly wants to keep going.

                You've made your opinion pretty clear and from the stance of many of us who don't have skin in the game, you're almost spot on.
                What skin do I have in this game? Cmon, man, if you're going to post at least add something of value to the discussion.
                {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9417227].message }}
                • Profile picture of the author James Campbell
                  Originally Posted by Thomas Belknap View Post

                  What skin do I have in this game? Cmon, man, if you're going to post at least add something of value to the discussion.
                  Apparently you missed Will's earlier comment re: helpdesk duties
                  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9417253].message }}
                  • Profile picture of the author Tom B
                    Banned
                    Originally Posted by James Campbell View Post

                    Apparently you missed Will's earlier comment re: helpdesk duties
                    Apparently you missed where I stated I don't and never worked for the WarriorForum. Nice try, though, to discount my opinion based on "skin" instead of discussing my points.
                    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9417262].message }}
                    • Profile picture of the author James Campbell
                      Originally Posted by Thomas Belknap View Post

                      Apparently you missed where I stated I don't and never worked for the WarriorForum. Nice try, though, to discount my opinion based on "skin" instead of discussing my points.
                      What points? You haven't engaged in any position of points in our interaction.

                      I do agree with your list of evils, though I'd probably add a few more to the list personally.

                      edit: I apologize for missing your post of not working for the forum. However, have you had or do you have helpdesk priveleges here paid or not?
                      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9417270].message }}
                      • Profile picture of the author Tom B
                        Banned
                        Originally Posted by James Campbell View Post

                        What points? You haven't engaged in any position of points in our interaction.
                        You're right, which was my whole point about adding value.

                        However, have you had or do you have helpdesk priveleges here paid or not?

                        Still digging, eh?

                        I don't have any nor have I had any more privileges than you or anyone else.
                        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9417280].message }}
                        • Profile picture of the author James Campbell
                          Originally Posted by Thomas Belknap View Post

                          Still digging, eh?

                          I don't have any nor have I had any more privileges than you or anyone else.
                          Nope. Just attempting to get more clarity in this particular situation.
                          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9417313].message }}
                • Profile picture of the author Kay King
                  What I see is a small group of members who have nothing but complaints and I have to wonder what the payoff is. It's one thing to express disappointment or disapproval or to offer constructive criticism. This goes farther than that - it claims deceit and dishonestry, etc. and some of the comments are really out there.

                  If you don't like the WF as it is now you can adapt or you can move on. That's the choice we all have. If you consistently complain, make charges of lies, etc and go on and on....you label yourself as someone who can't adapt to change. Not a good trait in business.

                  Apparently you missed Will's earlier comment re: helpdesk duties
                  Apparently you missed the reply - so you are equally misinformed.


                  Is it really that hard to grasp that more than one person is named "Thomas"???
                  Signature
                  Saving one dog will not change the world - but the world changes forever for that one dog
                  ***
                  One secret to happiness is to let every situation be
                  what it is instead of what you think it should be.
                  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9417283].message }}
                  • Profile picture of the author Tom B
                    Banned
                    Originally Posted by Kay King View Post

                    Is it really that hard to grasp that more than one person is named "Thomas"???
                    I blame my sexy photo.
                    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9417297].message }}
                    • Profile picture of the author James Campbell
                      Originally Posted by Thomas Belknap View Post

                      I blame my sexy photo.
                      We have the same haircut. I run into this problem all the time.
                      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9417309].message }}
                  • Profile picture of the author James Campbell
                    Originally Posted by Kay King View Post

                    What I see is a small group of members who have nothing but complaints and I have to wonder what the payoff is. It's one thing to express disappointment or disapproval or to offer constructive criticism. This goes farther than that - it claims deceit and dishonestry, etc. and some of the comments are really out there.
                    They aren't as "out there" as you think. I've got NO skin in the game regarding any of the service providers, absolutely none. What I am passionate about is this place and being told one thing and then being given another.

                    If you don't like the WF as it is now you can adapt or you can move on. That's the choice we all have. If you consistently complain, make charges of lies, etc and go on and on....you label yourself as someone who can't adapt to change. Not a good trait in business.
                    Yeah, yeah, same old song. "You have an opinion that goes contrary to what is going on so leave if you like." Thing is, I like this place, but I'm not a fan of this community being lied to or mislead or having any sort of "slight of hand" being used. My statements are random or coming out of thin air as it appears that some here would like to believe, they are not "charges" but rather factual if you do your research and go through the posts of Alaister and MattBarrie (not sure if that is how you spell his username), you'll find exactly where the statements directly conflict with the subsequent actions taken.

                    As for me labeling myself as not being able to adapt to change, well, I've never put that label on myself, maybe it is you doing the labeling? Maybe you should look in the mirror regarding that one.

                    My business doesn't rely on this place in any way, so the truth is my observations that I am voicing my disproval about have nothing to do with fear of change, fear that I will have to adapt or anything else you've made up in your mind.

                    Apparently you missed the reply - so you are equally misinformed.

                    Is it really that hard to grasp that more than one person is named "Thomas"???
                    I already addressed this in a previous reply to Thomas, but you missed that. I appreciate the sarcasm though.
                    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9417332].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author Tom B
              Banned
              Originally Posted by Steve Wells View Post

              First off, I want to clarify something. I am not trying nor wanting to debate with you. I am simply voicing my opinions which I believe are very valid and are true. If you do not agree, you have that right. I just simply do not want to debate with you.

              How do you define evil?

              1. Dishonesty/Deceit is wrong!
              2. Saying one thing and doing another is wrong!
              3. Hiding payment buttons which do not profit the forum and/or making them harder to find is wrong!

              DISCLAIMER: THIS IS A RHETORICAL QUESTION

              Which of the above numbered actions do you believe is ok? 1,2, or 3?
              Strange behavior for someone not wanting to engage another in debate or discussion.

              My definition of evil would be more inline of killing others, pedophilia, abuse types of things. Maybe that is why I find your posts overly dramatic when it comes to the evils of WarriorPayments/Freelancer.
              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9417238].message }}
              • Profile picture of the author James Campbell
                Originally Posted by Thomas Belknap View Post

                Strange behavior for someone not wanting to engage another in debate or discussion.

                My definition of evil would be more inline of killing others, pedophilia, abuse types of things. Maybe that is why I find your posts overly dramatic when it comes to the evils of WarriorPayments/Freelancer.
                Super valuable contribution you made there

                I've made quite a few posts in this thread that seem to have some value to people other than yourself.
                {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9417255].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author Mike Anthony
            Honesty is a very BASIC business principle. When honesty is sacrificed anything is possible, it's just shades of gray from that point on. So, when someone says one thing, and does another, or does something like HIDE or make it very hard to find ways to use alternative payment methods, such as JV ZOO and Warrior Plus, you know they are lying to you. And they are doing it while looking right into your eyes.
            Thats quite the redefinition of honesty you just embarked on though. If I allow other services to operate on my site but don't provide an easy link for my competition to use then I am dishonest? Really? thats your claim for the meaning of basic honesty?
            Signature

            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9417201].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author Steve Wells
              Originally Posted by Mike Anthony View Post

              Thats quite the redefinition of honesty you just embarked on though. If I allow other services to operate on my site but don't provide an easy link for my competition to use then I am dishonest? Really? thats your claim for the meaning of basic honesty?
              Nope, that's trickyness, which is deciet, which is in the catagory of dishonesty which has it's own defintion that most people know.

              I just said dishonest, because trickyness is dishonesty, just a shade of it.
              Signature
              Need Custom Graphics Work? - Message Me For A Design Quote!
              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9417214].message }}
              • Profile picture of the author Mike Anthony
                Originally Posted by Steve Wells View Post

                Nope, that's trickyness, which is deciet,

                Ah so we are redefining trickiness too - don't provide links for competitors then you are tricky. this is getting better by the moment. Sure theres no dog in the hunt? Usually when these redefinitions start flying the dogs are a chasing
                Signature

                {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9417274].message }}
                • Profile picture of the author sbucciarel
                  Banned
                  Originally Posted by Mike Anthony View Post

                  Ah so we are redefining trickiness too - don't provide links for competitors then you are tricky. this is getting better by the moment. Sure theres no dog in the hunt? Usually when these redefinitions start flying the dogs are a chasing
                  When you consider that when asked if the other payment platforms would still be allowed, Alaister said ... for now.

                  Then you consider that the link to implement that was already gone and only those members who happened to read that thread, and were given the link in that thread by Alaister when he was pressed for it, knew about the secret link,

                  do you not see anything deceptive, dishonest, or lacking in transparency with that scenario?

                  The honest answer, for those who are wondering, would have been ... No, we have no intention of allowing members to use the other platforms to launch their WSOs, but until we actually have some competitive features and get some kinks out, here's the secret link.
                  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9417381].message }}
                  • Profile picture of the author Mike Anthony
                    Originally Posted by sbucciarel View Post

                    Alaister said ... for now.

                    Then you consider that the link to implement that was already gone and only those members who happened to read that thread, and were given the link in that thread by Alaister when he was pressed for it, knew about the secret link,

                    do you not see anything deceptive, dishonest, or lacking in transparency with that scenario?
                    Deceptive? Nope
                    dishonest? Nope
                    Lacking in transparency? Perhaps but I'm not transparent about a lot of things and I bet you aren't either (don't see your home address prominently displayed online).

                    The honest answer, for those who are wondering, would have been ... No, we have no intention of allowing members to use the other platforms to launch their WSOs, but until we actually have some competitive features and get some kinks out, here's the secret link.
                    First off the only way that that is a secret link is if the other services are abandoning ship. If I go to any third party service I would expect they would inform me of the "secret" link and even teach me how to use the so called secret link. This is the internet and its their business to let me know how to use their service so the whole secret thing is no longer secret.

                    Second shucks yeah they might have the desire ultimately to be the only player in town. However I have no idea how long Allen had some of the ideas he had for the forum before implementing and that includes policies. If he had them for 6 months thinking about but did not tell us does that mean its dishonest?

                    Personally if I were them I would hope to see the use of other services dry up and not have to be shut out (at least until no one cared). In a strange way those drumming the the funeral tom, toms are hastening the day because those services will probably not want to move forward on enhancement plans integrated with being here.

                    Now all that is not to say its the right way of doing things and not even saying it will not bite them in the rear but all this "Evil" and
                    "dishonest" talk is just maligning and character assassination for what should be a simple business situation -

                    Don't like something then start something else move somewhere else. In so doing create more power for all marketers by expanding providers and places to do business. The whine fests and the character assassination stuff is all so unnecessary. Strengthening the alternatives has always been the way that consumers gain more power. Begging and whining never has been a long term solution.
                    Signature

                    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9417448].message }}
              • Profile picture of the author GarrieWilson
                Originally Posted by Steve Wells View Post

                Nope, that's trickyness, which is deciet, which is in the catagory of dishonesty which has it's own defintion that most people know.

                I just said dishonest, because trickyness is dishonesty, just a shade of it.
                Then Mike from W+ is dishonest for using the WF color scheme, naming it close to the forum and even using "WSOs of the Day". People got confused for a reason.

                Taking it a step further...

                By you using W+, you are approving and support the deception. Which makes you no better.

                -g
                Signature
                Screw You, NameCheap!
                $1 Off NameSilo Domain Coupons:

                SAVEABUCKDOMAINS & DOLLARDOMAINSAVINGS
                {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9417415].message }}
                • Profile picture of the author sbucciarel
                  Banned
                  Originally Posted by GarrieWilson View Post

                  Then Mike from W+ is dishonest for using the WF color scheme, naming it close to the forum and even using "WSOs of the Day". People got confused for a reason.

                  Taking it a step further...

                  By you using W+, you are approving and support the deception. Which makes you no better.

                  -g
                  Right ... that's the same thing. By using red and WSO of the Day, he eliminated the competition. Not to mention that Allen knew all this and most likely endorsed it since he did endorse W+. But go ahead and muck up the conversation with things that are not the same and irrelevant.

                  Originally Posted by Mike Anthony View Post

                  Deceptive? Nope
                  dishonest? Nope
                  Lacking in transparency? Perhaps but I'm not transparent about a lot of things and I bet you aren't either (don't see your home address prominently displayed online).
                  What does my address have to do with the price of beans? When asked what it is online, if I don't want you to know, I'll say it's none of your freaking business, although a few smart people here found it easily.

                  Originally Posted by Mike Anthony View Post

                  Second shucks yeah they might have the desire ultimately to be the only player in town.
                  .....

                  Personally if I were them I would hope to see the use of other services dry up and not have to be shut out (at least until no one cared).
                  They might hope all they want, but the other platforms are way ahead of the game at this point and in no danger of drying up. I'm certain that their programmers are pretty busy right now with some new things in store and I think when the dust settles, we'll have more choices than we've had rather than only one. Particularly W+. JVZoo already has the ability to launch independently of the WF.

                  Originally Posted by Mike Anthony View Post

                  Now all that is not to say its the right way of doing things and not even saying it will not bite them in the rear ...

                  Begging and whining never has been a long term solution.
                  I don't see begging and whining. I see some very disappointed customers. I'm not one of them ... I've already moved some listings to a self hosted JVZ page. Choices ... we all have them.
                  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9417493].message }}
                  • Profile picture of the author GarrieWilson
                    Originally Posted by sbucciarel View Post

                    Right ... that's the same thing. By using red and WSO of the Day, he eliminated the competition. Not to mention that Allen knew all this and most likely endorsed it since he did endorse W+. But go ahead and muck up the conversation with things that are not the same and irrelevant.
                    It is the same when talking about deception. Which Steve was.

                    -g
                    Signature
                    Screw You, NameCheap!
                    $1 Off NameSilo Domain Coupons:

                    SAVEABUCKDOMAINS & DOLLARDOMAINSAVINGS
                    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9417529].message }}
                  • Profile picture of the author Mike Anthony
                    Originally Posted by sbucciarel View Post

                    What does my address have to do with the price of beans?
                    Easy...its an example where not having full transparency is not a dishonest or immoral thing

                    They might hope all they want, but the other platforms are way ahead of the game at this point and in no danger of drying up.
                    Great then whats the problem why we have all this whining in like five threads

                    I don't see begging and whining. I see some very disappointed customers
                    Are they? Disappointed customers? because everyone in this thread knows the alleged secret link so at the moment they have nothing to be disappointed about.

                    I been here long enough to know if this were a move by Allen the complaints would be a bit more muted. Seems to me its been a bit anti new ownership by some people here from day one. Maybe some people feel a little more like an outsider looking in than they used to but that might be a good thing since the overwhelming amount of WF users felt like that regardless - new or old ownership.
                    Signature

                    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9417568].message }}
                    • Profile picture of the author WillR
                      Originally Posted by Mike Anthony View Post

                      Great then whats the problem why we have all this whining in like five threads
                      Oh boy I get so sick of people going on about whining.

                      Here's some news for you Mike. Just because someone does not agree with YOUR point of view does not make it whining. People are more than welcome to have their own opinion and voice it. That's what a forum is all about.

                      So why do you guys always feel the need for the pointless back and forth telling people they are whining just because their opinion does not fit in with yours?

                      Guess what. We don't have to agree. If everyone in the world agreed on everything then it'd be a pretty boring place.

                      You have your opinion. Other people have theirs. That's their right so don't sit here and try and make people feel bad or wrong simply because they do not share your opinion.

                      All this thread has turned into is a time waster. Hopefully the mods will close it soon.

                      I've had my say. The powers at be have no doubt read through all of this and it's up to them what they choose to do with it. But Mike, your opinion on our feedback is (sorry to say) irrelevant.
                      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9417583].message }}
                      • Profile picture of the author Mike Anthony
                        Originally Posted by WillR View Post

                        . Just because someone does not agree with YOUR point of view does not make it whining. People are more than welcome to have their own opinion and voice it. That's what a forum is all about.
                        and its about hearing what people think about your opinions too. yep especially if its the same drumbeat of in like five different threads people are free to say what they think about your opinions. If you don't want that part then they have things they call blogs where you can turn off comments

                        But Mike, your opinion on our feedback is (sorry to say) irrelevant.
                        Actually thats my whole point. Your opinion on how the former owner was better and how this one lies is totally irrelevant. Thats indisputable. Buy them out and then maybe it won't be. Thats the whole thing about whining...its going on and on about something you are not going to change.

                        They've heard you whining for weeks in MULTIPLE threads and the single link remains. Move on.
                        Signature

                        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9417614].message }}
                        • Profile picture of the author WillR
                          Originally Posted by Mike Anthony View Post

                          Your opinion on how the former owner was better and how this one lies is totally irrelevant..
                          Mike,

                          I never ONCE said these people lie. Not once.

                          Please get your facts straight if you are going to continually argue your point.

                          Originally Posted by Mike Anthony View Post

                          Move on.
                          Yep. That's what I said.
                          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9417626].message }}
                          • Profile picture of the author Mike Anthony
                            Originally Posted by WillR View Post

                            Mike,

                            I never ONCE said these people lie. Not once.

                            Please get your facts straight
                            My facts are fine. That which we defend against criticism is that which we support. Posts with objections to Steve's character assassination of ownership have been met with your resistance and my points in this thread have been on the point of claiming dishonesty for present ownership.
                            Signature

                            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9417646].message }}
                    • Profile picture of the author Mike Anthony
                      Boom. That is exactly Steve's point. They are a corporation and want to maximize profits as much as possible. Allen was an individual entrepreneur who valued what he had built and the members of that community. As such he was VERY willing to listen to suggestions and ideas from the community members and it was those ideas that shaped the forum into what it is today. He worked very much WITH the community.
                      You kinda missed where he said like all of us. Enough already with the Allen sainthood speeches. Allen like every marketer here was in for the money. When fees were raised for WSOs I don't recall any long voting period before hand and the idea it was done just to clean up the WSO section is contradicted by the fact it never did and the price still stayed.

                      Anyone who was around to know what a WSO used to be before it became a strictly advertising section knows the quality took a serious dip and he did not do that for the "value of what he had built" but because like all marketers he wanted to make bank.

                      Nothing wrong with wanting to make cash and maximize your profit margin. The narrative that the previous owner was an angel when it came to not caring about making cash and the new owners are the devil is mythical
                      Signature

                      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9417593].message }}
                    • Profile picture of the author sbucciarel
                      Banned
                      Originally Posted by Mike Anthony View Post

                      Easy...its an example where not having full transparency is not a dishonest or immoral thing
                      It's not an example of anything except trying to baffle people with BS.

                      I haven't stated that I am going to give you my address. As I said, it isn't hard to find at all, but I never promised anyone that I would provide it.

                      If I had and then I do this:

                      10486 I'm Hiding Lane
                      You Can't Find Me, VA 50000


                      that's lacking in transparency .... see?

                      Originally Posted by Mike Anthony View Post

                      Are they? Disappointed customers? because everyone in this thread knows the alleged secret link so at the moment they have nothing to be disappointed about.
                      What about the rest of the alleged 730 some K members who haven't bothered to read these threads, because most of the members haven't. They just get a little surprise should they decide to launch a WSO and find that they are now forced to pay to Beta test a system that is severely lacking in the features that they might be accustomed to using and rely on.

                      Originally Posted by Mike Anthony View Post

                      I been here long enough to know if this were a move by Allen the complaints would be a bit more muted.
                      Well, Allen built this forum and it was his efforts and the people around him that he trusted with administration and moderation that made this forum what it is, including building up the membership and traffic and making a marketplace that is conducive to both him and his customers making money. He deserves that respect that he has. He earned it.
                      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9419516].message }}
                      • Profile picture of the author Mike Anthony
                        Originally Posted by sbucciarel View Post

                        It's not an example of anything except trying to baffle people with BS.
                        Wow are we the angry little soul There was no accusation of anything just an example of where lacking total transparency is not dishonest. Don't like it too bad. Didn't insult you or your mom.

                        I haven't stated that I am going to give you my address. As I said, it isn't hard to find at all, but I never promised anyone that I would provide it.
                        and to this date I have seen no promise ever made that they would provide a link right next to their product. You got that quote Suzanne or is THAT just the real BS?

                        They just get a little surprise should they decide to launch a WSO and find that they are now forced to pay to Beta test a system that is severely lacking in the features that they might be accustomed to using and rely on.
                        Well if they don't have the IQ to go to the service provider they want to use and say hey how can I use your service over at WF then perhaps we have weeded out the less intelligent WSOs providers.

                        WIN WIN!!! Congratulations to Freelancer - place needed some cleaning out anyway,

                        Well, Allen built this forum and it was his efforts and the people around him that he trusted with administration and moderation that made this forum what it is, including building up the membership and traffic and making a marketplace that is conducive to both him and his customers making money. He deserves that respect that he has. He earned it.
                        Yep he earned the money he got paid for it too and shucks signed on the dotted line on what he thought was due compensation. Good for him and they bought it and paid for it. Its now their site you are on and some respect can be extended. If even the minimal not calling them liars and dishonest and all kinds of other things. Marketing lesson? People buy things they have earned something from that too.

                        Legit concerns? Sure but a bit overboard which begs the question -Isn't a lot of this just coming from being sore that the power structure has shifted? Maybe from a group some people felt in with? Because you couldn't convince me having been here years that the former owner rolls this out it that it would get anywhere near the same response from the same people.

                        In fact I am pretty sure I'd be reading that We should give that owner the chance to improve correct and enhance and according to you well he might have earned a different response so it really isn't all about the issue but whose doing it. which substantially weakens the argument against their sheer "evil".

                        Like I said the idea that one owner was an an angel in not caring about making money and the other is the devil is WF myth only believed by a minority (but invested ) set. You can get angry with me all you want because I didn't, don't and won't belong to either church.
                        Signature

                        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9419711].message }}
                        • Profile picture of the author NicheMayhem
                          I was curious about this very subject when I sought out and clicked the bookmarked link for this forum.

                          After reading through this thread, I have a pretty good idea. Something did come to mind though. I wonder, if the local McDonalds decided to start selling tacos, would anyone sit inside their dining area complaining about it? I can see the sign that says

                          "Yeah, we still got burgers..........for now"

                          lol

                          Bottom line, this isn't our playground. We come here to play, we walk right in, the gate is open. The rules of the games have always been posted up by the owner or people appointed by the owner to make rules and keep order. Period. If we can still get through the fence and play our games, yippy. If our games get stepped on by new rules and we can't or don't want to adapt, find another playground. Seems simple.

                          Transitions tend to be pretty scary but there was a price paid for this forum. That supersedes what Allen built along with his ideals and I am pretty comfortable assuming he knew that when he sold it. We should keep that in mind. Same goes for anyone who has been here forever, helped out or profited along the way.

                          You used it for what it was when you could and if that changes nobody owes you anything.

                          We all make our own choices in this life. If McDonalds decides to start selling tacos, it is a really silly idea to go in there and try to tell them how much you liked their burgers. Isn't it? Sorry, I need some lunch.

                          Truthfully, IMHO, all there is to do now is to sit back and watch what happens. I doubt a thread like this is going to change anything or even a hundred threads like this. With Allen, yeah, it may have had an impact but in the end he still ran it the way he wanted to based on his own standards and profited handsomely from what I know. Nothing wrong with that and nothing wrong with the new owners doing the same.

                          Honestly, I think anyone here who wants to have their voice heard ought to do so from a place of respect and gratitude. Be considerate of the time, the place and the setting. Let's title the thread "Ways to help the new owners keep this a great marketplace that works for everybody, INCLUDING THEM" If they don't profit, neither can we. That is just how things work. Anyone have an idea on how they can profit just as much without having to prioritize the WP system? Yes, no? That is the kind of thread that could make a difference.

                          What happened to the sense of pride in this community. Was it because we all liked what we knew of Allen so much? I honestly believe, he wouldn't have sold his baby to anyone had he not thought they shared at least some of his philosophy. Give them a chance, it might end up benefiting you that they regulate payment processing through this forum. Maybe that will allow them to weed out more of the scammy parasites. Wouldn't that be great? Truth is, we don't know the what or the why yet.

                          If you don't like that, get yourself a contingency plan because....well...you should have had one anyway. Who knows, maybe you'll find there really is a big ole world outside of the WSO and tacos are delicious, after all.

                          Or...

                          Signature
                          Whether you think you can, or think you can't, YOU'RE RIGHT!! <~~Henry Ford

                          Check out my video gigs on fiverr!
                          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9419928].message }}
                          • Profile picture of the author Tom B
                            Banned
                            Originally Posted by NicheMayhem View Post

                            I was curious about this very subject when I sought out and clicked the bookmarked link for this forum.

                            After reading through this thread, I have a pretty good idea. Something did come to mind though. I wonder, if the local McDonalds decided to start selling tacos, would anyone sit inside their dining area complaining about it? I can see the sign that says

                            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9420401].message }}
                            • Profile picture of the author sbucciarel
                              Banned
                              Originally Posted by NicheMayhem View Post
                              I was curious about this very subject when I sought out and clicked the bookmarked link for this forum.

                              After reading through this thread, I have a pretty good idea. Something did come to mind though. I wonder, if the local McDonalds decided to start selling tacos, would anyone sit inside their dining area complaining about it? I can see the sign that says
                              Originally Posted by Thomas Belknap View Post

                              Actually, that should be McTacos. But to answer that question, I wouldn't complain about McDonalds offering Tacos. I would be eating Tacos at Taco Bell, not McDonalds who has very little in the way of edible food.
                              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9420491].message }}
                        • Profile picture of the author sbucciarel
                          Banned
                          Originally Posted by Mike Anthony View Post

                          Wow are we the angry little soul There was no accusation of anything just an example of where lacking total transparency is not dishonest. Don't like it too bad. Didn't insult you or your mom.

                          and to this date I have seen no promise ever made that they would provide a link right next to their product. You got that quote Suzanne or is THAT just the real BS?
                          Whatever ... and they didn't say that they would make the bulk of the members search high and low and then go to the help desk to beg and plead for the link either, but that's what you have to do if you don't know it. If they don't want us to use competitors here, just get rid of it and be honest about it. I don't care either way. It's the saying one thing and doing another that most people don't like.

                          Originally Posted by Mike Anthony View Post

                          Well if they don't have the IQ to go to the service provider they want to use and say hey how can I use your service over at WF then perhaps we have weeded out the less intelligent WSOs providers. WIN WIN!!! Congratulations to Freelancer - place needed some cleaning out anyway,
                          From what I can see, making money is their goal, not weeding out a large portion of their customer base.

                          Originally Posted by Mike Anthony View Post

                          Yep he earned the money he got paid for it too and shucks signed on the dotted line on what he thought was due compensation. Good for him and they bought it and paid for it. Its now their site you are on and some respect can be extended. If even the minimal not calling them liars and dishonest and all kinds of other things. Marketing lesson? People buy things they have earned something from that too.
                          Another marketing lesson. Don't tell half truths to your customers. They respect you a lot more if you're up front. Respect is earned, and I never called them liars and "all kinds of other things." This is a forum discussion and it is not in the least bit unusual for the members to discuss major changes in the forum. Don't like it, don't discuss.
                          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9420324].message }}
                          • Profile picture of the author Mike Anthony
                            Originally Posted by sbucciarel View Post

                            From what I can see, making money is their goal, not weeding out a large portion of their customer base.
                            .
                            and which owner didn't have that goal? Only people really drinking the Kool Aid could look at the WSO section over the last 5 years and not know making money was the over riding goal of EVERY owner of WF.

                            If anything the fact that no one is employing any mental gymnastics to deny it is refreshing and dare I say....honest
                            Signature

                            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9420823].message }}
                            • Profile picture of the author sbucciarel
                              Banned
                              Originally Posted by Mike Anthony View Post

                              and which owner didn't have that goal? Only people really drinking the Kool Aid could look at the WSO section over the last 5 years and not know making money was the over riding goal of EVERY owner of WF.

                              If anything the fact that no one is employing any mental gymnastics to deny it is refreshing and dare I say....honest
                              Jeeezus ... Can you read? Can you follow a conversation at all? Stop pretending I'm saying things I'm not saying.

                              You Said:

                              Originally Posted by Mike Anthony View Post
                              Well if they don't have the IQ to go to the service provider they want to use and say hey how can I use your service over at WF then perhaps we have weeded out the less intelligent WSOs providers. WIN WIN!!! Congratulations to Freelancer - place needed some cleaning out anyway,
                              I Said:

                              I'm fairly certain that freelancer would rather make money than eliminate a large portion of it's membership .... duh ... meaning that freelancer would rather make money from customers than weed them out because they lack intelligence. WIN WIN!!! Money spends just as well when it comes from stupid people as it does from intelligent people.

                              So, your comment means what? Who doesn't know and who really cares that the business owners of this forum want to make money. We all are here to make money. If you don't understand this message, honestly, just get someone to read to you.
                              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9420858].message }}
                              • Profile picture of the author Mike Anthony
                                Originally Posted by sbucciarel View Post

                                Jeeezus ... Can you read?
                                I can read just fine but given your posts I can see you can't comprehend. too emotional? How many ownership comparisons are there in this thread?

                                I'm fairly certain that freelancer would rather make money than eliminate a large portion of it's membership .... duh
                                Maybe its you that needs to go over to the WSO sections and read. Its not happening. Apart from a few whining incessantly the WSO section is still kicking and a large portion are going along merrily with their business

                                meaning that freelancer would rather make money from customers than weed them out because they lack intelligence.
                                Who? Where are they? since the point flew over you head by about 100 feet - who spends the time and effort to develop a product that they want to sell in an WSO, goes to post it and says

                                "shucks I am not going to do it anymore because shuckems ... errrr .... can't figure out how the service I want to use can be used on Warrior Forum and hmmmm...duh errr......I don't figure I might get that info from the service i will be paying or EGADS! not from the search function on WF"

                                Before you tell someone to get somebody to read for them perhap get a VA who can think for you? Classified section might have a few.

                                Who doesn't know and who really cares that the business owners of this forum want to make money. We all are here to make money.
                                Which makes your observation that what you see is them wanting to make money redundant then. Pardon me for thinking you were attempting to make a point that was actually not already obvious.
                                Signature

                                {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9420963].message }}
                                • Profile picture of the author Caleb Spilchen
                                  Originally Posted by Mike Anthony View Post

                                  I can read just fine but given your posts I can see you can't comprehend. too emotional? How many ownership comparisons are there in this thread?
                                  I've been out of high school for a couple years now... did the whole college thing too (All while I was a member of this forum and selling WSO's lol).

                                  I forgot how much this forum was like high school. Calm down people . We're all grown ups here..

                                  Caleb
                                  Signature

                                  Canadian Expat Living in Medellin, Colombia

                                  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9421305].message }}
                                • Profile picture of the author sbucciarel
                                  Banned
                                  Originally Posted by Mike Anthony View Post

                                  Maybe its you that needs to go over to the WSO sections and read. Its not happening. Apart from a few whining incessantly the WSO section is still kicking and a large portion are going along merrily with their business
                                  That's pretty much exactly what I implied, if you read my post correctly, which again, you obviously didn't. It's the one part of the WF that makes a lot of money and they are not going to "elimiate the idiots", as you suggested, because idiots spend money too.

                                  Originally Posted by Mike Anthony View Post

                                  Who? Where are they? since the point flew over you head by about 100 feet - who spends the time and effort to develop a product that they want to sell in an WSO, goes to post it and says
                                  The same kind of person who has a link in their sig that does this when I click on it, (which by the way, doesn't appear to be a Warrior Payment fueled WSO ... gosh)

                                  Forbidden

                                  You don't have permission to access /rentanetwork.html on this server.

                                  Additionally, a 404 Not Found error was encountered while trying to use an ErrorDocument to handle the request.
                                  Apache Server at bestseoalive.com Port 80
                                  To be clear, I'm not the one that said the new owners were wicked or evil or god forbid, wanted to make money. My only point in this thread, ironically, is on topic of the thread title ... will this be an open marketplace? No, it won't. Is it now? Not really since they have no link to make it an open marketplace that is easily accessible to all who are attempting to launch their WSOs. If they don't want to allow the competition right NOW, at this point, let them just be honest about it and say NO, we are not going to allow it.

                                  I don't rule out giving it a whirl at some point long down the road. I'll let everyone else beta test it and see how it impacts their sales and their Paypal accounts. It's far too undeveloped at this point to be of any use to me.
                                  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9421780].message }}
                                  • Profile picture of the author Tom B
                                    Banned
                                    I bet most of you all didn't know that Allen is really Santa Clause. Yep, you heard it hear first. The WarriorForum was just a hobby on his "down" time. He was bored and had to put the elves to work so why not set up a big forum and let the elves moderate it.

                                    He became an affiliate because reindeers eat way too much food. I actually think he sold this place because he retired from the whole Christmas gig.

                                    Now he runs a restaurant in Cuba that specializes in reindeer steaks.
                                    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9422312].message }}
                                  • Profile picture of the author Mike Anthony
                                    Originally Posted by sbucciarel View Post

                                    The same kind of person who has a link in their sig that does this when I click on it, (which by the way, doesn't appear to be a Warrior Payment fueled WSO ... gosh)
                                    Oh you mean server admins/hosting companies who run WSOs (ah huge group eh?) or is your bailout logic that if my host has temporary issues that reflects on me?

                                    Originally Posted by Caleb Spilchen View Post

                                    If allen says "overwhelmingly" wanted to make money... He would have darn well done a lot more...

                                    There was a DEAD warrior forum opt in form on here for HOW MANY YEARS??? That he could have used to promote deals of the day etc... probably make an extra $10k-30k A MONTH off it... But he didn't...
                                    Caleb my point was not to claim Allen ONLY cared about money anymore than anyone here knows enough about alastaire and his team to claim that they only care about money (and are EVIL.....sigh )but I stand by what I said and its obvious. The WSO section did not get its outside rep under Freelancer (and yes I am aware of the great mental gymnastics employed to excuse things but they don't phase me) but money talked and guess what?? as an Internet marketer I can understand that. SO to distill the point

                                    This forum has been about making money for years. If people are going to be running around calling present ownership evil for integrating their payment system into WF and not providing an easy link for competition then its ludicrous to then turn around and claim sainthood for previous ownership that allowed all kinds of borderline offers for the WSO fees . Apples and oranges? Nope not when people are talking dishonesty and "evil" over a business decision.

                                    This isn't about the evils of Allen either. Far from it. its more about not trying to claim anything for one side against the other.

                                    Now if you (generic you not you personally) are in deep or too close and want to drink the Kool aid that no one has had a point all these years against what has gone on in the WSO section because it was all out of ownership hands then - hey enjoy that. read it never bought it.

                                    However having that double standard and psuedo righteously calling the new owners evil and dishonest at the same time is just poor form and lacks etiquette. they are due some respect and all these posts about how great previous ownership was contrasted with how evil present ownership is just well - bad manners. Still in love withthe first husband that to you can do no wrong? then maybe thats where you should be - not standing in the second husband's property all day long making accusations. Hey we love who we love but we don't have to flaunt it in their face on their property.
                                    Signature

                                    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9422496].message }}
                                    • Profile picture of the author Karen Blundell
                                      Originally Posted by Mike Anthony View Post

                                      they are due some respect and all these posts about how great previous ownership was contrasted with how evil present ownership is just well - bad manners. Still in love withthe first husband that to you can do no wrong? then maybe thats where you should be - not standing in the second husband's property all day long making accusations. Hey we love who we love but we don't have to flaunt it in their face on their property.
                                      Mike, respect is earned and further more, may I remind you that a community is nothing without members. Pissing off some of the most active WSO sellers is not a way to earn their respect, imho. So far, with the way Freelancer have launched their Warrior Payments - I think they have alienated a good many of the big WSO sellers - and many, like Suzanne, have been pro-active in launching campaigns elsewhere. By the way, she has been vocal here because she is one of the top female contributors in this forum. In my opinion, she deserves respect and not your condescending attitude towards her.

                                      Seeing that a vast majority of the top WSO sellers are remaining quiet, is quite telling to me. Perhaps it's because they have already made other arrangements and are launching outside of this forum. And who could blame them?
                                      Or they are simply watching and waiting like many of us are as John Taylor mentioned above.

                                      Lastly, the one thing that I don't like is people being labeled whiners if they speak up about things they don't like. Their opinion is just as valid as anyone's.
                                      That's why this is a discussion forum. All sorts of opinions are welcomed or at least they should be, without the fear of being attacked for having a differing opinion than the majority.

                                      Peace out.
                                      Signature
                                      ---------------
                                      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9423184].message }}
                                      • Profile picture of the author Paul Myers
                                        Karen,

                                        Yes, Suzanne is one of the more consistent contributors to the forum. So is Mike. And they both have strong opinions on ethics, which deserve careful consideration.

                                        The funny thing, if you read what they're saying, is that they're not really disagreeing. I suspect that they'd find themselves in radical agreement if they actually talked to each other and got to understand each other's opinions.

                                        They both seem to enjoy the fireworks, though.
                                        Seeing that a vast majority of the top WSO sellers are remaining quiet, is quite telling to me.
                                        The majority of "top WSO sellers" don't participate in a lot of threads. That doesn't tell me much except they're not posting on the subject.


                                        Paul
                                        Signature
                                        .
                                        Stop by Paul's Pub - my little hangout on Facebook.

                                        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9423250].message }}
                                        • Profile picture of the author Mike Anthony
                                          Originally Posted by Paul Myers View Post

                                          The funny thing, if you read what they're saying, is that they're not really disagreeing. I suspect that they'd find themselves in radical agreement if they actually talked to each other and got to understand each other's opinions.
                                          As far as I can see we disagree only on characterization issues of present ownership. I am on record thinking a beta was needed. Shucks I kinda chuckled when I saw the 80% criteria for deal of the day myself. In this thread however it seems if you do not swear undying allegiance to Allen (who I never met which is a minimum requirement for my undying anything) and curse the heathen occupiers you've offended the troops

                                          They both seem to enjoy the fireworks, though.
                                          My new title more - Defender of the Establishment,....who'd a thunk? lol. Quite an odd feeling as well.
                                          Signature

                                          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9423329].message }}
                                          • Profile picture of the author Paul Myers
                                            Mike,
                                            As far as I can see we disagree only on characterization issues of present ownership.
                                            I'd say that's a fair statement.

                                            I don't really think most of us know Matt or Alaister well enough to have formed opinions on either of them as people. I certainly don't. And the track record is a bit too short at the moment to be confident of their philosophies on much.

                                            It's tempting to interpret actions and infer motivations from them, but the Freelancer crew is still learning the ropes here. I think it would be a mistake to read too much into things until they have a better grasp of the forum as a whole.

                                            One can't help but form impressions. That should be treated as something different from an informed opinion, though. That's a distinction too many people fail to consider.


                                            Paul
                                            Signature
                                            .
                                            Stop by Paul's Pub - my little hangout on Facebook.

                                            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9423362].message }}
                                            • Profile picture of the author Paul Myers
                                              I really don't know how you did it so long, Paul.
                                              Thick skin and good scotch.
                                              Signature
                                              .
                                              Stop by Paul's Pub - my little hangout on Facebook.

                                              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9423373].message }}
                                            • Profile picture of the author sbucciarel
                                              Banned
                                              Originally Posted by Paul Myers View Post

                                              Mike,I'd say that's a fair statement.

                                              I don't really think most of us know Matt or Alaister well enough to have formed opinions on either of them as people. I certainly don't. And the track record is a bit too short at the moment to be confident of their philosophies on much.

                                              It's tempting to interpret actions and infer motivations from them, but the Freelancer crew is still learning the ropes here. I think it would be a mistake to read too much into things until they have a better grasp of the forum as a whole.

                                              One can't help but form impressions. That should be treated as something different from an informed opinion, though. That's a distinction too many people fail to consider.

                                              Paul
                                              Well it seemed to me that Mike was attributing a remark made by someone else to people who didn't say it .. i.e., wicked or evil corporation stuff.

                                              I haven't made any real judgments about the new ownership personally. Some of their actions seem a bit disconcerting. Here's the thing with the issue of automatic respect simply because a corporation or person had enough money to buy a property. I feel that respect is a two way street. There are some pretty intelligent people in this forum and being less than transparent on issues that are important to them insults their intelligence.

                                              I prefer an open, honest answer to a vague, deceptive answer ... always, even if I don't like the answer. I respect the honesty. I fully expected this move with Warrior Payments. It comes as no surprise at all. Do I think it's great that payment options will be limited to Warrior Payments on WSOs? No, but that's not my decision to make, and I don't have to use it if it won't serve my needs or I don't think it's quite ready.

                                              That doesn't mean that I dislike Alaister or Matt Barrie. I don't really know them. I didn't know Allen either, but respected him and the way he ran the forum. Voicing your opinions on some of the big issues that we are being served up here is not an indication of disrespect. It's sort of what we do here every day. Voice our opinions, right or wrong [smilie]. In some of the threads, our feedback has been requested and freely given.

                                              As for the new owners, who knows at this point what will happen here. It's too soon to tell for certain, and all any of us can do is wait and see. Mike made a statement about respecting someone when you walk into their home. Well, we didn't walk into their home. We were already here. They walked into "our" hangout. By now, they might think they made a wrong turn and ended up in a biker bar. lol.
                                              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9423670].message }}
                                              • Profile picture of the author Kay King
                                                Well, we didn't walk into their home. We were already here. They walked into "our" hangout.
                                                I guess I don't look at it that way. We were here as guests or tenants of the previous owner - new people bought the building where we hang out. Now we are guests or tenants of the new owner.

                                                When new members made demands in the past - we used to tell them "this isn't a democracy but a privately owned forum - and the owner makes the rules". That hasn't changed.
                                                Signature
                                                Saving one dog will not change the world - but the world changes forever for that one dog
                                                ***
                                                One secret to happiness is to let every situation be
                                                what it is instead of what you think it should be.
                                                {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9424460].message }}
                                                • Profile picture of the author sbucciarel
                                                  Banned
                                                  Originally Posted by Kay King View Post

                                                  I guess I don't look at it that way. We were here as guests or tenants of the previous owner - new people bought the building where we hang out. Now we are guests or tenants of the new owner.

                                                  When new members made demands in the past - we used to tell them "this isn't a democracy but a privately owned forum - and the owner makes the rules". That hasn't changed.
                                                  While some seem to be pushy and a bit overbearing or demanding, most are not making demands at all. They're asking for transparency and honest answers so they can make their own decisions accordingly. I don't care what rules are made. Make them and inform.

                                                  It's a little more complex than just being a guest. A lot of us are also customers and some are very big customers, and they want us to be customers and would like more customers. Customers don't like to be pushed. They push back.

                                                  I think this new contest is a great idea. It may or may not accomplish a goal of attracting big fish, but it will increase overall excitement for and use of the WP system and it feels a lot better than being pushed.
                                                  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9425130].message }}
                                          • Profile picture of the author Lance K
                                            Originally Posted by Mike Anthony View Post

                                            In this thread however it seems if you do not swear undying allegiance to Allen (who I never met which is a minimum requirement for my undying anything) and curse the heathen occupiers you've offended the troops .
                                            Well, I hope they don't forget...Allen is the one who turned over the reigns to Freelancer. I'm not making any judgments, just stating fact.
                                            Signature
                                            "You can have everything in life you want if you will just help enough other people get what they want."
                                            ~ Zig Ziglar
                                            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9423512].message }}
                                        • Profile picture of the author Karen Blundell
                                          Originally Posted by Paul Myers View Post

                                          Karen,

                                          Yes, Suzanne is one of the more consistent contributors to the forum. So is Mike. And they both have strong opinions on ethics, which deserve careful consideration.

                                          The funny thing, if you read what they're saying, is that they're not really disagreeing. I suspect that they'd find themselves in radical agreement if they actually talked to each other and got to understand each other's opinions.

                                          They both seem to enjoy the fireworks, though. The majority of "top WSO sellers" don't participate in a lot of threads. That doesn't tell me much except they're not posting on the subject.


                                          Paul
                                          I see things differently but then again, I often do. No biggie - that's why I could never ever be a forum mod again - I really don't know how you did it so long, Paul.
                                          Signature
                                          ---------------
                                          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9423359].message }}
                                      • Profile picture of the author Mike Anthony
                                        Originally Posted by Karen Blundell View Post

                                        Mike, respect is earned ............In my opinion, she deserves respect and not your condescending attitude towards her.
                                        Go ahead and read my first post and her first response to me. Truth be told I was surprised she acted as if she had been insulted when there was nothing of the sort toward here. Like you said respect is earned not squandered (Your opinion of whose earned yours has nothing to do with whose earned mine) and by the way how I was raised just the fact that you step into someones house means a minimum level of respect is due them. Theres no reason in the world any of you can give that justifies the "evil" label and all the accusations of dishonesty with no quote that shows it

                                        All sorts of opinions are welcomed or at least they should be, without the fear of being attacked for having a differing opinion than the majority.
                                        Oh the Irony
                                        Signature

                                        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9423288].message }}
                                        • Profile picture of the author Tom B
                                          Banned
                                          Originally Posted by Mike Anthony View Post

                                          Go ahead and read my first post and her first response to me. Truth be told I was surprised she acted as if she had been insulted when there was nothing of the sort toward here. Like you said respect is earned not squandered (Your opinion of whose earned yours has nothing to do with whose earned mine) and by the way how I was raised just the fact that you step into someones house means a minimum level of respect is due them. Theres no reason in the world any of you can give that justifies the "evil" label and all the accusations of dishonesty with no quote that shows it

                                          Oh the Irony

                                          The whole attack thing is subjective unless someone is straight up calling someone names. For some, if you don't flower your words with politically correct adjectives you are attacking. Forget the content, it's the delivery that seems to matter these days.

                                          I don't get it but, sadly, that is the world we live in.

                                          That is one of the things I enjoyed while living in Ukraine They were direct, didn't mince words and had no problem telling you what they thought. It was just normal to them and not considered attacking or personal in nature.
                                          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9423310].message }}
                                          • Profile picture of the author Sid Hale
                                            Thomas,

                                            No offense, but... what a dickhead
                                            Signature

                                            Sid Hale
                                            Coming Soon... Rapid Action Profits (Pro)

                                            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9423375].message }}
                                            • Profile picture of the author Tom B
                                              Banned
                                              Originally Posted by Sid Hale View Post

                                              Thomas,

                                              No offense, but... what a dickhead
                                              See Subjective. I choose to take that as a compliment unless you get too many people liking your post... then I will be offended.
                                              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9423380].message }}
                                            • Profile picture of the author Sid Hale
                                              Seriously...

                                              While it would be nice for FL to separate the posting of a WSO from the promotion of their new service, isn't it really the responsibility of the individual affiliate networks to communicate to their members (affiliates and vendors, alike) how to utilize their service on someone else's platform (i.e. WF)?

                                              FL just recently rescinded Allen's decision to disallow affiliate program promotion in the WSO thread (which I don't think they should have done), so they have acted in favor of the 3rd party affiliate networks (CB, JVZoo, Warrior+, DigiResults, and many more) in that instance.

                                              Those service networks may not be happy with the current stance regarding FL's promotion of their own in-house program, but isn't it really their responsibility to advertise their own benefits - rather than settling comfortably into a business plan that requires them to ride on the coattails of this marketplace?

                                              Does the advent of WarriorPayments upset the apple cart with respect to the amount of marketing required on their part? Probably... but such is business.
                                              Signature

                                              Sid Hale
                                              Coming Soon... Rapid Action Profits (Pro)

                                              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9423402].message }}
                                        • Profile picture of the author Karen Blundell
                                          Originally Posted by Mike Anthony View Post

                                          Go ahead and read my first post and her first response to me. Truth be told I was surprised she acted as if she had been insulted when there was nothing of the sort toward here. Like you said respect is earned not squandered (Your opinion of whose earned yours has nothing to do with whose earned mine) and by the way how I was raised just the fact that you step into someones house means a minimum level of respect is due them. Theres no reason in the world any of you can give that justifies the "evil" label and all the accusations of dishonesty with no quote that shows it

                                          Oh the Irony
                                          Mike, I apologize if I came across as attacking you. I was simply observing - to me it felt like you were condescending to Suzanne - but perhaps I was being overly-sensitive - Suzanne can hold her own. I know she doesn't need me to stick up for her, but me being who I am, I couldn't help myself. Sorry if I offended.
                                          Signature
                                          ---------------
                                          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9423381].message }}
                                          • Profile picture of the author Mike Anthony
                                            Originally Posted by Karen Blundell View Post

                                            I know she doesn't need me to stick up for her, but me being who I am, I couldn't help myself. Sorry if I offended.
                                            We are fine my lady. No offense taken. Friendship is never a sign of bad character
                                            Signature

                                            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9423390].message }}
                            • Profile picture of the author Caleb Spilchen
                              Originally Posted by Mike Anthony View Post

                              and which owner didn't have that goal? Only people really drinking the Kool Aid could look at the WSO section over the last 5 years and not know making money was the over riding goal of EVERY owner of WF.

                              If anything the fact that no one is employing any mental gymnastics to deny it is refreshing and dare I say....honest
                              If allen says "overwhelmingly" wanted to make money... He would have darn well done a lot more...

                              There was a DEAD warrior forum opt in form on here for HOW MANY YEARS??? That he could have used to promote deals of the day etc... probably make an extra $10k-30k A MONTH off it... But he didn't...

                              He could have had banner ads all over the place, in threads like on digitalpoint. While, I'm sure allen wanted to make money (And he did bank BIG dollars), he didn't have just that goal... or he coulda gone A LOT harder.

                              Caleb
                              Signature

                              Canadian Expat Living in Medellin, Colombia

                              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9421310].message }}
                              • Profile picture of the author Paul Myers
                                Caleb,

                                Thank you. A sensible response.

                                No-one with any awareness of the history of this forum is going to contend that Allen didn't want to make money from the place. For all you newcomers (meaning, folks who've been here less than a decade or so), consider: It started out in 1997 as a paid membership site, with an affiliate program. That pretty much answers that question.

                                The thing people tend to remember is that Allen always put the members first, even when it cost him money.

                                On top of policy decisions that chased out sellers that would have meant hundreds of thousands of extra dollars in sales, Allen backed up the mods. The one thing he asked of us was to protect the members as best we could. And he let us do that. I don't recall a single instance of him overriding a moderator's decision to delete an offer or ban a seller.

                                Not one. Ever.

                                I know from personal experience that his response, when I'd send him an email saying "This guy was banned for XYZ that's bad for the members," was always "Thanks." Occasionally he'd add something to the effect of "Good riddance."

                                Y'all can speculate. I've seen it, and the pattern has never varied over all the time I've been a member or moderator here. No-one hated the scammers more than Allen. Anyone who's heard the disgust in his voice when he talked about them has no doubt where he stood on that stuff.

                                The issue now is, do people believe the same philosophy holds true of the new management?

                                If enough people decide they don't, that will hurt the forum. Possibly in ways that could lead to serious problems.

                                That is 100% up to Alaister and Matt.


                                Paul
                                Signature
                                .
                                Stop by Paul's Pub - my little hangout on Facebook.

                                {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9421364].message }}
                  • Profile picture of the author Tom B
                    Banned
                    Originally Posted by sbucciarel View Post

                    Right ... that's the same thing. By using red and WSO of the Day, he eliminated the competition. Not to mention that Allen knew all this and most likely endorsed it since he did endorse W+. But go ahead and muck up the conversation with things that are not the same and irrelevant.
                    Actually, I have seen a few times where Allen mentioned he was close to getting rid of all of those platforms. I wouldn't mistake Allen's generosity as an endorsement.
                    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9417631].message }}
                  • Profile picture of the author Karen Blundell
                    Originally Posted by sbucciarel View Post


                    I don't see begging and whining. I see some very disappointed customers. I'm not one of them ... I've already moved some listings to a self hosted JVZ page. Choices ... we all have them.
                    Suzanne, I too don't see begging and whining. I see lots of intelligent people making valid statements and offering sensible opinions. This is a discussion forum, or so I thought, but unless we agree with the status quo we are no longer welcome, I guess.

                    Fair enough. Let's see how long this forum will last once all the business is gone elsewhere.

                    Good luck with your listings, Suzanne - may you have lots and lots of sales - and more than you would ever have here.
                    Signature
                    ---------------
                    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9419629].message }}
                • Profile picture of the author WillR
                  Originally Posted by GarrieWilson View Post

                  Then Mike from W+ is dishonest for using the WF color scheme, naming it close to the forum and even using "WSOs of the Day". People got confused for a reason.

                  Taking it a step further...

                  By you using W+, you are approving and support the deception. Which makes you no better.

                  -g
                  Is selling a Wordpress plugin called 'WP Whatever' deceiving people? I don't think so.

                  The reality is Mike had no reason to deceive people. He had absolutely no competition at the time so people only ever had the one choice... and it remained that way for years.
                  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9417531].message }}
                  • Profile picture of the author GarrieWilson
                    Originally Posted by WillR View Post

                    Is selling a Wordpress plugin called 'WP Whatever' deceiving people? I don't think so.

                    The reality is Mike had no reason to deceive people. He had absolutely no competition at the time so people only ever had the one choice... and it remained that way for years.
                    Maybe my point wasn't clear...

                    Steve is saying Freelancer is being deceptive over Warrior Payments. If they are, then so was Mike. Mike used forum branding which confused people. It might not have been on purpose but could still be considered deceptive.

                    I think Freelancer should put a link to use other payment methods, especially since theirs is so new but they are a business and want to maximize their profits. Just like all/most of us.

                    I wouldn't advertise a competitors product and wouldn't expect others to.


                    -g
                    Signature
                    Screw You, NameCheap!
                    $1 Off NameSilo Domain Coupons:

                    SAVEABUCKDOMAINS & DOLLARDOMAINSAVINGS
                    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9417551].message }}
                    • Profile picture of the author WillR
                      Originally Posted by GarrieWilson View Post

                      I think Freelancer should put a link to use other payment methods
                      Yep, we agree on that.

                      Originally Posted by GarrieWilson View Post

                      but they are a business and want to maximize their profits. Just like all/most of us.
                      Boom. That is exactly Steve's point. They are a corporation and want to maximize profits as much as possible. Allen was an individual entrepreneur who valued what he had built and the members of that community. As such he was VERY willing to listen to suggestions and ideas from the community members and it was those ideas that shaped the forum into what it is today. He worked very much WITH the community.

                      You then have a corporation who took it over, and as you correctly said, has a main aim of maximizing the money it can make for it's shareholders. Profit first, community second. No one can debate that with the changes that have been made. They have all been made with one goal in mind -- to make more money for THEM.

                      That's our point. Without a community this website is nothing. So they can choose to listen to us or ignore us. That is their choice. We also have the choice to stay here or go. But that's not the solution. The solution is to listen to people's feedback and focus on nurturing the community rather than trying to squeeze as much money out of it as you can. Because when you do that, people just feel used and abused and will go elsewhere.

                      It's not as though they are in a position to be losing anymore members. This forum has been on a downward slope for a few years now (Allen knew that, he's not dumb and thus why he sold) so their main aim right now should be getting members back over to this forum. You can only do that by giving people a reason to come back and want to use this forum. Removing payment options or making them harder to use is certainly not going to do that.

                      But hey. 99% of the stuff I do nowadays is outside of this forum.... like most people. So I really have no vested interest anymore. If the forum were to go down tomorrow it would be a shame, but it would make virtually no difference to my bottom line. My feedback is purely based on someone who has been selling here for years and wants to see the community keep thriving. So they can take our advice or leave it. That choice is theirs.
                      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9417562].message }}
                    • Profile picture of the author Tom B
                      Banned
                      Originally Posted by GarrieWilson View Post

                      Maybe my point wasn't clear...

                      Steve is saying Freelancer is being deceptive over Warrior Payments. If they are, then so was Mike. Mike used forum branding which confused people. It might not have been on purpose but could still be considered deceptive.

                      I think Freelancer should put a link to use other payment methods, especially since theirs is so new but they are a business and want to maximize their profits. Just like all/most of us.

                      I wouldn't advertise a competitors product and wouldn't expect others to.


                      -g
                      Yeah, I think they shot themselves in the foot by not having other payment methods easily available. At least until the WarriorPayments was up to actually competing.

                      Freelancer would have been better off waiving the 2% fee to get people using their payment platform while also continuing to improve based on feedback.

                      Like I said, this is a great case study that we can all benefit from. What to do and what not to do.

                      Introducing this type of change (forcibly by excluding other payment options) so quickly wasn't ideal either. In a press release Freelancer mention the Warriorforum had a "cult following". That in itself should have told them they needed to be careful how they implemented changes.
                      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9417644].message }}
                      • Profile picture of the author Mike Anthony
                        Originally Posted by Thomas Belknap View Post

                        Introducing this type of change (forcibly by excluding other payment options) so quickly wasn't ideal either.
                        Agreed. They should have had this go through a beta and added the feature requests that came out of that. They clearly wanted their link to be the default but the way they rushed it meant they put a not feature rich service as the default which was a poor move. On the other hand jobs are lost over annual profit reports so you don't know what people are up against.
                        Signature

                        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9417671].message }}
                        • Profile picture of the author Tom B
                          Banned
                          Originally Posted by Mike Anthony View Post

                          Agreed. They should have had this go through a beta and added the feature requests that came out of that. They clearly wanted their link to be the default but the way they rushed it meant they put a not feature rich service as the default which was a poor move. On the other hand jobs are lost over annual profit reports so you don't know what people are up against.
                          It's interesting. I feel like I have a front row seat to watching this go down. I was here long enough to understand the culture behind the forum. Heck, I have seen that culture change over time.

                          Still, watching a buy out and seeing how they make changes have been something we can all learn from. Freelancer has been through this before but that doesn't mean it will be a success.

                          That is why I am enjoying the show.
                          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9417688].message }}
                          • Profile picture of the author Paul Myers
                            A couple of points...

                            First, it is very unlikely that Mr Cueball would choose to muster the patience that The Real Thomas regularly displays in handling the help desk. The notion of Thomas Belknap behind that curtain evoked some very funny visuals for me.

                            For those of you slamming at James Campbell, I'd take a step back and lose the personal factor. James has been a consistent help to the mods on a number of issues, and does it because he cares about the direction of the forum. Not because his income is in any way wrapped up in it.

                            That's true of many people here, and none of them should be asked things like what skin they have in the game.

                            James and I have disagreed an a fair number of things. Unlike some folks, though, he has always responded to disagreement in a professional and thoughtful way when he is addressed with basic respect. Even when it's an issue about which he has very strong feelings.

                            That said...

                            The difference between a private owner and a publicly traded company is very real, in a legal and practical sense. Allen had the option to forego added profits if he chose, with no responsibility to explain that decision to anyone else. Regardless of the legal structure under which the forum was held. Publicly traded companies don't have that option. There is flexibility, certainly, but not to the degree a private owner has.

                            Allen and Matt have different views on these things, too. (Note: 'Different' is not a judgement of relative worth. Just a recognition of reality.)

                            The whole "good or bad" thing has no real connection to any of that. Things are just different.

                            I don't think it's wise to exclude the other payment platforms, but I think it's inevitable. And I'm not sure it will make all that much difference to how things evolve, given that it's already the default. People will respond according to how they see it fitting their best interests, as they should.

                            As far as being dishonest... If Alaister said "for now," I think that's a pretty clear and open statement that the option is not being excluded, and may even be part of the plan for later. That's not dishonest.

                            There is also nothing sneaky about not promoting your competition.

                            We had a rule here for years that you don't get to promote other forums in this market on this forum. Is that sneaky? I don't think so, especially with the "no bashing them, either" rule. We also didn't allow people to post links to a seller's competition in their paid threads. Same principle. You shouldn't have to pay to advertise your competitors.

                            A lot of people are arguing the rules of a game that no longer exists. This is not the same forum. It's mostly the same people, but the old loyalties no longer apply to the new management, sad as that may seem.

                            Some of us will hold to them, but we don't own the place.

                            Look at the new reality and choose how to respond to it. Don't try to invoke the old ways. They're gone.

                            And by the way... Mike Lantz was not being tricky or deceptive when he used the same colors and the like when he started W+. That was a service built specifically for members of this forum, and it was the only one at the time. It made sense to make that clear. If Allen had had a problem with that, the two of them would have dealt with it like the adult businesspeople they are.


                            Paul
                            Signature
                            .
                            Stop by Paul's Pub - my little hangout on Facebook.

                            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9417782].message }}
                            • Profile picture of the author Tom B
                              Banned
                              Originally Posted by Paul Myers View Post

                              A couple of points...

                              First, it is very unlikely that Mr Cueball would choose to muster the patience that The Real Thomas regularly displays in handling the help desk. The notion of Thomas Belknap behind that curtain evoked some very funny visuals for me.


                              Paul
                              I take offense, sir, even if accurate.
                              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9417791].message }}
                              • Profile picture of the author Paul Myers
                                Thomas,
                                I take offense, sir, even if accurate.
                                Note that I said you wouldn't choose to, not that you couldn't.

                                I think that was an eminently fair assessment.


                                Paul
                                Signature
                                .
                                Stop by Paul's Pub - my little hangout on Facebook.

                                {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9417809].message }}
                                • Profile picture of the author Tom B
                                  Banned
                                  Originally Posted by Paul Myers View Post

                                  Thomas,Note that I said you wouldn't choose to, not that you couldn't.

                                  I think that was an eminently fair assessment.


                                  Paul
                                  Ha! I hear ya and you gave me a chuckle. I think people offended Thomas by thinking he was me.
                                  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9417830].message }}
                                  • Profile picture of the author Paul Myers
                                    Thomas,
                                    I think people offended Thomas by thinking he was me.
                                    Thomas is not easily offended.

                                    I think "stunned surprise" would be more the thing for the rest of us. Thunderstruck, in a word.


                                    Paul
                                    Signature
                                    .
                                    Stop by Paul's Pub - my little hangout on Facebook.

                                    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9417855].message }}
                            • Profile picture of the author ClickMonkey
                              [DELETED]
                              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9418007].message }}
                              • Profile picture of the author Tom B
                                Banned
                                Originally Posted by ClickMonkey View Post

                                To the extent a decision were made by Freelancer to forgo added profits, I'm not entirely sure that would trigger the legal responsibility for that decision to be explained.



                                Stephen @
                                ClickMonkey
                                Good point. Many big companies will forgo profits. Simply look at a lot of the "internet" companies like Amazon. Amazon lost money for a long time because growth was more important than profits.
                                {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9418156].message }}
                                • Profile picture of the author Paul Myers
                                  Brian,
                                  I have the feeling there are more businesses than W+ and JVZoo who should be concerned about the forum's plans.
                                  Yeah. I could browse through the various for sale sections and point to dozens that should be concerned, just based on the connection with Freelancer. Not to mention the ones that are a small policy change away from being out of business entirely.

                                  I've been telling people for years not to depend too heavily on this place as a sole source of revenue.

                                  If they get the feature set up to par and set up to handle Payoneer payments, that changes the landscape even more, and starts to erode into other systems that haven't even been discussed yet. Assuming they don't blow the whole thing up with heavy-handed maneuvering.

                                  Stephen,

                                  All good points. They don't take into consideration that Matt Barrie seems to run things in the same way a more diversely held corporation would, with maybe even more focus on driving revenues at the possible expense of the longevity of the source. The effect is the same.

                                  Explaining minutiae isn't the point I was making. It was the ROI, and how fast it came in.

                                  I believe a bit too much stock is put in the value of the "cult following" Freelancer mentioned. That is the group most likely (and easily) driven out by the wrong tactics. That's the base the whole thing is built on.

                                  There's a fair bit of wiggle room based on the amount of organic traffic the place gets, but that won't last without that base of regular posters. It's a case of "Page One Syndrome." No matter how many people come in from SERPs and links, if all they see on page one of every section is unanswered questions and illegible gibberish, that advantage shrinks fast.

                                  This place isn't so much a resource as a system. You can adjust for a single element out of balance, but set too many things wonky at once and it will break.

                                  If I were Alaister, I'd start looking to get control of some of the critical system components. As an example, I'd isolate PMs and WarriorPayments mail to IPs/hosts that were distinct from the promotional mailings. That's a riot in the making otherwise.

                                  I'd figure out how to take some of the load the changes have created off of Thomas, without losing all the experience and good will he brings to the table. He's your best defense against the return of a lot of scam artists at this point. And right now, you simply don't have the people to handle that flood if you let it happen.

                                  I'd start trusting those new mods more. They're going to make mistakes, just like the old mods did. If they have a place to discuss them, they can share the learning experience and get up to speed a lot faster.

                                  Give the new mods anonymous usernames to avoid the BS, but let them get out here and post comments on the rules and their decisions. You've got good people in that crew. Give them a chance to show it. Better they make their public mistakes now, while folks understand they're new. They'll have the chance to develop into effective and accepted leaders that way.

                                  And put more emphasis on steak than sizzle. You guys have done a lot of good things so far. Don't screw up that momentum by overhyping things.

                                  You didn't do yourselves any good with the over-the-top announcement of WP and the subsequent delivery of something that was a weak third or fifth to existing systems. Yes, you're adding features, and I have no doubt you'll end up with a solid competitor to the other systems, assuming you can keep up.

                                  Impress people with speed, not promises.

                                  Show the members where you intend to go, and give them something to support and believe in. Do that, and you'll see everything that happens here moving in a positive direction. Including your sales.

                                  Trust these people, as a group. They deserve it.


                                  Paul
                                  Signature
                                  .
                                  Stop by Paul's Pub - my little hangout on Facebook.

                                  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9418357].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author James Campbell
              Originally Posted by Mike Anthony View Post

              Thats quite the redefinition of honesty you just embarked on though. If I allow other services to operate on my site but don't provide an easy link for my competition to use then I am dishonest? Really? thats your claim for the meaning of basic honesty?
              If you're positioning your stance as "everyone is welcome" and "nothing is changing... yet", which has been the stance, then yes it is dishonest. When you make it difficult to use, you are making the alternatives unwelcome alternatives. When you say nothing is changing yet and then you completely change the ability of the user to easily and quickly use those alternatives, then you are outright being dishonest.

              There isn't much a huge "redefinition" as you put it. Though I suspect you already know that and wanted to jump on the devil's advocate side of things.

              As for basic honesty, this should probably cover it:

              1. Do what you say (actions congruent with stated stances)

              2. Say what you mean (stated stances being congruent with the true meaning without wordplay having to be used to justify why what you said isn't exactly what you meant as demonstrated by your actions)

              3. Mean what you say (stated stances meaning and actions being congruent with those stated stances without further explanation needed)

              None of the above has been met by the current ownership specifically in regards to the not so subtlely forced use of WarriorPayments for WSOs while actively making efforts to exclude other platforms when the stated stance has been and currently is that all are welcome and nothing is changing in regards to the ability to use alternatives.

              Hope that clears it up for you a bit.
              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9417220].message }}
              • Profile picture of the author Mike Anthony
                Originally Posted by James Campbell View Post

                If you're positioning your stance as "everyone is welcome" and "nothing is changing... yet", which has been the stance, then yes it is dishonest. When you make it difficult to use, you are making the alternatives unwelcome alternatives.
                so ahem....a rose by any other name...If I don't "make the alternatives" welcome I am dishonest.

                Hope that clears it up for you a bit.
                As Mud until you provide an actual example of statements made that conclusively validates the criteria you set,
                Signature

                {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9417251].message }}
                • Profile picture of the author James Campbell
                  Originally Posted by Mike Anthony View Post

                  so ahem....a rose by any other name...If I don't "make the alternatives" welcome I am dishonest.
                  Nope that is in no way what I said. It makes you dishonest when you state that the alternatives are welcome and then you actively exclude them in the process in which you stated they are welcome.

                  If you're going to attempt to debate, at least look at the whole position instead of taking one small portion out of context to attempt to make your point.


                  As Mud until you provide an actual example of statements made that conclusively validates the criteria you set,
                  In this instance, I suppose those criteria would be considered "common" criteria based around accepted practices of communication in the western world. This common criteria has been violated by the current owners and the stated stances have been explicitly made by representatives of those owners in other threads regarding the WarriorPayments system and request for feedback regarding that system. I'm not willing to do your research for you, so you'll just have to check it out for yourself.

                  I appreciate your attempt to "play dumb" in pretending I wasn't clear, but I'm able to read between the lines. You didn't have a proper rebuttal so you decided to take that stance instead.
                  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9417267].message }}
                  • Profile picture of the author Mike Anthony
                    Originally Posted by James Campbell View Post

                    Nope that is in no way what I said. It makes you dishonest when you state that the alternatives are welcome and then you actively exclude them in the process in which you stated they are welcome.
                    Allowed and welcome have different connotations.depending on context. Please show where present ownership stated they wanted to make the use of competing services here at WF as easy as possible for everyone to use them. Until then you are begging bread.

                    If you're going to attempt to debate, at least look at the whole position instead of taking one small portion out of context to attempt to make your point.
                    Alas, We are not at the point of a debate. You are just at the "providing rhetoric" stage with no example or evidence to back it up. Substance would be required for debate.


                    In this instance, I suppose those criteria would be considered "common" criteria based around accepted practices of communication in the western world.
                    Seee? more rhetoric. The common criteria in the western world for dishonesty is to violate what you said not what others said you said.

                    You failed to make your case. The fact that you passed giving an example says it all actually. You don't like it wish it were other wise but its not dishonest.
                    Signature

                    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9417294].message }}
                    • Profile picture of the author James Campbell
                      Originally Posted by Mike Anthony View Post

                      Allowed and welcome have different connotations.depending on context. Please show where present ownership stated they wanted to make the use of competing services here at WF as easy as possible for everyone to use them.....The common criteria in the western world for dishonesty is to violate what you said not what others said you said.

                      You failed to make your case. The fact that you passed giving an example says it all actually. You don't like it wish it were other wise but its not dishonest.
                      Apparently you missed where I stated I will not do your research for you. It is clear to me that you are not well versed enough in what has/hasn't been stated on this topic to properly argue against my position.

                      Specifically the representative of the new forum owners who stated these things is Alaister. Feel free to go through his posts and you'll find what I'm talking about.
                      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9417305].message }}
                      • Profile picture of the author Mike Anthony
                        Originally Posted by James Campbell View Post

                        Apparently you missed where I stated I will not do your research for you. It is clear to me that you are not well versed enough in what has/hasn't been stated on this topic to properly argue against my position..
                        You have no position if you cannot back it up with facts. Thats how things work in the adult world. Suggesting that someone has to look those facts up or your point offered with no facts wins is junior high level debating skills. I've never read Alastaire say they would provide links to make it easy to bypass their system. If I am wrong then provide the quote. if you can't then we know whose the dishonest one in all this.
                        Signature

                        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9417319].message }}
                        • Profile picture of the author James Campbell
                          Originally Posted by Mike Anthony View Post

                          You have no position if you cannot back it up with facts. Thats how things work in the adult world. Suggesting that someone has to look those facts up or your point offered with no facts wins is junior high level debating skills. I've never read Alastaire say they would provide links to make it easy to bypass their system. If I am wrong then provide the quote. if you can't then we know whose the dishonest one in all this.
                          In an adult world people wouldn't engage in debates where they aren't actually properly informed of the full scope of the topic. It is not my job nor is it my desire to bring you properly up to speed. It is my choice to not take your bait of me doing the research for you. You're not equipped to debate it, so I made the decision to not waste my energy continuing to debate it with you.

                          Your false logic of knowing who the "dishonest" one is in all of this is nothing more than a junior high jab. Very adult of you.
                          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9417346].message }}
                          • Profile picture of the author Mike Anthony
                            Originally Posted by James Campbell View Post

                            In an adult world people wouldn't engage in debates where they aren't actually properly informed of the full scope of the topic
                            Your self proclamations do not make themselves into facts. . You seem to be given to that one feeble fallacious rhetoric tactic. I've read Alistaire on the subject and he never stated they were providing easy accessible links to bypass their system.

                            It is not my job nor is it my desire to bring you properly up to speed.
                            Which being interpreted means "i am not equipped to answer because I don't have the facts to back my position up"

                            so I made the decision to not waste my energy continuing to debate it with you.
                            Yet the time spent to indulge the same rhetoric sans facts betrays you on that position as well.
                            Signature

                            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9417373].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author seobro
    Hi Caleb:
    Well, you are a smart guy. I think you have your answer. Question for you. Do you think we need to get off pay pal? They are not good for micro pay.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9416099].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author WillR
    Really nothing for us to argue about.

    Everyone is entitled to their opinion.

    Things around here are changing. When that happens there will be people who like it and people who don't like it.

    You do seem to always have a problem with people who don't like the change though. But again, everyone is entitled to their opinion and if people don't like things, they have just as much right to say so as those who do.

    I take it you are still running the helpdesk (not sure if you get paid for that or not?) but that is always going to somewhat taint your opinion of things.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9416205].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Tom B
      Banned
      Originally Posted by WillR View Post

      Really nothing for us to argue about.

      Everyone is entitled to their opinion.

      Things around here are changing. When that happens there will be people who like it and people who don't like it.

      You do seem to always have a problem with people who don't like the change though. But again, everyone is entitled to their opinion and if people don't like things, they have just as much right to say so as those who do.

      I take it you are still running the helpdesk (not sure if you get paid for that or not?) but that is always going to somewhat taint your opinion of things.
      We aren't arguing, we are discussing and debating. I don't consider this arguments.

      The beauty about disagreements is it can bring out ideas that you or I never thought about which may or may not change our minds.

      You seem to be interjecting emotional responses into what I am posting. I can assure you I don't have a problem with anyone stating their opinions even if I agree or don't agree. I don't think it is productive to be constantly saying the same thing over and over again which we have seen with this topic. Nor do I think we need multiple threads talking about this topic.

      That hardly constitutes having a problem with people not liking the changes.

      To be honest, I would rather have more options than WarriorPayments. I use RAP and don't want to be stuck with any platform that isn't in my control. I just accept that I will need to use WarriorPayments sooner or later if I want to use the WSO section.

      That is ok, because the WSO section is just one place to reach customers. Not the only place.

      I have no association with the warriorforum nor have I ever. I don't run the help desk, the other less good-looking Thomas does.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9416276].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author James Campbell
    I've made the mistake of arguing with strangers on the internet. For the right crowd, they know what I mean.

    Bowing out from the 3 on one going on here Enjoy your willful blindness everyone.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9417366].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author GarrieWilson
    I do think a link should be added at the bottom of the payments page that takes you to the old method. Then later, they can always remove the link when they ban other payment methods.

    -g
    Signature
    Screw You, NameCheap!
    $1 Off NameSilo Domain Coupons:

    SAVEABUCKDOMAINS & DOLLARDOMAINSAVINGS
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9417437].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author WillR
    Mike,

    The argument is over. You are only arguing with yourself.

    We've had our opinions and those who matter have seen them.

    Back to making money everyone!
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9417613].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author aks000
    there is always competition in every field and people will choose only those platforms where they feel secure and convenient.
    Thanx for your bold question.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9417643].message }}
  • I really hope it does. That's all I can say. I think the people who run the forum understand that if they change the open marketplace to a paid one then they would probably lose a bunch of followers.
    Signature

    "Anyone Can Master The Art Of List Building And Generate A Solid Income All You Need Is Professional Advice"

    www.listmarketingmastery.com

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9419525].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author jross07
    what if,

    the warriorforum opened up another section not called WSO and let people post their products there using their own payment systems & programs? I guess it wouldn't be a special offer anymore, but then again are they ever really?

    thoughts?
    Signature

    Internet enthusiast, learning every day!

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9420916].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Caleb Spilchen
      Originally Posted by seobro View Post

      Hi Caleb:
      Well, you are a smart guy. I think you have your answer. Question for you. Do you think we need to get off pay pal? They are not good for micro pay.
      Lol what?

      I've paid a couple hundred bucks in a day in PayPal fees, I just chalk it up to a "cost of doing business"... every platform has fees.

      Think about it, go off paypal and process AMEX, it's like 3.5% + $0.50 or something insane... PayPal isn't much different in cost to credit cards when it comes down to it..

      (...And darn well a lot easier to use).

      That's been my experience anyway (Maybe Canadian merchant accounts have higher fees?

      Originally Posted by jross07 View Post

      what if,

      the warriorforum opened up another section not called WSO and let people post their products there using their own payment systems & programs? I guess it wouldn't be a special offer anymore, but then again are they ever really?

      thoughts?
      Why don't we just have one WSO forum, which really was never, and will never be "Warrior Exclusive Offers"... where we can use whatever payment platform we want, and one (the warriorpayments) is forum supported, and the others you need your own support...

      Ultimately this forum is owned by a corporation so they will do what best suits them... But I don't see changing the system as the way to do it.
      Signature

      Canadian Expat Living in Medellin, Colombia

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9421302].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author WillR
    Mike,

    No offense but since you've joined this forum you have run one WSO your stats show (and that was way back in May 2011)

    I've run 10+ (still have several running right now) and Suzanne has run many as well.

    So I think the opinions of those who are actively using the WSO forum to sell might be worth listening to over those people who never even use it, right?

    Well if I wanted to run a profitable company, that's what I would do. No point listening to those who don't spend any money posting in the WSO forum because they are not making you any money.

    So let's get feedback from sellers who are actually actively using the WSO forum. That's way more important than all this useless arguing from you for arguments sake.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9421206].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Mike Anthony
      Originally Posted by WillR View Post

      Mike,

      No offense but since you've joined this forum you have run one WSO your stats show (and that was way back in May 2011)

      I've run 10+ (still have several running right now) and Suzanne has run many as well.

      So I think the opinions of those who are actively using the WSO forum to sell might be worth listening to over those people who never even use it, right.
      Sorry Will maybe you should have asked first because As a result of new ownership I am in the process of getting back into utilizing the WSO section. The idea that Freelancer is not interested in my opinion or many of the others who are in my boat is fairly ridiculous (theres a lot of us) - point failed.

      In fact I dare say Freelancer is probably counting on attracting new members or people who didn't run many WSOs before to make up for the very few who are complaining in every thead about new ownership. You lose some you gain some.
      Signature

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9422327].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author John Taylor
    Is the Warrior Forum (WSO) gonna stay an open marketplace?
    It never really has been a completely "open" marketplace. Way back
    in the early days - yes I remember the Unisol Forum - it was simply
    a discussion group.

    Then we moved to the Snitz platform and it was a moderated discussion.
    Yes, every post was reviewed by a moderator before it was posted. That
    made for some disjointed discussions!

    The first marketplace as such was Host4Profit and that was a take it or
    leave it choice. ;-)

    The first WSO threads were seen as a privilege not a right. Your offer
    had to be truly special and something that would help your fellow Warriors.

    Here's me getting all nostalgic... back to my point...

    Every one of those policies and changes were initiated by Allen. It was his
    forum... his house, his rules. Every time there was a change there would
    be people who supported it and people who dissented. You can't please all
    of the warriors all of the time!

    So, now the forum is under new ownership and management. The new guys
    are looking to recover their $3m plus investment. No matter how much
    any of us had paid for a website... we'd be looking to generate a good ROI
    to recover our investment and to begin to make a profit. It's business.

    Matt and Alaister will make mistakes. If you don't take risks you don't grow.

    It's certainly not in their best interests to alienate the people who generate
    income or profit. And it's not in their interests to facilitate competitor's profit
    either.

    In my humble opinion the first signs are that these guys are interested in
    making the forum a better place for the members and users and a more
    profitable place for them. It's symbiotic relationship that requires balance
    and finesse. It's like learning to fly an aeroplane... you have to learn to
    make subtle and gradual changes to maintain your airspeed and altitude,
    big changes create instability!

    So, I'm sitting back, waiting, observing and thinking about how I can
    continue to enjoy being a member of this community and how i can adapt
    to the changes are taking place.

    John
    Signature
    John's Internet Marketing News, Views & Reviews: John Taylor Online
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9421509].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author MH Anwar
    Good Post.. i think warrior marketplace is the best one with cheap payment...
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9421518].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author GarrieWilson
    FL just recently rescinded Allen's decision to disallow affiliate program promotion in the WSO thread
    Huh?

    -g
    Signature
    Screw You, NameCheap!
    $1 Off NameSilo Domain Coupons:

    SAVEABUCKDOMAINS & DOLLARDOMAINSAVINGS
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9423582].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author ForumGuru
      Banned
      Originally Posted by Sid Hale View Post

      FL just recently rescinded Allen's decision to disallow affiliate program promotion in the WSO thread
      Originally Posted by GarrieWilson View Post

      Huh?
      Sid is saying we can promote our affiliate programs on our WSO threads as per the new rules.

      Originally Posted by Alaister View Post

      2) You can promote your affiliate programs in your WSO threads - I want to help you guys make more sales and support your launches to be as successful as possible. You are now allowed to place a link at the bottom of your WSO to get more affiliates to sign up and promote that particular WSO. Please note: It must be a link people can use to promote your WSO in that post.

      http://www.warriorforum.com/warrior-...ml#post9339382
      Cheers

      -don
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9423600].message }}

Trending Topics