Hisotry/Military Buffs Only - Why Nap?
Hear me out:
Napoleon lost his entire navy in Egypt while he was exploring the Nile. He left his ships behind and the Brits found them and sunk them.
Napoleon lost 100,000's of soldiers in Russia. Alexander would never have done the same, as Alexander was very concerned about supply lines.
Napoleon lost at Waterloo to the Duke of Wellington.
On the other hand, Wellington beat Napoleon's troops in Portugal. Granted, Napleon wasn't there, but Wellington won.
Wellington was undefeated in his India campaign.
And...Wellington beat Napoleon at Waterloo.
Napoleon had three catostrophic losses. Wellington was undefeated.
Can any of you history buffs convince me as to why Napoleon is considered a great general, yet Wellington is just an after-thought?
-
pjlyons1uk -
Thanks
SignatureUk child safety seats and playhouses{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1172073].message }} -