34 replies
  • OFF TOPIC
  • |
SHOWDOWN: TSA Threatens $10,000 Fine and Civil Court For Man Who Refused Scan and Groping
  • Profile picture of the author HeySal
    I'll never fly again until they cut the crap. I agree with that guy - I should not be forced to submit to those health hazardous electronic strip searches and also --- touching someone's genitals without consent is actually on the books as 1st degree rape. Do they think that because they wear badges they are now in a position to legally molest people? We PAY to fly. They should be shining our shoes and thanking us for the privileges of having jobs, not groping our body parts.

    This whole issue is just another shake down of civil and individual rights. If they actually go through with that suit, I hope he counter sues and fries them for every cent they will ever hope to see.
    Signature

    Sal
    When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
    Beyond the Path

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2873350].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author rondo
    Bring back the 90's when you could enjoy a smoke with your bourbon during long flights accross the pacific to LA.


    Andrew
    Signature
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2873439].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author seasoned
    I never understood why they said they only use the back of the hand, etc.... I guess it is supposed to imply that they can't feel size, etc...

    And I don't know WHAT I would do if they tried to do more than they have. But YEAH! I am AMERICAN, like my parents and their parents. I have spent almost my entire life in the confines of the lower 48. I am a frequent flier. People at the local airport KNOW ME! Frankly, if I wanted to cause trouble, I COULD! There are a LOT of holes in their security. It is funny that they, in some ways, were SMARTER immediately after 9/11! But they STILL treat me like an enemy.

    BTW I have a problem, maybe two, that may have been caused by those stupid scanners!!!!

    Steve
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2874092].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author pethanks
    Well, you can do what you think best for you.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2874136].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Martin2010
    I totally agree with you Sal.

    It's a crying shame that this has all happened as a result of the 9/11 attacks and that these people are still a risk to our countries.

    I sort of see why they are doing something like this but i think it's totally against human rights and the staff who are doing this are just stopping people at random so they can get their kicks is very sickening.

    What will it be next?
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2875770].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Kay King
      The greatest damage from 9/11 isn't what a group of terrorists did to us - it's what we have allowed to be done since then in the name of "security".

      We have abandoned dignity, privacy and common sense any time some govt agency screams "danger" or "security". What I think is funny is the prudish reaction to the body scans. I think they are overly invasive and unnecessary - but it's not like one person has unique body parts that others don't have.

      The restrictions put in place are reactionary. One guy fumbles with a useless shoe bomb so millions of people have to remove their shoes forever.

      Truth is - if you really think about it - had common sense dictated back in 2000 that flight deck doors must be secured throughout a flight....there would have been no 9/11 as we knew it.
      Signature
      Saving one dog will not change the world - but the world changes forever for that one dog
      ***
      Dear April: I don't want any trouble from you.
      January was long, February was iffy, March was a freaking dumpster fire.
      So sit down, be quiet, and don't touch anything.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2875933].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Martin2010
    Defo Kay thaat's what i was trying to say in a round a bout way
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2875954].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Rob141
    I applaud that man. It's sickening how he was treated as if he was a criminal.

    They have no case whatsoever. He opted out of a pat down, which anyone can do and chose not to fly and leave the airport. He did nothing wrong at all.

    This sort of thing makes me extremely angry.
    Signature

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2876253].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author HeySal
    Kay - the scanners work on radiation. The radiation builds up - so after many flights, you could get very ill from it. Also -- They perfectly outline your body so the guys looking at the pics (who happen to be right there) are looking at you as if you had no clothes on. It's a violation of health as well as privacy. If I wanted the guy at the gate to know what my T & A look like, I'd flash him or take him home with me. There's another problem that you aren't supposed to leave your luggage unattended and people are experiencing theft when pulled away from it. Needless to say - if someone can steal out of it, they can also put things into it.

    The most secure airport in the world does not use these techniques even though they have major amounts of possible terrorist traffic going through -- needing to subject us to these procedures are nothing but a crock of **** intended to break our spirits and subserviate us and I refuse to let it be done to me.

    If people don't stop allowing this right now it won't be long before you see the guards slipping on a surgical glove for "pat downs" as well.

    My objections to this type of thing started with drug testing for jobs - and I was right.........they are going to get worse and worse and won't stop until we forceably stop them.
    Signature

    Sal
    When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
    Beyond the Path

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2876378].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author ThomM
      I'm with Sal on this. I started objecting with the Drug tests. In fact I have refused to apply for any job that drug tests since they first started using them.
      I've stopped flying since they started searching your luggage and made you take your shoes off.
      This latest body scanning and groping is nothing but a way for them to take away our rights and destroy the constitution.
      Even I know from watching the news that the terrorist's are testing package bombs now.
      Like the article says, when you purchase your ticket to fly, you gave up your rights. If your rights and the constitution don't mean anything to you, keep flying. If your rights and the constitution are important to you, there isn,t any reason to fly.
      Signature

      Life: Nature's way of keeping meat fresh
      Getting old ain't for sissy's
      As you are I was, as I am you will be
      You can't fix stupid, but you can always out smart it.

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2876561].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author seasoned
      Originally Posted by HeySal View Post

      Kay - the scanners work on radiation. The radiation builds up - so after many flights, you could get very ill from it.
      I think I did! There are a number of things that together, point to liver damage.(I count about 5 symptoms so far. One is unusual, 2 are RARE, though all three could be explained by a bad liver, and the other two point SPECIFICALLY to liver disease. A previous doctor even pointed one of them out on a blood test.) Outside of being middle aged, I am at a LOW risk for that. SO, while getting treated for what is a symptom, I will have to convince the doctor to order a liver function test. He will probably direct me to ANOTHER specialist. As for overdosing on radiation, I hit the limit for my heart ALONE! That doesn't count 4 other tests, hospital error on the heart, and perhaps a half dozen back scatter scans.

      Also -- They perfectly outline your body so the guys looking at the pics (who happen to be right there) are looking at you as if you had no clothes on.
      Actually, the viewer is elsewhere.

      If people don't stop allowing this right now it won't be long before you see the guards slipping on a surgical glove for "pat downs" as well.
      They ALREADY DO! In fact, they replace the gloves before a patdown, and check them for bomb residue afterwards.

      My objections to this type of thing started with drug testing for jobs - and I was right.........they are going to get worse and worse and won't stop until we forceably stop them.
      On THIS gig, I had to go out of my way to get a drug test. The LAB must be on drugs! HECK, I go to an OPEN business, DURING BUSINESS HOURS, WITH A LINE, and they tell me they don't do the main part of their business on the weekend?

      Steve
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2876752].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author HeySal
    Steve -- I'm referring to cavity searches when I brought up gloves. All those scans and pats and people are still at risk......... but once they get used to electronic strip searches and having their genitals groped, they'll be nice and primed and pwnd enough to allow them to probe around the insides, too. As long as they are willing to act like cattle......why not treat em like it? I'm sure that in the closed door sessions our leaders are having quite a laugh at our expense.

    Also-- get some milk thistle and take it twice a day for a month or so and it will do wonders for any liver damage you are experiencing. It will not conflict with any drugs you are taking, but if it makes you more comfy you can always have that confirmed by a pharmacist.
    Signature

    Sal
    When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
    Beyond the Path

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2876908].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Kay King
      I'm not arguing - I don't like the scanner in any way. I also don't approve of the new pat down methods (or should we call them "feel up" methods?).

      But I think the arguments have to focus on something more than "the scanner guy can see me without clothes" - we just aren't all that unique.

      There are claims scanned images have been saved and some have been "leaked" - if that is proven, it's a big problem for TSA. There are concerns about the safety of the scanners - again, if there is a proven problem, it's a big concern. What "we, the public" think is clearly not an important factor.

      What is not useful is stamping our feet with "they can't do this to me" attitudes - because they can and they are.

      You can get scanned
      You can patted down thoroughly
      or
      You can drive instead of flying

      If the public refused to fly - how fast do you think those scanners would disappear? But we won't quit flying because we love the convenience and deep down we want "someone" to keep us "safe".
      Signature
      Saving one dog will not change the world - but the world changes forever for that one dog
      ***
      Dear April: I don't want any trouble from you.
      January was long, February was iffy, March was a freaking dumpster fire.
      So sit down, be quiet, and don't touch anything.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2877214].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author seasoned
        Originally Posted by Kay King View Post

        I'm not arguing - I don't like the scanner in any way. I also don't approve of the new pat down methods (or should we call them "feel up" methods?).

        But I think the arguments have to focus on something more than "the scanner guy can see me without clothes" - we just aren't all that unique.
        They ARE more than that! I guess you want more than POTENTIALLY FATAL!

        There are claims scanned images have been saved and some have been "leaked" - if that is proven, it's a big problem for TSA. There are concerns about the safety of the scanners - again, if there is a proven problem, it's a big concern. What "we, the public" think is clearly not an important factor.
        They CLAIM there is nothing to leak!

        What is not useful is stamping our feet with "they can't do this to me" attitudes - because they can and they are.
        YEAH, skunks are CUTE stomping their feet! Try to watch the WHOLE show and tell us how it ends up!

        You can drive instead of flying
        NO I CAN'T! I can't take a week to get to a contract!

        deep down we want "someone" to keep us "safe".
        HUH? What does THAT mean! Let's see about flight safety.....

        Possible injury on the ground, possibly go deaf from the bus airbrake noises, door alarms, jet engines, etc... Possibly get SICK. Possibly get hurt in the tiny seats. Thrombosis! etc.... So WHAT do you mean SAFE!? HEY, my aorta RIPPED and I nearly DIED after coming back from the airport!

        Steve
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2882864].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author seasoned
      Originally Posted by HeySal View Post

      Steve -- I'm referring to cavity searches when I brought up gloves. All those scans and pats and people are still at risk......... but once they get used to electronic strip searches and having their genitals groped, they'll be nice and primed and pwnd enough to allow them to probe around the insides, too. As long as they are willing to act like cattle......why not treat em like it? I'm sure that in the closed door sessions our leaders are having quite a laugh at our expense.

      Also-- get some milk thistle and take it twice a day for a month or so and it will do wonders for any liver damage you are experiencing. It will not conflict with any drugs you are taking, but if it makes you more comfy you can always have that confirmed by a pharmacist.
      Well, I DO have limits! NO real feeling, etc...

      And THANKS for the advice! I found three things on the internet claimed to be good:

      1. Fumitory ... Couldn't find at the store.
      2. Milk Thistle... Found, but they talked me into a product that contained it.
      3. Dandelion... I bought it.

      And I think it MAY be helping. An endocrinologist said I was low on Vitamin D, so I am megadosing on that. Apparently E would help my two main concerns, so I got THAT. I am TRYING to be deficient in K, so that isn't MUCH of a concern, but that will be checked later this week( do so ALL THE TIME!), and I kept forgetting about A, so I will take that. I am suspecting a problem with A and K because the LIVER is responsible for D,E,K, and A! ALSO, C can supposedly help, so I guess I will megadose on that.

      Steve
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2882832].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author HeySal
    Hell Kay --- that's exactly how we all ended up without rights. Fine with me. They can all just keep right on flying until they are required to allow someone to pump away on top of them if they are told to. But the "lets not make waves" attitudes haven't done one damned thing for us -- and never will. I don't care who sees those pics and who doesn't -- I refuse to give them the right to take them --- and there are several other countries who refuse to use scanners because of the radiation. The effects of radiation aren't imaginary or theoretical -- they are well known, and those scanners aren't coming in friendly doses.

    And do you realize that they are now putting them in vans so people can scan you while you walk down the street, sit in your car -- or even through the walls of your home? I would think that people might get a little upset at having people beaming radiation into their homes and watching what they are doing behind closed doors.

    This isn't all about standing in a line getting a pic taken --- it's about freedom and privacy and it's really about time all of our "sensible" people start taking offense and getting wired about it.
    Signature

    Sal
    When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
    Beyond the Path

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2877914].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author sarahberra
    My husband says he won't fly either. I am nervous about flying now also. It seems like the airlines are getting more facist.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2881447].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author HeySal
    Steve - if it were about safety, they'd just be doing what the safest airport in the world (Tel-Aviv) is doing. They are completely privacy respecting, yet terrorists don't stand a chance of getting through.......and nobody can say that there are no terrorists in that part of the world.

    And besides -- what self respecting terrorist is gonna go through all that hassle when they can just walk across the Mexican border without one bit of hassle?
    Signature

    Sal
    When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
    Beyond the Path

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2883212].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author seasoned
      Originally Posted by HeySal View Post

      Steve - if it were about safety, they'd just be doing what the safest airport in the world (Tel-Aviv) is doing. They are completely privacy respecting, yet terrorists don't stand a chance of getting through.......and nobody can say that there are no terrorists in that part of the world.

      And besides -- what self respecting terrorist is gonna go through all that hassle when they can just walk across the Mexican border without one bit of hassle?
      NEVER, EVER, ****EVER**** accuse me of implying the government is benevolent! Yeah, if I wanted to create trouble, there are SEVERAL ways I could do it. HECK, I JUST came up with a way that I could get the TSA to do it and kill potentially thousands of people in a place like LAX. A variant of it COULD bring down a plane. And I didn't even really try to think of that.

      HECK, kay spoke of how people can just ignore you if you make a fuss. Skunks aren't ugly, or even colorful. So I spoke of how a skunk can make the same sort of dance, etc... You can ignore it. HECK, MAYBE they'll be faking, or decide it isn't worth it! But if they aren't!?!?

      You know... To be FAIR... To avoid being SPECIST.... We should NOT treat the skunk ANY differently than ANYTHING else! To do so is DISCRIMINATION. So if it wants to dance, DANCE WITH IT! If it does something you don't like, have it sit in a CORNER! HEY, we should DEMAND that the TSA do that! If they DO, they will be skunked and may LEARN! If they DON'T, they are admitting that they are HYPOCRITES, and know better!

      Steve
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2883681].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author foxtrot3
    The Israelis figured this whole thing out a long time ago.

    Here's how they do it - no groping necessary.

    The 'Israelification' of airports: High security, little bother - thestar.com

    If you forward this to your congressperson and senators, who knows,
    it might even help to put an end to this nonsense.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2884382].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author HeySal
    It now seems that even senators are on the floor protesting the absolute absurdity of this trash security of ours.
    And our top admin just excused muslim women from both the electronic scans and the body searches - they can grope the head and neck only of a muslim woman, which is completely discriminatory to the rest of us. You shouldn't have to change your religion to be safe from molestation. I'm thinking the the discrimination suits are going to drain some money out the the TSA fast enough if they don't quit their crap.

    It just keeps getting more ridiculous every day. There are posts all over social media to "opt out" and to stop flying until they stop the Orwellian act.

    Thanks for the link foxtrot3 - that's what I've been saying all along. If they actually wanted security, they'd be doing what they do in the most secure airport in the world. But they don't want security here -- they want complete and absolute control. I say we don't give it to them.
    Signature

    Sal
    When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
    Beyond the Path

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2884422].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author seasoned
    Foxtrot3,

    "The word 'profiling' is a political invention by people who don't want to do security," he said. "To us, it doesn't matter if he's black, white, young or old. It's just his behaviour. So what kind of privacy am I really stepping on when I'm doing this?"
    In OTHERWORDS the * will have to ABANDON the * * mantra! That may NEVER happen. Heck, I said this SAME thing earlier in my stories about the skunk. MAN, I just keep seeing that cute little animal with a wry smile, stomping on the ground MOMENTS before.....

    As long as the US fails to realize that a hiding place is a hiding place, etc... and believes that a job is more important than what the job is FOR, the US will NEVER be truly secure.

    WHY can a muslim wear the coverings, etc... and I can't have a lousy factory sealed COKE? I REALIZE it could be poisoned, have gas, pathogens, or be explosive, but even DRINKING it isn't enough to allow me to keep it? COME ON! Do you REALLY think I have to do that to get stuff past them? And that covering may have a rather harmless looking fastener, or lining, that could help them to create havok.

    AND, the constitution talks about CRUEL and UNUSUAL. Yet it has historically been considered JUST and NORMAL to treat national enemies HARSHLY, yet we treat them virtually like KINGS! Outside of SUPPOSEDLY limiting freedom and voting, they can do almost anything they want, and they don't have to pay a PENNY. HECK, they have had "SEX CHANGES", or at least it is being considered. They have had COSMETIC SURGERY. They have LOTS of things. Who knows, maybe they can even order books from their library.

    The israelis, at least in Israel, have NEVER been afraid to profile, etc...

    Steve
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2884502].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author pickthat apple
      It would be interesting to see what would happen if there was no controls at the airport.
      I hated it when I had to take off my shoes and hand in my yoghourt -which was just over 100ml!
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2885633].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author seasoned
        Originally Posted by pickthat Apple View Post

        It would be interesting to see what would happen if there was no controls at the airport.
        I hated it when I had to take off my shoes and hand in my yoghourt -which was just over 100ml!
        It's STILL that way! I bought some toothpaste at the drugstore for my weekend stay. Due to a sale, I got a set of TWO tubes. I didn't remember, until I got to the airport, in a RENTAL car. I put it in my pack. They gave me like 4 "choices", like have someone keep it, take it back, etc... Basically, it was TWO valid choices! 1. Throw it out and fly. 2. keep it and DON'T. My last pair of shoes died an early death because of the regulations!

        It is interesting, and I have said this for almost TEN years... We are fighting wars, spending BILLIONS and BILLIONS, and have done the FOUR things UBL couldn't do!

        1. Cause fear, uncertainty, etc...
        2. Destroy the economy
        3. Put the US in PERIL!
        4. Destroy free speech.

        I spoke against it earlier, and do NOW! The US LITERALLY gives LIP SERVICE to security.
        I can't bring drinks or even suggest ways to improve security, but they will LITERALLY IGNORE things like arabs speaking arabic with FULL traditional garb.

        I WAS going to say more, but I'll stop here.

        Steve
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2885976].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author HeySal
    There's so much controversy and so many starting to refuse to fly - opting out of the scanners and being very loud and angry about the invasive searches........ So I am wondering, when it starts costing these people their airlines and jobs, will they maybe get the people who train security at Tel-Aviv in to train our guys to give us some REAL security?

    Another thing the no-fly website says to do (can't remember the URL but will post it when I find it again) is to call the destination hotel you would have stayed at if you had been flying and tell them you won't be there because you had to opt for a vacation closer to home. Let industry know that TSA is costing them money, too. Do the same if there's a restaurant that you would have been eating at. Let everyone in the industry know they just lost your business because you refuse to be handled like slaves.

    And now with the Muslim exceptions - your rep needs to hear about discrimination with a good dose of outrage.

    Other than that, I think it would be fun if everyone going on a flight bought a Muslim costume and wore it to the airport. Wonder how TSA would react if everyone in line was exempt from all of their security features. LMAO.
    Signature

    Sal
    When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
    Beyond the Path

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2886111].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author beargy11
    the airports should come up with a better way to do the checks ... it's getting a little out of control ... but at the same time, I think people may be a little overly sensitive these days about things ... I mean, the same people who are complaining about the "health hazards" of going through security likely drink and smoke and eat red meat ... or if they don't, I'm sure there is something they do that is not "healthy" ... people are always looking for ways to be heard these days
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2886177].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author HeySal
      Originally Posted by beargy11 View Post

      the airports should come up with a better way to do the checks ... it's getting a little out of control ... but at the same time, I think people may be a little overly sensitive these days about things ... I mean, the same people who are complaining about the "health hazards" of going through security likely drink and smoke and eat red meat ... or if they don't, I'm sure there is something they do that is not "healthy" ... people are always looking for ways to be heard these days
      So that give the government the right to force you to be radiated or groped? Whatever. I prefer to be sensitive about my rights.

      If you remember back to the 70's they started mandatory urine tests for work, now they are demanding poison scanners and gropings -- remember they wanted to chip us all, too and are still working on ways to implant "permanent papers" into us. They are taking the scanners out on the streets where they can be used to watch you in your own home.

      Exactly where do think we should draw the line before we can be considered judiciously outraged?

      It's my thought we should have stopped the first intrusion dead out before they were allowed to take it this far.

      If you are in the US someone is now allowed to listen to your phone calls, read your email and regular mail, enter your property and place GPS on your vehicle, scan through your clothes, touch your genitals, and scan into your home. So when do you think it's justified to be sick of it all?
      Signature

      Sal
      When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
      Beyond the Path

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2886425].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author seasoned
      Originally Posted by beargy11 View Post

      the airports should come up with a better way to do the checks ... it's getting a little out of control ...
      A LITTLE!?!?!? Try a LOT!

      but at the same time, I think people may be a little overly sensitive these days about things ... I mean, the same people who are complaining about the "health hazards" of going through security likely drink and smoke and eat red meat ...
      I ****DON'T DRINK****! I ****DON'T SMOKE****! I often DON'T eat red meat. BUT, ***SO WHAT IF I DID***!?!?!? And what does that have to do with radiation? SO, if someone shot you, and your entire family, it would be OK with you? After all, you ALREADY do something dangerous. You will die EVENTUALLY!

      or if they don't, I'm sure there is something they do that is not "healthy" ... people are always looking for ways to be heard these days
      Unhealthy things include:

      shaking hands/touching(Maybe close to 80% of or all non inherited diseases are caught this way. The common cold, for instance.)
      walking(Falls, crashes, impacts, jars, encounters.)
      driving/riding(Falls, crashes, impacts, jars.)
      eating(Really, MANY poisons, etc...)
      drinking EVEN PURE WATER!(One woman on a talkshow DIED from drinking too much water! REALLY!)
      BREATHING!(Maybe 20% of all non inherited diseases are contracted by breathing. Maybe 80% of all poisons.)
      etc....

      BTW NOTE! I KNOW you do those things, you are on line touching things, etc... And you HAVE to do them to LIVE! IRONIC, but living things DO die!

      BTW Fort Wayne uses the L3 devices. I STILL don't know if I trust them. Logan airport uses the backscatter type.

      Steve
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2887300].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author HeySal
    Here's an interesting note that will make the whole problem go away - the right way.

    TSA could have chosen a less intrusive screening machine | McClatchy
    Signature

    Sal
    When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
    Beyond the Path

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2886893].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Rob141
    I wouldn't mind but the ones doing the pat downs are almost always men...fat men.

    If they were all sexy women it would be great, I wouldn't mind one bit.
    Signature

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2887319].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author bretski
      If it was playboy bunnies searching guys and chippendale dancers searching women I doubt there'd be a problem....there'd probably be people spending their day going through security in an endless loop.

      I traveled one time to Bogata Columbia and on my trip back I had to go through 4 security checkpoints. As you can imagine, they went through everything and the final checkpoint was Columbian military. I speak very little Spanish and just moved along like the person in front of me. When it came my turn to be searched I lifted my arms and a very attractive female Columbian military soldier patted me down... including grabbing my crotch as she looked me square in the eyes and said something in Spanish. Everyone laughed and a guy that spoke English told me as I walked away that she asked me if this was a gun.

      Just one to keep me warm at night when I'm in the old folks home someday...
      Signature
      ***Affordable Quality Content Written For You!***
      Experience Content Writer - PM Bretski!
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2892293].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Dmoney83
    Yeah, I can't believe the TSA is allowed to do what they do. It's all just security theater really. I know their real value is as a deterrent, but seriously how many terrorist have they actually caught? They're almost as worthless as Federal Air Marshals, who are statistically more likely to be arrested themselves than to actually make an arrest while on duty.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2892652].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author seasoned
      Originally Posted by Dmoney83 View Post

      Yeah, I can't believe the TSA is allowed to do what they do. It's all just security theater really. I know their real value is as a deterrent, but seriously how many terrorist have they actually caught? They're almost as worthless as Federal Air Marshals, who are statistically more likely to be arrested themselves than to actually make an arrest while on duty.
      DETERRENT? ****DETERRENT****????? WHY does *****ANYONE***** care if people like me are deterred from bringing sodapop through security!?!?!? I mean it does NOT deter terrorists!

      How many have they caught? I BELIEVE the figure is ZERO! I don't know how many airmarshals arrested people, but I think at least 3 airmarshals have been arrested or
      detained.

      Stevve
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2892677].message }}

Trending Topics