7 replies
  • OFF TOPIC
  • |
Do you ever think about the number of times you hear or read a particular phrase? If you search Google for "Warrior Forum" "no brainer", you will get 61,400 results!

How many time did you write this in a thread?

Alton
#brainer
  • I use that phrase a lot in my ad copy, too. It's a no-brainer. :rolleyes:

    Seriously, though, I think marketers use it because it's effective. No one wants to be thought of as stupid, so...
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3808033].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author seasoned
      Originally Posted by Bradley J Anderson View Post

      I use that phrase a lot in my ad copy, too. It's a no-brainer. :rolleyes:

      Seriously, though, I think marketers use it because it's effective. No one wants to be thought of as stupid, so...
      Maybe the dumbest thing is believing that you don't know everything! I mean I have seen "info" in like 5 different areas where they try to make it sound like you are stupid if you don't buy. I buy it, and find it is ******NOTHING NEW******! If you knew EVERYTHING you would likely be smart, and ****NOT**** buy the product.

      In the END, the AUTHOR looks pretty stupid, even if he or she got some money.

      Steve
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8285374].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Alexa Smith
    Banned
    Originally Posted by Alton Hargrave View Post

    Do you ever think about the number of times you hear or read a particular phrase?
    I'm a little embarrassed to admit it, but I'm afraid I do; yes: I have an extravagant enthusiasm for noticing such turns of phrase.

    Originally Posted by Alton Hargrave View Post

    How many time did you write this in a thread?
    At least 36, according to the search function ... but always with a hyphen, in my case.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3808040].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Alton Hargrave
      Well, it has been two years now and the count has gone up to 76,200 returns from Google for the phrase.

      How cliche! (In case you wonder, 40,200,000 returns for "how cliche" warrior forum)

      Maybe, we all oughta try to come up with more grown-up language skills?

      Food for thought! (only 21,000 returns) I guess that is progress.

      Alton
      Signature

      Sales Page Builder:Make Your Own Professional Sales Pages
      Software For Collectors, Business:Check it Out

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8284293].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Dan C. Rinnert
        It's a no brainer that you're leaving money on the table if you don't end prices in 7s when you could be crushing it with a guaranteed proven system to explode your sales with an automated system that brings you loads of traffic for a quick and easy way to get clients now with powerful lead generating tools that will blow your mind for the first 10 buyers only!

        Signature

        Dan's content is irregularly read by handfuls of people. Join the elite few by reading his blog: dcrBlogs.com, following him on Twitter: dcrTweets.com or reading his fiction: dcrWrites.com but NOT by Clicking Here!

        Dan also writes content for hire, but you can't afford him anyway.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8284372].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Mary Stevens
    How many times is the word "newbie" used?
    Signature
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8284428].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Alexa Smith
      Banned
      Originally Posted by Mary Stevens View Post

      How many times is the word "newbie" used?
      Not nearly as often as it used to be: many people these days use the term "noob" (sometimes even spelled as "n00b"!) instead.

      The one that amuses me most is "doop".

      That one's a misspelling of "dupe", apparently an abbreviation of "duplicate content" sometimes used by people with - typically - a rather flawed (though they probably spell it "floored" or even "fl00red") understanding of what duplicate content actually is.

      I've even once seen "de-doop", the intended usage - I think - being that of a transitive verb: "to remove the duplicate content from something".
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8285152].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author ciwnuzibqlon
    Banned
    [DELETED]
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8287351].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author cbvndylqllij
    Banned
    [DELETED]
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8292217].message }}

Trending Topics