Test Your IQ

LouiGeeinMD

12 years ago

126 too for me.
Let's see what others got.

Originally Posted by travlinguy

126 for me. Pretty much the same as it's been since grammar school.

IQ TEST

[ 1 ] Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9420826].message }}

Claude Whitacre

12 years ago

Originally Posted by travlinguy

126 for me. Pretty much the same as it's been since grammar school.

IQ TEST

Cool. 130 for me. But the test allowed me to take advantage of my only real strength. Pattern recognition and logic. So I think in an extensive test, my score would be a little lower.

[ 2 ] Thanks
1 reply

Signature

One Call Closing book https://www.amazon.com/One-Call-Clos...=1527788418&sr

"Be kind. For everyone you meet is fighting a great battle" Ian Maclaren

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9420829].message }}

Joe Stewart

12 years ago

Originally Posted by Claude Whitacre

Cool. 130 for me. But the test allowed me to take advantage of my only real strength. Pattern recognition and logic. So I think in an extensive test, my score would be a little lower.

I got a 128, but pattern recognition is definitely not one of my strengths and neither is depth perception. In all fairness, I just got a prescription for glasses, too, and they're not here yet. Got my eyes dilated and all that good stuff on Monday.

I'm not sure how I'd do on a more extensive test. I'd like to believe I could hold my own as long as it were evenly balanced in different areas. I'm sure most people are like that.

Thanks
1 reply

Signature

My New "Share All" Blog Is Coming Soon! Online & Offline Marketing, More!

http://www.UnCENTSored.com

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9420952].message }}

MissTerraK 12 years ago

Aw Gee, guys, I have no excuse.

Wait!

Does being tired count? lol!

Terra
- Thanks
{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9420960].message }}

Dan Riffle

12 years ago

134. Yeah, I'm looking at you, Claude.

[ 3 ] Thanks
1 reply

Signature

Raising a child is akin to knowing you're getting fired in 18 years and having to train your replacement without actively sabotaging them.

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9420835].message }}

Claude Whitacre

12 years ago

Originally Posted by Dan Riffle

134. Yeah, I'm looking at you, Claude.

AAAAARRRRRGGGGGGGHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!

Originally Posted by David Maschke

128 for me. I don't believe it. Woulda done better in school if true.

Edit: I took the test again, and purposely answered 90% of the questions incorrectly, and it still gave me a 102

I think that's a smart way to do it. The test may be rigged to never give a score under 100.

Riffle; If you're so smart..why didn't you think of that?

And, while we're at it...why didn't I? Ha!

Thanks

Signature

One Call Closing book https://www.amazon.com/One-Call-Clos...=1527788418&sr

"Be kind. For everyone you meet is fighting a great battle" Ian Maclaren

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9420867].message }}

MissTerraK

12 years ago

I tested 132 on this test.

For whatever it is worth, lol!

Terra

[ 2 ] Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9420839].message }}

travlinguy

12 years ago

I seem to recall that the minimum score for genius level is 135. Hmmm. No geniuses yet, I see.

Thanks
2 replies

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9420846].message }}

Dan Riffle 12 years ago

Originally Posted by travlinguy

I seem to recall that the minimum score for genius level is 135. Hmmm. No geniuses yet, I see.

Pretty sure it depends on the specific test. If you look at the pic someone posted below, their 132 score was in the top 2 percent.

Originally Posted by Claude Whitacre

Riffle; If you're so smart..why didn't you think of that?

Because I don't have the inquisitive mind of one David Maschke?

The real question is why was only one of us smart enough to post proof?
- Thanks
- 1 reply
Signature

Raising a child is akin to knowing you're getting fired in 18 years and having to train your replacement without actively sabotaging them.
{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9420883].message }}
- travlinguy 12 years ago
  
  Originally Posted by Dan Riffle
  
  Pretty sure it depends on the specific test. If you look at the pic someone posted below, their 132 score was in the top 2 percent.
  
  I went back and changed the ones I though were wrong the first time around and got 124, two points lower than my first score.
  
  I'm not really up on IQ testing and the types of tests available. I know I don't do well with logic and mathematics though that tends to change with word problems. Usually my feelings are more important in figuring out stuff than my analytic skills. One thing I have noticed, any IQ test I've taken in my life, regardless of what specific skill or talent they were trying to identify, I've always scored in the mid 120s.
  
  [ 1 ] Thanks
  
  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9420901].message }}

MikeAmbrosio

12 years ago

Originally Posted by travlinguy

I seem to recall that the minimum score for genius level is 135. Hmmm. No geniuses yet, I see.

Dang! 134. So close!

Thanks
1 reply

Signature

Are you protecting your on line business? If you have a website, blog, ecommerce store you NEED to back it up regularly. Your webhost will only protect you so much. Check out Quirkel. Protect yourself.

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9420999].message }}

Nice Sabino

12 years ago

Originally Posted by MikeAmbrosio

Dang! 134. So close!

No genius allowed in that IQ Test. They made 134 the max score. Haha.

[ 1 ] Thanks
1 reply

Signature

Warrior Forum Rules | WSO Guidelines | Help Desk Support

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9421006].message }}

Lance K

12 years ago

134 for me too. I agree with Don...pretty lame test. It's pretty obvious it was designed to be fairly easy so people would share their results on Facebook and help the site go viral.

[ 1 ] Thanks
1 reply

Signature

"You can have everything in life you want if you will just help enough other people get what they want."
~ Zig Ziglar

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9421021].message }}

ForumGuru

Banned 12 years ago

Originally Posted by Lance K

134 for me too. I agree with Don...pretty lame test. It's pretty obvious it was designed to be fairly easy so people would share their results on Facebook and help the site go viral.

Yeah, I deleted that nonsense as soon as it hit my page.

Cheers

-don

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9421030].message }}

Nice Sabino

12 years ago

I got 132!

Thanks
1 reply

Signature

Warrior Forum Rules | WSO Guidelines | Help Desk Support

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9420848].message }}

Dennis Gaskill 12 years ago

Originally Posted by creiben31

I got 132!

Nice! I didn't notice that line about being in the top 2% when I was on the page. I was just looking for the number. I wonder where the top 1% line is?
- Thanks
- 2 replies
Signature

Just when you think you've got it all figured out, someone changes the rules.
{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9420903].message }}
- Dan Riffle 12 years ago
  
  Originally Posted by Dennis Gaskill
  
  Nice! I didn't notice that line about being in the top 2% when I was on the page. I was just looking for the number. I wonder where the top 1% line is?
  
  We're in the top 1%, Dennis. Claude isn't.
  
  [ 1 ] Thanks
  
  2 replies
  
  Signature
  
  Raising a child is akin to knowing you're getting fired in 18 years and having to train your replacement without actively sabotaging them.
  
  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9420907].message }}
  
  Dennis Gaskill 12 years ago
  
  Originally Posted by ForumGuru
  
  I wonder if speed had anything to do with it because I don't think I missed any... It's one of the lamest IQ tests I've ever taken, no doubt about that!
  
  That's what I was wondering. That's why I speculated that perhaps I shouldn't have been eating when I took it.
  
  Originally Posted by Dan Riffle
  
  We're in the top 1%, Dennis. Claude isn't.
  
  Well hello Captain Obvious.
  
  [ 1 ] Thanks
  
  1 reply
  
  Signature
  
  Just when you think you've got it all figured out, someone changes the rules.
  
  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9420926].message }}
  
  ForumGuru Banned 12 years ago
  
  Originally Posted by Dennis Gaskill
  
  That's what I was wondering. That's why I speculated that perhaps I shouldn't have been eating when I took it.
  
  Yup...I am going to take it again and speed through it and see what happens.
  
  Thanks
  
  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9420940].message }}
  
  Claude Whitacre 12 years ago
  
  Originally Posted by Dan Riffle
  
  We're in the top 1%, Dennis. Claude isn't.
  
  Yeah...well.....um...I was holding back. I was only looking through one eye.
  
  And I'm pregnant.
  
  Thanks
  
  1 reply
  
  Signature
  One Call Closing book https://www.amazon.com/One-Call-Clos...=1527788418&sr
  
  "Be kind. For everyone you meet is fighting a great battle" Ian Maclaren
  
  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9421033].message }}
  
  Dennis Gaskill 12 years ago
  
  Originally Posted by Claude Whitacre
  
  And I'm pregnant.
  
  Congratulations! Can we expect a Tonight Show appearance?
  
  Thanks
  
  1 reply
  
  Signature
  
  Just when you think you've got it all figured out, someone changes the rules.
  
  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9421054].message }}
  
  Claude Whitacre 12 years ago
  
  Originally Posted by Dennis Gaskill
  
  Congratulations! Can we expect a Tonight Show appearance?
  
  Nerd......
  
  Thanks
  
  Signature
  One Call Closing book https://www.amazon.com/One-Call-Clos...=1527788418&sr
  
  "Be kind. For everyone you meet is fighting a great battle" Ian Maclaren
  
  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9421062].message }}
- ForumGuru Banned 12 years ago
  
  Originally Posted by Dennis Gaskill
  
  Nice! I didn't notice that line about being in the top 2% when I was on the page. I was just looking for the number. I wonder where the top 1% line is?
  
  The post to facebook shows the 2% as well...if you are smart enough to perform the calculation.
  
  Cheers
  
  -don
  
  Thanks
  
  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9420911].message }}
  
  Dan Riffle 12 years ago
  
  [DELETED]
  
  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9420925].message }}
  
  ForumGuru Banned 12 years ago
  
  [DELETED]
  
  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9420934].message }}

David Maschke

12 years ago

128 for me. I don't believe it. Woulda done better in school if true.

Edit: I took the test again, and purposely answered 90% of the questions incorrectly, and it still gave me a 102

Thanks

Signature

I

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9420853].message }}

ForumGuru

Banned 12 years ago

A 132 for me.

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9420864].message }}

Dennis Gaskill

12 years ago

134 ... that's a little bit disappointing. Maybe I shouldn't have been eating while I took it.

[ 1 ] Thanks
1 reply

Signature

Just when you think you've got it all figured out, someone changes the rules.

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9420885].message }}

ForumGuru Banned 12 years ago

Originally Posted by Dennis Gaskill

134 ... that's a little bit disappointing. Maybe I shouldn't have been eating while I took it.

LoL --> I was eating and watching TV!
- Thanks
{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9420890].message }}

ForumGuru

Banned 12 years ago

I wonder if speed had anything to do with it because I don't think I missed any... It's one of the lamest IQ tests I've ever taken, no doubt about that!

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9420906].message }}

travlinguy

12 years ago

It must be the new self esteem IQ test. You're guaranteed at least 100.

Get Lexy in here. She'll score 232.

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9420919].message }}

ForumGuru

Banned 12 years ago

@Dennis --> Speed must not be considered as I blazed through it with identical answers and received the identical score of 132. So I retook it again and...

I think 134 is the max and 132 is 1 wrong. I changed my glove answer which I am almost positive is the only question I could have missed and scored a 134.

Cheers

-don

[ 1 ] Thanks
1 reply

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9420956].message }}

Nice Sabino

12 years ago

I took it again and got 134! (1%)

I tried changing answers and got 130 for 3% - 2 mistakes. So, I agree that 134 is the max.

Originally Posted by ForumGuru

@Dennis --> Speed must not be considered as I blazed through it with identical answers and received the identical score of 132. So I retook it again and..

I think 134 is the max and 132 is 1 wrong. I changed my glove answer which I am almost positive is the only question I could have missed and scored a 134.

Cheers

-don

[ 1 ] Thanks

Signature

Warrior Forum Rules | WSO Guidelines | Help Desk Support

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9420966].message }}

MikeAmbrosio

12 years ago

Not to be a party pooper...ok, maybe that's what I am...but these free tests don't mean anything. Here's a guy who tested some. Interesting what he found:

Online IQ tests: are they valid? | Dean Burnett | Science | theguardian.com

2 things stood out in his article:

At this point it would probably be informative to reveal my techniques for getting such high scores. Basically, all the tests used multiple choice questions, and I answered each one entirely at random. The whole thing took me less than half an hour. While it is technically possible that I regularly chose the correct answers due to chance alone (one issue with using MCQs in IQ tests), the odds against this are incredibly high. The results provided by one test give us something of a clue as to what’s going on

I did this one randomly and scored a 124. Lucky?

There may well be valid online IQ tests, but tread carefully if you’re using them. And be wary of anyone who publicly shows off about their scores on such tests. An intelligent person would do no such thing.

LOL - love that last line.

[ 1 ] Thanks
1 reply

Signature

Are you protecting your on line business? If you have a website, blog, ecommerce store you NEED to back it up regularly. Your webhost will only protect you so much. Check out Quirkel. Protect yourself.

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9421012].message }}

Dennis Gaskill

12 years ago

Originally Posted by MikeAmbrosio

Not to be a party pooper...ok, maybe that's what I am...but these free tests don't mean anything.

I think most of us knew that, which is why we can have some fun with it. Even if some online IQ test are somewhat indicative of your IQ, it wouldn't be this one. It was far too easy.

Thanks
2 replies

Signature

Just when you think you've got it all figured out, someone changes the rules.

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9421152].message }}

Claude Whitacre

12 years ago

Originally Posted by Dennis Gaskill

I think most of us knew that, which is why we can have some fun with it. Even if some online IQ test are somewhat indicative of your IQ, it wouldn't be this one. It was far too easy.

Far too easy, and far too dependent on luck.

It's the only way to explain how Riffle and you both got a higher score than I did.
There is no other explanation. None.

Maybe payoffs........but that's it.

Thanks
1 reply

Signature

One Call Closing book https://www.amazon.com/One-Call-Clos...=1527788418&sr

"Be kind. For everyone you meet is fighting a great battle" Ian Maclaren

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9421193].message }}

Dennis Gaskill

12 years ago

Originally Posted by Claude Whitacre

Far too easy, and far too dependent on luck.

It's the only way to explain how Riffle and you both got a higher score than I did.
There is no other explanation. None.

Maybe payoffs........but that's it.

It's OK, Claude. We may be smarter than you, but you weigh more.

Wait, that didn't come out right. Let me try again. We may be smarter than you, but you have less hair. Wait...dang, this is hard. One more try... We may be smarter than you, but IQ is like golf, the lowest score wins!

[ 1 ] Thanks

Signature

Just when you think you've got it all figured out, someone changes the rules.

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9421216].message }}

MikeAmbrosio

12 years ago

Originally Posted by Dennis Gaskill

I think most of us knew that, which is why we can have some fun with it. Even if some online IQ test are somewhat indicative of your IQ, it wouldn't be this one. It was far too easy.

LOL, yeah but I liked that last part of the article about sharing the score. That's probably the reason I brought it up. It was funny

[ 2 ] Thanks

Signature

Are you protecting your on line business? If you have a website, blog, ecommerce store you NEED to back it up regularly. Your webhost will only protect you so much. Check out Quirkel. Protect yourself.

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9421762].message }}

HeySal

12 years ago

Alert - we believe your pet is walking on your keyboard. Intelligence undetectable.

WTH? Uh.................

Thanks

Signature

Sal
When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
Beyond the Path

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9421059].message }}

travlinguy

12 years ago

Hey, I thought it would be more fun than, What Kind of Bird are You? or which Disney Character Best Describes You?

[ 1 ] Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9421090].message }}

st0nec0ld

12 years ago

It's been awhile since the last time I tested my IQ haha nothing has changed (good thing) haha

Thanks

Signature

12BET | Live Casino Malaysia

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9421114].message }}

WalkingCarpet

Banned 12 years ago

I got 130

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9421438].message }}

thunderbird

12 years ago

You're all smart people. Surprise, surprise. I didn't need a test to tell me that. Good thing, too -- the test, is bogus, LOL. If you randomly answer those questions, you'll likely still get a high test score. I don't think someone would get a high test score by randomly answering a real IQ test. Flattery helps sales. Again, I already know you're smart people and don't need an unreliable online test to tell me that.

[ 2 ] Thanks

Signature

Project HERE.

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9421654].message }}

MH Anwar

12 years ago

Cool Guys..

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9421657].message }}

melissa1

12 years ago

Interesting!! 134 for me..

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9421971].message }}

Karen Blundell

12 years ago

130 for me too

Thanks
1 reply

Signature

---------------

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9423239].message }}

Claude Whitacre

12 years ago

As a couple of others have figured out, this is an involvement device. The minimum you can score is 100, and the top score is 134.
So the test results aren't real, although the answers may influence the score.

That is the only way that Dan Riffle and Dennis Gaskill got a higher score than me....Claude Whitacre.

Because those guys are morons. They think they can fool us with their feeble attempts at facial hair. But we are too smart for that "facial hair ruse". And compared to me, their heads are quite small.

Thanks
1 reply

Signature

One Call Closing book https://www.amazon.com/One-Call-Clos...=1527788418&sr

"Be kind. For everyone you meet is fighting a great battle" Ian Maclaren

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9423347].message }}

Dennis Gaskill

12 years ago

Originally Posted by Claude Whitacre

As a couple of others have figured out, this is an involvement device. The minimum you can score is 100, and the top score is 134.
So the test results aren't real, although the answers may influence the score.

That is the only way that Dan Riffle and Dennis Gaskill got a higher score than me....Claude Whitacre.

Because those guys are morons. They think they can fool us with their feeble attempts at facial hair. But we are too smart for that "facial hair ruse". And compared to me, their heads are quite small.

I'm not sure you want to brag about having a thick skull.

[ 1 ] Thanks
1 reply

Signature

Just when you think you've got it all figured out, someone changes the rules.

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9424273].message }}

imogenhobbs

12 years ago

hardly a valid IQ test when these questions were so easy compared to the Mensian entry... Definitely off, mine was last tested at 148 at a valid test. IQ scores are redundant lol, any higher doesn't translate to any real world success :p

Fun though.

Thanks
1 reply

Signature

PM me if you're a self-improv/women dating ghostwriter.

Lost your way again? 5 basic steps to never "fail"again (WF post)

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9425039].message }}

Alexa Smith

Banned 12 years ago

Originally Posted by imogenhobbs

hardly a valid IQ test when these questions were so easy compared to the Mensian entry... Definitely off, mine was last tested at 148 at a valid test.

Yes, this is right ... these tests' scoring sensitivities all vary, significantly, according to the purpose for which they're designed. The "mass consumption" ones are designed to be most accurate in the 92-108 range (that's half a "standard deviation" on either side of the so-called global norm) and get increasingly less accurate the further away from 100 points the score they're reporting.

The Mensa entrance one is very different: it's designed around a "norm" of about 136, I think, and from memory I think about 148 is the Mensa-entry "pass" (that's 3 standard deviations above the norm on a "global test").

Warriors posting their results in the Off Topic forum here are clearly a highly self-selected subgroup of a subgroup, and "our average" results are going to be way higher than 100.

The tests are also pretty culturally and educationally biased, even though they often purport not to be: people with "Western education" tend to score significantly higher on them.

(I haven't looked at this one, and am in any case not intelligent enough to know how to paste a screenshot into the forum because I'm technophobic and incompetent, too

).

.

Thanks
1 reply

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9428011].message }}

thunderbird

12 years ago

Originally Posted by Alexa Smith

<snip>

The tests are also pretty culturally and educationally biased, even though they often purport not to be: people with "Western education" tend to score significantly higher on them.<snip>

.

It is fair to say that anyone who scores high on such tests is smart, but also fair to say that there are many things that involve cognition that the tests don't measure (eg ability at such things as music and sports). I used to have an opinion on IQ tests, then realized I don't really know squat about them, how they come up with their questions, the basis for designing them the way they do, etc, I think some people's abilities may not get triggered by tests, but emerge with the best "test" of all -- life itself. Among professions as a whole, musicians tended to score lowest on IQ tests while accountants scored among the highest; I suspect that would at least partially reflect the value they place on the test to begin with.

Holy moly. I just saw your artwork. Amazing.

[ 1 ] Thanks

Signature

Project HERE.

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9428304].message }}

Isabella

12 years ago

I got 126! Not so bad....

Thanks

Signature

Message me about WarriorForum!

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9423372].message }}

thunderbird

12 years ago

Now with your high iq credentials (that is you took the test), you can join this site:
http://www.malaysia-chronicle.com/in...#axzz39lLAwJrk

Or if you're goodlooking, this site:
Online Dating Sites, Internet Dating Websites - BeautifulPeople.com

Thanks

Signature

Project HERE.

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9424185].message }}

Alex Blades

12 years ago

Maybe I should be less opinionated and think before I speak

Thanks

Signature

" I knew that if I failed, I wouldn't regret that.
But I knew the one thing I might regret is not ever having tried. "

~ Jeff Bezos

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9424221].message }}

HN

Banned 12 years ago

I've got 134. You have all guessed right. I am positive this is the max score.

Not sure if the time matters. I tried to answer pretty fast. Could have gone a few seconds faster but had to look up what the word 'twig' means. My logic guess was 'a small branch' and I was right.
I now know 42,771 English words.

Thanks
1 reply

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9424836].message }}

Dan Riffle 12 years ago

Originally Posted by HN

Could have gone a few seconds faster but had to look up what the word 'twig' means.

Cheater.

..
- [ 5 ] Thanks
- 1 reply
Signature

Raising a child is akin to knowing you're getting fired in 18 years and having to train your replacement without actively sabotaging them.
{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9427077].message }}
- Claude Whitacre 12 years ago
  
  You mean you are allowed to look up answers?
  Well...that explains the "genius".
  
  [ 1 ] Thanks
  
  Signature
  One Call Closing book https://www.amazon.com/One-Call-Clos...=1527788418&sr
  
  "Be kind. For everyone you meet is fighting a great battle" Ian Maclaren
  
  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9427785].message }}

perfectionmovers

12 years ago

Mine is 124 am i dumb

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9424872].message }}

celente

12 years ago

I went into negative, cause I could not even get the page to load. LOL haha.

Thanks

Signature

Create a $5000 USD a month Business. 1-on-1 Coaching. By 6 figure marketer! - CLICK HERE

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9424899].message }}

BuddhaOfCode

12 years ago

I got 134 .. Is this the max

?

Thanks
1 reply

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9426788].message }}

ForumGuru Banned 12 years ago

Originally Posted by BuddhaOfCode

I got 134 .. Is this the max ?

Yes it is.
- Thanks
{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9426796].message }}

georgeweb13

12 years ago

i got 126 also!

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9427900].message }}

Camron

12 years ago

I scored 130

Personally, I don't like their room for interpretation because there are multiple intelligences and the ones being tested are mostly based on logical-mathematical skills as well as visual thinking.

Thanks for sharing the test. It was fun to take up an English version

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9429533].message }}

umc

12 years ago

I got a 132. Can I get extra credit for noticing that jewelry was spelled two different ways on one of the questions and answers? Hoping that will bump me to a perfect score.

Thanks

Signature

Simple "pay what you want" life coaching services online.
Get out of your own way in business. It's personal. Click Here

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9430238].message }}

Floyd Fisher

12 years ago

130, but considering the facebook comments, it's a bs test.

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9430951].message }}

Test Your IQ

Trending Topics

Lightening strikes :(

Visual marketing ideas and concepts - How do I present myself to the marketing world?

If you had to start over today -- what would you do ?

" It is what it is" ... overused way too much imo

What would you do without the Internet ??