web 2.0-is it worth of trying?

In the mix of other things such as guest posting, outreach, pbn's, yes.
On their own, no.

That's the extreme short answer

jinx1221 have you ever used this method to rank site??

Is it that people can't read, or that people don't read?

I offered help to person who even did not know what was web2.0 as nobody answered his question properly. I'm not the web2.0 guru but I know some basics so I thought my advice would be helpful.

Godoveryoy!!!! You are mentally I'll and instead of helping someone you search for mistakes! That very bad! Soo **** your radar !

It's okay guy. I'm not looking to pick a fight with you and if I was I would have done it directly.

You are wrong on a lot of points, but you're newer to the industry and so it's to be expected and it's largely forgivable.

It's clear that you don't have the full picture of things yet, haven't figured out who people are yet, etc. It's your choice how you decide to go about doing that of course...

While people can get over your short comings in terms of knowledge and industry-insight, the one thing people won't look beyond is when you decide to start burning down bridges around you.

So, freak out if you would like to, that's fine but it's what caught my attention initially and what you've done again. If you were just another guy learning his way through the industry I wouldn't have even noticed you.

It's when you act-out that you draw all the attention to yourself that you don't want. You can say whatever you want about my radar, but you are the one who decided to embed yourself in my memory with your behavior.

If I was just looking to be a dick to you, I would have slammed you yesterday but I didn't because I really don't care that much. Giving you an ass-ache does nothing for me, you're not an important influence around here... it would just be me stomping on a little person. So stop being annoying and spastic and you will go on your way with a much more enjoyable forum experience.

... or respond to this with a flaming, screaming fit and just keep being who you are making yourself out to be ... You're choice of course.

Ok, I felt a little bad that your thread got thrashed so I'll kick in a response....

This is a completely worthless "Method" that is at least 6 years old. See: https://web.archive.org/web/20081205...acklink-method

That dates back to December 5th, 2008! In other words, the advice in the article is useless crap at this point. Particularly since it is advising creating a giant autoblog link wheel. It's just horrible, horrible advice.
Yes, it still can 'work' in a sense but it's nothing great or special. You would be much better off controlling a real domain to get a backlink out of 9 out of 10 times.

At one point in time, web 2.0 properties were a very workable strategy. Now, they are better used almost exclusively for branding than anything else.
No. Squidoo is nofollow, hubpages MAY be as well - but even if they aren't passing moderation can be a real pain in the ass. You'll end up wasting a lot of time an energy for nothing.

It helps, but not required. Of course, it only helps if the twitter account is frequently crawled itself. Ideally you should have better indexing strategies in place - or just use a real domain as advised above.

Quality guest posting is always better. If you are going to use a guest posting network though, then you aren't really getting anywhere.

I wouldn't bother with that. Social media, yes. Squidoo and the like? No. Just use guest blogging instead.

Yes Web 2.0 is still works ! Web 2.0 is strong platform for Blogging But just few people use it ! There are various web 2.0 platform those gives strong Back links But some give No Follow Back links But No Follow Back Links also not matter ! Use Good & high quality content for Web 2.0 & If you use Twitter for Web 2.0 than it's more Best !

1. Web 2.0s work
2. Yes, 3 good backlinks.
3. No. Just build links to them and they'll get indexed.