For All Those Hit Hard From June 6th-June 10th

by dp40oz
24 replies
  • SEO
  • |
After seeing all the threads posted its no coincidence that many people have been hit hard in the last few days. Basically the point of this thread is to gather info from the people who were hit and see if we can figure out whats going on.

My Facts:

- I have 15 websites
- Only one of my websites was hit. It was my top earning website and has basically been completely knocked out. I had over 200 page one rankings from 20 pages of unique content.
- It was in an information and education niche with some high search counts
- I had 20 pages of unique content and about 40 pages of syndicated articles from article ranks.
- I had done very aggressive link building for this website for about 3 months hitting with xrumer, scrapebox, pretty much everything under the sun. I had mellowed out the last 2 months, just using article ranks, BMR and some se-nuke but no Xrumer, blog comments for a few months.
- All of my other websites have seen the same treatment and are still fine. They are "thinner" sites though just 2-3 pages but all had syndicated articles on them as well. Some sites had only 2 pages of totally unique content and 100 pages of syndicated articles and are still ranking well.
- Sometimes at about midnight my site will show up in the serps for about 10 minutes and then poof gone again. I also get a few drips of traffic from my major keywords which means that some servers still have my site ranking somewhere in the US. Mind you this is very minimal compared to what I was getting. For a search term that would normally get 100 views a day I am getting maybe 3-4, but they are coming from the exact search term.

My Penalty:

- Site lost all its rankings and my major pages where links were built can only be found deep into the 500-900's and not for their normal search terms. They rank but for search terms they weren't optimized for.
- The only pages I have that break the top 500 are the pages that didn't see much link building.
- The pages that are ranking in the 500-800's just seem to be ranking for the wrong search terms which strikes my as odd.

My Thoughts:

Is this panda 2.2?
I don't think so personally. The penalty is too stiff for too many sites. Ive heard so many sites having very similar stories and it just seems way too harsh of a penalty. Its not like I went from #3 to number #87. I went from #3 to nowhere to be found for almost all terms. I also don't think the timetable for Panda 2.2 has come yet from what Matt Cutts has said.

What happened?
Is Google possibly cleaning up servers, transferring things or just doing major shuffles? Thats I guess what my hope is. The fact that this was my only site affected and that so many other people have had issues last week lends me to believe this could just be a Google glitch of sorts. But then again it may be a penalty.

I for one can suck up this loss. I can let it ride out for a month see if things change. The site earned well but I have others doing well and it wasn't making so much that I can't live with moving on. I just don't like not knowing what happened at all. It seems so arbitrary. I would love to hear the specifics and thoughts from other people in a similar boat.
#10th #6thjune #hard #hit #june
  • Profile picture of the author WealthWithin
    I'm seeing a similar pattern. The sites I have with many pages were affected. A site which had top 5 rankings for 1 yr completely lost rankings. Sites with less than 10 pages are improved or not affected.

    I doubt this has anything to do with links, as all the sites I have, get a similar sort of a link graph.

    All I can think for now is, remove or merge any content pages with closely matching content.

    Google definitely did a significant algorithm change during last week.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4063212].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author dp40oz
      Originally Posted by WealthWithin View Post

      I'm seeing a similar pattern. The sites I have with many pages were affected. A site which had top 5 rankings for 1 yr completely lost rankings. Sites with less than 10 pages are improved or not affected.

      I doubt this has anything to do with links, as all the sites I have, get a similar sort of a link graph.

      All I can think for now is, remove or merge any content pages with closely matching content.

      Google definitely did a significant algorithm change during last week.
      Interesting point. My site for example had a lot of pages with similar titles, for example.

      Foot fungus in men
      foot fungus in women
      foot fungus in children
      dogs with foot fungus

      Stuff like that. Do you think that may have been a big contributor. My other sites do have similar page titles but not as many.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4063268].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author WealthWithin
    I think it's too early to jump into a conclusion.

    I have few sites that had wild ranking fluctuations during past few days. (From #53 to #3 to #53 to #3). Google hasn't issued an official statement yet (They usually do after a significant change). So I'm guessing they're still testing whatever is going on.

    I would hold on to the sites for another few weeks before making any significant changes.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4065395].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author craft
    This happened to me also. After 6 months in this game I was finally getting to the top of Google for various keywords. I started to make money for the first time and was ecstatic.

    6th-10th rankings gone
    11th-14th rankings return
    15th-17th rankings gone
    18th-21st rankings return
    22nd-24th(now) rankings gone!

    When I say rankings gone I mean somewhere from index page 36 to 80.

    I have been doing so much reading my head hurts trying to figure this out. I am in the same boat as dp40oz.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4130774].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author rvdp
      I lost one site (my only one so far) which had a #2 ranking. The main reason for me to think these are not the "final Panda 2.2 rankings", is simply the fact that when I look at the SERPS for my niche and a couple of others I have been observing for a while, I see sites have climbed their way up which are absolutely lower value thean the ones that disappeared. For example, the #2 that replaced my site is an extremely thin affiliate with nothing but syndicated content and copied testimonials.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4130826].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author John Dales
      I think the cause of the drop of the OP's site is the automation especially the part that was done by Scrapebox and Xrumer.

      We had several websites blogs in several free blogging platforms such as Wordpress, Blogspot, Weebly, Typepad. Each blog contains only 1 article that was spun from a unique 500-word seed article. Now, we experimented blasting our blogspot.com site with 10,000 profile links using Xrumer and we did 200 profile links to our Weebly site on a manual basis. The blogspot site shoot up from No. 12 to No. 4 in the rankings and the Weebly site crawled from No. 14 to No.11. However, after a few days, our Blogspot site is nowhere to be seen in the Top 800 while our Weebly continued to crawl upwards and it is now sitting strongly at No. 7 for the same Keyword.

      It has been several days now and our Blogspot site is still nowhere in the Top 800 and I think it will not regain its ranking.

      I think Google is now looking very closely at links which are built in an automated fashion.
      Signature

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4130910].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Jeremy Banks
    I have been making more and more each day since June 5th, but yes some of my sites were affected as well. My thoughts?

    Google is always crapping on your sites
    It seems no matter what google will take one of my top earning sites and knock it down the 2nd page. Out of my 30-40 sites I always have to pull one of my top earners out of the sandbox.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4130855].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author coronaborcalis
      Here is the stat that I took from wp-stat




      In that stat you can see that my site gets back to SERP on 17 June after the dooms day on 6 june. What I did is just copy the technique from warriors who gets hit from 6 June and get back after a couple of days. The technique is send reconsideration letter to google but make sure before you do this your sites have to follow all webmaster guideline that provide by google.

      Cheers

      Rian
      Signature
      BisnisOnlineZ - Indonesian Make Money Online Blog


      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4131011].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author dp40oz
        Originally Posted by coronaborcalis View Post

        Here is the stat that I took from wp-stat




        In that stat you can see that my site gets back to SERP on 17 June after the dooms day on 6 june. What I did is just copy the technique from warriors who gets hit from 6 June and get back after a couple of days. The technique is send reconsideration letter to google but make sure before you do this your sites have to follow all webmaster guideline that provide by google.

        Cheers

        Rian
        Their webmaster guidelines are a joke! They are vague and leave every site open for them to interpret anyway they'd like. If they wanted to they could find apple.com, facebook.com or wikipedia in violation of their webmaster guidelines. Its the most useless guide ive ever read.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4131041].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author coronaborcalis
          Originally Posted by dp40oz View Post

          Their webmaster guidelines are a joke! They are vague and leave every site open for them to interpret anyway they'd like. If they wanted to they could find apple.com, facebook.com or wikipedia in violation of their webmaster guidelines. Its the most useless guide ive ever read.
          Lol, how can you say that mate? I don't see any joke in this google guidelines, check it out.

          https://www.google.com/support/webma...er=35769&hl=en

          Even if the guidelines contain with crappy jokes we have to admit that google provides us with targeted traffic that can generate $$ for us, just feed google like what they want and $$ will comes
          Signature
          BisnisOnlineZ - Indonesian Make Money Online Blog


          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4131099].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author dp40oz
            Originally Posted by coronaborcalis View Post

            Lol, how can you say that mate? I don't see any joke in this google guidelines, check it out.

            https://www.google.com/support/webma...er=35769&hl=en

            Even if the guidelines contain with crappy jokes we have to admit that google provides us with targeted traffic that can generate $$ for us, just feed google like what they want and $$ will comes
            Sorry I was referring to these Panda guidelines because we all assume we've followed the Webmaster guidelines. These are the most subjective guidelines ive ever seen. Not only that, they are having a robot be the one deciding these things. Its ridiculous. Google is catching more quality sites in their Panda net then non-quality sites and this WILL hurt them in the end. Panda has been an awful business move and horrible PR mess.

            Would you trust the information presented in this article?
            Is this article written by an expert or enthusiast who knows the topic well, or is it more shallow in nature?
            Does the site have duplicate, overlapping, or redundant articles on the same or similar topics with slightly different keyword variations?
            Would you be comfortable giving your credit card information to this site?
            Does this article have spelling, stylistic, or factual errors?
            Are the topics driven by genuine interests of readers of the site, or does the site generate content by attempting to guess what might rank well in search engines?
            Does the article provide original content or information, original reporting, original research, or original analysis?
            Does the page provide substantial value when compared to other pages in search results?
            How much quality control is done on content?
            Does the article describe both sides of a story?
            Is the site a recognized authority on its topic?
            Is the content mass-produced by or outsourced to a large number of creators, or spread across a large network of sites, so that individual pages or sites don't get as much attention or care?
            Was the article edited well, or does it appear sloppy or hastily produced?
            For a health related query, would you trust information from this site?
            Would you recognize this site as an authoritative source when mentioned by name?
            Does this article provide a complete or comprehensive description of the topic?
            Does this article contain insightful analysis or interesting information that is beyond obvious?
            Is this the sort of page you'd want to bookmark, share with a friend, or recommend?
            Does this article have an excessive amount of ads that distract from or interfere with the main content?
            Would you expect to see this article in a printed magazine, encyclopedia or book?
            Are the articles short, unsubstantial, or otherwise lacking in helpful specifics?
            Are the pages produced with great care and attention to detail vs. less attention to detail?
            Would users complain when they see pages from this site?
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4131544].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author paulgl
              "Panda" guidelines are nothing new. Same old webmaster guidelines.
              Those that listened, followed, do not fear the big bad google.

              There is nothing new in panda. Just maybe a more militant
              enforcement of old guidelines.

              So many people have come to this forum and flatly stated:
              "I don't care what google says...."

              Good. Don't. Go in peace.

              Paul
              Signature

              If you were disappointed in your results today, lower your standards tomorrow.

              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4131968].message }}
              • Profile picture of the author dp40oz
                Originally Posted by paulgl View Post

                "Panda" guidelines are nothing new. Same old webmaster guidelines.
                Those that listened, followed, do not fear the big bad google.

                There is nothing new in panda. Just maybe a more militant
                enforcement of old guidelines.

                So many people have come to this forum and flatly stated:
                "I don't care what google says...."

                Good. Don't. Go in peace.

                Paul
                Paul I respect that you play by the rules and follow them to a tee. The problem with Panda is that its not only punishing those breaking the rules but its punishing those who aren't and the punishments are beyond harsh. 500-700 place ranking drops across every page of an entire website is excessive. Just because Google runs the show doesn't mean every move they make is correct.
                {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4131999].message }}
              • Profile picture of the author rvdp
                Originally Posted by paulgl View Post

                "Panda" guidelines are nothing new. Same old webmaster guidelines.
                Those that listened, followed, do not fear the big bad google.

                There is nothing new in panda. Just maybe a more militant
                enforcement of old guidelines.

                So many people have come to this forum and flatly stated:
                "I don't care what google says...."

                Good. Don't. Go in peace.

                Paul
                Every. Single. Time. You keep saying nothing has changed but fail to explain why quality sites are disappearing without good reason. More militant enforcement you say? Then what rule(s) exactly are being enforced beacause as far as I can tell, the sites we're talking about follow them practically all, which is one of the reasons they ranked well in the first place.
                {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4132058].message }}
                • Profile picture of the author Fernando Veloso
                  Originally Posted by rvdp View Post

                  Every. Single. Time. You keep saying nothing has changed but fail to explain why quality sites are disappearing without good reason. More militant enforcement you say? Then what rule(s) exactly are being enforced beacause as far as I can tell, the sites we're talking about follow them practically all, which is one of the reasons they ranked well in the first place.
                  Read my post above.

                  If a rule was clear (or even followed), everyone would have #1 sites.

                  You people need to wake up.
                  Signature
                  People make good money selling to the rich. But the rich got rich selling to the masses.
                  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4132072].message }}
                  • Profile picture of the author paulgl
                    Originally Posted by Fernando Veloso View Post

                    Read my post above.

                    If a rule was clear (or even followed), everyone would have #1 sites.
                    Man is that on heck of a quote!

                    Paul
                    Signature

                    If you were disappointed in your results today, lower your standards tomorrow.

                    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4132174].message }}
                    • Profile picture of the author Fernando Veloso
                      Originally Posted by paulgl View Post

                      Man is that on heck of a quote!

                      Paul
                      And truthful.

                      Google is like a crazy drunk man with a gun on his hands: it shoots everywhere, everytime. No one is safe.

                      Sad but true.
                      Signature
                      People make good money selling to the rich. But the rich got rich selling to the masses.
                      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4132208].message }}
                      • Profile picture of the author Jeremy Banks
                        Originally Posted by paulgl View Post

                        Google is always crapping on sites because the internet and
                        search results are dynamic.

                        I wish this panda-monium would stop. It's just filling up the WF
                        with nonsense. Like I predicted, it caused everybody who drops
                        to now claim the big bad voodoo panda.


                        Paul
                        Too many people believe corelations are grounds for hard proof and fact when in reality there could be (and usually are) 100s of other factors involved. I am not on the panda wagon, google changes things on a daily basis. If everyone's sites on increased in rankings then everyone would be tied for first.

                        The rules haven't changed. Add original content, get links from quality sources and have a diversified link portfolio. If your site drops in rankings add more content and get more links.

                        Originally Posted by Fernando Veloso View Post

                        It's a cycle - as usual.

                        Google knocks down sites cause it's their method. It's usual, happens often and it's a good way to keep folks wondering what happened.

                        I tell you in all honestly what I think: even if you do the best SEO around, your sites will be hammered: one update or the other.

                        It's cyclic. And random too. Thats why everyone is so confused. Guess what?? Thats the whole IDEA!!!!
                        Thats why most of us use a similar 33/33/33 rule:

                        33% this technique
                        33% that technique
                        33% other technique

                        and so on.

                        This way when the freaking hammer drops, you have 1/3 (or more) of them safe. But if you still want to follow updates/trends/mouse traps... be my guest. It's insane the amount of people discussing this everyday, crossing data (and proving Google kills random sites!!!) and no one see the big picture.

                        Geeessh.
                        Some people see the bug picture, the ones making the money . I diversify like a mofo. Diversify types of sites ( niche, micro niche, authority), monetization methods and link building tactics
                        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4132385].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author 2stroke
        Originally Posted by coronaborcalis View Post

        Here is the stat that I took from wp-stat




        In that stat you can see that my site gets back to SERP on 17 June after the dooms day on 6 june. What I did is just copy the technique from warriors who gets hit from 6 June and get back after a couple of days. The technique is send reconsideration letter to google but make sure before you do this your sites have to follow all webmaster guideline that provide by google.

        Cheers

        Rian
        Don't get too comfy, My site disappeared from the first page, I did the reconsideration request, they sent the email saying it wasn't manually removed. My site climbed back to first page for a couple days, then dropped to the second page for a few days then disappeared again now for 3 days.

        Something is getting adjusted somewhere, and apparently it's not over yet.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4132300].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author paulgl
      Originally Posted by Jeremy Banks View Post


      Google is always crapping on your sites
      Google is always crapping on sites because the internet and
      search results are dynamic.

      I wish this panda-monium would stop. It's just filling up the WF
      with nonsense. Like I predicted, it caused everybody who drops
      to now claim the big bad voodoo panda.

      Funny thing, I wonder what the corresponding number of people
      who went up are claiming? I guess those people don't populate
      forums.

      Take responsibility of your own sites.

      (Note: not aimed at Mr. Banks)

      Paul
      Signature

      If you were disappointed in your results today, lower your standards tomorrow.

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4131440].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author thebitbotdotcom
      Originally Posted by Jeremy Banks View Post

      I have been making more and more each day since June 5th, but yes some of my sites were affected as well. My thoughts?

      Google is always crapping on your sites
      It seems no matter what google will take one of my top earning sites and knock it down the 2nd page. Out of my 30-40 sites I always have to pull one of my top earners out of the sandbox.
      Manual review. They must have hired an army...
      Signature
      Do Your Copywriting Skills Suck?

      Let Us Help You Develop Your Writing Skills!

      Submit Guest Posts With [ TheBitBot.Com ]
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4132763].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author bigpoppa3
    I'm relatively new to the IM world but I've suffered a hit also. I have 70 sites (a loose combination of adsense, amazon and clickbank sites) which really started making money in May. I noticed a problem in my sites which had been averaging 300-450 visitors a day since the first part of June but dropped to 12 since June 17th. Yesterday I check my adsense account and noticed by average for daily page views and income (for all my sites) experienced a 50% drop since the June 17th.

    Now I have to figure I what Google wants so I can feed that monster what it wants!
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4130914].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Fernando Veloso
    It's a cycle - as usual.

    Google knocks down sites cause it's their method. It's usual, happens often and it's a good way to keep folks wondering what happened.

    I tell you in all honestly what I think: even if you do the best SEO around, your sites will be hammered: one update or the other.

    It's cyclic. And random too. Thats why everyone is so confused. Guess what?? Thats the whole IDEA!!!!
    Thats why most of us use a similar 33/33/33 rule:

    33% this technique
    33% that technique
    33% other technique

    and so on.

    This way when the freaking hammer drops, you have 1/3 (or more) of them safe. But if you still want to follow updates/trends/mouse traps... be my guest. It's insane the amount of people discussing this everyday, crossing data (and proving Google kills random sites!!!) and no one see the big picture.

    Geeessh.
    Signature
    People make good money selling to the rich. But the rich got rich selling to the masses.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4132018].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author thebitbotdotcom
      Originally Posted by Fernando Veloso View Post

      It's a cycle - as usual.

      Google knocks down sites cause it's their method. It's usual, happens often and it's a good way to keep folks wondering what happened.

      I tell you in all honestly what I think: even if you do the best SEO around, your sites will be hammered: one update or the other.

      It's cyclic. And random too. Thats why everyone is so confused. Guess what?? Thats the whole IDEA!!!!
      Thats why most of us use a similar 33/33/33 rule:

      33% this technique
      33% that technique
      33% other technique

      and so on.

      This way when the freaking hammer drops, you have 1/3 (or more) of them safe. But if you still want to follow updates/trends/mouse traps... be my guest. It's insane the amount of people discussing this everyday, crossing data (and proving Google kills random sites!!!) and no one see the big picture.

      Geeessh.
      or...33.3% long-tail
      .....33.3% long-tail
      .....33.3% long-tail

      i.e. never put your keywords into one basket.

      Build your business on long tail keywords in addition to short-tail...

      short-tail = profits
      long-tail = stability
      Signature
      Do Your Copywriting Skills Suck?

      Let Us Help You Develop Your Writing Skills!

      Submit Guest Posts With [ TheBitBot.Com ]
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4132793].message }}

Trending Topics