Latest From Panda - Backlinks Over Quality?

10 replies
  • SEO
  • |
Best strategy for internet marketing is not thinking about internet marketing at all.
#backlinks #latest #panda #quality
  • Profile picture of the author huangyouyou117
    Originally Posted by omrishabbat View Post

    Over the last couple of weeks (since October 14th- allegedly Panda 2.5.2) i am sensing that Google is now giving backlinks the advantage over quality content, almost just like before the first Panda update in February.

    Does anyone else feel this way and sense this change?
    I've been doing the same ever since I started doing SEO last year, and I didn't feel anything from the Panda Update. I build links the same way, the same amount, etc. Why do you feel Google is giving backlinks more credit? Thanks.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4938053].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author omrishabbat
    [DELETED]
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4938149].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author orina
      Originally Posted by omrishabbat View Post

      I have noticed that few quality sites i regularly visit, have fallen in rankings and more spammy sites have moved up ahead.

      Additionally, my website which is 100% original and very high-quality also suffered from somewhat of a drop.
      Really? Maybe that's only a temporary thing. After all Google always put quality over backlinks.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4938270].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author tomaz
    I have a similar feeling as you do. But I have not done enough tests to make this with certainty claimed.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4941237].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Eleanor
    Google will always be looking for quality sites but they are, and have been for a long time, moving towards high quality content combined with high quality backlinks.

    Google might be leaning towards giving an advantage to sites with high quality backlinks as well as high quality content. If this is the case (which it probably is) then sites that have average content might get a temporary boost if their backlinks are of high quality.

    Just my thoughts.

    Thanks
    Eleanor
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4941261].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author mosthost
    I've given up trying to figure out what Google wants. It's about what I want now
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4941277].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author commoditytrainer
    Originally Posted by omrishabbat View Post

    Over the last couple of weeks (since October 14th- allegedly Panda 2.5.2) i am sensing that Google is now giving backlinks the advantage over quality content, almost just like before the first Panda update in February.

    Does anyone else feel this way and sense this change?
    It is a common known fact that Google puts more weight in backlinks that any other feature of SEO and rankings in search engines. As long as you don't do anything drasticly, Panda, dup content is just for those to talk about, while the rest jump up in the searches.
    Signature
    If you want insurance quotes then check out one of the best ways to compare at http://www.autoinsuresavings.org and your insurance costs could be reduced to more than you think?
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4941288].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author RevSEO
    Google's actually after a few things with the recent Panda update.

    Here's what they are after:

    Quality content - Google's admitted publicaly that they have a problem. HackerNews, a popular tech "forum", often has dialogue with Matt Cutts about how littered the search results are. Heck, they've even gone as far as creating a form that helped combat duplicate content for a while.

    Crap spun content is on its way out as the bots and algorithms get smarter and smarter. Panda was created in an effort to do just that, combat low quality content.

    Quality backlinks - Let's face it, with each new linkbuilding service often comes a new spam service. I hate it more than the next guy. But, there are more and more these types of services being released to the public daily. Profile links, blog comments, and other abused links once were a good indicator of backlinks. Now, not so much.

    Taking it to the next level Google's doing all they can to de-index and remove the crap from the SERPs. Part of that are forum profiles from overly abused domains with huge databases of spammers. Why should Google index a forum profile that's just like the next 50,000 on the same domain? They shouldn't.

    Google's has two real goals as a search engine, provide kick-butt results for the searchers, and make sure they refine the way they make money.

    The trick is finding how to balance great content, high PageRank backlinks, and the value that the searcher is looking for.

    No need to reinvent the wheel.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4941440].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Black Hat Cat
    Banned
    Originally Posted by omrishabbat View Post

    Over the last couple of weeks (since October 14th- allegedly Panda 2.5.2) i am sensing that Google is now giving backlinks the advantage over quality content, almost just like before the first Panda update in February.

    Does anyone else feel this way and sense this change?
    So, basically, they're doing what they've always done then, because content quality has never played much of a role in the ranking process.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4942938].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author JettH
      My impression is that they are doing alot more human reviewing now, and also trying to match search results better to "searcher intent".

      eg
      walmart.com is probably a good match for someone searching for "walmart"
      cheap-blue-widgets.com may not be a good match for someone searching for "cheap blue widgets".
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4943699].message }}

Trending Topics