Web 2.0 Backlinks

14 years ago

Well yes because they are 4 different websites

Thanks

Signature

Lets Us Do Your Back linking >>> The Best SENuke X Campaign <<< Panda and Penguin friendly

Cheap Web Hosting Â£2.49 per month

London Website Design

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6442167].message }}

InternetJon

14 years ago

It would make more sense to be getting 4 different backlinks from 4 totally different sources, in my opinion. Try different web 2.0 sites or find some links that are actually relevant to your niche, which are most likely going to do a lot more for you than the standard web 2.0 ones.

Thanks
1 reply

Signature

Click here to connect with me on Facebook!

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6442178].message }}

namaserajesh

14 years ago

Originally Posted by InternetJon

It would make more sense to be getting 4 different backlinks from 4 totally different sources, in my opinion. Try different web 2.0 sites or find some links that are actually relevant to your niche, which are most likely going to do a lot more for you than the standard web 2.0 ones.

Yeah agree with you, instead of creating 4 blogs on same network create one blog in Blogger, one in WordPress, One in Weebly etc.

Thanks

Signature

How to Blog Complete Guide {9058 Words} | WordPress SEO Complete Guide {9363 Words} | Find the Best Web Hosting

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6444017].message }}

TotalWebsiteControl

14 years ago

Originally Posted by wilsonm

For e.g. if I create:

myblog.blogspot.com
randomstuff.blogspot.com
helloh.blogspot.com
dangersone.blogspot.com

And populate these blogs with unique content and backlink them to the same site, do they count as more then one backlink?

That is correct

Thanks

Signature

Get Your Website Ranked on Google Page ONE in 2016

ALL-IN-ONE SEO SOLUTION FOR YOUR BUSINESS

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6442279].message }}

jakecoop79

14 years ago

If you are going to create 4 web 2.0 sites, I think you would be better off creating them from 4 different web 2.0 sites.

Your blogspot blogs would all count as separate backlinks, but for seo purposes, more domain diversity would be better.

Thanks
1 reply

Signature

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6442705].message }}

wilsonm

14 years ago

Originally Posted by jakecoop79

If you are going to create 4 web 2.0 sites, I think you would be better off creating them from 4 different web 2.0 sites.

Your blogspot blogs would all count as separate backlinks, but for seo purposes, more domain diversity would be better.

I have created web2.0 backlinks from different domains but there is only a certain number of decent web2.0s out there (with indexing for e.g.). I made backlinks from about 20 web 2.0 but now need to "reuse" ones that have already been used.

Thanks
2 replies

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6444532].message }}

jordenstive 14 years ago

Building Backlinks is one of the most effective SEO techniques that many marketers are using. In fact, it is the main foundation of SEO. One quality 2.0 backlink can lead to dozens of potential visitors from just one mention.
- Thanks
Signature

Industrial Cooling Tower Manufacturer
TowertechIndia
{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6469577].message }}

jakecoop79

14 years ago

Originally Posted by wilsonm

I have created web2.0 backlinks from different domains but there is only a certain number of decent web2.0s out there (with indexing for e.g.). I made backlinks from about 20 web 2.0 but now need to "reuse" ones that have already been used.

Um, there's tons out there. Here's a few:

Code:

http://blogger.com|9
http://wordpress.com|9
http://citeulike.org|8
http://livejournal.com|8
http://my.opera.com|8
http://tumblr.com|8
http://typepad.com|8
http://weebly.com|8
http://angelfire.com|7
http://bravenet.com|7
http://freewha.com|7
http://jimdo.com|7
http://multiply.com|7
http://my.telegraph.co.uk|7
http://officelive.com|7
http://posterous.com|7
http://rediff.com|7
http://salon.com|7
http://squidoo.com|7
http://tripod.com|7
http://webnode.com|7
http://webs.com|7
http://wikidot.com|7
http://yola.com|7
http://allvoices.com|6
http://areavoices.com|6
http://blog.co.uk|6
http://blog.com|6
http://blog.de|6
http://blogsome.com|6
http://diaryland.com|6
http://dzone.com|6
http://edublogs.org|6
http://fc2.com|6
http://freeblog.hu|6
http://gather.com|6
http://home.onsugar.com|6
http://hotklix.com|6
http://hubpages.com|6
http://journalspace.com|6
http://jumptags.com|6
http://linkagogo.com|6
http://moonfruit.com|6
http://onsugar.com|6
http://quizilla.teennick.com|6
http://sphinn.com|6
http://springnote.com|6
http://travelblog.org|6
http://twine.com|6
http://twoday.net|6
http://ucoz.com|6
http://webspawner.com|6
http://webstarts.com|6
http://wetpaint.com|6
http://xanga.com|6
http://zimbio.com|6
http://20six.co.uk|5
http://350.com|5
http://alivenotdead.com|5
http://beep.com|5
http://blinkweb.com|5
http://blog.com.es|5
http://blog.hr|5
http://blogdrive.com|5
http://blogs.ie|5
http://blogtext.org|5
http://buddymarks.com|5
http://business.blinkweb.com|5
http://devhub.com|5
http://ewebsite.com|5
http://flixya.com|5
http://freeblogit.com|5
http://freeflux.net|5
http://freehostia.com|5
http://hazblog.com|5
http://insanejournal.com|5
http://kirtsy.com|5
http://livelogcity.com|5
http://mytripjournal.com|5
http://opendiary.com|5
http://snappages.com|5
http://sosblog.com|5
http://sosblogs.com|5
http://soulcast.com|5
http://soup.io|5
http://spurl.net|5
http://tblog.com|5
http://terapad.com|5
http://thoughts.com|5
http://webgarden.com|5
http://weblogs.us|5
http://yousaytoo.com|5
http://zoomblog.com|5
http://zoomshare.com|5
http://bcz.com|4
http://bigadda.com|4
http://blog.ca|4
http://blogetery.com|4
http://bloggerteam.com|4
http://bloggum.com|4
http://bloghi.com|4
http://blogreaction.com|4
http://blurty.com|4
http://busythumbs.com|4
http://doomby.com|4
http://fotopages.com|4
http://freeblogspot.org|4
http://getjealous.com|4
http://hipero.com|4
http://hpage.com|4
http://i.ph|4
http://inube.com|4
http://iseekblog.com|4
http://mywapblog.com|4
http://netcipia.com|4
http://nireblog.com|4
http://ohlog.com|4
http://spi-blog.com|4
http://tabulas.com|4
http://typolis.net|4
http://upsaid.com|4
http://visualsociety.com|4
http://wallinside.com|4
http://wikipages.com|4
http://blogge.rs|3
http://flukiest.com|3
http://iblog.at|3
http://journalfen.net|3
http://mylinkvault.com|3
http://publr.com|3
http://spyuser.com|3
http://weblogplaza.com|3
http://wordcountjournal.com|3
http://blogpico.com|2
http://blogster.com|2
http://evood.com|2
http://uwcblog.com|2
http://2itb.com|N/A
http://blogspirit.com|N/A
http://blogstream.com|N/A
http://honmag.com|N/A
http://myblogsite.com|N/A
http://simpy.com|N/A
http://sphere.com|N/A

Thanks

Signature

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6473603].message }}

rafiseo

Banned 14 years ago

No these will not be effective for SEO. Backlinks from different class C IP address will work. So you should build backlinks from different class c domains. If you build backlinks using different anchor texts then yes it would work fine.

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6443758].message }}

Chronic IM

14 years ago

Hello! try making all of these web 2.0 sites from different domains and see if it works.

Thanks

Signature

[FREE WSO] Say "Good-Bye" to Tiny Commissions Forever!

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6443968].message }}

multiplecloud

14 years ago

It should be different site but value of each backlink will be discounted from par. Let's imagine 100 backlink from only blogspot site, What google think about this? I'm sure it will treat this backlink as discounted. So try to make backlink from different source as much as possible.

Thanks

Signature

█ SafePBN - PBN on different shared hosting company
█ 100% no bad neighborhood | host pbn at safest
█ MultipleCloud - Multiple location hosting provider
█ 200+ worldwide location | different server | different ip owner | best for pbn

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6444040].message }}

LiftMyRank

14 years ago

The more backlinks you get from the same domain the less effective each of them becomes.......wish SEO was that easy

Thanks
1 reply

Signature

The #1 SEO Service on the Warrior Forum

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6444061].message }}

trytolearnmore 14 years ago

Originally Posted by John Moore

The more backlinks you get from the same domain the less effective each of them becomes.......wish SEO was that easy

Hey John,

Not sure what you meant. What if i get links from 2 authority sources... let's say:

XXX.harvard.edu
YYY.harvard.edu

Are you saying that because they are from the same domains, the value of these backlinks will be less effective?
- Thanks
{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6470114].message }}

risingrank

14 years ago

yes, diversifying backlinks will be a better linking strategy.

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6444111].message }}

AbhinayaSree

14 years ago

Originally Posted by wilsonm

For e.g. if I create:

myblog.blogspot.com
randomstuff.blogspot.com
helloh.blogspot.com
dangersone.blogspot.com

And populate these blogs with unique content and backlink them to the same site, do they count as more then one backlink?

You are right

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6469607].message }}

inglebey

14 years ago

you want them to be different domains, this way they will be different IPs and give you more domain diversity.

4 blogger sites
blog.blogger.com
random.blogger.com
three.blogger.com
four.blogger.com

these are 4 separate links but all coming from 1 IP blogger.com's IP.

go to opensiteexplorer (dot) org and enter in your website, root linking domains is different domains that link to you and total links is everything that links to you.

where as;

one.blogger.com
one.wordpress.com
one.webbly.com
one.tumblr.com

these are more effective as it is 4 links from 4 different IPs and 4 different root domains. This is stronger than 4 blogger links with the same IP and same domain.

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6470617].message }}

mimoune12

14 years ago

i want to help me for geting the baklins

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6473258].message }}

Alex The Lion

14 years ago

This would work, you should create a second tier of links to the Web 2.0s to boost their power also.

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6473637].message }}

adam337

14 years ago

I have created web2.0 backlinks from different domains but there is only a certain number of decent web2.0s out there (with indexing for e.g.). I made backlinks from about 20 web 2.0 but now need to "reuse" ones that have already been used.

Open new account then post new article in those web2.0s. You can bookmark all of them to index them fast.

Thanks
1 reply

Signature

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6473907].message }}

ajajahmedshaikh 14 years ago

Open new account then post new article in those web2.0s. You can bookmark all of them to index them fast.

i hope this would improve SERP Ranking
- Thanks
{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6476045].message }}

palme

14 years ago

each link from web 2.0 is the same as links from comment in that blog.

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6477319].message }}

BlueXephos

Banned 14 years ago

There are many web 2.0 websites that are using "nofollow tag" and that is a big disadvantage because these IBLs will not count for the PageRank.

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6478405].message }}

seamy82

14 years ago

The more links you get from the same domain the less effective they become? Yes, I agree. But two links from a network is still better than one from that network but may not be as good as two from different networks, depending on the quality of the network. You still need no-follows, as I would bet my house that these are worked into the algorithm in some way. If the algorithm is designed to favour natural link building, then a page with lots of do-follow links and zero no-follow links does not look natural. So no-follow backlinks have a role to play in your seo strategy.

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6478820].message }}

mimoune12

14 years ago

thank you freinds

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6479388].message }}

Web 2.0 Backlinks

Trending Topics

Walking for Exercise is a Different Animal...

I wanted to make a game blogging site with the help of claude will it monetize ?

Integrating AWS Bedrock into a Web App?

What Picks You Up?

Hi from Rachel, new here