Scrapebox Backlinks and Google

15 replies
  • SEO
  • |
I have been using scrapebox for awhile now. I have successfully submitted over 10000 comments. I know that the majority of the submitted comments are possibly awaiting approval. I believe that after a few months have passed at least a few have been approved therefore at least a fewer comments pages should have been indexed by google. Is this the right chain of thought? When check google webmaster tools for external links the number is same as before using scrapebox. Why? At least one link must showup in google.

#backlinks #google #google adesense #scrapebox #seo
  • Profile picture of the author BrianCorcoran
    You might want the check if the links in your blast are auto approved and the pages are popular enough to be crawled by google bots daily. Also because its scrapebox the links wont stick for long, so as one link gets indexed another gets deindexed. Just the nature of the beast!
    Signature

    Don't be afraid to ask me any question about YOUR SEO issues right now! SEO is my First, Middle & Last Name.



    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6810904].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author megatr0n
      So then what do you suggest to do get most of those 10000 links indexed or at least crawled?
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6811004].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author jackrice
    ping all your bloglist that you submitted to that is the secrets, then after 72 huours re- ping them again. scrape box has mass inderxer use it to index your blog list,

    here are some good ping site you can make use of
    pingfarm
    bulkping
    pingdevice
    mass-pinging
    pingler

    use all of them be sure to get atlest 70% of your bloglist link index
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6812257].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author marketwarrior06
    Banned
    Scrape Box backlinks are good if you can use them properly. But remember that Scrape Box follow the rule of Quantity of back links not quality. you can get 6k back link in 2 days. the juice form those links are less than 2 high PR do follow and related manual back links. But its easy to use SB
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6812398].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author fmnely1
    CERTAINLY THEY WILL SOON BE INDEX YOU JUST HAVE SOME PATIENCE
    Signature
    Long Kept Guru Secret Traffic Heaven Download :Now http://www.filedropper.com/trafficheaven
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7002709].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author webstrategistpk
    good advice. I will try this.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7493251].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author JSProjects
    Originally Posted by megatr0n View Post

    I have been using scrapebox for awhile now. I have successfully submitted over 10000 comments. I know that the majority of the submitted comments are possibly awaiting approval. I believe that after a few months have passed at least a few have been approved therefore at least a fewer comments pages should have been indexed by google. Is this the right chain of thought? When check google webmaster tools for external links the number is same as before using scrapebox. Why? At least one link must showup in google.

    A MUCH better solution is to use SB to discover higher quality blogs and manually comment on them. Throwing 10,000 comments at random blog posts and hoping they stick is generally a pretty bad idea.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7493502].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author squadron
      I agree that the best use of scrapebox is to find high PR blog pages to manually comment on. Matt Cutt's blog is a great place to start

      You will find one manual comment on a decent PR3 or PR4 blog page will be worth more than thousands of crappy little spam comment links on PR0 pages.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7537051].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Janice Stacy
    I wonder if google marked them as spam backlinks. Because as you have used mass commenting through SB, they are likely to get approved in auto approved blogs which are already full of outbound, irrelevant links.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7537118].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author JSProjects
      Originally Posted by Janice Stacy View Post

      I wonder if google marked them as spam backlinks. Because as you have used mass commenting through SB, they are likely to get approved in auto approved blogs which are already full of outbound, irrelevant links.
      Pretty spot on. I doubt Google really has much of an interest in crawling a site with thousands of spammy outbound links. I guess with a little bit of a push you can get them indexed. But you're much better off just manually leaving comments on a much smaller number of a blogs.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7541432].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Joel33020
    I have been happy with SEO LINK ASSISANT because it gives the PR.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7543957].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author michealburns
    I have been using scrapebox for 3 -4 months. I'm simultaneously using scrapebox for 3 sites but only 1 site lost its ranking like anything on google and other search engine.

    Can anyone tell me what wrong with my link building approach?
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7544311].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author JSProjects
      Originally Posted by michealburns View Post

      I have been using scrapebox for 3 -4 months. I'm simultaneously using scrapebox for 3 sites but only 1 site lost its ranking like anything on google and other search engine.

      Can anyone tell me what wrong with my link building approach?
      If you're sending tons of SB created backlinks directly @ all of your sites you'll most likely see an eventual drop unless they've got some serious authority.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7544866].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author RedShifted
    I use scrapebox to blast my youtube videos. To help them rank on page 1. Then the videos are linked to my website. And so far I've never had a problem.

    For direct links to my site, I never blast them. Always search for high pr blogs instead. On occassion however, I will blast secondary layers, and so far haven't had a problem.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7544939].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author JSProjects
      Originally Posted by RedShifted View Post

      I use scrapebox to blast my youtube videos. To help them rank on page 1. Then the videos are linked to my website. And so far I've never had a problem.

      For direct links to my site, I never blast them. Always search for high pr blogs instead. On occassion however, I will blast secondary layers, and so far haven't had a problem.
      I do the same. YT videos seems to be able to handle, and even benefit, from this. At least for now.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7549043].message }}

Trending Topics