Web 2.0 or Web 2.0 Profile ?

19 replies
  • SEO
  • |
I am totally confused here which method is more effective Web 2.0 content links or web 2.0 profile links ?
#profile #web
  • Profile picture of the author IM Nick
    Content links will be more effective because they are seen as higher quality.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7030966].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author rtc1979
      Yeah links within content are generally stronger than links within a profile. Google likes to see contextual links which means links within content. Stay away from garbage spun content though.
      Signature
      Internet Business Passion - Internet business blog including case studies, tutorials and interviews.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7030976].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author keyuria
    Definitely, content links but ensure it is from the same niche coz it will be treated as a quality link in the long run.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7031323].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author kaluuu
    Originally Posted by boosters View Post

    I am totally confused here which method is more effective Web 2.0 content links or web 2.0 profile links ?
    Web 2.0 content links!
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7032263].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Website Promotor
    I think web 2.0 content links are best becoz u r getting more exposure and relevancy.
    Signature
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7265559].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author vickyk
    Yes i also think that Web 2.0 Content Link are more effective than Link's because as we know that that link will be create between the content, if some one read your content data and we create here content link then may be that person click on that link and visit on this.
    Thank's
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7266437].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Business Qatar
    As all saying Web 2.0 Properties are more important simply because it will give a more attractive way and a more strong link..as it contains content and you can also add some images , videos in it with your links. It will be good for both Search engines and Users also. Use some good web 2.0 sites like blogspot, livejournal, tumblr, weebly, webs..etc. All are nice ones and you'll get traffic also threw them. Web 2.0 Profiles are also fine if make naturally but Web 2.0 is more effective.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7266533].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Rukshan
    Contextual web 2.0 properties work well in these days. Few years ago web 2.0 profile backlinks worked.
    Signature

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7266947].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Warock
    Banned
    Content link is more valuable than link in profile in webs 2.0.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7266972].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author themesplice
    Like everyone said above, contextual links are far better than profile links, but that doesn't mean profile links are not worth it at all...
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7267036].message }}
  • All kind of link can be beneficial but content links are more valuable as search engine likes link within content. High quality content with link can give you extra benefit.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7267180].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author kimseo
    Originally Posted by boosters View Post

    I am totally confused here which method is more effective Web 2.0 content links or web 2.0 profile links ?
    I will vote for web 2.0 content link. Infact any content link is way better than standalone links (be it web2.0 or anything else)
    Signature
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7267211].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author cisin
    So making 2.0 Profiles are not worth at all ?
    Signature
    LiveHelpIndia- Support and Sales with Smile!
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7267322].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author gotlinks
      Originally Posted by cisin View Post

      So making 2.0 Profiles are not worth at all ?
      I'd make a few but focus on contextual placed links on web 2.0 sites.

      It really is better.
      Signature
      Learn the secrets to growing your Youtube Channel!

      - Feel free to private message me about anything. I love to help people and you are definitely no exception!
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7267343].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author kimseo
      Originally Posted by cisin View Post

      So making 2.0 Profiles are not worth at all ?
      Nobody said that.
      It just like content links are better than profile link. Try to get content link wherever you can
      Signature
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7267355].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author STLSEO
    Contextual links are considered to have the most value, and it makes sense.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7267451].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author honeymor
    Hi Everyone,
    I know that Web 2.0 Content Link are more effective but profile link also Beneficial for us.
    So, we should use both link for ranking our keywords.



    Thanks
    Honey Mor
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7271614].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author puredesiart
      Originally Posted by honeymor View Post

      Hi Everyone,
      I know that Web 2.0 Content Link are more effective but profile link also Beneficial for us.
      So, we should use both link for ranking our keywords.



      Thanks
      Honey Mor
      I would second that thought!

      PureDesiArt
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8242303].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author samirah465
    Web 2.0 sites are popular with both users and search engines alike. An information page on these sites with contextual links to your main site are very valuable.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8242444].message }}

Trending Topics