Web 2.0 link, any good

10 years ago

From traffic perspective it depends on what web 2.0 it is. From SEO perspective it's important what PageRank has that site and if links from that site are dofollow, meaning if they transfer PR.

[ 1 ] Thanks
1 reply

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7165553].message }}

timpears 10 years ago

Well, it looks like the overwhelming response is that they are good for SEO purposes, and you may get some traffic from them if the articles are as good as those on your web site.

Not sure I want to spend a fortune on articles for other peoples web sites. But I got, what I got to do.

Thanks to everyone who contributed to this thread.
- Thanks
Signature

Tim Pears
{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7167398].message }}

kaymehelp

10 years ago

they are important, dont know why many people say that W2.0 will kill your ranking, trust me they are very effective

[ 1 ] Thanks

Signature

Build your Online Apparel Brand - $XX,XXX Monthly Earnings ....

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7165558].message }}

edpudol1973

10 years ago

Web 2.0 are powerful source of backlink either dofollow or no follow as long as you provide high quality content. Treat your web 2.0 pages as your personal websites or blogs.

Because if you treat them as your personal site, of course you provide a high quality content and value to your audience. If you give them a value then surely one or more of them soon will give link to your web 2.0 site/blog that make them more authority. When they earn google trust the link they will send to your website is juicier than other source of links

[ 1 ] Thanks

Signature

Government Emergency Contact Numbers

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7165775].message }}

DK JAMES

10 years ago

its very much important in SEO.

[ 1 ] Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7165947].message }}

retsek

10 years ago

If it's too easy to get, avoid it if you want long-term rankings. Looking to rank fast with no care about the future? Go ahead.

Thanks
1 reply

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7166017].message }}

edpudol1973 10 years ago

Originally Posted by retsek

If it's too easy to get, avoid it if you want long-term rankings. Looking to rank fast with no care about the future? Go ahead.

Web 2.0 backlinks can be a long term source of quality link and can use as SEO backbone if you do it right.
- [ 1 ] Thanks
- 1 reply
Signature
Government Emergency Contact Numbers
{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7166057].message }}
- retsek 10 years ago
  
  Originally Posted by edpudol1973
  
  Web 2.0 backlinks can be a long term source of quality link and can use as SEO backbone if you do it right.
  
  If it's the backbone of your SEO strategry, then you should be worried.
  
  Thanks
  
  1 reply
  
  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7166069].message }}
  
  edpudol1973 10 years ago
  
  Originally Posted by retsek
  
  If it's the backbone of your SEO strategry, then you should be worried.
  
  Well no I don't... I would be more worried if my SEO backbone are article directories and guest posting.
  
  Thanks
  
  Signature
  Government Emergency Contact Numbers
  
  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7166233].message }}

cooler1

10 years ago

There was a thread posted after Penguin first rolled out you might want to check out- http://www.warriorforum.com/adsense-...2-0-works.html

[ 1 ] Thanks

Signature

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7166066].message }}

yukon

Banned 10 years ago

Why would you even care about measly web 2.0 links when you can make $1k+ per week from your sig.?

[SCREW SEO - SCREW ARTICLE WRITING] Here's A Solid $1,000+ Per Week Business Model That WORKS!

Thanks
1 reply

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7166216].message }}

timpears 10 years ago

Originally Posted by yukon

Why would you even care about measly web 2.0 links when you can make $1k+ per week from your sig.?

Is a $1,000 a week enough for you?
- Thanks
- 1 reply
Signature

Tim Pears
{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7167361].message }}
- yukon Banned 10 years ago
  
  Originally Posted by timpears
  
  Is a $1,000 a week enough for you?
  
  So it can only be done once, by a single person? Why would it be limited to only $1K? If your sig. can generate $1K, why not $2K+? :confused:
  
  To answer your question, yes, I could live on $52,000 a year (family of 3). House & cars are payed for.
  
  Thanks
  
  1 reply
  
  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7167478].message }}
  
  suwatchai s 10 years ago
  
  I use web 2.0 to create free network for my money site
  
  Tumblr.com
  TypePad.com
  WordPress.com
  Blogger.com
  Blog.com
  LiveJournal.com
  Multiply.com
  my.opera.com
  sites.google.com
  onsugar.com
  InsaneJournal.com
  blinkweb.com
  
  Thanks
  
  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7180103].message }}

ronnieavelino

10 years ago

Originally Posted by timpears

Are web 2.0 links good for ranking? Or did they get the axe in the Penguin and beyond algorithm updates?

Please advise and or your opinions welcome.

It still good in rankings if you do it right as Edpudol said. Actually this is one of our link building technique. Build a web 2.0 properties, put a quality content on it and do a tier 2 link building

[ 1 ] Thanks
1 reply

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7166496].message }}

timpears

10 years ago

Originally Posted by PeterJonesIMC

It still good in rankings if you do it right as Edpudol said. Actually this is one of our link building technique. Build a web 2.0 properties, put a quality content on it and do a tier 2 link building

And that was my thinking, build your pyramids to those Web 2.0 articles.

Thanks

Signature

Tim Pears

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7167371].message }}

johnben1444

10 years ago

Web 2.0 on it's own is not of any great benefit for your ranking because it's a PR0 but with some other links pointing to it there will be good improvement.

Thanks
1 reply

Signature

Grow your social media account, Spotify Streams, YT Views & IG Followers & More
Software & Mobile APP Developer
Buy Spotify, Facebook Bot & IG M/S Method

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7167449].message }}

jinx1221 10 years ago

Originally Posted by johnben1444

Web 2.0 on it's own is not of any great benefit for your ranking because it's a PR0 but with some other links pointing to it there will be good improvement.

All pages start out pr-0.. it's not necessarily the pagerank you are going after, it's the high authority and trust factor of the site that's of importance. It would be like having a link from wikipedia.. they're authority is so through the roof that your site would immediately become 'trusted'.. it's no mystery why they went from d/f to n/f
- Thanks
{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7186700].message }}

risingrank

10 years ago

web2.0 + tier linking is the key to make it work.
money site <- web2.0 <-wiki+amr+scrapebox+xrumer

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7180776].message }}

stevejhon1

10 years ago

Web 2.0 Is An Awesome Off Page Optimization Technique And Helpful For Website Traffic.

Thanks
2 replies

Signature

Bitwords.com - Bit-Cart.com

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7185648].message }}

mrsvirtualassistant 10 years ago

Web 2.0 links can increase your rankings and enhance your SEO efforts. However, you need to make sure that those links come from quality web 2.0 sites. When you create web 2.0 pages, add original content and use appropriate anchor text.
- Thanks
- 1 reply
{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7185983].message }}
- gotlinks 10 years ago
  
  As mentioned above by several people, what you need is Quality links.
  
  I suggest Naked links if you have not been doing them already.
  
  Yes web 2.0 sites do work but they need to be used as buffer sites, but those buffer sites need content on them just like your main site. Do not be fooled into thinking you can get away with 300-500 words. You need multiple pages of that amount so Google doesn't ban it or penalize it as useless.
  
  Thanks
  
  1 reply
  
  Signature
  Learn the secrets to growing your Youtube Channel!
  
  - Feel free to private message me about anything. I love to help people and you are definitely no exception!
  
  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7186021].message }}
  
  CYCLONE 10 years ago
  
  I think they work well I try to do the high PR ones.
  
  Thanks
  
  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7186031].message }}
jackwebson 10 years ago

Posting your articles in many web 2.0 properties is advantageous for increasing your site's domain popularity. You have to make sure that the articles should be unique so that you will get the juice your are thriving for.
- Thanks
{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7186006].message }}

jfambrini

10 years ago

Isn't Web 2 linked to Link Wheels and Link Pyramids and some folks here are saying that Link wheels are dead after Penguin. I'm a little confused now.

Thanks
1 reply

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7186043].message }}

gotlinks 10 years ago

Originally Posted by jfambrini

Isn't Web 2 linked to Link Wheels and Link Pyramids and some folks here are saying that Link wheels are dead after Penguin. I'm a little confused now.

Link wheels still work if you use a buffer system to filter it.

Google cant control that many links and they have no desire to. Just ensure your content is good cuz that's all Google can really nail.
- Thanks
Signature
Learn the secrets to growing your Youtube Channel!

- Feel free to private message me about anything. I love to help people and you are definitely no exception!
{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7186074].message }}

Matt Helphrey

10 years ago

Web 2.0 sites seem to be able to gain rank fairly quick and can stand the barrage of links you send to them. Use them as a buffer to send mass amounts of links to. Tiering several web 2.0 platforms is also working great still today.

Thanks

Signature

My Advanced SEO Blog
---------->Search Engine Optimization Tips<----------
Absolutely No BS!
Rank #1 For Most Keyword Phrases

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7187048].message }}

twilightofidols

10 years ago

Web 2.0's are essential for any serious SEO strategy. You should never exclude any link type from your overall strategy.

You should only exclude bad links regardless of what TYPE of link it is. Viagra, porn, malware, ugg boots everywhere? Try not to link it to your money site.

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7187105].message }}

kavinfordseochamp

10 years ago

web 2.0 properties are well as per seo prospective, but totally defend on you how you promote your blog, using unique fresh content with each property, such as well known blog word press, blogger, even most important part of driving more traffic into your business niche, Suppose you submit 100 live links on different web 2.0 properties, instant of you use 1, 2 blog, and promoting on daily base, you will get more traffic only from 2 blogs rather than 100 approved live links, many people published articles with web 2.0 site, and forget the rest of else process, and looking for traffic, once everything planned with your blog and start work rapidly. In natural way as per Google algorithm. These all stuff really helps you pour best traffic for your blog. Good Luck!!

Thanks
Kavin

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7189311].message }}

walterharis

Banned 10 years ago

[DELETED]

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7189488].message }}

kavinfordseochamp 10 years ago

Originally Posted by walterharis

web 2.0 sites are blog posting . These are also called mini sites.

It's really good to listen, which is also know as mini sites, But the important things is this how we active with these all mini communities, to get maximum effort for our business..
- Thanks
{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7189586].message }}

Warock

Banned 10 years ago

web 2.0 is important to get backlinks

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7189504].message }}

cisin

10 years ago

Link building on 2.0 isnt hard but bringing traffic from there is definitely.

Thanks
2 replies

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7189734].message }}

kavinfordseochamp 10 years ago

Originally Posted by cisin

Link building on 2.0 isnt hard but bringing traffic from there is definitely.

Yes Mate, it's not hard, But always give bunch of traffic, bringing more customer, the important things where you place your links.. Thanks!!
- Thanks
{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7189771].message }}

jackwebson

10 years ago

Originally Posted by cisin

Link building on 2.0 isnt hard but bringing traffic from there is definitely.

It depends on the quality of your microsite because you can't gather traffic with less content or let's just say not enough information a person is looking for. Quality should be taken in account also for this.

Thanks
1 reply

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7190445].message }}

gotlinks

10 years ago

Originally Posted by jackwebson

It depends on the quality of your microsite because you can't gather traffic with less content or let's just say not enough information a person is looking for. Quality should be taken in account also for this.

Exactly.

A mini site / web 2.0 / hub page whatever the heck you want to call it should have the following at least in my opinion.

6,000+ words of content spread out among 7-15 pages.
Each page should have a unique title with long tail keywords and content related to its title.
OBO links to quality sources along with your personal money site link (again related).
Each of those pages should have backlinks directed to them.

Hope this helps the OP

Thanks

Signature

Learn the secrets to growing your Youtube Channel!

- Feel free to private message me about anything. I love to help people and you are definitely no exception!

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7190466].message }}

Warock

Banned 10 years ago

Webs 2.0 is good to build backlinks.

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7190459].message }}

Billy Rey

10 years ago

yes, the links are working just fine.

Thanks

Signature

âœ”âœ”âœ”Leapfroggr Digital Marketing+SEO Servicesâœ”âœ”âœ”
[/CENTER]

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7234399].message }}

Web 2.0 link, any good

Trending Topics

Fake stories? Or True Stories? Any thoughts?

How To Write An Article With ChatGPT

Writer's block

The pros and cons of insourcing and outsourcing your content creation

New Member