Web 2.0 link, any good

37 replies
  • SEO
  • |
Are web 2.0 links good for ranking? Or did they get the axe in the Penguin and beyond algorithm updates?

Please advise and or your opinions welcome.
#good #link #web
  • Profile picture of the author pego
    From traffic perspective it depends on what web 2.0 it is. From SEO perspective it's important what PageRank has that site and if links from that site are dofollow, meaning if they transfer PR.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7165553].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author timpears
      Well, it looks like the overwhelming response is that they are good for SEO purposes, and you may get some traffic from them if the articles are as good as those on your web site.

      Not sure I want to spend a fortune on articles for other peoples web sites. But I got, what I got to do.

      Thanks to everyone who contributed to this thread.
      Signature

      Tim Pears

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7167398].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author kaymehelp
    they are important, dont know why many people say that W2.0 will kill your ranking, trust me they are very effective
    Signature
    Let's Make Money with Dropshipping & POD | The ONLY Service you ever need | Clear M.B Guarantee
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7165558].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author edpudol1973
    Web 2.0 are powerful source of backlink either dofollow or no follow as long as you provide high quality content. Treat your web 2.0 pages as your personal websites or blogs.

    Because if you treat them as your personal site, of course you provide a high quality content and value to your audience. If you give them a value then surely one or more of them soon will give link to your web 2.0 site/blog that make them more authority. When they earn google trust the link they will send to your website is juicier than other source of links
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7165775].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author DK JAMES
    its very much important in SEO.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7165947].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author retsek
    If it's too easy to get, avoid it if you want long-term rankings. Looking to rank fast with no care about the future? Go ahead.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7166017].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author edpudol1973
      Originally Posted by retsek View Post

      If it's too easy to get, avoid it if you want long-term rankings. Looking to rank fast with no care about the future? Go ahead.
      Web 2.0 backlinks can be a long term source of quality link and can use as SEO backbone if you do it right.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7166057].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author retsek
        Originally Posted by edpudol1973 View Post

        Web 2.0 backlinks can be a long term source of quality link and can use as SEO backbone if you do it right.
        If it's the backbone of your SEO strategry, then you should be worried.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7166069].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author edpudol1973
          Originally Posted by retsek View Post

          If it's the backbone of your SEO strategry, then you should be worried.
          Well no I don't... I would be more worried if my SEO backbone are article directories and guest posting.
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7166233].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author cooler1
    There was a thread posted after Penguin first rolled out you might want to check out- http://www.warriorforum.com/adsense-...2-0-works.html
    Signature

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7166066].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author yukon
    Banned
    Why would you even care about measly web 2.0 links when you can make $1k+ per week from your sig.?


    [SCREW SEO - SCREW ARTICLE WRITING] Here's A Solid $1,000+ Per Week Business Model That WORKS!
    Signature
    Hi
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7166216].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author timpears
      Originally Posted by yukon View Post

      Why would you even care about measly web 2.0 links when you can make $1k+ per week from your sig.?
      Is a $1,000 a week enough for you?
      Signature

      Tim Pears

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7167361].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author yukon
        Banned
        Originally Posted by timpears View Post

        Is a $1,000 a week enough for you?

        So it can only be done once, by a single person? Why would it be limited to only $1K? If your sig. can generate $1K, why not $2K+? :confused:

        To answer your question, yes, I could live on $52,000 a year (family of 3). House & cars are payed for.
        Signature
        Hi
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7167478].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author suwatchai s
          I use web 2.0 to create free network for my money site

          Tumblr.com
          TypePad.com
          WordPress.com
          Blogger.com
          Blog.com
          LiveJournal.com
          Multiply.com
          my.opera.com
          sites.google.com
          onsugar.com
          InsaneJournal.com
          blinkweb.com

          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7180103].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author ronnieavelino
    Originally Posted by timpears View Post

    Are web 2.0 links good for ranking? Or did they get the axe in the Penguin and beyond algorithm updates?

    Please advise and or your opinions welcome.
    It still good in rankings if you do it right as Edpudol said. Actually this is one of our link building technique. Build a web 2.0 properties, put a quality content on it and do a tier 2 link building
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7166496].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author timpears
      Originally Posted by PeterJonesIMC View Post

      It still good in rankings if you do it right as Edpudol said. Actually this is one of our link building technique. Build a web 2.0 properties, put a quality content on it and do a tier 2 link building
      And that was my thinking, build your pyramids to those Web 2.0 articles.
      Signature

      Tim Pears

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7167371].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author johnben1444
    Web 2.0 on it's own is not of any great benefit for your ranking because it's a PR0 but with some other links pointing to it there will be good improvement.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7167449].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author jinx1221
      Originally Posted by johnben1444 View Post

      Web 2.0 on it's own is not of any great benefit for your ranking because it's a PR0 but with some other links pointing to it there will be good improvement.
      All pages start out pr-0.. it's not necessarily the pagerank you are going after, it's the high authority and trust factor of the site that's of importance. It would be like having a link from wikipedia.. they're authority is so through the roof that your site would immediately become 'trusted'.. it's no mystery why they went from d/f to n/f
      Signature

      The Ultimate Private Network Management,
      Visualization and Automation Tool




      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7186700].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author risingrank
    web2.0 + tier linking is the key to make it work.
    money site <- web2.0 <-wiki+amr+scrapebox+xrumer
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7180776].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author stevejhon1
    Web 2.0 Is An Awesome Off Page Optimization Technique And Helpful For Website Traffic.
    Signature

    Bitwords.com - Bit-Cart.com

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7185648].message }}
    • Web 2.0 links can increase your rankings and enhance your SEO efforts. However, you need to make sure that those links come from quality web 2.0 sites. When you create web 2.0 pages, add original content and use appropriate anchor text.
      Signature
      -> Get Profile Backlinks here
      -> #1 Virtual Assistant Service Hire Your Own Virtual Assistant To Work JUST For You
      -> Ezine Articles Service Let Us Build Your Article Portfolio Today!
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7185983].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author gotlinks
        As mentioned above by several people, what you need is Quality links.

        I suggest Naked links if you have not been doing them already.

        Yes web 2.0 sites do work but they need to be used as buffer sites, but those buffer sites need content on them just like your main site. Do not be fooled into thinking you can get away with 300-500 words. You need multiple pages of that amount so Google doesn't ban it or penalize it as useless.
        Signature
        Learn the secrets to growing your Youtube Channel!

        - Feel free to private message me about anything. I love to help people and you are definitely no exception!
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7186021].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author CYCLONE
          I think they work well I try to do the high PR ones.
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7186031].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author jackwebson
      Posting your articles in many web 2.0 properties is advantageous for increasing your site's domain popularity. You have to make sure that the articles should be unique so that you will get the juice your are thriving for.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7186006].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author jfambrini
    Isn't Web 2 linked to Link Wheels and Link Pyramids and some folks here are saying that Link wheels are dead after Penguin. I'm a little confused now.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7186043].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author gotlinks
      Originally Posted by jfambrini View Post

      Isn't Web 2 linked to Link Wheels and Link Pyramids and some folks here are saying that Link wheels are dead after Penguin. I'm a little confused now.
      Link wheels still work if you use a buffer system to filter it.

      Google cant control that many links and they have no desire to. Just ensure your content is good cuz that's all Google can really nail.
      Signature
      Learn the secrets to growing your Youtube Channel!

      - Feel free to private message me about anything. I love to help people and you are definitely no exception!
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7186074].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Matt Helphrey
    Web 2.0 sites seem to be able to gain rank fairly quick and can stand the barrage of links you send to them. Use them as a buffer to send mass amounts of links to. Tiering several web 2.0 platforms is also working great still today.
    Signature
    My Advanced SEO Blog
    ---------->Search Engine Optimization Tips<----------
    Absolutely No BS!
    Rank #1 For Most Keyword Phrases
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7187048].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author twilightofidols
    Web 2.0's are essential for any serious SEO strategy. You should never exclude any link type from your overall strategy.

    You should only exclude bad links regardless of what TYPE of link it is. Viagra, porn, malware, ugg boots everywhere? Try not to link it to your money site.
    Signature
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7187105].message }}
  • web 2.0 properties are well as per seo prospective, but totally defend on you how you promote your blog, using unique fresh content with each property, such as well known blog word press, blogger, even most important part of driving more traffic into your business niche, Suppose you submit 100 live links on different web 2.0 properties, instant of you use 1, 2 blog, and promoting on daily base, you will get more traffic only from 2 blogs rather than 100 approved live links, many people published articles with web 2.0 site, and forget the rest of else process, and looking for traffic, once everything planned with your blog and start work rapidly. In natural way as per Google algorithm. These all stuff really helps you pour best traffic for your blog. Good Luck!!

    Thanks
    Kavin
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7189311].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author walterharis
    Banned
    [DELETED]
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7189488].message }}
    • Originally Posted by walterharis View Post

      web 2.0 sites are blog posting . These are also called mini sites.
      It's really good to listen, which is also know as mini sites, But the important things is this how we active with these all mini communities, to get maximum effort for our business..
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7189586].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Warock
    Banned
    web 2.0 is important to get backlinks
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7189504].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author cisin
    Link building on 2.0 isnt hard but bringing traffic from there is definitely.
    Signature
    LiveHelpIndia- Support and Sales with Smile!
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7189734].message }}
    • Originally Posted by cisin View Post

      Link building on 2.0 isnt hard but bringing traffic from there is definitely.
      Yes Mate, it's not hard, But always give bunch of traffic, bringing more customer, the important things where you place your links.. Thanks!!
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7189771].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author jackwebson
      Originally Posted by cisin View Post

      Link building on 2.0 isnt hard but bringing traffic from there is definitely.

      It depends on the quality of your microsite because you can't gather traffic with less content or let's just say not enough information a person is looking for. Quality should be taken in account also for this.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7190445].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author gotlinks
        Originally Posted by jackwebson View Post

        It depends on the quality of your microsite because you can't gather traffic with less content or let's just say not enough information a person is looking for. Quality should be taken in account also for this.
        Exactly.

        A mini site / web 2.0 / hub page whatever the heck you want to call it should have the following at least in my opinion.

        • 6,000+ words of content spread out among 7-15 pages.
        • Each page should have a unique title with long tail keywords and content related to its title.
        • OBO links to quality sources along with your personal money site link (again related).
        • Each of those pages should have backlinks directed to them.
        Hope this helps the OP
        Signature
        Learn the secrets to growing your Youtube Channel!

        - Feel free to private message me about anything. I love to help people and you are definitely no exception!
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7190466].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Warock
    Banned
    Webs 2.0 is good to build backlinks.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7190459].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Billy Rey
    yes, the links are working just fine.
    Signature

    ✔✔✔Leapfroggr Digital Marketing+SEO Services✔✔✔
    [/CENTER]

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7234399].message }}

Trending Topics