Twitter Sues Spammers

by Jeo Liana Banned
9 replies
  • SEO
  • |
Twitter has had enough of TweetAttacks, TweetAdder, TweetBuddy, Troption, and Justinlover. So much so, that the microblogging site filed a suit against these five tool providers and spammers in San Francisco's federal court this morning.

"Our engineers continue to combat spammers' efforts to circumvent our safeguards, and today we're adding another weapon to our arsenal: the law," Twitter announced on its blog today. "With this suit, we're going straight to the source."

By working to shut down these tool providers, Twitter hopes to stop other spammers from using those tools. The tools function by providing downloadable software (usually for a fee) that lets users easily tweet posts and direct messages automatically.

The tool provider justinlover.info says its tool can help users get Justin Bieber to follow them. "So, if you really want to, all you have to do is to seize the right moment, for example, the time when he just updates his twitter, then immediately leave him messages," the site says. "You'd better keep leaving him messages to attract his attention."

Twitter now has 140 million active users and more than 340 million tweets a day, which makes it a prime target for spammers. The social network says that the suit filed today is intended to "act as a deterrent" to spammers and send a clear message to would-be spammers that there are consequences for violating its anti-spam rules.

"One challenge in battling spam are bad actors who build tools designed to distribute spam on Twitter (and the Web) by making it easier for other spammers to engage in this annoying and potentially malicious activity," Twitter wrote on its blog.

Besides the suit, the company has also taken other anti-spam efforts including acquiring the anti-malware company Dasient, using its link shortener to analyze whether a tweeted link leads to spam, and making it easy for users to report or block spammers.

Twitter isn't the first tech company to go after spammers in court. In January, Facebook and the Washington State Attorney General filed suits against alleged "likejackers" that trick users into "liking" sites, and Google has also filed suits against spammers' online pharmacy scams and work-from-home scams.
#spammers #sues #twitter
  • Profile picture of the author fpdeziner
    Yup, this was more likely to happen.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8327696].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author seonutshell
    i think you can get much better results by building up a real following and engaging with them, helping them out etc. Then when you do reccomend they buy Ebook x they are more likely to trust your judgement and buy it.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8327730].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author vk3
    Lol - the times keep changing... another reminder (thinking as these Twitter service providers) to keep diversifying and trying on/starting new projects.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8327774].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author smodha
    I am pretty sure that any type of automated software is a violation of ToS on any platform.
    Signature
    I Sell What People Want. The Money Is A Bonus..
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8328278].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author yukon
      Banned
      Originally Posted by smodha View Post

      I am pretty sure that any type of automated software is a violation of ToS on any platform.
      Not really, a lot of large online business have API's to let anyone automate services/data.

      Even Twitter has an API for 3rd party developers, anyone that knows how to code can build apps/software to do whatever...
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8328315].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author smodha
        Originally Posted by yukon View Post

        Not really, a lot of large online business have API's to let anyone automate services/data.

        Even Twitter has an API for 3rd party developers, anyone that knows how to code can build apps/software to do whatever...
        API is slightly different. Platforms are happy to share certain functionality in a very controlled environment. It's more integration than automation.

        Can the Twitter API allow developers to automate tasks like TweetAdder et al did? I haven't seen an example. The way I see it - any application that requires proxies is a SPAM tool.
        Signature
        I Sell What People Want. The Money Is A Bonus..
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8328340].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author yukon
          Banned
          Originally Posted by smodha View Post

          API is slightly different. Platforms are happy to share certain functionality in a very controlled environment. It's more integration than automation.

          Can the Twitter API allow developers to automate tasks like TweetAdder et al did? I haven't seen an example. The way I see it - any application that requires proxies is a SPAM tool.
          I was commenting where you said that automation tools are against TOS. I have no idea what these 3rd party Twitter developers are doing but If they're getting sued for spam, it probably has something to do with spam, not 3rd party automated tools in general.
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8328364].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Complex
    [DELETED]
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8328407].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author paulgl
      Originally Posted by Complex View Post

      Old news is old news.
      I wonder where people are living. It is very old news.

      Anyone that dared used a 3rd party for various twitter junk had
      been warned.

      Now, the question still is where do people live? To report something
      that happened over a year ago, which in internet terms, is a lifetime,
      just shows how behind the times people are.

      People should be talking about the "dongle." Now that's news.

      Paul
      Signature

      If you were disappointed in your results today, lower your standards tomorrow.

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8328590].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author yukon
        Banned
        Originally Posted by paulgl View Post

        I wonder where people are living. It is very old news.

        Anyone that dared used a 3rd party for various twitter junk had
        been warned.

        Now, the question still is where do people live? To report something
        that happened over a year ago, which in internet terms, is a lifetime,
        just shows how behind the times people are.

        People should be talking about the "dongle." Now that's news.

        Paul
        Lol, some of us don't care about bogus Twitter accounts (or whatever they do/spam), so really the age of the article doesn't mean much to me. I only commented because of the API/TOS.

        I read about the new Google Dongle, but don't see how it's that big of a deal.

        I've been streaming from my wifi/pc to TV's all over the house for a few years, most late model TVs are internet ready (my TVs are). The later model TVs come with a wifi USB dongle that plugs into the back of the TV.

        Isn't the new Google Dongle simply streaming TV via existing wifi from other internet electronics (PC, phone, etc...), it doesn't actually deliver TV on it's own does it?
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8328633].message }}

Trending Topics