How to get my forum profiles indexed by google?

[Sayed]

Hello fellow warriors,

I have 100 forum profile links (Angela type links) for over a month now and till the moment they are not indexed by google or yahoo!
What should I do to get these links indexed and count?
Thanks in advance

[yukon]

1) Build a single page someplace on the net (anyplace), & include all 100 profile URLs on that page.

2) Build a single new high PR5+ (page) backlink (I use blog comments), & link to the page that includes your 100 URLs.

The high PR-Page backlink will get Google to keep going to your 100 URL page.

Better than a Ping, that only happens once...

[Sayed]

Originally Posted by yukon

1) Build a single page someplace on the net (anyplace), & include all 100 profile URLs on that page.

2) Build a single new high PR5+ (page) backlink (I use blog comments), & link to the page that includes your 100 URLs.

The high PR-Page backlink will get Google to keep going to your 100 URL page.

Better than a Ping, that only happens once...

Awesome idea!
So, for example, I create a blogger blog with a post containing that 100 urls and then make a high quality backlink for that blog post and done, right?

Thanks a million dude

P.S. Should I add an anchor text for each link or just add the links without anchor?

[yukon]

I would just post the URLs, you don't want 100 URLs with the same anchor-text pointing to 100 different sites on the net that you don't own.

It wouldn't hurt to include a related article with the keyword in the page title + URL on that blogspot. You don't have to but it wouldn't hurt...

If you use blogspot, lay low & don't comment on any other blogs, that will only increase your chances of getting your blogspot deleted.

[yukon]

Make sure the high PR5+ is on the actual page that you create the new backlink.

[RealEcon]

Originally Posted by yukon

1) Build a single page someplace on the net (anyplace), & include all 100 profile URLs on that page.

2) Build a single new high PR5+ (page) backlink (I use blog comments), & link to the page that includes your 100 URLs.

The high PR-Page backlink will get Google to keep going to your 100 URL page.

Better than a Ping, that only happens once...

Or you can find a forum with a decent page rank (dofollow preferably) comment a few times a popular threads that are sure to get crawled by Gbots, and drop a sig link to the page your 100 profiles are on. Try to make the sig link something that people wont click on like a period at the end of a sentence.

Anyway, using this technique you can easily change out the sig link when you have new pages of profiles to get indexed.

[yukon]

Originally Posted by RealEcon

Anyway, using this technique you can easily change out the sig link when you have new pages of profiles to get indexed.

The end result is the same, example If you need to change out backlinks on the blogspot.

The single high PR backlink can be used over, & over again for multiple sites with hundreds of backlinks getting indexed in a short amount of time.

I've had good luck with a single high PR6 blog comment/backlink to boost my profile pages & get them indexed + cached.

In OPs case the single blogspot page can be recycled with new links forever (well almost )...

[eppingvonryan]

split the backlinks list into two halves..put one half on a page @ 3stepAds | Free Advertising Blog and the other on a squidoo lens put a short article on each plus a photo with correct anchor text and a footer link on each pointing at each other....if you see what I mean....both of these sites get their content indexed really quick!!! been using this for a while now...seems to work just fine!!

[eppingvonryan]

Oh I also ping them...now some people don't like to do this but it cannot hurt!!! I use Blog and Ping Tool - Use Pingler.com to Drive Traffic your Blogs and Websites and Ping-o-Matic! ....Now I say pinging will not hurt these links.....Otherwise if google penalised a site for doing it then if you wanted to bring a competitor site down all you would have to do would be to ping thier links....Obvious really!!!

[jimbo74]

Your advices sound really nice! I will start making some test tomorrow to see if your methods really work ;-)

[Sayed]

I tried Yukun's method and I'll inform you the results soon

[yukon]

Originally Posted by Sayed

I tried Yukun's method and I'll inform you the results soon

Just make sure the high PR is on the actual backlink page, otherwise it will take a long time for Google to find the backlink pointing to the 100 URLs.

I have a single blog post with a PR6 on the page, that I use to send Google to a list of URLs anytime I do backlinking.

Most times Google keeps returning to high PR pages on a regular basis.

[Dan B Rusu]

Originally Posted by yukon

1) Build a single page someplace on the net (anyplace), & include all 100 profile URLs on that page.

2) Build a single new high PR5+ (page) backlink (I use blog comments), & link to the page that includes your 100 URLs.

The high PR-Page backlink will get Google to keep going to your 100 URL page.

Better than a Ping, that only happens once...

This is great and will get your backlinks indexed fast. You can also create an rss feed with all sites and ping the feed.

You can do that with this: Links 2 RSS - Convert a list of URLs to RSS feeds

Good luck

[Sayed]

Originally Posted by yukon

Just make sure the high PR is on the actual backlink page, otherwise it will take a long time for Google to find the backlink pointing to the 100 URLs.

I have a single blog post with a PR6 on the page, that I use to send Google to a list of URLs anytime I do backlinking.

Most times Google keeps returning to high PR pages on a regular basis.

I commented on 2 pages both of which are PR 5 (The actual page not the blog)

[Chris Sweeney]

Originally Posted by Daniel7rusu

This is great and will get your backlinks indexed fast. You can also create an rss feed with all sites and ping the feed.

You can do that with this: Links 2 RSS - Convert a list of URLs to RSS feeds

Good luck

Yup, that's what I do too! Except Links2RSS deletes their feeds within 24 hours now . Buttttt I think that might still be enough time for the search engines to come crawling around to find those links .

[genti555]

Thanks for this wonderful tip Yukon

[edgelance]

You can also use SB rapid index added on to speed up the indexing process

[Chris Sweeney]

Originally Posted by edgelance

You can also use SB rapid index added on to speed up the indexing process

What's SB rapid index? I can seem to find anything for it on Google; just a couple forum posts.

[yukon]

Originally Posted by Chris Sweeney

What's SB rapid index? I can seem to find anything for it on Google; just a couple forum posts.

I don't use ScrapeBox, but I think that's what they are talking about?

http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=scrapebox+rapid+index

That can be done without buying ScrapeBox...

[jtpada]

Originally Posted by yukon

I don't use ScrapeBox, but I think that's what they are talking about?

http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=scrapebox+rapid+index

That can be done without buying ScrapeBox...

Scrapebox has a variety of addons, among which is a mass ping tool for rapid indexing. Very useful.

[Chris Sweeney]

Originally Posted by yukon

I don't use ScrapeBox, but I think that's what they are talking about?

http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=scrapebox+rapid+index

That can be done without buying ScrapeBox...

Ahhhh, thanks Yukon. I've heard of ScrapeBox but never actually looked too hard into it. I could be wrong, but it seems that the "rapid index" function is the same idea as Steve's SEO Link Dominator FAST Indexer (located as a free download for Warroom members). It basically takes your page/site URL and "meta indexes" it by creating a page with your the URL on several thousand of those WhoIs website statistics sites.

[yukon]

Originally Posted by Chris Sweeney

Ahhhh, thanks Yukon. I've heard of ScrapeBox but never actually looked too hard into it. I could be wrong, but it seems that the "rapid index" function is the same idea as Steve's SEO Link Dominator FAST Indexer (located as a free download for Warroom members). It basically takes your page/site URL and "meta indexes" it by creating a page with your the URL on several thousand of those WhoIs website statistics sites.

Yep, I think that's what it does.

The downside is you can only use those sites for your sites Index page.

I thought about making my own app to do this (still might) with VB.net, just need time to work on it. Maybe do a JV with someones list here on WF?

[jacked]

Yea as the above posted mentioned you can use Backlink Energizer or RSS submissions. I personally make an RSS feed, each of 800 links, since I index over 5k links at a time. I then do RSS submissions of them all, then I put all the feeds into the footer of my oldest blog which gets crawled on like crazy, and ping the shi** out of it. I usually just leave it there til I am happy with the amount indexed, and then I put up the next batch of feeds. The way I create my RSS feeds is a little more complicated, but you can use what I said above and it will work fine.

[Chris Sweeney]

Originally Posted by yukon

Yep, I think that's what it does.

The downside is you can only use those sites for your sites Index page.

I thought about making my own app to do this (still might) with VB.net, just need time to work on it. Maybe do a JV with someones list here on WF?

Nice, that wouldn't be a bad idea. There are some huge lists floating around. I saw one on one of the black hat forums that has 70,000+ sites, but I totally forget how I came across that thread and I can't find it now . I'll let you know if I do though.

[Sayed]

The results are amazing guys
my keyword jumped a huge jump in SERPs (it was steady for over a month), so I guess Yukun's method worked
Thank you all guys for your help
Another stupid question, If I need to add new 100 profiles, should I add them to the same page or create a new one?

[ExploringInfinity]

Originally Posted by yukon

1) Build a single page someplace on the net (anyplace), & include all 100 profile URLs on that page.

2) Build a single new high PR5+ (page) backlink (I use blog comments), & link to the page that includes your 100 URLs.

The high PR-Page backlink will get Google to keep going to your 100 URL page.

Better than a Ping, that only happens once...

Does this matter if I put like 4700 links from an xrumer blast on a page like this?

Will google still index them all even when there are thousands of links??

[yukon]

Originally Posted by ExploringInfinity

Does this matter if I put like 4700 links from an xrumer blast on a page like this?

Will google still index them all even when there are thousands of links??

That's a lot of links for a single page.

I try to keep my outbound links around 100 per page.

You still have a few options.

A) Break that list of URLs into 47 pages x 100 URLs.

B) Create an RSS feed for the entire list

C) Create about 5 RSS feeds with approx. 1,000 URLs per feed, then create a master RSS that links to the 5 URL feeds.

The important thing is having a single high PR5-6+ backlink pointing to the master feed, that's what gets the ball rolling, & shows Google your backlinks.

I do all my backlinks by hand, so I'm not dealing with thousands of links at the same time. However, If I did have thousands of new links the RSS feed would be my first choice.

Here is the RSS flow:

1) Single high PR5-6+ backlink pointing to master RSS feed

2) Master RSS feed pointing to 5 pages of RSS feed that contain 4,700 links.

3) RSS feeds pointing to backlinks

You can go about this several ways, & Google can read an xml file just fine.

If you use the single high PR5-6+ backlink, you can host the xml files on your own hosting account without having to worry about it being deleted from a RSS host, & that high PR backlink will keep the RSS in the loop with Google.

Here is a great thread about getting links indexed with RSS, might help.

I Figured Out How to Write VALID RSS FEEDS + Best Directories!

[yukon]

Originally Posted by Sayed

The results are amazing guys
my keyword jumped a huge jump in SERPs (it was steady for over a month), so I guess Yukun's method worked
Thank you all guys for your help
Another stupid question, If I need to add new 100 profiles, should I add them to the same page or create a new one?

Good deal, glad it worked out for you!

It works & is easy to get the new backlinks indexed.

Now anytime you have new links, just swap out the links on that page after the old links are indexed.

Just remember the single high PR5-6+ backlink is the key to all those backlinks getting indexed faster.

After that high PR backlink is created you can forget about it & no need to keep going back, that backlink will keep working as long as it stays intact.

If you want to create a safer setup you can take it one step further & create 3-4 high PR backlinks all pointing to the same List of 100 URLs. This way If one high PR backlink is ever deleted you still have a few backups that will finish the job.

[Young Samurai]

Thanks to all of you chaps,

I've been trying out a few things the past few days to get profile links indexed.

This thread has been what I thought was the best option.

I created an xml at Link2RSS with all the urls in it and hosted it on my site

http://www.mysite.com/mylinks.xml

and I've been feeding and pinging like mad.

Following reading this thread I'm now going to create a high PR backlink to it.

Am I going about it correctly?

[paulhamak]

Thanks to you all for this post

[yukon]

Originally Posted by Young Samurai

Thanks to all of you chaps,

I've been trying out a few things the past few days to get profile links indexed.

This thread has been what I thought was the best option.

I created an xml at Link2RSS with all the urls in it and hosted it on my site

http://www.mysite.com/mylinks.xml

and I've been feeding and pinging like mad.

Following reading this thread I'm now going to create a high PR backlink to it.

Am I going about it correctly?

Yes, get a high PR backlink pointing at that feed.

It only takes 1 high PR backlink, but If you have more than that it can only help.

Make sure the high PR isn't nofollow, & the actual pagerank is on the page.

[SamDermot]

Yes, but don't put more than 50 links per high pr sites for better response..

[Chris Sweeney]

Originally Posted by yukon

Good deal, glad it worked out for you!

It works & is easy to get the new backlinks indexed.

Now anytime you have new links, just swap out the links on that page after the old links are indexed.

Just remember the single high PR5-6+ backlink is the key to all those backlinks getting indexed faster.

After that high PR backlink is created you can forget about it & no need to keep going back, that backlink will keep working as long as it stays intact.

If you want to create a safer setup you can take it one step further & create 3-4 high PR backlinks all pointing to the same List of 100 URLs. This way If one high PR backlink is ever deleted you still have a few backups that will finish the job.

Serious question, and I'm not trying to sound like a wiseguy at all. But if we're in the process of creating high PR backlinks, why don't we just point those links to our main sites instead of using those high PR links to get PR 0 or PR- backlinks indexed? Then we could forget about the hundreds or thousands of low-PR backlinks that we get from profile links, etc.

[Chris Sweeney]

Originally Posted by Young Samurai

Thanks to all of you chaps,

I've been trying out a few things the past few days to get profile links indexed.

This thread has been what I thought was the best option.

I created an xml at Link2RSS with all the urls in it and hosted it on my site

http://www.mysite.com/mylinks.xml

and I've been feeding and pinging like mad.

Following reading this thread I'm now going to create a high PR backlink to it.

Am I going about it correctly?

Again, serious question. Correct me if I'm wrong, but if you upload the RSS feed to your site, now you've essentially created reciprocal links, haven't you? You have the feed on your domain now, right? So now your domain is linking to all of your backlinks, and those backlinks are linking right back to your domain. Wouldn't that be reciprocal linking? I could be wrong, but the general understanding is that reciprocal links carry much less weight in terms of SEO. Anyone have any thoughts on that?

[ExploringInfinity]

Originally Posted by yukon

That's a lot of links for a single page.

I try to keep my outbound links around 100 per page.

You still have a few options.

A) Break that list of URLs into 47 pages x 100 URLs.

B) Create an RSS feed for the entire list

C) Create about 5 RSS feeds with approx. 1,000 URLs per feed, then create a master RSS that links to the 5 URL feeds.

The important thing is having a single high PR5-6+ backlink pointing to the master feed, that's what gets the ball rolling, & shows Google your backlinks.

I do all my backlinks by hand, so I'm not dealing with thousands of links at the same time. However, If I did have thousands of new links the RSS feed would be my first choice.

Here is the RSS flow:

1) Single high PR5-6+ backlink pointing to master RSS feed

2) Master RSS feed pointing to 5 pages of RSS feed that contain 4,700 links.

3) RSS feeds pointing to backlinks

You can go about this several ways, & Google can read an xml file just fine.

If you use the single high PR5-6+ backlink, you can host the xml files on your own hosting account without having to worry about it being deleted from a RSS host, & that high PR backlink will keep the RSS in the loop with Google.

Here is a great thread about getting links indexed with RSS, might help.

I Figured Out How to Write VALID RSS FEEDS + Best Directories!

Thank you! This cleared everything up that I was questioning. Great advice!

[seoservicescontract]

I think by making a free blog and posting all your forum signature will work. However, if you do regular forum posting, I think it will be index automatically.

[Young Samurai]

I had returned to this thread to ask this very question.

If we host the feed on our site, eg,

http://www.mysite.com/my-links-to-mysite.xml

is this reciprocal linking?

Would it be better to host it on another of our properties, eg

http://www.another-of-my-sites.com/my-links-to-mysite.xml

What think ye?

Originally Posted by Chris Sweeney

Again, serious question. Correct me if I'm wrong, but if you upload the RSS feed to your site, now you've essentially created reciprocal links, haven't you? You have the feed on your domain now, right? So now your domain is linking to all of your backlinks, and those backlinks are linking right back to your domain. Wouldn't that be reciprocal linking? I could be wrong, but the general understanding is that reciprocal links carry much less weight in terms of SEO. Anyone have any thoughts on that?

[ExploringInfinity]

If you can host it on a different site, I'd say you might as well do it that way.. Just to make sure!

[yukon]

Originally Posted by Young Samurai

I had returned to this thread to ask this very question.

If we host the feed on our site, eg,

http://www.mysite.com/my-links-to-mysite.xml

is this reciprocal linking?

Would it be better to host it on another of our properties, eg

http://www.another-of-my-sites.com/my-links-to-mysite.xml

What think ye?

Originally Posted by ExploringInfinity

If you can host it on a different site, I'd say you might as well do it that way.. Just to make sure!

Same here, If you have another domain it wouldn't hurt to host it on that site.

I have an older domain that I use for testing different things (seo), I just slap my links up their get them indexed & cached then pull the links back down 3-4 days later. It won't hurt to leave them longer.

[Cataclysm1987]

I'd recommend this:

Backlink Indexing Service - 100% Hands-Off | Backlink Indexing

Or this:

Link Juice Maximizer

[Young Samurai]

Thanks again to all you guys.

[designerjack]

I can help you and I can prove all my backlinks get indexed with this system.
Don't worry, I won't charge you a DIME for this information. :P

Here is what I do...
I setup the backlinks on a daily basis, and break them in sections
10/day (for my new domains) or 20/day - 40/day (for my domains older than 1 years old)

I get those backlinks, and submit to pingomatic and ping.fm

Then... I'll use one of my web 2.0 properties/blogs and
add a link into my page, pointing to my backlinks page.

After that, I will submit my backlinks and web 2.0 property page onto (20) social bookmarking sites.
Meaning I submit 40 total links.

(20) for my backlinks page, and (20) for my blog/web2.0 pages

Just to sum it up... I take those 40 submissions and I ping them.

Walla... Gets the work done and you actually get backlinks to your backlinks, which creates more value to your links. Let me know if you need help with anything. This method is proven for me. But this guide isn't the complete guide on how my SEO will out perform my competition.

We can discuss that in a later day.

[Young Samurai]

Designerjack,

Thank you very much.

I can't believe the info I'm getting on this thread (sorry Sayed, hopefully I haven't totally hijacked your thread.)

Originally Posted by designerjack

... But this guide isn't the complete guide on how my SEO will out perform my competition.

We can discuss that in a later day.

Does your current wso in the signature link contain the "complete guide?"

[yukon]

Originally Posted by Chris Sweeney

Serious question, and I'm not trying to sound like a wiseguy at all. But if we're in the process of creating high PR backlinks, why don't we just point those links to our main sites instead of using those high PR links to get PR 0 or PR- backlinks indexed? Then we could forget about the hundreds or thousands of low-PR backlinks that we get from profile links, etc.

Sure you can point the high PR directly to your domain.

OP, was asking how to get 100 forum profile links (existing links) indexed, because he hasn't had much luck getting Google to find the existing backlinks.

This only takes a single high PR link to work.

Low PR pages are not all bad, it depends on how they are setup (page-title, anchor-text, <h1> tag) on the backlink page.

The problem with low PR pages is they are not very active or have very few backlinks pointing at the new backlink page.

High PR pages tend to be more active with Google crawling them often. High PR pages are also harder to get your backlink on. In this case (this thread) it's not that difficult to find at least a single high PR backlink that can be used over & over for years.

Hope that helps,

[Chris Sweeney]

Originally Posted by yukon

Sure you can point the high PR directly to your domain.

OP, was asking how to get 100 forum profile links (existing links) indexed, because he hasn't had much luck getting Google to find the existing backlinks.

This only takes a single high PR link to work.

Low PR pages are not all bad, it depends on how they are setup (page-title, anchor-text, <h1> tag) on the backlink page.

The problem with low PR pages is they are not very active or have very few backlinks pointing at the new backlink page.

High PR pages tend to be more active with Google crawling them often. High PR pages are also harder to get your backlink on. In this case (this thread) it's not that difficult to find at least a single high PR backlink that can be used over & over for years.

Hope that helps,

Ah, I see, thanks for clearing that up for me yukon!

[navyseal]

Doing angela paul backlinks is really a time consuming..

sometimes I used it but sometimes I don't.

Mostly I use twitter.

[alexmw106]

Im loving this thread clears up a few questions i had in a prvious post. Quick question is it better to make an rss feed of you link and get high pr link to it or a backlink page normal html or blog with a link pointing to it.

Can i set up both or will that send a red flag to google?

[Chris Sweeney]

Originally Posted by ambroseprince12

Yes, that's what I do too! Unless removed Links2RSS flows within 24 hours now. Buttttt I think maybe even enough time for the search engines come crawling to find these links

I hate to break the good flow of this thread, but didn't I already post nearly the exact same thing you just said there? See above in post #15: How to get my forum profiles indexed by google?

It seems as though you've copied and pasted my post, switched a couple words around, and re-posted. Are you trying to increase your posts to get more backlinks from your signature or something? If so, that kind of stuff will get you banned around here.

[Danial09]

brilliant idea solving my problem. i like the way to get profiles link indexed by signature. This methods would work great

[Chris Sweeney]

Originally Posted by yukon

Yep, I think that's what it does.

The downside is you can only use those sites for your sites Index page.

I thought about making my own app to do this (still might) with VB.net, just need time to work on it. Maybe do a JV with someones list here on WF?

Originally Posted by Chris Sweeney

Nice, that wouldn't be a bad idea. There are some huge lists floating around. I saw one on one of the black hat forums that has 70,000+ sites, but I totally forget how I came across that thread and I can't find it now . I'll let you know if I do though.

Yukon, I found that list for ya. Scott G has one with 77,777 sites and said if anyone wants it, just ask. Here's his post: Get Index in Google really fast