dkruglyak wrote: Zale, Looks like you got most of the issues addressed and quality scores are the proof... I thought that might be the case as I posted only after reading Page 1 of this thread.


I apologize for the delay in responding. I had written a wonderful response yesterday. But didn't push submit. Then when I...

dkruglyak wrote: Zale,
Looks like you got most of the issues addressed and quality scores are the proof... I thought that might be the case as I posted only after reading Page 1 of this thread.


Wow - to get that far through certainly takes some patience.
I am a embarrassed at some of my earlier errors....

T202Wes wrote: yes you got it, it is the search partners.
Hi Wes (and everybody else),

Thanks for commenting. I appreciate it.

I have dropped the content search partners and am now in pure google land. Thinking it through now - its obvious this is where I should have started.

Its amazing...

dkruglyak wrote: ...

I just looked at my spend and I noticed that the google network spend was far above my google spend. It wasn't even close. The google network was taking up a lot of my spend.

When I looked at who the referrers were in T202, I am not sure it was a wise spend. Of the three top - google.com was matched by business.com and ask.com.

I have gone to these site - not something that looks profitable to me.

For example - I did one of my keywords on business.com...