Why Not Ditch GA4 and Build My Own Analytics?

12 replies
Hey all,

So is there any reason why I shouldn't exclude GA4 and instead build my own serverside tracking tool to track users, page visits, events, drop a first-party cookie to track their entire historical site visits and actions over time then store that data in a data platform and a BI front end?

The only things I see that I would lose unless there are better options are:

1. Google Signals, so I wouldn't get cross-device attribution unless I have them login.

2. Demographics Gender / Age, which is going to be limited at best, I think, and probably even less valuable really if I have a general idea of my market based on lead research.

3. Re-targeting - I'm not sure how accurate this is going to be anyway after they remove 3rd party cookies on chrome. And of course currently on safari and firefox?


Anything I'm missing or reasons why my only 3 concerns are bigger than I'm making them out to be?
#analytics #build #ditch #ga4
  • Profile picture of the author DABK
    Yours will not be better than theirs but it will use up resources to create.


    Originally Posted by CWDynamic View Post

    Hey all,

    So is there any reason why I shouldn't exclude GA4 and instead build my own serverside tracking tool to track users, page visits, events, drop a first-party cookie to track their entire historical site visits and actions over time then store that data in a data platform and a BI front end?

    The only things I see that I would lose unless there are better options are:

    1. Google Signals, so I wouldn't get cross-device attribution unless I have them login.

    2. Demographics Gender / Age, which is going to be limited at best, I think, and probably even less valuable really if I have a general idea of my market based on lead research.

    3. Re-targeting - I'm not sure how accurate this is going to be anyway after they remove 3rd party cookies on chrome. And of course currently on safari and firefox?


    Anything I'm missing or reasons why my only 3 concerns are bigger than I'm making them out to be?
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[11744302].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author dave_hermansen
      Originally Posted by DABK View Post

      Yours will not be better than theirs but it will use up resources to create.
      Additionally, if you rely on just your own, you will not have a complete picture of how Google sees your site.

      I guess the real question should be ... "Is there any reason why you would want to waste your time building your own?"
      Signature
      BizSellers.com - The #1 place to buy & sell websites!
      We help sellers get the MAXIMUM amount for their websites and all buyers know that these sites are 100% vetted.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[11744409].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author expmrb
        Originally Posted by dave_hermansen View Post

        Additionally, if you rely on just your own, you will not have a complete picture of how Google sees your site.

        I guess the real question should be ... "Is there any reason why you would want to waste your time building your own?"

        The main question will be "Why shouldn't we use it? Isn't it free?"
        Signature
        SEO Motionz Forum & Blog- Digital Marketing Forum & Blog,
        Forum Management & Promotion, SEO Tips, Money Making tips etc.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[11744489].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author NetMan
          Originally Posted by expmrb View Post

          The main question will be "Why shouldn't we use it? Isn't it free?"
          Well, NOT really "free" in reality.
          You can use it for "free" IF you accept and abide by their TOS and Privacy Policy.

          Did you ever really read their TOS and PP, to discover their cost of "free"?


          Regards,
          Andy
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[11752140].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author RMRC
    The time and energy to build your own wouldn't be worth it unless you just really love the building part itself. So just as the other comments mention, why wouldn't you use GA4? Is there something else you are trying to achieve by building your own analytics?
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[11744684].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Casey Whitcher
    Thanks all, The reasoning to go with our own would be to have serverside historical tracking tied to a user in our CRM, which I don't see we can do natively in GA4.

    I'm doing a pretty good job of this with Tag manager at the moment anyway, but it's still not readily available in our CRM.

    I'm trying to convince higher-ups we can't get rid of GA4, but I assumed I would get better answers if I asked from their perspective. I agree it doesn't make any sense to me. I'm trying to understand if there are advantages I am not seeing or other reasons I might forget to bring up why it's a bad idea.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[11745322].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author DABK
      Without knowing what you're tracking users in your CRM for, hard to tell if it's worth your while...


      A while back, I would send people letters with a link to a sales page that had their name in the url, and tracked that way.


      Do you want to see if they go to a particular page after you send them an email/letter? Do you want to see all the pages they go to once they get to your site? Do you want to see where they go from your site?


      What's the goal?


      Google's toy is better than yours but it does not tie users to a particular name. For that, you do have to create your own. But why can't you use both? If you use Google's you do know how it sees your site, as David said. If you do not, you lose that and it might end up biting you in the ass.


      Originally Posted by Casey Whitcher View Post

      Thanks all, The reasoning to go with our own would be to have serverside historical tracking tied to a user in our CRM, which I don't see we can do natively in GA4.

      I'm doing a pretty good job of this with Tag manager at the moment anyway, but it's still not readily available in our CRM.

      I'm trying to convince higher-ups we can't get rid of GA4, but I assumed I would get better answers if I asked from their perspective. I agree it doesn't make any sense to me. I'm trying to understand if there are advantages I am not seeing or other reasons I might forget to bring up why it's a bad idea.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[11745345].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Kay King
    meanwhile, I am disabling that new acct - one acct per member only allowed - though I understand what the point was in using an unknown name. I will wait a day or so to do that so you can copy this discussion if you want.


    kay
    Signature
    Saving one dog will not change the world - but the world changes forever for that one dog
    ***
    Dear April: I don't want any trouble from you.
    January was long, February was iffy, March was a freaking dumpster fire.
    So sit down, be quiet, and don't touch anything.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[11745323].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Casey Whitcher
      thanks, kay! I was actually just trying to figure out my original account, I haven't used this forum as much as I should! Thank you for consolidating!
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[11745441].message }}
  • Self-orbitin' is a deloosion.

    Trackin' pre-tracked tracks is trackin' pre-tracked tracks.

    Gotta figure when you jackin' yusself off what is subject & object, I guess.

    I endeavor to observe this distinction whenevah I am able.

    Store. Bar. Home. Zoo. Riot.

    Like William Carlos Williams said, "no one will believe this of vast import to the nation".

    Hey, but we all sooperlative slackahs here on WF, so mebbe I can slip this one through ....
    Signature

    Lightin' fuses is for blowin' stuff togethah.

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[11745654].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Johnny12345
    Originally Posted by CWDynamic View Post

    Why Not Ditch GA4 and Build My Own Analytics?

    I don't use Google Analytics. I have my own basic tracking code (that I wrote in PHP). I've been using it for many years.

    However, any time I want super-detailed stats, I use web-stat.com. Their all-in-one page reporting is fantastic.

    John
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[11746489].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author NetMan
    Originally Posted by CWDynamic View Post

    Hey all,

    So is there any reason why I shouldn't exclude GA4 and instead build my own serverside tracking tool to track users, page visits, events, drop a first-party cookie to track their entire historical site visits and actions over time then store that data in a data platform and a BI front end?

    The only things I see that I would lose unless there are better options are:

    1. Google Signals, so I wouldn't get cross-device attribution unless I have them login.

    2. Demographics Gender / Age, which is going to be limited at best, I think, and probably even less valuable really if I have a general idea of my market based on lead research.

    3. Re-targeting - I'm not sure how accurate this is going to be anyway after they remove 3rd party cookies on chrome. And of course currently on safari and firefox?

    Anything I'm missing or reasons why my only 3 concerns are bigger than I'm making them out to be?
    Be it known that there exist FOSS (free open source software) for about any web services offered by GA4 and else, that one can self-host to service oneself and others.

    In our case, the very best alternative of GA is Matomo analytics server, with which you can take back control using a powerful web analytics platform on which you get 100% data ownership, without sharing all you do with G.

    As you can see, there are alternative to "build your own" as well, because, moreover, since it is Open Source one can use and modify the code at liking for one needs.


    Regards,
    Andy
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[11752139].message }}

Trending Topics