Google Destroys Good Content Sites?

12 replies
I was just doing a little thinking... (trying not injure myself in the process)

Back in the day, Yahoo was a big Google competitor, and Yahoo was a directory. What did Google do? They put DMOZ into directory.google.com and then got it and so many other directories spammed to oblivion, pretty much taking down Yahoo and DMOZ in one devious plan.

Then they went on to make news.google.com while at the same time penalizing newspapers for posting links.

Then they really pushed Trip Advisor and Yelp, got them spammed pretty major, and then pulled them out of the serps too as the acquired Frommers. Maybe they were planning that all along?

Now there is the Knowledge Graph competing with Wikipedia. It wasn't long ago that wiki results were tops. Probably not for long.

Then there is Google getting the article sites spammed too.

Then there is google finance competing with bloomberg.

Google loves content! Theirs! And if you get too big, they plan your demise.

Now tell me I'm not right!

Now they have the
#content #destroys #good #google #sites
  • Profile picture of the author Indecision
    If google ever plan the demize of one of my websites then I will be pretty damn happy and ballin on the profits!
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6816738].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author peteJ
    Google is first and foremost a business, and they are going to do whatever it takes to protect their bottom line.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6816751].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author BiggyJ
      I don't think you can say Google ruins other websites on purpose. It's like a hedgehog loving someone, the closer it gets, the more it hurts. The same with google. It will give you a lot of trafic if it favors you, but if you are not smart, you will implode on yourself.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6816772].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author NetUsher
    Banned
    Google has a funny way at looking things, all their decisions and direction is totally based on the end user of their service. The end user is their product and anything that gets in the way that might hurt the quality of their search results is going to feel the wrath of the mighty Google. They have even gone so far as to dump advertisers that spent millions in advertising in an effort to protect their search results.

    They will, and have cut off their head in an effort protect their product at all cost. And I think they have made a very serious mistake. Instead of trying to find an equitable compromise and solution to deal with spam and poor quality pages, but instead they just trash everything that threatens their bottom line of good search results for their end users.

    All the time and money they spend fighting spam and poor quality would have been better spent trying to develop an environment that would naturally encourage webmasters and content sites to only display quality content. They chose a simple solution, that I feel in the long run will be their demise
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6816874].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author dswconsulting
    Ultimately what google does comes down to people, such as us on this forum. If we target the news sites, yelp and etc. in a un-natural way to capitalize on serp's - google slaps. Content is the priority to google. If they allow weak, spammy content they will dissolve. (not easily but over time that is) I hate it on one hand because it makes things difficult for us to succeed and we always seem to be at the demise of googles decisions. Contrarily, I know it's necessary otherwise we would seek out every avenue to profit and saturate the web with a mass of irrelevant crap.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6817501].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author easternodyssey
    Well Google is a buisnes and happens to own the major search engine so i think they kind of do what they want. The funny thing is most of these web enterprises would have dominated the Chinese web market by now if it was not for the Chinese government and censorship. Facebook tried to take over the market until it got blocked and now would never compete with weibo. Google tried to take over Baidu until the bad press related to Google and well Amazon is the only strong surviver left in the market. The problem its all just buisness wipe out your competition to earn more money. The only problem is just like everywhere else in the world of buisness, it is very hard to compete with the leading companies and if you do, they are either going to destroy your company, take your idea, move into your field or focus on improving their own company.
    Signature
    Eastern Odyssey | The Definitive Guide to Asia
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6817715].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author John J Brown
    yes, everything google says is just for the show and a bunch of crap,
    they hate affiliate sites no matter how good they are
    because we do not use stupid Adwords on them,
    this is the future,
    they want all the money
    thank you google
    you are a true friend
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6817722].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author mohsinmallik
    You have raised some very good points which I have never think of. Google is the Big Boss of internet in recent days and liekly to hold this position for a longer time for sure.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6818426].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author VegasVince
      I've learned the hard way that when ever you base your business model around any third party that could care less if you live or die.....your have built a business on a house of cards.

      I personally would rather have traffic then worry about being on Google's good graces because as u say.....tomorrow I'll wake up and find out that I've become the ******* red headed step child of the very same company.

      Watch out for You Tube as well....they have destroyed sites for videos that THEY HAVE FEATURED.

      Pay Pal? lmao. 5 years ago I almost got run off this site because I told you people that Pay Pal can and will screw more honest marketers then bad apples. Fast forward and the list of good Warriors screwed by that group of Mafia pencil pushers is off the chain. (See.....when they freeze your funds for 180 days.....they EARN INTEREST ON IT.......but when it comes time to pay it back...you get NOTHING.)

      I have learned that paid traffic is a hell of a lot safer and cheaper then so-called free Google love....AND ANY OTHER COMPANY WITH A TOS THAT READS LIKE A WAR AND PEACE MANIFESTO.

      peace,

      Vegas Vince
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6818524].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Jackson Tan
        Originally Posted by VegasVince View Post


        Pay Pal? lmao. 5 years ago I almost got run off this site because I told you people that Pay Pal can and will screw more honest marketers then bad apples. Fast forward and the list of good Warriors screwed by that group of Mafia pencil pushers is off the chain. (See.....when they freeze your funds for 180 days.....they EARN INTEREST ON IT.......but when it comes time to pay it back...you get NOTHING.)
        Totally agreed.. the big fish out there will stop at nothing to eat up us.. unfortunately

        Hence, i need to grow BIG FAST!

        Cheers! lets do this together
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6818708].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author MovingAround
    I, for one, agree with Google. G is a business and it has a goal, to provide the best user experience. This means that G must provide the best search results and whatever it (G) does, is geared towards a better quality of search results.

    The problem with so called affiliate websites is that the majority are absolute rubbish and Google knows this. Unfortunately, G uses a robot to tell whether your site is rubbish or not, so it uses generalizations. If G sees that your site is an affiliate, you could be a professor in neuroscience who just happens to make money selling CBT products on the side and who knows what he is talking about, G will see those skanky redirects (hope G doesn't notice your cloaking) and treat you like the 99% of aff. sites.

    Affiliate sites are known for the low quality of their content and for also having one single goal: to provide sale-type content to make a sale within a click (or few). And G doesn't like this. In G's happy and beautiful colourful world, websites should be altruist in nature and give out great content for the sake of helping others (well, include some Google Adsense there, will ya?). Your content should be liked, tweeted, shared on G+ and linked like a champ. No redirects. Oh, god help you if you redirect to an affiliated vendor site, son.

    Of course, with the above, good luck making money (unless you use, yes, you guessed it, Google Adsense!). 99% of aff.sites are rubbish that should be best destroyed (including some I've seen in people's sig here). They are middlemen of middlemen, sites that are not experts in their fields and just want to sell that ONE product for that ONE extra buck. In G's eyes, traffic should be sent to the guy whose product you are pimping because he is the expert (i.e. authority), not you. You just have PLR content in your site and are an amateur (at best) in the niche of the product you are trying to sell.

    Couple that with people's dislike for site's that are based in trying to sell them anything (i.e. typical aff. site) and you have huge bounce rates and not relevant nor high PR backlinks for aff. sites, unless your site is one of the big daddys of the affiliate world, but then you are not a middleman. As you know, relevant high PR backlinks is the only way to go for backlinks these days. And you won't get that with PLR spun content (the stuff I have seen in weight loss sites, makes me cry, I swear).

    In essence, yes, the majority of aff. sites are doomed with G nowadays but that's because they should have been doomed long time ago.

    My 3 cents, people!
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6818858].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author michellex
    Originally Posted by dvduval View Post

    I was just doing a little thinking... (trying not injure myself in the process)

    Back in the day, Yahoo was a big Google competitor, and Yahoo was a directory. What did Google do? They put DMOZ into directory.google.com and then got it and so many other directories spammed to oblivion, pretty much taking down Yahoo and DMOZ in one devious plan.

    Then they went on to make news.google.com while at the same time penalizing newspapers for posting links.

    Then they really pushed Trip Advisor and Yelp, got them spammed pretty major, and then pulled them out of the serps too as the acquired Frommers. Maybe they were planning that all along?

    Now there is the Knowledge Graph competing with Wikipedia. It wasn't long ago that wiki results were tops. Probably not for long.

    Then there is Google getting the article sites spammed too.

    Then there is google finance competing with bloomberg.

    Google loves content! Theirs! And if you get too big, they plan your demise.

    Now tell me I'm not right!

    Now they have the
    Hmmm, some interesting points here. Never really thought about it that way. It's interesting how Google can get 'sites spammed' by promoting them and BOOM, Google bans you. :confused:
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6818874].message }}

Trending Topics