Which is best SEO tool for creating web 2.0 links

mathompson

10 years ago

Originally Posted by faisalmaximus

Title says everything, want to know your opinion on which is the best SEO tool for creating Web 2.0 links ?

i alway use ahrefs seo tool for my job
do you use it ever ? what is your access ?

Thanks
1 reply

Signature

Superior Singing Method Review

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10602581].message }}

nettiapina 10 years ago

Originally Posted by mathompson

i alway use ahrefs seo tool for my job

And Ahrefs allows you to create spammy blogs or post to them? You didn't even read the question.

I'm sure there's several tools to this stuff. Even a generic desktop tool to update blogs might work if that's what you're mostly doing. Just "creating web 2.0 links" tends to be waste of time, tho.
- Thanks
Signature
Links in signature will not help your SEO. Not on this site, and not on any other forum.
Who told me this? An ex Google web spam engineer.

What's your excuse?
{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10602865].message }}

beyond11

10 years ago

You can use opensitexplorer . org to search your competition and create backlinks.

Thanks

Signature

Profi webshop Ã¼zemeltetÃ©s hazai vÃ¡llalkozÃ¡soknak. | SzÃnvonalas weboldal kÃ©szÃtÃ©s Budapest terÃ¼letÃ©n. | Ismerje meg a keresÅ‘optimalizÃ¡lÃ¡s referenciÃ¡k weblapot.

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10602977].message }}

rubelzain83

10 years ago

Well, I would recommend you to do it the manual way as you will be able to create quality web 2.0 blogs with would help you rank your money site.

And take my words, automation process is waste of time these days.

Thanks
1 reply

Signature

Regards,
Rubel
IRCTC Railway Website:- Check PNR Status | Live Train Running Status | Blog.

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10602990].message }}

PassiveIncomes

10 years ago

Originally Posted by rubelzain83

Well, I would recommend you to do it the manual way as you will be able to create quality web 2.0 blogs with would help you rank your money site.

And take my words, automation process is waste of time these days.

Automation does save time.

Autofill Magic will be the first choice if you want to semi-automate your webs 2.0 links.
FCS Networker or RankerX if you want to automate your webs 2.0.

AUTOMATION does not waste of time, the only difference between automated and manual posting is just the content.

JUST THE CONTENT ITSELF! If you are able to get WordAi to produce human readable content it is ok.

Read this.

You post manually -> write content to blogger -> your blogger post is published.

You post automatically using FCS Networker -> WordAi to get human readable content -> your blogger post is published.

Both ways get the same result!

Thanks
1 reply

Signature

WARNING!

> Click HERE to STEAL the TOP SEO tools and services list for 2016! <

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10602999].message }}

nettiapina 10 years ago

Originally Posted by PassiveIncomes

Both ways get the same result!

Yeah, they both lead to the same result. Which is of course no result at all, unless you've done work to actually build links to the sites. If you're just posting some random crap you're just wasting time for no gain. Automate it, and you're at least wasting a little less time.
- Thanks
Signature
Links in signature will not help your SEO. Not on this site, and not on any other forum.
Who told me this? An ex Google web spam engineer.

What's your excuse?
{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10603106].message }}

svsets10

10 years ago

I wouldn't say that web2.0 get no result at all....it's part of a bigger picture. Best tool for web2.0 creation? I use FCS networker but I wouldn't say it's THAT good at creating accounts.

Here is what I do:
1. Scrape for expired web2.0 blogspots, tumblrs etc....
2. Upload them to FCS and take care of the the posting automatically.

I'm having really good results doing this but you need to learn how to juice those web2.0 properties up, the links alone from them aren't going to give you a push. If you use them as a buffer.....

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10603128].message }}

Michael Nguyen

10 years ago

Web 2.0 links are rubbish. Anything that is free to create and can be done via tools at the push of a button is probably NOT going to produce any real results. Instead of spending all the time producing 20 web2.0 pages, why not seek a strong website and gain a link back.

1. Relevant website
2. Has history
3. It probably has a following
4. From a real website

Quality over quantity, core SEO has not changed that much apart from adjustments

Thanks

Signature

FREE Cold Calling Course: >>> Looking for Serious & Aspiring Cold Callers to Train for FREE <<<

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10603517].message }}

rankanalysis

10 years ago

it is good way to check competitors site back links , do the same way they use

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10603830].message }}

affilorama-portal

10 years ago

I would always do manual work for this one. It is not a matter of quantity but quality. And also, IMO, it is better to spend your money and time on building links to high traffic, content-based websites through content marketing.

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10604620].message }}

chrisjohn93

10 years ago

Creating backlinks by automated method is not a good idea, you must create all the backlinks by manual method.

But still want to use tool then GSA search engine ranker is the best tool to create web 2.0 backlinks.

Thanks
1 reply

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10604645].message }}

svsets10

10 years ago

Originally Posted by chrisjohn93

Creating backlinks by automated method is not a good idea, you must create all the backlinks by manual method.

But still want to use tool then GSA search engine ranker is the best tool to create web 2.0 backlinks.

Most of GSA web2.0 are broken and don't work