Can article spinner software really fool google?

by ohcn
28 replies
  • SEO
  • |
I am struggling with concept of the article spinner software. Is it really useful or dangerous? It saves time for sure, but I don't want my site to be banned just because of using software.
#article #fool #google #software #spinner
  • Profile picture of the author Marko Vel
    For me useful, if you write 1 original article and spin that article with 4-5 new variations, you will get 1000 or more unique articles in the eye of Google.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1910984].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author ohcn
    what do yo mean by "4-5 new variations"?
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1911056].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author TomBond
    If the software is advanced then it's possible. I believe people get good results with UAW
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1911204].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author ohcn
    what is "UAW?"
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1911234].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Marakatapolis
    The best is 400-500 words and 37% or greater unique. (from what I know). For example, I use The Best Spinner and do the synonyms and word phrases myself, so I know it will read well no matter which word/phrase comes up. It takes an hour or less per article, but you can then output 100 variations into a zip file, and if you have it 37-50%+ uniqueness, then that is a lot of decent quality content to spread around. And if you save the file already in spin syntax, you can just load that up into ArticleBot and submit it and a different variation to dozens or hundreds of article directories.

    Or grab a variation from your zip file and slap it on Squidoo, Hubpages or some other Web 2.0 property.

    Anyways, spinners done right, save a lot of time. The junk ones are the ones which auto-generate the content, but if you do the spinning syntax yourself, then you know what kind of iterations you will end up with.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1912684].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author frqhuss
    Article spinner does work and it will be rank well if it is on hot niche but the thing is that article should have atleast a change of 35%-55% ......
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1912841].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author alf82
    I have it and spoke with the developer who is OK, but it only fooled Google for 10 minutes...and they don't tell you if you are put in the Sand Box. My own take is that the "duplicate content" issue is way overrated. I worked 2 years on a golf site with my business partner who is a PGA professional and who shot a 50 last year at St. Andrews, qualified for the US Open, etc., etc.
    Everything was totally original - and we are not even in the top 850,000.
    To answer your question:
    If you want to use that software, you must also re-arrange whole paragraphs and spin no more than 5 times. Then you have to re edit the whole thing again tio make sure...and if you have any intention of using affiliate links...it's a real problem
    I have found it easier and better to simple rewrite the whole article.
    Besides, others can tell a post like that and delete it as spam in 5 seconds. I do.
    I also made the same mistake that I am guessing you did which was to listen to that fraud Michael Jones. DON'T!!!
    Registering for 120 MU blogs linking to Blogger in the hope that you will get back links is a joke...a joke which cost me 2 months of my life.
    I have found that my AW stats - hits on your server - went way up when I just started ONE blog and redirecting the main site. You can see it here at loseweight-keepfit dot com/blog All the best
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1912884].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Glenn Leader
      Originally Posted by alf82 View Post

      I have it and spoke with the developer who is OK, but it only fooled Google for 10 minutes...and they don't tell you if you are put in the Sand Box.
      You spoke to which developer? You need to quote
      the software for that comment to mean anything.

      Originally Posted by alf82 View Post

      My own take is that the "duplicate content" issue is way overrated. I worked 2 years on a golf site with my business partner who is a PGA professional and who shot a 50 last year at St. Andrews, qualified for the US Open, etc., etc.
      Everything was totally original - and we are not even in the top 850,000.
      There are several factors in geting ranked. Having
      'Unique' content is just one facet. What about on-
      page and off-page SEO? What about site structure?
      What about internal linking? If I was involved with
      that website, you'd be cracking the top page on a
      number of keywords. I would also have used a
      number of under served keywords, where there is
      no competition at all.


      Originally Posted by alf82 View Post

      To answer your question:
      If you want to use that software, you must also re-arrange whole paragraphs and spin no more than 5 times. Then you have to re edit the whole thing again tio make sure...and if you have any intention of using affiliate links...it's a real problem
      I have thousands of spun articles that have links
      embedded, both affiliate, and back links. They're
      a very effective method for me.

      Originally Posted by alf82 View Post

      I have found it easier and better to simple rewrite the whole article.
      Besides, others can tell a post like that and delete it as spam in 5 seconds. I do.
      You're obviously doing this wrong. You need to
      start off with a good article, and then only use
      quality content in your pin points. You'd be hard
      pressed to tell the difference between the original
      article, and any of my spun versions. They all read
      very well.

      Originally Posted by alf82 View Post

      I also made the same mistake that I am guessing you did which was to listen to that fraud Michael Jones. DON'T!!!
      Registering for 120 MU blogs linking to Blogger in the hope that you will get back links is a joke...a joke which cost me 2 months of my life.
      Oh yeah? that all that money in my Clickbank
      account must be an illusion.

      Originally Posted by alf82 View Post

      I have found that my AW stats - hits on your server - went way up when I just started ONE blog and redirecting the main site. You can see it here at loseweight-keepfit dot com/blog All the best
      If this is working for you, then good luck to ya.
      I'm gonna continue to do the things that work
      well for me.

      All the best

      Glenn
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1913329].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author hurn
    you can do submit to article directories. it is better rather than using in your site.
    Signature
    247 Techies listed in crunchbase.com as a reputed online tech support company in US.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1913193].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author ramccluskey
    I don't think it is a question of 'fooling Google.' Google runs a business that needs unique content, which it sells to advertisers as an advertising medium. Google has chosen to define "unique content" by some criteria that make sense for their business. I run a business selling them that content. They determine whether my content meets their criteria and if it does, they buy it from me. They don't ask how I produce it because they don't care. I don't tell them how I produce it. I assume that if I am successful, they are successful.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1913249].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Dan B Rusu
    Lets say I upload an article to ezine, then I want to spin that article and resubmit to ezine under the same account. To what uniqueness % do I need to spin for the article to be accepted?

    What about with buzzle, who only accepts unique content.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1913311].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Glenn Leader
    You need to be careful to what you listen to. A lot
    of people will post their opinion. Often this opinion
    isn't based on any work they've done, or they base
    it on their limited experiences.

    For the record, and this isn't opinion, just cold hard
    facts.

    Listen up. I've been spinning articles long before
    most people ever heard of it. For well over seven
    years in fact. Along the way, I've made mistakes,
    as well as good guesses as to what works, and what
    doesn't. All my guesses were tested thoroughly
    before they entered into my daily methods. So I'm
    talking from a position of strength here. I even
    worked out a way to use spun articles with Traffic
    Equalizer.

    I have a number of blogs on free platforms, as well
    as on my own servers. These are filled with spun
    versions of the same seed articles. Each spun
    variation has it's own keyword, and has affiliate and
    backlinks embedded within the text. Not only are
    most of my blogs fully indexed, but giving me my
    desired results. either a click on my affiliate links,
    or a free link-back to my desired site/blog.

    These articles are posted organically, and usually,
    no more often than one a day at random times.
    My system handles this completely on automatic
    control, save setting up the blogs, and entering
    the information into 'the system'.

    I prefer to work smart, not hard. I'm prepared to
    put the ground work into developing as system
    that works for me, and buying what I need if I
    can't develop that part of my system yet.
    Investment is more than just spending money, it's
    about investing time in developing a unique system
    that works. Any one of you can outsource this
    development work yourself, and get a workable
    solution for less than $500. This might sound like a
    lot of money, and it is, but your return is many
    fold.

    I expand my system a blog at a time, based on the
    research I carry out before embarking on a new
    niche. Each morning, I add new blogs to my
    empire, just one or two a day, and spend no more
    than ten minutes doing it. While my coffee is
    cooling in fact. I use a spread sheet for keeping
    track of what I'm doing which also has the details
    of future blogs to build. Next week, I plan to
    outsource the blog building, so it's completely
    hands free for me.

    HTH

    Glenn
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1913408].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author LindseyRainwater
    I'm really interested in article spinning software, just because I've never seen it at work.

    I've been being hired to spin articles manually, taking the article and then writing 4 completely new sentences for each original sentence. This seems to be very popular.

    I guess my curiosity comes from the thought that if article spinning software did the same thing faster, it would seem to be more economical for people to just get the program.

    What is the difference between having a program spin an article, or hiring a writer like me to do it all one sentence at a time? Does one or the other give better uniqueness? Or is it just the preference of the person with the original article?
    Signature
    Limited Time: Grab the "Pay Your Way" option, and get a complete website with content created - without having to pay the full amount up-front! Pay what you can today, and make payments from there! Click HERE for more info!
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1915482].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author contentwriter1205
    No, there won't be any problem if you keep the uniqueness about 70 or so %. You should use a completely original article to spin. Don't copy content from other websites. It is risky. Write an original article and then spin it.

    I spin articles too. If you want to use my services, you can click on the link in my signature.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4102196].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author xylement
    Any good wordpress AUTO spinner plugin to recommend?
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4102403].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author ebrg
    If there is link between spun versions of the the same article , I do not think that google can be fooled. The link serves as a cue for google to check for spun articles, and eases the computation load.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4102428].message }}

Trending Topics