.CO domains SEO factor. Has anyone Ranked .CO Domains?

52 replies
  • SEO
  • |
Hello Warriors,

I have got a question.

I wanted to know do .co domains are treated the same manner as .com, .org or .net? Especially if the domain is exact match?

Has anyone experienced any difficulty ranking for .CO domains?

I have done some googling related to my question but most of the answers were based on assumptions. Some were even saying that .CO is global but they are treated as .info not .com .net or .org. I don't know how true it is.

Can anyone please answer my question?

Answer from warrior who has practical experience in ranking or working on a .co site is very much appreciated
#.co domains #domains #factor #ranked #seo
  • Profile picture of the author MikeFriedman
    If there were issues with ranking a .co, I don't think Overstock.com would have changed to o.co.
    Signature

    For SEO news, discussions, tactics, and more.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4840442].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author paulgl
      Originally Posted by MikeFriedman View Post

      If there were issues with ranking a .co, I don't think Overstock.com would have changed to o.co.
      LOL! That's what I would say. But I would also add that .co has
      been a big, fat bust. Cyber squatters and speculators took
      that into the stratosphere. Unfortunately, lots of people
      probably lost money on that deal.

      There's nothing wrong with a .co, but anyone who jumped on
      the bad wagon expecting to get some boost out of a .co
      has been sadly mistaken. Just like all the rest who say that
      one particular extension gives a boost. They don't.

      But it keeps domain resellers rich.

      See, .co was supposed to be the next .com.

      Never worked out that way because extension just does
      not matter.

      Plus, logically speaking, a .co just does not seem right. It
      begs for something more. Like an m on the end.
      Before you scream..., yes I know, that has nothing to do
      with SEO. Exactly.

      Off topic, but I do a ton of offline marketing. Fliers, business
      cards, etc. I can't see me putting a domain.co on anything
      like that.

      Paul
      Signature

      If you were disappointed in your results today, lower your standards tomorrow.

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4840470].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author damon79
        Originally Posted by paulgl View Post

        LOL! That's what I would say. But I would also add that .co has
        been a big, fat bust. Cyber squatters and speculators took
        that into the stratosphere. Unfortunately, lots of people
        probably lost money on that deal.

        There's nothing wrong with a .co, but anyone who jumped on
        the bad wagon expecting to get some boost out of a .co
        has been sadly mistaken. Just like all the rest who say that
        one particular extension gives a boost. They don't.

        But it keeps domain resellers rich.

        See, .co was supposed to be the next .com.

        Never worked out that way because extension just does
        not matter.

        Plus, logically speaking, a .co just does not seem right. It
        begs for something more. Like an m on the end.
        Before you scream..., yes I know, that has nothing to do
        with SEO. Exactly.

        Off topic, but I do a ton of offline marketing. Fliers, business
        cards, etc. I can't see me putting a domain.co on anything
        like that.

        Paul
        Missed the bandwagon hey buddy? I have over 60 .Co's and have pulled in profits of over 200K in nearly 2 years.
        While you're poo pooing the domain, I'm making good $$$.
        I'm glad people in general are ignorant and sheepish, makes it so much easier for me to dominate. Had this wanker that lived across the road from me. Supposed to be a SEO Marketing expert an a maths genius. Told him to invest. He ignored me. He found out about the sales I've been making. Now he feels as tiny as his brain!
        Lolz.
        Seriously though, don't listen to this fool. He contributes nothing to growth or innovation. .CO is already utilised in dozens of countries ccTLD's. This person is either a noob or just lonely and wants attention.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5776556].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author damon79
        Originally Posted by paulgl View Post

        LOL! That's what I would say. But I would also add that .co has
        been a big, fat bust. Cyber squatters and speculators took
        that into the stratosphere. Unfortunately, lots of people
        probably lost money on that deal.

        There's nothing wrong with a .co, but anyone who jumped on
        the bad wagon expecting to get some boost out of a .co
        has been sadly mistaken. Just like all the rest who say that
        one particular extension gives a boost. They don't.

        But it keeps domain resellers rich.

        See, .co was supposed to be the next .com.

        Never worked out that way because extension just does
        not matter.

        Plus, logically speaking, a .co just does not seem right. It
        begs for something more. Like an m on the end.
        Before you scream..., yes I know, that has nothing to do
        with SEO. Exactly.

        Off topic, but I do a ton of offline marketing. Fliers, business
        cards, etc. I can't see me putting a domain.co on anything
        like that.

        Paul
        _______________________

        Missed the bandwagon hey buddy? I have over 60 .Co's and have pulled in profits of over 200K in nearly 2 years.
        While you're poo pooing the domain, I'm making good $$$.
        I'm glad people in general are ignorant and sheepish, makes it so much easier for me to dominate. Had this wanker that lived across the road from me. Supposed to be a SEO Marketing expert an a maths genius. Told him to invest. He ignored me. He found out about the sales I've been making. Now he feels as tiny as his brain!
        Lolz.
        Seriously though, don't listen to this fool. He contributes nothing to growth or innovation. .CO is already utilised in dozens of countries ccTLD's. This person is either a noob or just lonely and wants attention.
        You beg for something more? Perhaps a non sheepish mentality?
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5776569].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author paulgl
          Originally Posted by damon79 View Post

          _______________________

          Missed the bandwagon hey buddy? I have over 60 .Co's and have pulled in profits of over 200K in nearly 2 years.
          While you're poo pooing the domain, I'm making good $$$.
          I'm glad people in general are ignorant and sheepish, makes it so much easier for me to dominate. Had this wanker that lived across the road from me. Supposed to be a SEO Marketing expert an a maths genius. Told him to invest. He ignored me. He found out about the sales I've been making. Now he feels as tiny as his brain!
          Lolz.
          Seriously though, don't listen to this fool. He contributes nothing to growth or innovation. .CO is already utilised in dozens of countries ccTLD's. This person is either a noob or just lonely and wants attention.
          You beg for something more? Perhaps a non sheepish mentality?
          Poo poo because extension does not matter. Note I never said don't
          get a .co domain, of course you missed that. Just the idiocy of thinking
          some domain extension is going to be some panacea for website marketing.

          It's not.

          Your post could be written by someone with 60+ .coms, .infos, .nets,
          .WTF, who cares?

          A .co is not worth the extra money. Period.

          Repeat: .co's have been the biggest internet bust since MS took
          over yahoo search results. Scratch that. MS will always be the
          biggest internet bust...you can add cellphone bust to that
          ever growing MS stupid list.

          Paul
          Signature

          If you were disappointed in your results today, lower your standards tomorrow.

          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5950186].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author seosoldier
            Originally Posted by paulgl View Post

            Poo poo because extension does not matter. Note I never said don't
            get a .co domain, of course you missed that. Just the idiocy of thinking
            some domain extension is going to be some panacea for website marketing.

            It's not.

            Your post could be written by someone with 60+ .coms, .infos, .nets,
            .WTF, who cares?

            A .co is not worth the extra money. Period.

            Repeat: .co's have been the biggest internet bust since MS took
            over yahoo search results. Scratch that. MS will always be the
            biggest internet bust...you can add cellphone bust to that
            ever growing MS stupid list.

            Paul
            No one was asking if .co was worth extra money; the question was, can you rank one?
            The answer is yes.
            And you don't have to pay extra money, in fact they're cheaper than .com's and others.
            Signature
            > My Promise To You: I will never promote any offer I do not truly believe to be 100% worth buying and using!
            https://bestwaterfilter.us
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6727715].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author eightmotives
              Please explain how .co domains are cheaper than .coms. Sorry for reviving the thread, but I want the user to clarify what he is talking about.
              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8320626].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author tsx
      Originally Posted by MikeFriedman View Post

      If there were issues with ranking a .co, I don't think Overstock.com would have changed to o.co.
      I don"t think overstock is the best run company to be honest.

      However I am also weighing between a .com or .co domain name.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5949568].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author UpMarketing
    Stick with Exact-Match-Domains for ranking purposes on Google and other major search engines. While EMD's predominance may change later on; right now, they are the easiest by FAR to rank.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4840450].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Murphysmurfy
      Originally Posted by UpMarketing View Post

      Stick with Exact-Match-Domains for ranking purposes on Google and other major search engines. While EMD's predominance may change later on; right now, they are the easiest by FAR to rank.
      *Facepalm*

      I'm not going to bother to explain myself.

      I am tired of explaining how domains work.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8320714].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author KevinRichardsonMD
    I find what many have found: EMD is the way to go. .co doesn't rank well.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4840591].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author paulgl
      Originally Posted by KevinRichardsonMD View Post

      I find what many have found: EMD is the way to go. .co doesn't rank well.
      Soooooooooooo a .co cannot be an EMD?!?!?!

      Better stick with that day job, E "MD."

      If they don't rank worth a darn, which is just BS, why do domain
      sellers put a premium price on a .co? Because it's junk?

      People used to call .infos junk because they were so cheap.
      Even though they're not. So, logic would hold, there must
      be something magical about a .co as you pay more for it
      than a dot com from most sellers.

      But the whole logic of some extensions being magic is just BS.

      Paul
      Signature

      If you were disappointed in your results today, lower your standards tomorrow.

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4840860].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author NYC SEO
        Originally Posted by paulgl View Post

        Soooooooooooo a .co cannot be an EMD?!?!?!

        Better stick with that day job, E "MD."

        paul
        Lighten up, man. Quit playing semantics. He means .com .net .org as is quite evident.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4840883].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author paulgl
          Originally Posted by NYC SEO View Post

          Lighten up, man. Quit playing semantics. He means .com .net .org as is quite evident.
          Unfortunately, Mr. MD has made some crazy-spam-like posts...

          But, what would the WF without the fun these people seem
          to want to inject?

          Paul
          Signature

          If you were disappointed in your results today, lower your standards tomorrow.

          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4841434].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author JSProjects
      Originally Posted by KevinRichardsonMD View Post

      I find what many have found: EMD is the way to go. .co doesn't rank well.
      This makes no sense at all.

      EMD referrers to the keywords themselves, not the extension.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4881356].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author damon79
      My .Co's rank Page 1. Perhaps there are idiots that don't understand SEO? Great for me, as it's easier for me to dominate.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5776532].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Dan277
    I think .co domains are perfectly fine. Even though they are Colombian domains, they are accepted world wide. Domain names can make a difference. We all know that .edu and .gov domains rank better. I think it's down to the restrictions on the domain that affect rankings. When there are no restrictions it shouldn't make the slightest bit of difference. I've bought a few .co domains, mainly because the .com domains I wanted were taken, but also because it is short and easy to remember.

    I tried to get a .co domain ranked and I did have problems with it but I am certain that it's because I cannot get relevant backlinks. Competitors simply will not link to me unless I pay them and forums that are relevant either use nofollow links or don't like me putting a site that is competing with them in my signature. I've had 0 positive results from paid services, so I am left with writing dozens of unique articles to promote, which I have not yet done.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4840627].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author MikeFriedman
      Originally Posted by Dan277 View Post

      I've bought a few .co domains, mainly because the .com domains I wanted were taken, but also because it is short and easy to remember.

      .co is easier to remember, but .com might be too tough for you? wow.
      Signature

      For SEO news, discussions, tactics, and more.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4840689].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Daedalus
    Yes, Matt actually discussed it.

    GoogleWebmasterHelp's Channel - YouTube
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4840826].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author NYC SEO
    .co is the antithesis of what you want for ranking highly in the serps.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4840837].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Natlex
    I ranked .co websites, they rank as well as any other of the 3 main TLDs but don't expect tog et an EMD bonus, thats reserved for .com/.net/.org.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4841362].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author John Williamson
    Signature
    The Google Adwords Keyword Tool is hiding your valuable keywords!
    OFFLINERS, Start using this simple technique and these 6 "weapons" today to get more clients and skyrocket your conversions! - FREE, no opt-in.
    Make some money by helping me market this idea.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4841422].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author thebitbotdotcom
    Theoretically, any extensions should rank (except dot co dot cc or course). However...

    Keep in mind that part of SEO now is behavioral metrics as measured on a site by Google in particular.

    In my experience and speaking personally, it seems that people trust dot coms, orgs, and nets more so...and this may influence the answer to your question.

    I have no hard data to back this up, but that is the gut feeling I get...that being that (long term) com, org, net will be "easier" to rank.
    Signature
    Do Your Copywriting Skills Suck?

    Let Us Help You Develop Your Writing Skills!

    Submit Guest Posts With [ TheBitBot.Com ]
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4842556].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Dr.faizan
    ok I see lot of related replies here but guys I mean let us keep aside the offline marketing factor or easy to remember factor. Let us only focus on SEARCH ENGINES and like we all know that exact match domains still hold a big value and are easier to rank than other domains for instance if I want to rank for a keyword called WARRIOR FORUM and warriorforum.com .net .org is already taken and the only extension remained is WARRIORFORUM.CO in that case what is better WARRIORFORUM.CO or WARRIOR-FORUM.COM ? A hifen (-) should be fine for .com or exact match .co holds more factor? I see few warriors posting they had difficulty in ranking .co can you please explain a bit more?
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4842584].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Scritty
    The only extensions I've ever found "slow" were ".me" and ".biz"
    Look on the internet for money searches. "Insurance", "Loans", "Warcraft", "Diet"..loads of .orgs, .infos and dot almost everything else.
    But not one ".me" could I find on any of them - and very few ".biz" - the rest?
    Fine.
    If it's the right prefix and not one of these two - buy it.
    I know guys who build a micro site a day based on on .info only for adsense - they make plenty of cash.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4843232].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Dr.faizan
    Well I found few guys outside this forum today and they were saying they managed to rank exact match .co domains on page 1 with minimum efforts in low competitive niche.. it took almost the same efforts which should be for .net or .org..
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4844121].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author ASCiiDiTY
    I personally would stay away from these and other such domains unless the .com, .net, .org all had very bad or dead sites on them.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4844137].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author WakondaMarketing
    Trust me. They both work. Domain extensions will not be a huge ranking factor in an SEO campaign. It will always boils down to the quality of backlinks. I have ranked and even outranked typical domain extensions such as .com, .net, etc. just by making use of a .co extension. I thought this issue was long dead?
    Signature

    Wakonda Marketing Inc
    Want to crush it with Media Buying ?
    Needs hordes of traffic ?
    Call us now 514-688-2576
    or visit http://www.wakondamarketing.com

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4849259].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author warhammer
    Originally Posted by Dr.faizan View Post

    I wanted to know do .co domains are treated the same manner as .com, .org or .net? Especially if the domain is exact match?
    "Yes – .CO Ranks Just As Well As .COM"
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4856755].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author seosoldier
      Originally Posted by warhammer View Post

      Yes, the Head Penguin, Matt Putz says in a video on the above site that .co domains can be targeted to U.S. in Webmaster Tools and therefore - no problem using this.
      Signature
      > My Promise To You: I will never promote any offer I do not truly believe to be 100% worth buying and using!
      https://bestwaterfilter.us
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6727705].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author outwest
    Personally having witnessed 100s, probably 1000 kws I researched the top 10 competition on google, the last month

    I say
    Domain does not matter

    Period


    I think we all see EMDs out there ranking and say AHA! SEE! EMD is why this guy is ranking

    To that I say Poppycock and BS
    Its not true

    Most of the sites I see rank 1,2 and they do not have the kws in the domain name and they dont have it in the url either. Heck one site that drives me crazy has about 100 different kws, thats only the ones I have found so far...............that rank 1 and 2 on Google. how can they put all those kws in their domain? its impossible. The domain name is a totally unrelated name. Why do they rank so high? These pages have 10s of thousands of backlinks. not the domain. the pages. Its all about Backlinks and to a smaller extent Onpage SEO

    Why is that,? how is it possible?
    Because Domain name makes no difference in Ranking

    Even a EMD .com....................makes no difference in ranking. The reason you see these EMD.coms ranking? is because sure
    if they go out and buy BigBlueCars.com
    of course they are going to go and put 1000 backlinks with
    Big blue cars in the anchor text
    THAT IS WHY they are ranking high.........................not the EMD

    Thats my Statement
    Signature
    Tech article writing .Native English Speaker(with Proof)
    specializing in SmartPhones , Internet security, high tech gadgets, search engines, tech shows, digital cameras.

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4856785].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author warhammer
      There are cases where .CO ranks higher than any other TLD: if you search for Charlotte Church on Google, CharlotteChurch.CO, the singer's official website, is second on page 1, while the .com and .co.uk are nowhere to be found.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4856834].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Scritty
    Google have said .co is a premium suffix. I've ranked with .co just fine.
    EMD's still seem to count for a lot no matter ho much the SE owners say they don't.
    Also - content on site has a far greater impact these days than it did even 12 months ago.
    I'm not saying LSI is taking over from linking - but quality unique content, lots of it and updated regularly is now an even bigger thing than it was 12 months ago. (And I HAVE had sites rank for local - but competitive search terms on LSI alone - not a single link)

    Scritty
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4877184].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Justin Says
    I ranked an exact match .co earlier this month faster than the same .com website. Of course the content was different, but the niches were the same.

    I feel .co is just another addition to the family.
    Signature

    My name is Justin Lewis. My digital marketing company has been in business for over 10 years with multiple six-figure years. We do provide a premium web design service.

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4880461].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author ddDonPaul
      the only things that matter in the ranking of a website is the competition, unique content, quality backlinks and an exact match domain name. it doesn`t matter if it is .co or .com or .info...
      i created a website .info for my highschool and ranked 1# on google in just 2 days, because of the low competition...
      Signature

      "At the end of pain is success." E.T.

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4881200].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Yara
    My EMD.co domains ranks pretty well in google, but no where to be found on bing and yahoo.

    While my Keyword+suffix.com ranks well on google, yahoo and bing. But getting them to rank took a bit more work.

    Just speaking from my experience so far. Any suggestions if I should keep getting .co or just stick with .com?
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4975971].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author pjp007
    Example from the gaming niche: car games.

    The .co holds a nice top 5 position in google.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5442809].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author warhammer
      Originally Posted by pjp007 View Post

      Example from the gaming niche: car games.

      The .co holds a nice top 5 position in google.
      It confirms what we already know: .CO is treated exactly as a gTLD like .com and .net
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5442882].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Cheeth
    Cargames.co, that's awesome first time I've seen a .co rank in google to be honest. So the conclusion is that all TLD's are ranked equally?
    Signature
    YouTube Views 100% Adsense Safe
    Yes our YouTube views still work because we use PTC networks with real traffic, never had a video banned in 3 years of service ->
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5682101].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author warhammer
      Originally Posted by Cheeth View Post

      Cargames.co, that's awesome first time I've seen a .co rank in google to be honest. So the conclusion is that all TLD's are ranked equally?
      There are other examples. Search on Google for Domain Security and Used Cars Austin.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5715132].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author WilliamBlah
    I've recently worked on ranking a .CO and having reached page 1 it was exactly as I would have expected ranking any other TLD to be.

    No difference, in my opinion.

    Regards
    Will
    Signature
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5682578].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author zabalex
    Since it is not more than a year .co has hit the market, also the price of the domain is too high as compared to .com, .net and ther TLDs so it is not much popular. Just because it is not in the market and not too old you may not be seeing the sites in the SERP.

    Gone are the days when TLDs play the role in ranking factor, now all TLDs treated the same way. You only need to work on them. Once there is enough work they will appear in the SERP.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5715230].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author warhammer
      Originally Posted by zabalex View Post

      the price of the domain is too high as compared to .com, .net and ther TLDs
      GoDaddy has been selling .COs for $7.99 since the end of January. If you're interested in buying one, the promo will end on February 29th.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5715244].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author kenneth1982
    Originally Posted by Dr.faizan View Post

    Hello Warriors,

    I have got a question.

    I wanted to know do .co domains are treated the same manner as .com, .org or .net? Especially if the domain is exact match?

    Has anyone experienced any difficulty ranking for .CO domains?

    I have done some googling related to my question but most of the answers were based on assumptions. Some were even saying that .CO is global but they are treated as .info not .com .net or .org. I don't know how true it is.

    Can anyone please answer my question?

    Answer from warrior who has practical experience in ranking or working on a .co site is very much appreciated
    Just go to google.com and search with keyword "2 player games" .co #2
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5950907].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author SEOChemist
    TLD makes no difference in my experience. Exact match domains are preferable.

    I have had no trouble ranking .co, .me, .us, etc.
    Signature

    Filled with SEO Goodness

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5954575].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author JodyRossDeane
    Thanks to the comments here and some quality articles on the subject, I will be buying .co's

    Cheers guys
    Signature

    Get Hyper-Targeted Instagram Followers and Start Banking Big!:-
    TARGETED INSTAGRAM FOLLOWERS SERVICE (Guaranteed Delivery)
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6004802].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author warhammer
      Originally Posted by JodyRossDeane View Post

      Thanks to the comments here and some quality articles on the subject, I will be buying .co's

      Cheers guys
      Wise decision, I agree. I recently bought some at GoDaddy which has currently .COs for sale for just $7.99, you just need to use coupon cjc799CCb1 at checkout. This will surely make you save some money.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6004838].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Swami Narayan
    CO has proved to be a popular domain name and reaching the millionth milestone in less than a year is testament to it's popularity and flexibility. Power brands such as Twitter and Overstock are among those who have already adopted the .CO domain.

    Since launching in July 2010, organisations, businesses and individuals from more than 200 countries have all registered .CO domain names. "Entrepreneurs and innovative businesses around the globe are adopting .CO web addresses at an unprecedented pace, way beyond my initial expectations," said Juan Diego Calle, CEO of the .CO registry.

    DOES THAT RINGS BELL IN OUR EARS....!!
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6635792].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Make Money Ninja
    .co ranks as well as any other top level domain name.
    Signature

    The Ultimate Guide To Link Building

    Get More Links - Generate More Traffic - Make More Money!
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8320754].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author website design
    Only domains to stay away from are .info and .biz because the vast majority are spam/junk sites and might put doubts in your customers from lack of professionalism.

    All the other domains can rank the same = there is no direct benefit of having a .co or .com or .net or .org. I've got a few .co ranked high no problems at all. Also sometimes it's easier to get a brandable or emd .co.
    Signature
    no sig needed.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8321094].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author kangenguru
    I found the video where Matt Cutts officially discusses the .CO. Here is the link.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8816724].message }}

Trending Topics