2013 Working Backlink Structure

by uzojvp
23 replies
  • SEO
  • |
Which of these will you recomend from your experience and that's still very effective even until now with panda and penguin to outrank a low competition assuming every other thing both onpage and offpage is fine but remaining backlinks....


-------------------1st Choice----------------------

Money site

^
web 2.0 and Article directory(all
pointing to money site)

^
web 2.0 and article directory and bookmark (all pointing to 1st tier web 2.0 and. Article sites)

^
Mass blog coments and profile backlink (pointing to second web 2.0 and article site)

++++++++++++++++++++++++++

-----------------2nd Choice__---------------

Money site

^
web 2.0 and article directory and bookmark (all pointing to money site).

^
mass blog coments and profile backlinks (all pointing to web2.0 and Article sites)

___________________________________________
All of These to be Completed in a Month....
----------------------------------------------------------_________________________________
Which Strategy will you Recommend?
---------------------------------------------
#2013 #backlink #structure #working
  • Profile picture of the author uzojvp
    Reserved Spot.....
    Signature

    Check this out for some of the best information on Kitchen Decoration Ideas | You wanna know the best Pest Control Service in Africa? see the Best Pest Control

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7683020].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author darrenlc
      I really don't get why people still create these tiered link structures the way they do? Most of the tier 1's people create are just spun articles which get picked up by Google. Then to go and mass spam them with crappy automated blog posts - why?

      Surley it just creates tier 1 links direct to your site that are all open for penalties! Why would people want only penalised links pointing to thier site because that will be what happens.

      For all the time it takes to build all this crap would it not be easier just to go out and find a few good links from relevant high quality sites and add something useful to the website which in turn links back to yours. I don't understand why people are just looking for a quick fix still rather than long term. This method you speak of will be dead within the year if not sooner.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7683138].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Loudlaunchit
        So true and they are the most "unorganic" way to promote your site but the quickest way to start problems with the search engines. We are looking for people to test our new link building platform that grows links on blogger outreach- are you interested?
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7683150].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Jacob Sterbenk
    To succeed with SEO in 2013, you'll have to make a step further than that. Only two types of links will make your link profile much less natural.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7683179].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author kaytav
    Didn't understand your strategy. But I guess instead of going for 2.0 stuff, indulge yourself in Guest Blogging. This will increase your traffic.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7683187].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author jtuttlechiro
      Originally Posted by kaytav View Post

      Didn't understand your strategy. But I guess instead of going for 2.0 stuff, indulge yourself in Guest Blogging. This will increase your traffic.
      I will try this advice...
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7684587].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Demetrius
      Originally Posted by kaytav View Post

      Didn't understand your strategy. But I guess instead of going for 2.0 stuff, indulge yourself in Guest Blogging. This will increase your traffic.
      I agree with you. Guest blogging can be a very good source of traffic and it can also generate some good quality backlinks.

      Web 2.0 stuffs are not a bad idea either. You can get good results through it.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7692076].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author uzojvp
    @darren: gat a question for u..hasn't it been working for other people
    ..And also what if d blast is not AA comments..
    @lordlauchit: do me a PM of mor details
    @Jacobs: u mean adding guess blogging,social signals and bookmarks.... Will that make it fine?

    Generally, does this kind of strategy still work?
    Signature

    Check this out for some of the best information on Kitchen Decoration Ideas | You wanna know the best Pest Control Service in Africa? see the Best Pest Control

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7683222].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author darrenlc
      Originally Posted by uzojvp View Post

      @darren: gat a question for u..hasn't it been working for other people
      Yes it has but for how long? I bet that a high majority of penalized sites have used this exact method. Leaves a bit of an obvious footprint for future updates if it is not the case.

      Originally Posted by uzojvp View Post

      ..And also what if d blast is not AA comments..
      You mention 'AA' comments and 'blast' in the same sentence. Are the comments going to be automated or are you going to manually comment. If it's manually then surely you would want the links just to point direct to your site which in turn could generate traffic to it instead of having to go through your tier 1 links to get to your site.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7683254].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author cleptoiii
    stop with these structures!
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7683846].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author uzojvp
    when you say 2nd and 3rd tier do you mean these.

    Example:
    Money site ----1st tier
    Web 2.0 ------ 2nd tier
    Bookmark ----- 3rd tier

    or
    Money site -
    Web 2.0 ------ 1st tier
    Bookmark ----- 2nd tier

    Which of these is the correct arrangement to be called 1st tier or 2nd tier
    Signature

    Check this out for some of the best information on Kitchen Decoration Ideas | You wanna know the best Pest Control Service in Africa? see the Best Pest Control

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7684007].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Matthew Anton
    Don't overcomplicate it. You only need 2 structures:

    1) Quality Sites that Link to your Website
    2) Bulk Links that link to your quality sites (to push them further)

    I use to do really extravagant link wheels but realized this method is the best. I typically build web2.0s, articles, videos, and then blast them with forum profiles, wiki backlinks, blog comments, etc. Great winning strategy.

    Of course you can do just step 1, but I see the difference when backlinking them in a mass, bulk, affordable way.
    Signature
    BacklinksIndexer - automated index/bulk links
    TwitterBacklinks - retweets service
    Web2.0Backlinks - web2.0 creation/link building
    Google+ Matthew Anton
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7684078].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author uzojvp
      Originally Posted by Matthew Anton View Post

      Don't overcomplicate it. You only need 2 structures:

      1) Quality Sites that Link to your Website
      2) Bulk Links that link to your quality sites (to push them further)

      I use to do really extravagant link wheels but realized this method is the best. I typically build web2.0s, articles, videos, and then blast them with forum profiles, wiki backlinks, blog comments, etc. Great winning strategy.

      Of course you can do just step 1, but I see the difference when backlinking them in a mass, bulk, affordable way.
      Very Nice......Who agrees or disagrees with him?
      Signature

      Check this out for some of the best information on Kitchen Decoration Ideas | You wanna know the best Pest Control Service in Africa? see the Best Pest Control

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7684107].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author asiriusthoth
      I would agree with that also. Unique, manual spun (or legit content) on web 2.0 sites with highly ranked youtube videos; to expand on that a bit.

      Originally Posted by Matthew Anton View Post

      I typically build web2.0s, articles, videos, and then blast them with forum profiles, wiki backlinks, blog comments, etc. Great winning strategy.
      Signature

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7685453].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author RedShifted
    I agree with him, but in SEO, anything is falsifiable or open to debate.

    That doesn't mean you should go around denying things however, just because you have a vested interest in white hat SEO. Which realistically, doesn't even exist. Thats called "naive falsifiability". Something like, "link wheels don't work, because I hate them and that must mean google hates them too!!!)

    You're not actually proving anything wrong with observations as scientific as those (speaking to the whole board in general).

    Now, I do believe, that link wheels could possibly be a waste of time. I don't know enough about SEO to say either way. But I'm not using a traditional link wheel on my current site, and so far its ranking wonderfully.

    What I'm doing, is making less than a dozen high quality blogs/web2.0 then linking to my website. Along with this, I'm building up 2 .coms and linking to my site. But I am persistently updating my site, and all these blogs/sites essentially everyday. Occassionally, when I burn out, I will use some higher quality spun content. There are random periods of 3-4 days where I just can't look at content, and when I reach those points I use my own high quality spintaxs.

    People may argue with spinning, saying its not a good "tool". But spinning is not a tool, its a skill. So anything that I spin, I spin really well. 3 paragraph variations, 3 sentence variations, then as many word/phrase variations that make sense. Most importantly, I get all the right keywords in those articles. So far, all my content has been getting indexed, both original and spun.

    After 3 months, my site is doing very well (the first 2 months it wasn't doing anything). But I'm not blasting it with links either. I'm using a much more focused approach. I think less is more in both marketing and SEO. I think relevancy is huge, which is why I try to make all my links relevant. And so far it seems to be helping me a lot. Keep in mind, I'm still an SEO newb, so I can only speak for whats working for me right now. I also do blog commenting too from time to time, but only on high pr pages that are relevant. And all those comments are done manually.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7684529].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author jinx1221
      Originally Posted by RedShifted View Post

      I agree with him, but in SEO, anything is falsifiable or open to debate.

      That doesn't mean you should go around denying things however, just because you have a vested interest in white hat SEO. Which realistically, doesn't even exist. Thats called "naive falsifiability". Something like, "link wheels don't work, because I hate them and that must mean google hates them too!!!)

      You're not actually proving anything wrong with observations as scientific as those (speaking to the whole board in general).

      Now, I do believe, that link wheels could possibly be a waste of time. I don't know enough about SEO to say either way. But I'm not using a traditional link wheel on my current site, and so far its ranking wonderfully.

      What I'm doing, is making less than a dozen high quality blogs/web2.0 then linking to my website. Along with this, I'm building up 2 .coms and linking to my site. But I am persistently updating my site, and all these blogs/sites essentially everyday. Occassionally, when I burn out, I will use some higher quality spun content. There are random periods of 3-4 days where I just can't look at content, and when I reach those points I use my own high quality spintaxs.

      People may argue with spinning, saying its not a good "tool". But spinning is not a tool, its a skill. So anything that I spin, I spin really well. 3 paragraph variations, 3 sentence variations, then as many word/phrase variations that make sense. Most importantly, I get all the right keywords in those articles. So far, all my content has been getting indexed, both original and spun.

      After 3 months, my site is doing very well (the first 2 months it wasn't doing anything). But I'm not blasting it with links either. I'm using a much more focused approach. I think less is more in both marketing and SEO. I think relevancy is huge, which is why I try to make all my links relevant. And so far it seems to be helping me a lot. Keep in mind, I'm still an SEO newb, so I can only speak for whats working for me right now. I also do blog commenting too from time to time, but only on high pr pages that are relevant. And all those comments are done manually.
      For calling yourself a 'noob', yours makes more sense than any of these replies. Thanks for sharing!
      Signature

      The Ultimate Private Network Management,
      Visualization and Automation Tool




      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7685804].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author uzojvp
    My goal here is applying the right strategy for ranking high in "G" for low competition
    Signature

    Check this out for some of the best information on Kitchen Decoration Ideas | You wanna know the best Pest Control Service in Africa? see the Best Pest Control

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7684868].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author jackrice
    its a cool ideal i go with the first step
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7684916].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author supereek
    For 2013 imo pyramids and wheels are not favored anymore.
    Those days are over, now days you need mix of backlinks, if you choose profiles make sure its from authority sites, do some limited bookmarking, also important now are social signals, so facebook/twitter/g+.
    dont overdo things it has to look natural, also when blogcommenting have a mix of 80%dofollow with 20% nofollow, everything on relevant niches!!

    Grt
    Signature

    Get my fiverr abritage tutorial for free HERE.

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7685013].message }}
  • [DELETED]
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7692050].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author excloc
      I would think twice about the mass bog comments and profile links.

      The profile links are super spammy and google will eventual task some animal to kill it
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7692061].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Q-Writers
    Providing crappy 1st tier will not do any good because once your 1st tier links are penalized by Google your subsequent Tier2 or 3 will be gone along with the 1st one.

    I agree with posting quality content as the 1st Tier and diversifying it on different platform - Web2.0, Article sites, Press Release, Guest Posting, Personal Blogs and Videos.

    For 2nd tier I mix it with bookmarking and blog commenting on relevant blog (not over-stuffing) and I also believe that social signals do plays a very important part in your SEO endeavor, which is also stressed by Matt Cutts.

    Hope it helps...
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8206713].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author BigNorm
    Here's a spanner to throw into the mix, you can use skeleton web 2.0 site as your first tier, throw a bunch of thin tier 2 backlinks and still be able to rank your site. To the be perfectly blunt, buy a a few PR2-3 domains, ad nothing but an H1 tag, image with the keyword as the alt, out bound link and a link to your site and you'll be able to rank low to medium competitive keywords with just that set up. With highly competitive keywords you could do the same thing but backlinking with a few PR5 sites. Original content, duplicate content, spun content, it's all the same. Right now, the weight of your backlinks is based on the weight of the site your links are coming from more than the content on that site. If it were based solely on content, then backlinks from services flogging off their PR services using spammy content wouldn't work, but they do, and do you think it's because of their highly informative articles?

    A bunch of people will say it's b/s, but go out, register a domain and try, in fact don't even register a domain, just go make a web 2.0 site .webs, create a simple 4 spoke link wheel pointing back your .webs site using blogger, tumblr or any other 2.0 properties, back link your first tier with some spammy links and watch your .webs site climb up the rankings.

    Now this isn't great advice if your looking at long term ranking, but if your looking for quick rankings or see what works right at this point and time, it makes for a fun experiment as well.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8206801].message }}

Trending Topics