No one offers On-page Optimisation Service

It involves a lot of work and can bring extra costs that the client is not willing to pay, like adding more content etc, so then it would still be half work.

I think the main reason is that just onpage is not profitable enough for most, and personally I don't know to much about html errors, there are free online tools to do a html check though.

If you're sure that your hidden div's hurt your rankings, sounds unlikely but well, then why don't you hire a web designer to fix it for you?

It is just strange that no one offers a service that can look at your website and tell you what you are doing wrong.

You're right that onpage services aren't really popular, I guess they're not as "sexy" as off-page services, however it's still very important to have your onpage right as it can make a huge difference, and it's for this reason that we offer a on-page/keyword service as a add-on to our normal off-page service.

The use of a swfobject by itself should not affect your site unless you are saying its huge part of your site and you have a general architecture problem. But let me put it to you straight

Your site probably needs to be rebuilt. Flash is on its way out for HTML5 and you can dress up the iframe problem or try to work around it but it will never be great SEO wise. Not just me saying it. Google has weighed in long ago

https://support.google.com/webmaster...er/34445?hl=en

So regardless if you can tweak things you probably should be looking to modernize your page so it can keep up for the years to come.

Here's one

https://yoast.com/hire-us/

Mike woke up this morning and found there was no sugar for his cornflakes.

Most of the High Authority SEO companies offer on Page seo... one example is Neil Patel's Company... or browse his blog quicksprout

A large percentage of SEO is actually on-page SEO, it should be the first place you start, otherwise you'll be doing a bunch of unnecessary work when you figure out little things that are important need tweaked, like ugly URLs (ex: hxxp://domain.com/?p=257). That's not a page/URL I would want to point external backlinks.

I agree with the comments above, If your SEO doesn't know HTML they're most likely only a link seller.

OP, If you really need content delivered via flash it's better to use a remote self hosted (same domain) xml file to store the content which will show up as plain text on the Google Cache (text version). It's a lot of work setting up the project, after the project is setup it's mostly repetitive copy/pasting URLs, content in the xml file.

Keep in mind xml files can easily be crawled by Googlebot since xml is plain text. XML files can also have PR, which proves it's not much different then a regular HTML web page as far as SEO goes.

Also keep in mind it will cost money to have this type of setup but the end result can be worthwhile since the flash can be setup as a movie file (content via xml file) & display a video thumbnail image in Google SERPs. I'm a fan of video thumbnail images for increasing SERP CTR. It's one of the most underused search listing tweaks that can be done since it's a bit more complex than basic SEO (that's good news for the rest of us). It's funny because I know video related sites that don't even optimize their search listings with video thumbnail images, of all people, they should be doing this type of SEO (some still don't).

Frames is hit and miss for SEO, I've seen a site (bookmarked it) that has a ranked internal page with 100% frames that also has Google Sitelinks for the same page, If you search the page title without quotes the same page has Mega Sitelinks, when you view the Google Cache (text version) the entire page is blank, the page also has a PR3. Personally I wouldn't use frames, just not a fan but this example was still interesting (IMO).

Anyways, that's what SEOs do, they deal with HTML & page source code. Looking at your source code & competition source code & both Caches (text version). Most people that don't know this type of research would be very surprised what's happening on web pages for example the frames page I mentioned above with zero direct content on the ranked page (blank cache).

I think I've never dealt with a SEO company that would not touch on-page SEO, and it actually seems to be very high on their list. Often seems to be a part of a service package, though. It's also pretty typical that the deliverable is a report that gets passed to the client's webmaster.

I'd guess that a simple report would be a bit hard to justify in the case there's not much to improve on the client's site. Even though it seems that a good SEO will always find something to fix. I say this as a guy who takes pride in building websites that are reasonably search engine friendly.