Crappy public blog network links are dead? Really???

11 years ago

Yes true. even crappy blog comment links still work for me but using 20 keywork like "click here" etc. money keyword is only 5-10 percent. internal links aond onpage optimization do the rest of the work.

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8589110].message }}

Mike Anthony

11 years ago

The one still ranking for SEO service on the 1st page has 1469 refering domains and as much as 765 different anchor text's. That's the way to go and completely confirms my point....................Fix this and you're good to go instead of paying way too much for fake whitehat campaigns.

Said Like the great Wiliam Shatner as James Tiberious Kirk

"Must.............
"convince.........
"board.........
"that all is well....
"with crappy public networks"
"the good for the one's pocket book.....
"out weigh the good of the many.......
"Scotty...we need full power to go into full sales warp drive"
"Cue......
"the Dilethium Crystals WSO"

Thanks

Signature

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8589203].message }}

yukon

Banned 11 years ago

Originally Posted by nik0

Type in SEO service and see who's still ranking on page one with 1000's of private blog network links a la ALN / BMR / UAW style.

Clear your browser history & try again. None of that junk is on Google SERPs first page when I search Incognito.

Thanks
1 reply

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8589241].message }}

Mike Anthony 11 years ago

Originally Posted by yukon

Clear your browser history & try again. None of that junk is on Google SERPs first page when I search Incognito.

I don't know what he is talking about either. That and I have to say again first page is NOT ranking. Top 3-5 maybe but 10 gets a very small sliver of the traffic. This is another thing that SEO WSOs has done bad to peoples'understanding. First page this and first page that as ranking is not really ranking.

In some serps position ten will get you all of ten visits a week....or less.
- Thanks
Signature
{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8589340].message }}

Ben Acharyaa

11 years ago

I dont really understand this anchor variation and stuff. If i have a website about iphone 5, the anchors will be about iphone 5. how the hell am i going to find 765 different anchor texts?

That doesnt even make sense. if my website viewers/readers were to link to me, they wont go looking for a unique anchor text so that i get SEO benefits.

I wouldnt blame this all on anchor diversity rite now becoz its not the only thing google is after. I've a few sites that got hit and they had tons of different anchor text. i've another site that is doing just fine with most of the anchor text being their brand name. Is anchor diversity included in their algo filter? probably. is it all about anchor diversity? Hell no!! You cant really get away from penguin by just having a huge diversity of anchor text when all the links coming in are crap!!

Thanks
1 reply

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8589278].message }}

nik0

Banned 11 years ago

Originally Posted by Ben Acharyaa

I dont really understand this anchor variation and stuff. If i have a website about iphone 5, the anchors will be about iphone 5. how the hell am i going to find 765 different anchor texts?

That doesnt even make sense. if my website viewers/readers were to link to me, they wont go looking for a unique anchor text so that i get SEO benefits.

I wouldnt blame this all on anchor diversity rite now becoz its not the only thing google is after. I've a few sites that got hit and they had tons of different anchor text. i've another site that is doing just fine with most of the anchor text being their brand name. Is anchor diversity included in their algo filter? probably. is it all about anchor diversity? Hell no!! You cant really get away from penguin by just having a huge diversity of anchor text when all the links coming in are crap!!

When you ask 1000 people to send a link to your iphone5 site without further instructions, you think you would only receive a dozen different anchors? Go check some large legit sites to see how many different anchors they get.

I analyzed a lot of sites and it was clearly a lack of different anchor text's.

When you focus on iPhone5 and your url is Telecom, just to say something then your anchors could look like:

hxxp://www.telecom.com
hxxp://www.telecom.com/
hxxp://telecom.com
hxxp://telecom.com/
hxxp://www.telecom.com
hxxp://www.tele.com.com/
Telecom
telecom
telecom.com
iphone5
where to buy the iphone5
how good is the iphone5
visit our website now
iphone5 @ Telecom.com
Great iPhone5 discounts at Telecom.com
go to our website
here
visit our site
more info about the iphone5 here
etc.

Of course you are not going to get away with tons of spam links when only your anchor text is diverse enough.

But when you have a semi-decent back link profile based on some public links and high PR links then you do get away with it as long as your anchors are wide enough. Now keep in mind that those public links and high PR links aren't real legit links, we don't have to lie about that of course. But as long as you stick to great anchor diversity in a very varied way then you do get away with it.

When you don't there is a high chance you tank. I didn't grab this from the air, it's based on 20 of my own clients that tanked and >90% had too many money keywords.

I then compared it to similar type of clients that didn't tank (similar in same country TLD, same kind of competition level and same back link profile) and there >90% didn't have too many money keywords.

When you graph that out it looks pretty much of the opposite doesn't it?

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8589912].message }}

FranksToys

11 years ago

Niko BAD networks are poison.

The networks you are seeing aren't apart of the services you mentioned. I know because I'm apart of some private blog networks and homepage link networks. Some that I got referred toand others that friends have setup.

Over exposed and spammed to death networks are the poison. Paid links and networks still work long term if you dont buy into a crap service.

Thanks
1 reply

Signature

"The highest glory of the American Revolution was this - that it connected, in one indissoluble bond, the principles of civil government with the principles of Christianity."

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8589770].message }}

nik0

Banned 11 years ago

Originally Posted by FranksToys

Niko BAD networks are poison.

The networks you are seeing aren't apart of the services you mentioned. I know because I'm apart of some private blog networks and homepage link networks. Some that I got referred toand others that friends have setup.

Over exposed and spammed to death networks are the poison. Paid links and networks still work long term if you dont buy into a crap service.

I wouldn't want my links on a huge public blog network either of course.

My point is just that Google isn't able to auto detect those links contrary to what others seem to claim, if that was the case this page wouldn't be ranking at the 1st page anymore.

@Mike & Yukon: The kw is: seo service so check again, you should be quite familiar with the url and lol about incognito, that I didn't think of that myself

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8589929].message }}

Henney

11 years ago

of course crappy blogs works

you just need to use proper amount of them and not only them

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8589962].message }}

Crappy public blog network links are dead? Really???

Trending Topics

Digital Marketer

Model Collapse

how to create new thread

Teacher seeking guidance/mentorship

YouTube expands Shorts to 3 mins